Good looking swiss made watch with a decent movement, sapphire crystal and italian leather strap for £107.45 delivered.
I've ordered one and it's a beautiful watch. I think it's much better value than £100 watches from high street.
Features
Swiss made
Quartz movement
Surgical grade stainless steel case
Unique engraved serial number
Screw-in crown and back plate
Anti-reflective sapphire crystal
Galvanic finish charcoal dial
Embossed alligator pattern Italian leather strap with CW motif clasp
Technical
Diameter: 39mm
Height: 9.7mm
Calibre: Ronda 515
Case:316L Stainless steel
Water Resistance: 50 metres
Strap: 18mm black leather
Dial Colour: Charcoal
Top comments
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 168#16
At the moment i have about 60 watches in my collection, including 3 CW and 10+ seiko's, ranging from a vintage Pogue through Prospex right down to staight up 7002 auto beaters so i am not "talking the talk" - i am talking about a topic that i consider to have some knowledge about, in stark contrast to your comments to date.
The watch industry regards CW as an entry level luxury product that offers outstanding value. This consensus is also prevalent among most (exclude Archie Luxury as he is certifiably nuts) experts and customers that have owned a CW product. They even have the strap line "the worlds most affordable luxury watches".
To assert they are overpriced is flat out wrong.
The Rhonda movement used here is extremely accurate, robust and proven performer and is often fitted in watches that are considerably more expensive. In most cases, short of some extremely rare complications (Tourbillon etc..) only a very small proportion of the cost of any watch is made up by the movement. Most automatic watches that the general public consider "expensive" normally contain a bog standard ETA 2824-2.
You pay for the fit, finish and brand on the watch. Mainly the brand.
For £100 this watch will be vastly superior to its Seiko counterpart, that is not an opinion its a fact. Hold a £100 Seiko sideways and admire the strap sag and hair plucking linkages - you will probably have mineral glass or if your lucky "hardlex" (Seiko's owe value proposition). You certainly will not have a decent anti-reflective Sapphire crystal.
I am a massive Seiko fan but your suggestion that at this price point it is comparable to the C5 is also flat out wrong. Also this is a dress watch and despite their multiple attempts Seiko have not successfully cracked the dress watch market, short of the Grand seiko price point. They are very much a rugged sport / utility brand.
simmo15
20 Jan 164#10
Really!? Would much rather have a Christopher Ward on my wrist than a Citizen or Seiko!
mudds
20 Jan 164#24
I would keep collecting the novelty socks, whilst your at it buy some fetching white sports socks... and jog on.
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 163#14
Stick to your iPhone. It is evident that you do not have a "scooby doo" about the topic. Do you buy all of your jewelry from Argos or just the classy pieces for special occasions?
All comments (61)
finnmaccool
20 Jan 161#1
Cheap for a C5
LOUGHBORO GUY to finnmaccool
20 Jan 161#7
She is hot
mudds
20 Jan 162#2
Classic watch by a quality brand. Voted hot. 100 quid will not buy you better imo.
Obstinate_Person
20 Jan 16#3
Why is the movement decent
___Josh____ to Obstinate_Person
22 Jan 16#48
Yeah people see Swiss made and think decent movement I suspect
worthinger
20 Jan 16#4
It's just a fairly bog standard quartz movement - you can buy them for about a tenner. And that's singly.
doctorf to worthinger
21 Jan 161#44
K
davewave
20 Jan 16#5
Really like Christopher Ward, very large range all the way up to complex movements.
Bendown
20 Jan 161#6
About all it is worth really. For £100 there are loads of quartz watches about. I lke some of Christopher ward watches but they are way over priced.
Burgainhunter to Bendown
20 Jan 16#8
Over priced?
Tyranicus66 to Bendown
20 Jan 161#13
Actually the brand is famous for exactly the opposite.
Bendown
20 Jan 161#9
Yes, really it is. better off picking up a citizen or seiko from argos, loads to choose from at £100, at least your friends/workmates would have heard of these brands.
simmo15
20 Jan 164#10
Really!? Would much rather have a Christopher Ward on my wrist than a Citizen or Seiko!
Opening post
I've ordered one and it's a beautiful watch. I think it's much better value than £100 watches from high street.
Features
Swiss made
Quartz movement
Surgical grade stainless steel case
Unique engraved serial number
Screw-in crown and back plate
Anti-reflective sapphire crystal
Galvanic finish charcoal dial
Embossed alligator pattern Italian leather strap with CW motif clasp
Technical
Diameter: 39mm
Height: 9.7mm
Calibre: Ronda 515
Case:316L Stainless steel
Water Resistance: 50 metres
Strap: 18mm black leather
Dial Colour: Charcoal
Top comments
The watch industry regards CW as an entry level luxury product that offers outstanding value. This consensus is also prevalent among most (exclude Archie Luxury as he is certifiably nuts) experts and customers that have owned a CW product. They even have the strap line "the worlds most affordable luxury watches".
To assert they are overpriced is flat out wrong.
The Rhonda movement used here is extremely accurate, robust and proven performer and is often fitted in watches that are considerably more expensive. In most cases, short of some extremely rare complications (Tourbillon etc..) only a very small proportion of the cost of any watch is made up by the movement. Most automatic watches that the general public consider "expensive" normally contain a bog standard ETA 2824-2.
You pay for the fit, finish and brand on the watch. Mainly the brand.
For £100 this watch will be vastly superior to its Seiko counterpart, that is not an opinion its a fact. Hold a £100 Seiko sideways and admire the strap sag and hair plucking linkages - you will probably have mineral glass or if your lucky "hardlex" (Seiko's owe value proposition). You certainly will not have a decent anti-reflective Sapphire crystal.
I am a massive Seiko fan but your suggestion that at this price point it is comparable to the C5 is also flat out wrong. Also this is a dress watch and despite their multiple attempts Seiko have not successfully cracked the dress watch market, short of the Grand seiko price point. They are very much a rugged sport / utility brand.
All comments (61)