Good looking swiss made watch with a decent movement, sapphire crystal and italian leather strap for £107.45 delivered.
I've ordered one and it's a beautiful watch. I think it's much better value than £100 watches from high street.
Features
Swiss made
Quartz movement
Surgical grade stainless steel case
Unique engraved serial number
Screw-in crown and back plate
Anti-reflective sapphire crystal
Galvanic finish charcoal dial
Embossed alligator pattern Italian leather strap with CW motif clasp
Technical
Diameter: 39mm
Height: 9.7mm
Calibre: Ronda 515
Case:316L Stainless steel
Water Resistance: 50 metres
Strap: 18mm black leather
Dial Colour: Charcoal
Top comments
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 168#16
At the moment i have about 60 watches in my collection, including 3 CW and 10+ seiko's, ranging from a vintage Pogue through Prospex right down to staight up 7002 auto beaters so i am not "talking the talk" - i am talking about a topic that i consider to have some knowledge about, in stark contrast to your comments to date.
The watch industry regards CW as an entry level luxury product that offers outstanding value. This consensus is also prevalent among most (exclude Archie Luxury as he is certifiably nuts) experts and customers that have owned a CW product. They even have the strap line "the worlds most affordable luxury watches".
To assert they are overpriced is flat out wrong.
The Rhonda movement used here is extremely accurate, robust and proven performer and is often fitted in watches that are considerably more expensive. In most cases, short of some extremely rare complications (Tourbillon etc..) only a very small proportion of the cost of any watch is made up by the movement. Most automatic watches that the general public consider "expensive" normally contain a bog standard ETA 2824-2.
You pay for the fit, finish and brand on the watch. Mainly the brand.
For £100 this watch will be vastly superior to its Seiko counterpart, that is not an opinion its a fact. Hold a £100 Seiko sideways and admire the strap sag and hair plucking linkages - you will probably have mineral glass or if your lucky "hardlex" (Seiko's owe value proposition). You certainly will not have a decent anti-reflective Sapphire crystal.
I am a massive Seiko fan but your suggestion that at this price point it is comparable to the C5 is also flat out wrong. Also this is a dress watch and despite their multiple attempts Seiko have not successfully cracked the dress watch market, short of the Grand seiko price point. They are very much a rugged sport / utility brand.
simmo15
20 Jan 164#10
Really!? Would much rather have a Christopher Ward on my wrist than a Citizen or Seiko!
mudds
20 Jan 164#24
I would keep collecting the novelty socks, whilst your at it buy some fetching white sports socks... and jog on.
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 163#14
Stick to your iPhone. It is evident that you do not have a "scooby doo" about the topic. Do you buy all of your jewelry from Argos or just the classy pieces for special occasions?
Latest comments (61)
LOUGHBORO GUY
24 Jan 16#60
I've saw fake omega on gumtree
lugsy3 to LOUGHBORO GUY
24 Jan 16#61
Awful quality though.
LOUGHBORO GUY
23 Jan 16#57
I love the look of the omega sea master is there a cheaper watch that looks similar ??? Thankyou for your help
jockscot1 to LOUGHBORO GUY
23 Jan 16#58
A few of the Seikos here look like Rolexs or Omegas. Good prices from Creation also.
I recently sold my Omega seamaster quartz, part of the swatch group. The movement in that was a plastic movement, I was surprised that a watch costing over a thousand quid would have what appears to be a cheap movement, however it did. There is a lot of snobbery with watches, I like value now a days. You can keep the over priced "look at me I have a Roolex-Omeeega type brands"
Gaspode
22 Jan 16#53
According to their website, swatch currently own: Breguet, Harry Winston, Blancpain, Glashütte Original, Jaquet Droz, Léon Hatot, Omega, Longines, Rado, Union Glashütte, Tissot, Balmain, Certina, Mido, Hamilton, Calvin Klein watches + jewelry, Swatch, & Flik Flak, so a significant chunk of the watch industry - and they also own a number of the production companies including ETA who are one of the largest manufacturers of watch movements.
As far as this deal goes, there is a huge amount of inverse snobbery being spouted on here - of course you pay for the name, the style, the warranty, the fit and finish, so picking purely on the movement as a reason why this watch is supposed to be a bad deal is ridiculous - if you take that view, how do Tag Heuer manage to sell watches with $25 quartz movements for over £1000? It's a deal (the point of this site), because it's on offer for half the normal price (and as Ward sell directly then there aren't many chances to buy at a serious discount) - if you don't like the watch or won't pay that amount for a quartz watch then fine, move on to the next deal for a Casio or a cheap swatch or whatever else floats your boat, but it might be better to keep your predjuces to yourself rather than publish them on here.....
___Josh____ to Gaspode
22 Jan 16#55
I hope you don't think I am calling this a bad deal or using the quartz movement as a reason for this being a bad deal, I am just saying its a bog standard movement. The description states swiss made with a decent movement as I don't even know the brand I thought this might be an interesting deal to me turns out I don't like the watch style, brand or movement so, if I think this watch is overpriced in the first place and then gets dropped to half price I should vote Hot because someone else might disagree with me and think it was a reasonable price in the first place? That isn't how it works I voted cold because to me it is cold that is how it works.
Still not a bad deal if it appeals to you.
I am far from a watch snob because I voted cold though, I own 2 Armani watches that both have bog stand quartz movements and a £5.99 casio for the gym, far from a snob.
p.s. sorry if my massive sentences are hard to read lol.
Gaspode
22 Jan 161#54
sorry Tyranicus66 - you beat me to it....
One point regarding the use of 'swiss' on the dial is that a number of manufacturers are a little 'lose' with the concept of where the watches are made - Rotary for example (who have a long and proud history - but have gone downmarket over the past few years) use their swiss heritage on their dials (i.e. 'Est Switzerland') for watches that are made in the far East whereas very few of their watches are actually now made in Switzerland - 'swiss made' should be a guarantee, but the high quality of some of the Japanese (and increasingly Chinese) manufacturers means that it's not always that simple (i.e. even the swiss watch industry produces cheap junk nowadays....)
Tyranicus66
22 Jan 16#52
Swatch are the industry monster.
They own Breguet, Harry Winston, Blancpain, Glashütte Original, Jaquet Droz, Léon Hatot, Omega, Longines, Rado, Union Glashütte, Tissot, Balmain, Certina, Mido, Hamilton, Calvin Klein watches + jewelry, Swatch, Flik Flak. That's a bit of shameless copy paste but it stopped me missing any. They also own a host of production companies like ETA that make the watch parts themselves
The price point of any specific watch and brand will determine if it is actually Swiss made. Check the dial!
___Josh____
22 Jan 16#51
Swatch group own omega and and swatch they are a Swiss company as far as I know, I don't know if the watches are Swiss made never bought one.
LOUGHBORO GUY
22 Jan 16#50
Are swatch still Swiss made ? I was told that omega own them ?
CountFilth
21 Jan 16#28
I really dislike the "Chr." part of the logo. It's not any kind of normal abbreviation and the lack of a vowel makes it not really pronounceable. I don't understand, it's supposed to be a quality brand so write it in full or not at all.
Broadsands to CountFilth
22 Jan 16#49
I do agree on that - they would be better off just branding them as "Ward".
Obstinate_Person
20 Jan 16#3
Why is the movement decent
___Josh____ to Obstinate_Person
22 Jan 16#48
Yeah people see Swiss made and think decent movement I suspect
worthinger
21 Jan 16#47
It doesn't impress me at all.
If you are looking for something a wee bit unusual, these appeal to me:
And you can often get 7 zlotys for £1 so very affordable. Yes, they use Seagull movements as well as Seiko, but they're something a little different.
mudds
21 Jan 16#46
All joking aside these are well finished pieces. I know it's only a quartz (generally not my bag) but I would say it looks better on the wrist than in the pics. Having owned six differing CW auto models alongside Tudor and Tags a number of vintage seikos I would say give it a go you won't be disappointed. I like the fact that not many people recognise the brand but those that do really appreciate.
doctorf
21 Jan 16#45
Sorry. The iPhone app is impossible to control at times!
worthinger
20 Jan 16#4
It's just a fairly bog standard quartz movement - you can buy them for about a tenner. And that's singly.
doctorf to worthinger
21 Jan 161#44
K
worthinger
21 Jan 16#43
Good Lord, the fawning over a bog standard quartz movement is bizarre.
Are we really going to compare a Sekonda to this one !
neoboy
21 Jan 161#40
Guess we'll add watch ignorance to the list of HUKD community vices :stuck_out_tongue:
lugsy3
21 Jan 16#39
Anytime (pun intended)
worthinger
21 Jan 16#38
I'm blown away by your wit.
Deweysboy
21 Jan 16#37
Fascinating. Thank you so much for sharing your comments regarding this deal and this watch.
lugsy3
21 Jan 16#36
Have to agree that looks a very nice watch, I own a Sekonda that I got from Amazon for £42 after seeing it at my local jewelers for £90.
kayzee
21 Jan 16#35
This is a great deal. Really don't need another watch... but damn it's tempting!
lugsy3
21 Jan 16#33
Lovely looking watch good find.
jasee
21 Jan 16#31
A boring watch at an inflated price, now reduced. I've got maybe 15 watches, all battery operated. They all still work (some after many years) I see no reason to add this one.
neoboy
21 Jan 16#30
Outstanding value for one of their watches.
ristriad
21 Jan 16#29
when I saw it I thought omega actually, which reminds me I need to find a strap for my beloved watch.
Broadsands
21 Jan 161#27
It's Trident and agreed, they do look very nice for the money - although at their full cost they are moving in to the realms of Oris which makes them a little harder to justify.
daverobinson5243
20 Jan 16#26
theroman
20 Jan 16#25
want
mudds
20 Jan 164#24
I would keep collecting the novelty socks, whilst your at it buy some fetching white sports socks... and jog on.
worthinger
20 Jan 162#23
"You pay for the fit, finish and brand on the watch. Mainly the brand."
And, regardless of the long winded and boring brag about owning "60" watches, that is exactly why this is an overpriced item.
As an owner of over 60 pairs of socks, including ones with Family Guy, Simpsons and even the new Star Wars characters, I recommend wearing this enchanting timepiece with the Levis you bought from Sports Direct.
Meathotukdeals
20 Jan 16#22
When is this once a year clearance? Is this it?
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 161#21
Got one :smiley: but an original. Best place to pick up new Seiko's is currently creationwatches.
Bendown
20 Jan 16#20
No, I am not biased against anything. Just strikes me as nothing special on that watch for the money. I looked after xmas on their sale but no Tridente 42mm Black dialled on bracelet, Talking watches, Have you seen the re issue of the seiko 6309 turtle, looks nice but not available many places yet. Like the look of that and 44mm dia
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 16#19
Is that a climb down i sense? :P
You can pick up a decent C60 for around £300 in the clearance that happens once a year. I have a black on stainless and it is great. Looks a lot like an Omega Seamaster but without the tears when you scratch / smash it. Gets some nice comments too. Avoid the small one, 42mm is the way to go.
Bendown
20 Jan 16#18
I actually like the tridente range, would bite if they had the right one at half price. A always miss the 42mm version on the bracelet though. They used to be reasonably priced but now they seem overpriced at the regular price. Perhaps I will get the chance to get one when they have a sale on the tridentes
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 16#17
P.S. This a dress watch on a leather strap, remind me again why you would be swimming with it on?
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 168#16
At the moment i have about 60 watches in my collection, including 3 CW and 10+ seiko's, ranging from a vintage Pogue through Prospex right down to staight up 7002 auto beaters so i am not "talking the talk" - i am talking about a topic that i consider to have some knowledge about, in stark contrast to your comments to date.
The watch industry regards CW as an entry level luxury product that offers outstanding value. This consensus is also prevalent among most (exclude Archie Luxury as he is certifiably nuts) experts and customers that have owned a CW product. They even have the strap line "the worlds most affordable luxury watches".
To assert they are overpriced is flat out wrong.
The Rhonda movement used here is extremely accurate, robust and proven performer and is often fitted in watches that are considerably more expensive. In most cases, short of some extremely rare complications (Tourbillon etc..) only a very small proportion of the cost of any watch is made up by the movement. Most automatic watches that the general public consider "expensive" normally contain a bog standard ETA 2824-2.
You pay for the fit, finish and brand on the watch. Mainly the brand.
For £100 this watch will be vastly superior to its Seiko counterpart, that is not an opinion its a fact. Hold a £100 Seiko sideways and admire the strap sag and hair plucking linkages - you will probably have mineral glass or if your lucky "hardlex" (Seiko's owe value proposition). You certainly will not have a decent anti-reflective Sapphire crystal.
I am a massive Seiko fan but your suggestion that at this price point it is comparable to the C5 is also flat out wrong. Also this is a dress watch and despite their multiple attempts Seiko have not successfully cracked the dress watch market, short of the Grand seiko price point. They are very much a rugged sport / utility brand.
Bendown
20 Jan 16#15
In my life I have owned many high end watches, I personally would not buy from argos. You seem to talk the talk so tell me why this quartz watch is superior to another brand? Perhaps its the 50 meter water resistance or the genuine leather strap, or perhaps the eta auto movement. Oh I forgot its got a ronda quartz movement, lol
Tyranicus66
20 Jan 163#14
Stick to your iPhone. It is evident that you do not have a "scooby doo" about the topic. Do you buy all of your jewelry from Argos or just the classy pieces for special occasions?
Bendown
20 Jan 161#6
About all it is worth really. For £100 there are loads of quartz watches about. I lke some of Christopher ward watches but they are way over priced.
Burgainhunter to Bendown
20 Jan 16#8
Over priced?
Tyranicus66 to Bendown
20 Jan 161#13
Actually the brand is famous for exactly the opposite.
darkstar300
20 Jan 163#12
Iv got 4 different Christopher ward watches. never had a problem with any of them, all have 5 year warranty. and customer service that IMO is second to none. Friend just bought one of these and it looks stunning in person.
And try talking to citizen or Seiko if you need any help or advice.
jdrob123
20 Jan 161#11
Anyone who has any remote interest in watches will have heard of Christopher Ward. At this price it's good value. Much better than the equivalent Argos Seiko/Citizen.
simmo15
20 Jan 164#10
Really!? Would much rather have a Christopher Ward on my wrist than a Citizen or Seiko!
Bendown
20 Jan 161#9
Yes, really it is. better off picking up a citizen or seiko from argos, loads to choose from at £100, at least your friends/workmates would have heard of these brands.
finnmaccool
20 Jan 161#1
Cheap for a C5
LOUGHBORO GUY to finnmaccool
20 Jan 161#7
She is hot
davewave
20 Jan 16#5
Really like Christopher Ward, very large range all the way up to complex movements.
mudds
20 Jan 162#2
Classic watch by a quality brand. Voted hot. 100 quid will not buy you better imo.
Opening post
I've ordered one and it's a beautiful watch. I think it's much better value than £100 watches from high street.
Features
Swiss made
Quartz movement
Surgical grade stainless steel case
Unique engraved serial number
Screw-in crown and back plate
Anti-reflective sapphire crystal
Galvanic finish charcoal dial
Embossed alligator pattern Italian leather strap with CW motif clasp
Technical
Diameter: 39mm
Height: 9.7mm
Calibre: Ronda 515
Case:316L Stainless steel
Water Resistance: 50 metres
Strap: 18mm black leather
Dial Colour: Charcoal
Top comments
The watch industry regards CW as an entry level luxury product that offers outstanding value. This consensus is also prevalent among most (exclude Archie Luxury as he is certifiably nuts) experts and customers that have owned a CW product. They even have the strap line "the worlds most affordable luxury watches".
To assert they are overpriced is flat out wrong.
The Rhonda movement used here is extremely accurate, robust and proven performer and is often fitted in watches that are considerably more expensive. In most cases, short of some extremely rare complications (Tourbillon etc..) only a very small proportion of the cost of any watch is made up by the movement. Most automatic watches that the general public consider "expensive" normally contain a bog standard ETA 2824-2.
You pay for the fit, finish and brand on the watch. Mainly the brand.
For £100 this watch will be vastly superior to its Seiko counterpart, that is not an opinion its a fact. Hold a £100 Seiko sideways and admire the strap sag and hair plucking linkages - you will probably have mineral glass or if your lucky "hardlex" (Seiko's owe value proposition). You certainly will not have a decent anti-reflective Sapphire crystal.
I am a massive Seiko fan but your suggestion that at this price point it is comparable to the C5 is also flat out wrong. Also this is a dress watch and despite their multiple attempts Seiko have not successfully cracked the dress watch market, short of the Grand seiko price point. They are very much a rugged sport / utility brand.
Latest comments (61)
http://www.creationwatches.com/products/index.php?main_page=products_bestseller&zenid=mpm5tgjiohmblu4fu0149n6s10
As far as this deal goes, there is a huge amount of inverse snobbery being spouted on here - of course you pay for the name, the style, the warranty, the fit and finish, so picking purely on the movement as a reason why this watch is supposed to be a bad deal is ridiculous - if you take that view, how do Tag Heuer manage to sell watches with $25 quartz movements for over £1000? It's a deal (the point of this site), because it's on offer for half the normal price (and as Ward sell directly then there aren't many chances to buy at a serious discount) - if you don't like the watch or won't pay that amount for a quartz watch then fine, move on to the next deal for a Casio or a cheap swatch or whatever else floats your boat, but it might be better to keep your predjuces to yourself rather than publish them on here.....
Still not a bad deal if it appeals to you.
I am far from a watch snob because I voted cold though, I own 2 Armani watches that both have bog stand quartz movements and a £5.99 casio for the gym, far from a snob.
p.s. sorry if my massive sentences are hard to read lol.
One point regarding the use of 'swiss' on the dial is that a number of manufacturers are a little 'lose' with the concept of where the watches are made - Rotary for example (who have a long and proud history - but have gone downmarket over the past few years) use their swiss heritage on their dials (i.e. 'Est Switzerland') for watches that are made in the far East whereas very few of their watches are actually now made in Switzerland - 'swiss made' should be a guarantee, but the high quality of some of the Japanese (and increasingly Chinese) manufacturers means that it's not always that simple (i.e. even the swiss watch industry produces cheap junk nowadays....)
They own Breguet, Harry Winston, Blancpain, Glashütte Original, Jaquet Droz, Léon Hatot, Omega, Longines, Rado, Union Glashütte, Tissot, Balmain, Certina, Mido, Hamilton, Calvin Klein watches + jewelry, Swatch, Flik Flak. That's a bit of shameless copy paste but it stopped me missing any. They also own a host of production companies like ETA that make the watch parts themselves
The price point of any specific watch and brand will determine if it is actually Swiss made. Check the dial!
If you are looking for something a wee bit unusual, these appeal to me:
http://sklep.gerlach.org.pl/index.php?route=common/home
And this quartz hybrid is nice - but with watches it's each to his own.
http://sklep.gerlach.org.pl/index.php?route=product/category&path=81
And you can often get 7 zlotys for £1 so very affordable. Yes, they use Seagull movements as well as Seiko, but they're something a little different.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B006JH0MHE/ref=tnp_emaildp_1
And, regardless of the long winded and boring brag about owning "60" watches, that is exactly why this is an overpriced item.
As an owner of over 60 pairs of socks, including ones with Family Guy, Simpsons and even the new Star Wars characters, I recommend wearing this enchanting timepiece with the Levis you bought from Sports Direct.
You can pick up a decent C60 for around £300 in the clearance that happens once a year. I have a black on stainless and it is great. Looks a lot like an Omega Seamaster but without the tears when you scratch / smash it. Gets some nice comments too. Avoid the small one, 42mm is the way to go.
The watch industry regards CW as an entry level luxury product that offers outstanding value. This consensus is also prevalent among most (exclude Archie Luxury as he is certifiably nuts) experts and customers that have owned a CW product. They even have the strap line "the worlds most affordable luxury watches".
To assert they are overpriced is flat out wrong.
The Rhonda movement used here is extremely accurate, robust and proven performer and is often fitted in watches that are considerably more expensive. In most cases, short of some extremely rare complications (Tourbillon etc..) only a very small proportion of the cost of any watch is made up by the movement. Most automatic watches that the general public consider "expensive" normally contain a bog standard ETA 2824-2.
You pay for the fit, finish and brand on the watch. Mainly the brand.
For £100 this watch will be vastly superior to its Seiko counterpart, that is not an opinion its a fact. Hold a £100 Seiko sideways and admire the strap sag and hair plucking linkages - you will probably have mineral glass or if your lucky "hardlex" (Seiko's owe value proposition). You certainly will not have a decent anti-reflective Sapphire crystal.
I am a massive Seiko fan but your suggestion that at this price point it is comparable to the C5 is also flat out wrong. Also this is a dress watch and despite their multiple attempts Seiko have not successfully cracked the dress watch market, short of the Grand seiko price point. They are very much a rugged sport / utility brand.
And try talking to citizen or Seiko if you need any help or advice.