Pretty simple offer on the LG 43UH603V 4K UHD HDR TV, it comes with a 6 year guarantee and when you enter the checkout page, at the bottom it says, "I have a giftcard/voucher" click on this and enter FLASH30 to receive an extra £30 off. You can get free delivery too, so for a 43 inch 4K HDR TV for only £369, not bad I reckon.
Should be illegal imo to advertise as 4k but they get round it because if the source material is a black and white image its ok.
Example images of a 4k TV versus the LG, notice how it handles colour.
4k TV
LGs non 4k TV
shifty277
16 Mar 175#30
IMHO everyone needs to calm down on the 4k tv situation, the 4k picture is still incredibly foggy.
In the UK there is hardly any channels in true 4k HDR (HDR is what sets 4k apart from full 1080p not the 4k pixels). Maybe 5 channels on Sky, Virgin, BT?
As well the 4k blu ray players are like £300.
Unless you're children have accidentally broken your tv or it broke by itself wait another 2 years for the ultra hd certified tv's to come down in price (£1k is the cheapest right now). Also let the content providers start putting out 4k HDR as DEFAULT.
Right now stick to Full HD Youtube, Netflix (all of netflix), Amazon Prime (Same) and all of the freeview and pay tv providers.
Right now everyone throwing their self in the 4k pit is just a BETA tester it is as simple as that. Unless you are buying every single 4k HDR bluray and watching these with your 7.1 surround system that is to really be watching true 4k all the time.
jaydeeuk1 to ramiuk1
16 Mar 173#16
Its not HDR capable (as said above it'll accept a HDR signal and shove something overly saturated out the other end) and it isn't 4k either, its 2.8k. Infact I wouldn't buy any set that doesn't do what it says out of principle regardless of how cheap it is. Shame, as their OLED lines are the best in the business (or were until Philips did one)
Isn't hdr though is it, it can read hdr but not display it if I remember right, also is sub 4k due to how the pixels work.
Having a white sub pixel every do often
CivRules to ramiuk1
16 Mar 171#4
I'd love to say I have an answer for your query, but I do not. It's just something I noticed earlier today and thought might be a good deal for someone wanting/needing a cheap 4K for the bedroom or kids room.
jaydeeuk1 to ramiuk1
16 Mar 173#16
Its not HDR capable (as said above it'll accept a HDR signal and shove something overly saturated out the other end) and it isn't 4k either, its 2.8k. Infact I wouldn't buy any set that doesn't do what it says out of principle regardless of how cheap it is. Shame, as their OLED lines are the best in the business (or were until Philips did one)
CivRules
16 Mar 171#5
FYI, I haven't bought this, so can't comment on how good a TV this actually is.
Opening post
Top comments
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/rgbw-201510084189.htm
Should be illegal imo to advertise as 4k but they get round it because if the source material is a black and white image its ok.
Example images of a 4k TV versus the LG, notice how it handles colour.
4k TV
LGs non 4k TV
In the UK there is hardly any channels in true 4k HDR (HDR is what sets 4k apart from full 1080p not the 4k pixels). Maybe 5 channels on Sky, Virgin, BT?
As well the 4k blu ray players are like £300.
Unless you're children have accidentally broken your tv or it broke by itself wait another 2 years for the ultra hd certified tv's to come down in price (£1k is the cheapest right now). Also let the content providers start putting out 4k HDR as DEFAULT.
Right now stick to Full HD Youtube, Netflix (all of netflix), Amazon Prime (Same) and all of the freeview and pay tv providers.
Right now everyone throwing their self in the 4k pit is just a BETA tester it is as simple as that. Unless you are buying every single 4k HDR bluray and watching these with your 7.1 surround system that is to really be watching true 4k all the time.
All comments (62)
Having a white sub pixel every do often