Stunning TV for the money but the 4k police will be on it like a shot.

55" 4k TV is utterly pointless, you're regular person won't notice the difference. 4k TV needs to be at least 65" and even then i'm not convinced it's enough.

1080p is more than enough at 55" unless you want to sit right in front of your tv, furthermore. Whilst we're on the subject, still severely lacking 4k content, 95% of most peoples TV viewing isn't even 1080p, let alone 4k.

This TV will destroy the likes of the Samsung UE55KS7000U which has been here for a similiar price, and is 4k

camera roll? i;m not getting into a willy waggling contest mate, and not even sure what that has to do with this? you're clueless based on your comments, if someone has 850 sheets to spend you would recommend they wasted it on an inferior 4k tv???

Ok, if you have 3k to spend, then yeah ok get a 4k OLED

Everyone told they need 4k, it's just not true, 1080p will be more than enough for most people for at least 5 more years.

I have more pictures than you.
And mine is bigger than yours.
And my dad can beat your dad.

You;re just not getting it are you

Spending £850 on a budget 4k TV is also a complete waste of money, if going 4k for it's superior image quality and viewing pleasure, what sense does it make to purchase a budget £850 4k TV??

I already said, if money is no object then you would purchase an OLED 4k TV, however this is a thread for a £850 TV, and you need to bear that in mind.

don't bother paying this much for 1080p tv better off paying the extra and buying a 4k future proof tv

Great price...soooo tempted :smiley:

Stunning TV for the money but the 4k police will be on it like a shot.

I've had this Tv for 1 year now and I'm still wowed by it. Makes friends £1000 lg led LCD Tv look like sh1t

I can see people being caught out by the scam prices , If you are going to purchase DO NOT pay outside of Amazon as you can kiss goodbye to your hard earned money. If your in doubt contact Amazon first. Don't stray away from Amazons website !!
Trust me, I was nearly done !!
Amazon need to clamp down on this.

I bought this TV from Amazon a couple of weeks ago when it was around £850. It is a fantastic TV at this price. The picture is outstanding when watching an HD signal. The only minor niggle is when you get the brightness dimming, this is only really noticeable when you have a full white background which mainly occurs when you watch TV adverts. I would give it a 9 out of 10. Hope this helps someone.

I'm tempted for this set as 4k content is limited and would I really notice 8 ft from TV.

Interesting thanks; did'nt know about that. Guess if you want 4k may as well hold for 16k.....

No 4K, Cold

Good price, I think, but don't buy this thinking you can record onto a hard disk via USB. It works for a bit, but then just will not play then back without fault. Known fault and I think Samsung also suffers from it. I've not yet found a cure.

LG included Dolby Vision (ie dynamic HDR, where there is colour metadata for every scene) in 2016 though, and have a software update for HLG (broadcast HDR designed by the BBC).

Can't argue about the ever changing HDMI spec though.

Talking of 8K, this 8K displayed at the CES was quite impressive. Anyways this deal is still very cold

You're clueless my friend.

Well apparently, the manufacturers were advised not to go to 4K and wait until 8K became available at a cheaper price. (8K is the maximum the human eye can see supposedly). They were told that the masses wouldn't notice a big enough jump from 1080p to 4K (They were right) hence why we now have HDR.

Basically, wait until CES 2018 if you can (a year from now) and then look to buy a new TV. We'll know then if this spec is truly completed then and the added benefit is the TVs will be cheaper too. :wink:

Far from clueless pal , I have more pictures on my camera roll of new technology being rolled out this year taken at the Las Vegas CES Convention 2017 than you could ever dream of. you are really wasting your money buying an OLED 1080p TV in 2017!

The HDMI spec changing HDR again is the main issue I have with buying a TV right now. LG have arguably made their TVs more futureproof but they will still lack the HDMI spec for Dynamic HDR10. Until manufacturers confirm which TVs can be upgraded via firmware (some can apparently) I just wouldn't risk it. With a HDR format war looming too (unless Dolby Vision will just be a niche product), I'm staying well away for now and sticking with my TV for a while longer. Hasn't helped that they killed off 3D this year either. (Wasn't to everyone's taste but I enjoyed it and it's annoying they made my discs obselete on new tvs).

55" 4k TV is utterly pointless, you're regular person won't notice the difference. 4k TV needs to be at least 65" and even then i'm not convinced it's enough.

1080p is more than enough at 55" unless you want to sit right in front of your tv, furthermore. Whilst we're on the subject, still severely lacking 4k content, 95% of most peoples TV viewing isn't even 1080p, let alone 4k.

This TV will destroy the likes of the Samsung UE55KS7000U which has been here for a similiar price, and is 4k

camera roll? i;m not getting into a willy waggling contest mate, and not even sure what that has to do with this? you're clueless based on your comments, if someone has 850 sheets to spend you would recommend they wasted it on an inferior 4k tv???

Ok, if you have 3k to spend, then yeah ok get a 4k OLED

Everyone told they need 4k, it's just not true, 1080p will be more than enough for most people for at least 5 more years.

It seems you are the clueless one my friend. My point is that spending £900 in 2017 on an OLED 1080p TV is ridiculous and a complete waste of money.

"Ignore all the scam prices."

It is insane that these scam sellers have been on Amazon for years, and Amazon don't do a thing about it.

Rant aside, good price :smiley:

I'm very tempted, and I know it comes up every thread, but the only thing stopping me from pulling the trigger is the thought that I will later regret not going for a 4k hdr tv.

​I Had a Samsung 4k TV and hated it for the backlight bleed. Got the 930V OLED and love it despite its ONLY

You;re just not getting it are you

Spending £850 on a budget 4k TV is also a complete waste of money, if going 4k for it's superior image quality and viewing pleasure, what sense does it make to purchase a budget £850 4k TV??

I already said, if money is no object then you would purchase an OLED 4k TV, however this is a thread for a £850 TV, and you need to bear that in mind.

This or the KS7000?

This isn't good advice unfortunately. I phoned Amazon to report a scam seller once, and they insisted that the seller was genuine.

What had actually happened was that the seller's account was hacked, and they added lots of listings for TV's and Macbook's etc.

I had to contact the company who owned the account to let them know. They didn't even respond to me, but their Amazon account was later removed.

Amazon don't care less. This has been happening for years.

I viewed quite a few TVs in store before I settled on this model, including a couple of 4k 55" oleds, and I only really appreciated 4k on the 65" TVs, so I also think that 4k is only really worth having on 65" TVs and up.

In the end I came down to this or a 65" quantum dot samsung, and I went with OLED as I would have been unhappy to have another TV with grey blacks and would still be missing my hi-black screen sony trinitron CRT TV :smiley:.

I was also tempted to spend several grand on the 65" OLED LG I saw that was absolutely stunning showing 4k content, and by far the best picture I saw.

By the time I need a new TV, hopefully there will be enough 4k content to make it worthwhile, and 65"+ OLEDs will be much cheaper, or LCD will have caught up.

Is the picture better then a plasma tv or the same. Tempted to retire my Panasonic G20 for this

Your right It's a lot less wattage then my current elecy eating TV :smile: I'm not bothered about smart features just want something modern.

I have just ordered one of these to replace a sony lcd which has been ok for the most part but will be retired to the bedroom,before that i had a pioneer kuro which was excellent, hoping this will be the same.I did think about a 4k oled but the cost(need a 65'' at least) and lack of 4k stuff to watch means this tv will do for a few years

I have more pictures than you.
And mine is bigger than yours.
And my dad can beat your dad.

Anyone know how low this TV has sold for as a lightning deal?

This is the 1st generation of OLED and the ones that LG would rather forget about.
Buy this and you'll be regretting it.

Thanks ordered, worthy upgrade to my 2011 Panasonic Plasma :smile:

the blacks are amazing, almost as black looking as my wife's cooking... almost :stuck_out_tongue:

Clueless? lol. Go read my posts from over a year ago on here, think you'll find everyone agrees this like ur comment is a heap off...

Do your research before you have to go back to edit ur posts :wink:

This ain't a 1st gen OLED, so need for me to read your previous posts.

Hhmmm stupid comment. The reason no bbc1 hd on sky 101 or any platform for that matter is to do with the regional news. Until all regions film in hd and then pay to broadcast every region in hd u won't see it. But tbf u seem to know everything so maybe u can teach a old dog new tricks.
Make stupid comment, get put in ur place!!!!

No longer available at this price :disappointed:

Oh my god. Seriously, if you don't know what you're talking about, walk away from the keyboard. If you really think you require a 65" TV to appreciate a 4K picture you'd better get yourself down to Specsavers.

Happy to slate this deal, but you've offered no alternative

Price is back up at £1063 by Amazon

When you move out of your mums house and have a decent sized living room, maybe then.. just maybe you will understand

Please don't tell me they are now doing 4k glasses....

I've had this TV for 2 months and am blown away every day.
Since all the hype is that 4k is better you can get it for a ridiculous bargain price.
Don't think - just buy it.

4k like HD will take time. I remember those awful early HD ready tv's that were a work in progress. I'll wait 2- 3 years when the flaws have been ironed out. 1080p is great for the Mo.

Apologies, I wasn't aware I needed to spoon feed, http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/lg-55-inch-curved-4k-oled-tv-1199-96-costco-hayes-2550471 there are hot deals within this app for 55 OLED 4K with Dolby Vision or HDR for a couple hundred pound more, that £200-300 will future proof you and as mentioned stop you from wasting £900 on soon to be obsolete technology. Come on.... If you are going to upgrade to OLED why would you even consider 1080p :/

The only thing that is obsolete is you, stop it.
Full HD is only used on a handful of channels/content of those channels.
4k is even further away

Keep telling yourself that. Who watches live channels nowadays. You are fully aware of the 4k sources available to you, stop making excuses for wasting £900

Price back down to £838.96. Please unexpire.

Can't help but think it'll goo lower still.
Agree with the previous posts that live hd tv content is just not ready available enough to get concerned about 4k (unless you are a 4k gamer).

​You do realise this set (920) is also obsolete (in a manner of speaking) unless you're talking about a 2016 oleds - which you are not.

Just to clarify, there are further iterations of HDR which the 920 won't get - ever but at least the 2016 (although b6 might not) models will get a firmware upgrade to support HLG HDR.

This is the best non 4k set money can buy - period.

If you're not convinced, speak to owners of Panasonic and Pioneer plasma owners who bought an Oled.

Funny how you talk of CES 2017 but failed to provide any info whatsoever.

Oled - waste of money lol, clueless? If this is true, why are other market leaders jumping on the bandwagon?

Fact remains 4k HDR standard with further iterations on the way. HDR isn't set in stone and it seems we have another vhs/betamax showdown on the horizon, only with more participants.

Back on topic - this was a hot deal.

Speaking of gaming

I just got it for £665 from amazon warehouse. Came here to compare the price glad i got it as its over 1k everywhere else :smiley:

What was interesting was that someone bought an Amazon Warehouse 910V which stated it had dead pixels!
Even without dead pixels, I am not sure I'd want to spend that much with only a 30 day or year limited warranty.

It's on a lightening deal now for £949 :neutral_face:

Hi yeah 90% stuff i bought from warehouse came brand new or like new condition just come repackaged or in damaged packaging. Btw going to cancel my tv order but think they will relist it for higher price





Hi yeah i daw that but bought the one was mentioned without scratches etc btw amazon warehouse are pointless as they just do it randomly sometimes not even related to a product lol