No arguments about 10 bit vs 8 bit here as this is a FULL HD set! Handy for anyone not watching 4k which is just about everyone.
Top comments
PAL
26 Nov 165#11
perfect TV in every way. makes SD quality look amazing. HD and bluray are crazy quality. kodi / streaming is sublime. The quality of the blacks would destroy any other format of TV. UHD/4k is useless unless to sit at a specified distance versus are specified screen size. do your research people. ......
benjam1n to crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 165#16
the Samsung is great but why do you care if the guy wants an oled, they are awesome tvs. And ranting on about 4k when most people have no 4k content even. It's his choice and seems like a perfectly acceptable one.
rickj
26 Nov 164#49
Sensational TV .love the comment from guy comparing in a TV retailer who have them switched to demo mode where everything is saturated.You get superb HD pics on all HD channels not just a few uhd ones .
I bought it spring this year on a price match from JL and every single person has commented on picture quality even friends with 4k TVs .Its covered for 5 years so no worries there.As a bonus its also the best looking TV on or Off.
ashmac
26 Nov 163#27
see for me ive looked into it comming from a high emd plamsa pansonic led/lcd is not an option
so im going for the b6 65 " sat about 7 feet ive actually messaured it then im getting 4k netflix a uhd player to watch it in proper 4k and virgins new 4k tivo i have 200 meg bb
if your going to get 4k you have to get the best from it other wise dont bother.
All comments (114)
Jaybeam
26 Nov 16#1
At last some oleds FHD hope these get cheaper as this is they way I'm thinking now. Heat
crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 162#2
More and more is coming on. If I was spending £1000 I would get ks7000 Samsung. Full HDR and 4K. Future proof your self you will regret this in a year or 2
gr8h8me to crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 162#4
Absolute garbage. Don't know what your talking about...I've had this for a year and it replaced a Samsung. The TV is superior in every way. You've probably got a PC to research and a 26" Toshiba/ DVD combi as your main TV set
ashmac to crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 163#9
belive it or not this is better than most 4k tvs baring the lg oled 4k ..
its not all about the resolution .if you knew about tvs you wouldn't have made your comment :smile:
Jaybeam to crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 161#12
You obviously haven't read the user threads in avforums-I wouldnt touch the ks7000 with a barge pole!
crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 161#3
Grand tour in uhd is mint
crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 16#5
When uhd comes properly then you stuck wanting uhd and have to then buy a new tv to watch it.
crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 162#6
What's wrong with using a pc to research lol what do you do get every TV set sent to your home and spend a day on each one to compare? Or use the internet?
I bought a Samsung 55ks8000 2 weeks ago £1449. Just cos this is oled does not mean it's better picture it has 25% of the pixels lol.
It currys the £2500 oleds were next to the Samsung and I preferred the Samsung picture. Might have been lg demo was crap in space one that didn't look at that good.
Uhd is where hd was when it started, give it 6-12 months and there will be loads to watch
gr8h8me to crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 162#7
Why not just buy another when the markets ready for a 4K OLED at the moment its yet another Sky addon. Picture is down to personal taste but this HD OLED is superb and well worth the £1k
donslibi to crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 16#21
More like 6-12 years. There's still barely anything full HD on TV channels. Mostly 720p. By the time 4k content catches up, there'll be new technology in TVs that will make you want to buy another. 1080p OLED is the sweet spot for me. But can't justify another TV when ours is 2yrs old lol
This oled fits on the same category so why just cos this is oled did it not win?
It's like saying every tv that is 4K is better
Just cos this is oled does not mean it's better
Do some research on your spectrum computer
crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 16#10
But you can buy the ks7000 55 inch for £979 which is better than this as per every review I have read. With 4K
So again stupid decision. Samsung future proofed this is not. You buy oled as you want the best picture so why would you buy one that can't produce the best picture which is uhd
benjam1n to crazzzzzy_b
26 Nov 165#16
the Samsung is great but why do you care if the guy wants an oled, they are awesome tvs. And ranting on about 4k when most people have no 4k content even. It's his choice and seems like a perfectly acceptable one.
PAL
26 Nov 165#11
perfect TV in every way. makes SD quality look amazing. HD and bluray are crazy quality. kodi / streaming is sublime. The quality of the blacks would destroy any other format of TV. UHD/4k is useless unless to sit at a specified distance versus are specified screen size. do your research people. ......
WessexUnderwater to PAL
26 Nov 16#38
What is it about this box that makes Kodi sublime? Upscaling? Mine is borderline unwatchable.
Opening post
Top comments
I bought it spring this year on a price match from JL and every single person has commented on picture quality even friends with 4k TVs .Its covered for 5 years so no worries there.As a bonus its also the best looking TV on or Off.
so im going for the b6 65 " sat about 7 feet ive actually messaured it then im getting 4k netflix a uhd player to watch it in proper 4k and virgins new 4k tivo i have 200 meg bb
if your going to get 4k you have to get the best from it other wise dont bother.
All comments (114)
its not all about the resolution .if you knew about tvs you wouldn't have made your comment :smile:
I bought a Samsung 55ks8000 2 weeks ago £1449. Just cos this is oled does not mean it's better picture it has 25% of the pixels lol.
It currys the £2500 oleds were next to the Samsung and I preferred the Samsung picture. Might have been lg demo was crap in space one that didn't look at that good.
Uhd is where hd was when it started, give it 6-12 months and there will be loads to watch
Scan down to below £1500 tv see what wins
If you have a which subscription, their best 2016 is my Samsung
http://www.which.co.uk/reviews/televisions/article/best-tvs-of-2016
This oled fits on the same category so why just cos this is oled did it not win?
It's like saying every tv that is 4K is better
Just cos this is oled does not mean it's better
Do some research on your spectrum computer
So again stupid decision. Samsung future proofed this is not. You buy oled as you want the best picture so why would you buy one that can't produce the best picture which is uhd