You can get the far superior Sapphire model for £208 delivered at Ebuyer, which isn't voltage locked like this Gigabyte edition and has a much better, much quieter cooler.

http://www.ebuyer.com/724601-sapphire-nitro-r9-390-tri-x-8gb-gddr5-dvi-d-hdmi-3x-displayport-pci-e-11244-01-20g

No, RX480 performs about the same at the moment and that's for the reference version which throttles.

(the Max setting is them setting the card to a higher fan)
Also, the latest drivers 16.7.2 push the 480 a slight bit ahead even at stock settings:

The RX480 uses a lot less power, is likely to improve more with newer drivers etc. Of course, currently there are no 8GB ones in stock at £200...

You can cook with this one.

Genuinely better?

Free shipping on this

Was about to ask, what's the power usage on this thing, and yeah I bet it generates some serious heat.

FYI to purchasers, from few threads on HUK plus other forums the Gigabyte cards come voltage locked.

You replied and included graphs - I love you dude!

Waiting for BF1 before card upgrade, sadly I only play 2 games on my PC so don't want to go for a 1070 as its 400 quids.

About 100W more than the RX 480 - LINK.

You can get the far superior Sapphire model for £208 delivered at Ebuyer, which isn't voltage locked like this Gigabyte edition and has a much better, much quieter cooler.

http://www.ebuyer.com/724601-sapphire-nitro-r9-390-tri-x-8gb-gddr5-dvi-d-hdmi-3x-displayport-pci-e-11244-01-20g

R9 290 runs Battlefield 1 really well at 1080 on ultra settings. Uses about 3.8GB vram so this 8GB card would be slightly better.

​
Good luck :confused:

​Haha, yeah, I know..... I'm really pushing it too with a 750w PSU. There's space on the side of my case for another fan by the GPUs so I think the heat will be fine. But would be a pain to have to invest again in a bigger PSU. Well, nothing ventured..... just wish Vega wasn't so far away.

Is this much of an upgrade for my GeForce 256?

480 was a rushed card because Vega is not ready.

Vega will be the ultimate card.

Yeah, I really want one! Wish it was coming out now but by the sounds of it we might have to wait a year before its available. I could wait a few months, possibly even to January, but a year is too long. Hence the second R390... not ideal but hey ho it'll tide me over and then I can sell it so it only sets me back £100 really.

I tried that Quidco offer but I get "We're really sorry, you're not eligible for this offer
Chin up. We'll have another offer for you soon, but in the meantime we've still got great cashback offers available at over 4,300 retailers. Simply browse our offers by category or, if you know what you're after, search for a specific retailer." :disappointed:

Recent history... Is not on your side.

AMD have not released a 'killer' card since the 290x.

Great card. Got one second hand. Very quiet and VR capable.

Not bashing this deal but I think you'd be much better off scoring a 2nd hand GTX 970 for £160/70 or a gtx 980 for about £210

Vulkan and DX12 definitely helping performance over Nvidia in games that utilise it properly, not that many that do, but Doom and Rise of the Tomb Raider bench around the same as a GTX980 when using an RX480.

8gb graphics card.... have I been living in a cave....I want one

My bad, I thought the 970 was faster than a 390, this is incorrect.

oh i disagree.... you could argue that at the point of sale their last 'killer' card was the 7990 as at the point of release it was the best pound/performance card of its kind. yes it was far superceeded by the nvidia ti but that nvidia was not there at release of the the 7990

The 480 already hits the performance mark at its price point but is and has always been a filler card for the vega which is next due. And due to the architecture change in the vega, that is set to be the next killer card with HBM 2 which will surely be beaten by the Nvidia 1080ti and next titanesque.... But thus we delve into the murky world of GPU's and their marketing strategies even further....

I flit between them both.... but Nvidia dont give a hoot about their customers - there is a reason why AMD resides in both the xbox 1 and PS4... and that is bang 4 buck, not gloryhole sales.

Did you just say the 7990 was a killer card? :smile:

I'm sorry, but what? The 7990 was not a 'killer card' in any sense of the word.

The reason AMD 'resides' in the xbox 1 and PS4 is because NVIDIA didn't want that low value contract. The margins were very slim.

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/150892-nvidia-gave-amd-ps4-because-console-margins-are-terrible

I just don't see how you can make the assumption the Vega will be a showstopper. AMD haven't released a card that has lived up to it's hype in a VERY long time.

At least since the 290x.

The 3xx series was hugely disappointing, the 480 was a flop out the game, and the Fury/Fury X have been an afterthought.

Also, the 7990 was released April 2013, the 290x was released October 2013.

Even if we agreed the 7990 was even a 'good' card, it doesn't change what I said. (It's really not).

you sound like a fanboy with a flacid argument.... Do you work for Nvidia or something. Ha!

That's your reply? Instead of any thought, you just blindly throw out "oh you must be a fanboy shill, haha!!111!!one".

Guess you aren't worth the effort of an adult conversation.