Great price for this card. Not the fastest one around but should be fine for most applications (I have one full of FLAC files in my car stereo). Lifetime warranty from the manufacturer and Amazon's peerless customer service. You could always run it past Flubit for anything up to another 15% off.
Top comments
intranix
12 Jun 165#3
Explain the logic please. Why not use a 4GB card instead of your 32GB?
jackvdbuk
12 Jun 164#2
I just purchased a 32gb sd card, i think the main worry with such large storage in a camera is if it gets corrupted or damaged thats alot of data to lose.. Bettef imo to have multiple sd cards of a smaller size.
or have one large one... totally up to you :wink:
nomnomnomnom
12 Jun 164#4
People have been saying this since the days of the floppy disk.
You could lose your other SD cards. They could corrupted when you plug them into a reader. You could get attacked by Noel Edmonds who stamps of them in a fit of rage.
You either have a backup or you don't. It's that simple. This notion of having multiple data sources, with the same data spread across them being 'safer' is absurd.
Take some pictures / video. Remove the card when you're done and plug it into your PC / laptop. Copy the images off (which should be syncing to the cloud anyway) so they are part of your backup procedure for that device (you have one, RIGHT!?). Delete them or leave them on the card.
There is *nothing* more to it. This entire 'lot of data to lose' mindset needs to die in a big ball of fiery death.
We might as well carry around 32 * 1GB cards going on your logic.
fireman1
12 Jun 163#10
I personally prefer to use a few thousand 128mb cards.
Losing data is then never an issue but on the other hand i have lost endless cards.
All comments (21)
Mghf
12 Jun 16#1
Best price that this class 10 UHS-1 card has been on sale for according to the Camel.
jackvdbuk
12 Jun 164#2
I just purchased a 32gb sd card, i think the main worry with such large storage in a camera is if it gets corrupted or damaged thats alot of data to lose.. Bettef imo to have multiple sd cards of a smaller size.
or have one large one... totally up to you :wink:
intranix
12 Jun 165#3
Explain the logic please. Why not use a 4GB card instead of your 32GB?
nomnomnomnom
12 Jun 164#4
People have been saying this since the days of the floppy disk.
You could lose your other SD cards. They could corrupted when you plug them into a reader. You could get attacked by Noel Edmonds who stamps of them in a fit of rage.
You either have a backup or you don't. It's that simple. This notion of having multiple data sources, with the same data spread across them being 'safer' is absurd.
Take some pictures / video. Remove the card when you're done and plug it into your PC / laptop. Copy the images off (which should be syncing to the cloud anyway) so they are part of your backup procedure for that device (you have one, RIGHT!?). Delete them or leave them on the card.
There is *nothing* more to it. This entire 'lot of data to lose' mindset needs to die in a big ball of fiery death.
We might as well carry around 32 * 1GB cards going on your logic.
pavel76
12 Jun 16#5
Not so great deal...U3 version with 80Gb write speed is only less than £4 from Amazon
airdsuk
12 Jun 16#6
I'd go for the Lexar Pro 64Gb x1000/150MB/s speed card for around the £22 quid mark with code at MyMemory this weekend. (Be quick) They hold 9700 or so JPGs in my Fuji. Or even get 2, and still have change .
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Top comments
or have one large one... totally up to you :wink:
You could lose your other SD cards. They could corrupted when you plug them into a reader. You could get attacked by Noel Edmonds who stamps of them in a fit of rage.
You either have a backup or you don't. It's that simple. This notion of having multiple data sources, with the same data spread across them being 'safer' is absurd.
Take some pictures / video. Remove the card when you're done and plug it into your PC / laptop. Copy the images off (which should be syncing to the cloud anyway) so they are part of your backup procedure for that device (you have one, RIGHT!?). Delete them or leave them on the card.
There is *nothing* more to it. This entire 'lot of data to lose' mindset needs to die in a big ball of fiery death.
We might as well carry around 32 * 1GB cards going on your logic.
Losing data is then never an issue but on the other hand i have lost endless cards.
All comments (21)
or have one large one... totally up to you :wink:
You could lose your other SD cards. They could corrupted when you plug them into a reader. You could get attacked by Noel Edmonds who stamps of them in a fit of rage.
You either have a backup or you don't. It's that simple. This notion of having multiple data sources, with the same data spread across them being 'safer' is absurd.
Take some pictures / video. Remove the card when you're done and plug it into your PC / laptop. Copy the images off (which should be syncing to the cloud anyway) so they are part of your backup procedure for that device (you have one, RIGHT!?). Delete them or leave them on the card.
There is *nothing* more to it. This entire 'lot of data to lose' mindset needs to die in a big ball of fiery death.
We might as well carry around 32 * 1GB cards going on your logic.
Use thew code SUMM10 at checkout (note the case, and it ends at midnight)