​She never had a 'skin colour' in the book - the pigmentation of her skin is not mentioned once. Hollywood's adaptation of the novels chose to have a person of a certain heritage/colour and other may choose to have another. JKR herself states this and the fact she is happy with a directors choice of 'black' or 'white' actors playing the part - so long as character is true to the script. One of the key tenants if the book is that its not the difference of how we look that makes us good or bad, but our actions, words and character.

​Yes....it was white....the same as it was in all 8 films. All official visual representations of Hermione have, up to this point, been white. The fact she is black in the play annoys me - nothing to do with race, everything to do with continuity. J K Rowling saying she never stated a skin colour is BS. As an advisor on all of the films including a producer credit on the final two, she "signed off" the whole look of the HP universe. She approved Jim Kay's illustrations in the illustrated Philosophers Stone book. Changing it now, just so she can meet so called 'Diversity' quotas is pathetic.
I am not a racist. I would have the same issue if the character of 'Cho Chang' was played by a non asian actor in a future production. Continuity, for me, is very important.

It's the script......the one where Hermione completely changes her skin colour.

Books £10 or over are free delivery anyway.. Is that a proper book though or the script of the play?

It's the script......the one where Hermione completely changes her skin colour.

It's the script of the play.
As Jk doesn't have time to write it as a novel but we all want to know what happens.

This will be £10 or less everywhere when released. Potentially biggest book launch of the year.

I'd wait.

Did she have a skin colour in the Philosopher's Stone illustrated edition and Chamber of Secrets illustrated?

Nothing special about that price, unless I'm missing something?

£10 at WH Smith, free delivery to store and 5% TCB:
http://www.whsmith.co.uk/products/harry-potter-and-the-cursed-child---parts-one--two-special-rehearsal-edition-parts-i--ii---the-official-script-book-of-the-original-west-end-production/9780751565355

I find WH Smith's very competitive online, usually always the cheapest and they pay UK taxes!

I preordered it with water stones same price

Well I don't know about the illustrations, but on the front cover of the Prisoner of Azkaban, Hermione has the same skin tone as Harry. A book that came out before the movies.

I find the whole argument silly, I think it's obvious JKR intended Hermione to be white, but at the end of the day she doesn't care what the skin tone is as long as the charactor is done justice.

​Yes....it was white....the same as it was in all 8 films. All official visual representations of Hermione have, up to this point, been white. The fact she is black in the play annoys me - nothing to do with race, everything to do with continuity. J K Rowling saying she never stated a skin colour is BS. As an advisor on all of the films including a producer credit on the final two, she "signed off" the whole look of the HP universe. She approved Jim Kay's illustrations in the illustrated Philosophers Stone book. Changing it now, just so she can meet so called 'Diversity' quotas is pathetic.
I am not a racist. I would have the same issue if the character of 'Cho Chang' was played by a non asian actor in a future production. Continuity, for me, is very important.

As Harryisme above stated, Hermione has the same skin tone as Harryon the original front cover of Prisoner of Azkabam UK and US version.

UK version.


US version

continuity

I'm not against any ethnicity in particular, but there is this from chapter 4 of The Prisoner of Azkaban:

> They were there, both of them, sitting outside Florean Fortescue’s Ice Cream Parlor — Ron looking incredibly freckly, Hermione very brown, both waving frantically at him.

Why comment on how brown Hermione looks if that is her regular skin colour?

I'm fairly sure that JKR didn't paint the covers

​I did not accuse you of being a racist nor did I intend to imply you to be one. So, if my lack of clarity in my post lead you to assume that I accused you of racism - for this lack of clarity I will apologise, and say to all readers that my words or intentions were not to accuse you of racism.

However I stand by what I wrote and I will reiterate that to sum up a whole piece of work as "​​It's the script......the one where Hermione completely changes her skin colour." does a disservice to the message of not just the book and play, but also the wishes of the author. A more apt description when asked what this deal relates to would have possibly been: 'it's the script, based on the new show' - full stop. To summarise a whole piece of work based on an actors skin colour is akin, in my opinion, to summarising all the works of Shakespeare as the one where people wear old fashioned clothes or speak in odd verse - it does nothing to describe the narrative, characters personalities or production value or context of its production.

I'm not going to get involved in a back and forth discussion on here (my life, as I hope everyone's is busy with more relevant day to day tasks) but I did want to do you the courtesy of replying to your post - based on my post (namely to clarify to that my intension was not for you to get the impression that I think you are racist, because I do not think that.).

​who precisely 'called' anyone - let a lone you - a racist? Is it something you are frequently called or just something you frequently assumed people are saying about you behind your back?

Point stuff does not make you a racist - but deliberately attempting to blow up and twist OTHER PEOPLES discussions and debate in a non constructive manner and offering nothing but bile does make you a sh*t stirrer (feel free to quote me on that - it actually something I have written, implied, and stand by).

Same price in store to

What I would like to know is, is it any good?

£9 in Sainsburys