Not in the same class as the Casio 83gt plus. It would have to be a lot cheaper than the Casio to be worth buying this one, and it isn't.
Magnetica
9 Feb 161#5
Are we still in 90's?
shaunp
9 Feb 16#6
Got the last 9.
Thanks OP :smiley:
Magister to shaunp
9 Feb 16#8
Yawn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
splender
9 Feb 16#7
did the job in 90's when HP and Texas were much more expensive, Casio is king now, for £2, it can still do the job in 2016.
blaser to splender
10 Feb 16#15
I used to buy the Casio calcs, but recently switched to Canon they uses the same screen and powered by the same chip and can be found cheaper than the equivalent casio i.e. Casio FX-991ES PLUS vs Canon F-789SGA virtually identical except that the canon has a few more functions and can be found as cheap as a tenner (note it's a high-end product) so very cheap.
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
A great scientific calculator with large 10 digit display, plastic keys, stylish hard casing, protective clip on cover and 56 functions.
Top comments
All comments (19)
manual
Thanks OP :smiley: