This is an online deal and available to all. Price includes delivery and their excellent 5 year warranty. Specs
Screen Size 65 inch
Resolution 4K UHD (2160p)
3D Ready No
Smart TV Yes
HDMI / Scarts 3 x HDMI
Digital Tuner Yes
Frame Rate 200Hz, 1000Hz Motion Clarity Index
Screen Technology LED
Curved Screen No
Package Yes - Blu-ray
Top comments
gazter
9 Jan 164#17
It's a new minuscule minor potential improvement hyped up to try and differentiate...
Uncommon Sense
9 Jan 163#10
That makes no sense, an OLED still will continue to give the same quality of picture, which is superior to that of the model posted, regardless of HDR content becoming available.
The TV is an output device, not an input device.
All comments (32)
klushs
9 Jan 16#1
why New models so rearly have 3D?
macgyvers child to klushs
9 Jan 16#5
i think most people think it's a gimmick and don't want to wear the glasses. I think it makes things look really small as well.
Baldieman64 to klushs
9 Jan 16#8
Because it was a useless fad - like curved screens.
strettyp
9 Jan 16#2
just tried to order - out of stock
Rado16v
9 Jan 161#3
There were more than 10 in stock at the time of posting. Try later in case someone has them in their basket.
Rado16v
9 Jan 16#4
Just to add, my father in law ordered one last week which was the last. They've only come back on so I posted so it's worth keeping an eye on daily if they do sell out.
stuellis
9 Jan 16#6
Heat given but I'd rather a 1080p OLED, far more impressive improvement than 4k
Baldieman64 to stuellis
9 Jan 16#9
The OLEDS are impressive but they are only the vanguard of a whole swathe of HDR TV's that will be coming out over the next couple of years. The format standards are still being finalised so this might not be the best time to go with OLED unless you enjoyed the Betamax experience.
neroneuk
9 Jan 161#7
Problem with 3d is that picture becames darker, less colours. contrast etc... and a less enjoyable picture in these respect. I think 3D is still great, unfortunately the market is also been flooded with these films that have never been shoot in 3d originally, hence no special effect were you see things getting out of the screen and they are not that very enjoyable but the good one are a must to be seen in 3D. Passive glasses are brighter but only good for up to lets say a 32inches TV’s but after that the lines do became obvious and makes active a better choice. 3d should not be abused, that is another factor to consider and why many people do not use anymore. Proper 3d glassless technology is still far away but surely something could be done to improve brightness on the existing technology. Saying so , no sure what is changed in the last 4 years in relation to improvements as my Samsung 3d is about 4 year old. Not very much I believe
Uncommon Sense
9 Jan 163#10
That makes no sense, an OLED still will continue to give the same quality of picture, which is superior to that of the model posted, regardless of HDR content becoming available.
The TV is an output device, not an input device.
Baldieman64
9 Jan 16#11
Yes, it's an output device, but an output device can only give optimal performance if it adheres to format standards. When HDR comes on-line, you will get 4K images with the colour balance optimised for TVs that comply with the new standards.
Opening post
Screen Size 65 inch
Resolution 4K UHD (2160p)
3D Ready No
Smart TV Yes
HDMI / Scarts 3 x HDMI
Digital Tuner Yes
Frame Rate 200Hz, 1000Hz Motion Clarity Index
Screen Technology LED
Curved Screen No
Package Yes - Blu-ray
Top comments
The TV is an output device, not an input device.
All comments (32)
The TV is an output device, not an input device.