It's a new minuscule minor potential improvement hyped up to try and differentiate...

That makes no sense, an OLED still will continue to give the same quality of picture, which is superior to that of the model posted, regardless of HDR content becoming available.

The TV is an output device, not an input device.

Back in stock if anyone's interested.

Read up on CES 2016 all major manufacturers have unified in sonys/Samsung and LG 4K format and have all agreed with HDR. If a 4K set is not HDR then it should drop massively in price pretty quickly. Amazon and Netflix are starting to film shows with HDR and 4K Bly Ray's will be out in the summer along with 4K Blu Ray players. Also sky 4K should be out about the same time

True. I want a 65 as my next set but not because it's mahoosive but because OLED 65 will blow me away in quality. I think it's the tech that can show off the size rather than the size being let down by the tech.

I was replying to guy who said oled has bad fast motion ,yet no reviews commented on this .I got Jl to match crampton and moore at 1269.Not a fortune but find Jl service best out there.
Sorry if a bit off topic .may help someone comparing this to a oled.

Not to mention the fact that Samsung are now getting back into the OLED TV business, using the same production technique that LG pioneered. OLED will become the dominant technology used in TV's without question, although I'd imagine small sets may lag slightly behind until production costs fall in line with that of LED.

I think this deal for 65" is great, but I'd probably say if you are buying a 65" TV at this price it's because you care more about the size that the actual quality of the picture.

I think the amount of dosh LG has pumped in it may be here for a bit...

I think they are getting confused and referring to this set in the deal.
Who did jl price match with?

Very strange .just purchased the LG oled 55EC930V and could not find a bad review and looked the best tv under 1300 on display .thought more use able than 4K due to limited 4K coverage.Jl even price matched to 1269 so cheapest on net.if motion blur that bad luckily Jl returns top draw.

On which oled set is that ?

Any details on input lag for this TV?

Saw the curved 65 inch Samsung 4K etc, etc, in John Lewis for £1300.

it is already, motion is awful

So oled will become obsolete like Betamax, bizarre statement.

This entirely depends within the context of what you mean by coming online. Should you mean broadcast TV then an HDR signal would not work at all on a non HDR set, of you mean Netflix etc. then they can offer as many different qualities as they want, and what is sent is determined by the users equipment.

Also HDR, is not all about color balance, it's about the difference in light intensity. Since OLED already does pure black, on a pixel by pixel basis, and can do a pure white pixel right next door to a black one without any wash out, that you'll see on LED, the the dynamic range of OLED is already much greater.

When do you think we'll see actual HDR content, we're not exactly flooded with 4K are we?

It's a new minuscule minor potential improvement hyped up to try and differentiate...

Google it, not enough space here to really describe it

Thx what does that do?

what is HDR?

Your comparing Apples and Oranges and that statement makes no sense.

Yes, it's an output device, but an output device can only give optimal performance if it adheres to format standards. When HDR comes on-line, you will get 4K images with the colour balance optimised for TVs that comply with the new standards.

That makes no sense, an OLED still will continue to give the same quality of picture, which is superior to that of the model posted, regardless of HDR content becoming available.

The TV is an output device, not an input device.

Heat given but I'd rather a 1080p OLED, far more impressive improvement than 4k

why New models so rearly have 3D?

Problem with 3d is that picture becames darker, less colours. contrast etc... and a less enjoyable picture in these respect. I think 3D is still great, unfortunately the market is also been flooded with these films that have never been shoot in 3d originally, hence no special effect were you see things getting out of the screen and they are not that very enjoyable but the good one are a must to be seen in 3D. Passive glasses are brighter but only good for up to lets say a 32inches TV’s but after that the lines do became obvious and makes active a better choice. 3d should not be abused, that is another factor to consider and why many people do not use anymore. Proper 3d glassless technology is still far away but surely something could be done to improve brightness on the existing technology. Saying so , no sure what is changed in the last 4 years in relation to improvements as my Samsung 3d is about 4 year old. Not very much I believe

Just to add, my father in law ordered one last week which was the last. They've only come back on so I posted so it's worth keeping an eye on daily if they do sell out.

There were more than 10 in stock at the time of posting. Try later in case someone has them in their basket.

just tried to order - out of stock