2Gb, no display, average sound quality. Goes Hot.

http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/9082177.htm

4Gb, full colour display and plays video, £29.99, superior sound quality. Goes freezing.

Can Apple fans possibly BE more Muppetational....

Voted cold, can't beat this to have tunes on the go

No, it isn't. Would suggest you look that one up. Besides any of which, 2Gb versus 4Gb.....and no display whatsoever....oh but yeah let me just choose the Apple because I've been blinded by marketing. :neutral_face:

I would say they are going to appeal to different markets. Shuffles are very popular with runners who want something as small as possible.

says 36 to me

2Gb, no display, average sound quality. Goes Hot.

http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/9082177.htm

4Gb, full colour display and plays video, £29.99, superior sound quality. Goes freezing.

Can Apple fans possibly BE more Muppetational....

Apple is better than Philips maybe

£29. for me as well

No, it isn't. Would suggest you look that one up. Besides any of which, 2Gb versus 4Gb.....and no display whatsoever....oh but yeah let me just choose the Apple because I've been blinded by marketing. :neutral_face:

Apple is better looking and expensive but everything else is bad specs, battery, etc

I would say they are going to appeal to different markets. Shuffles are very popular with runners who want something as small as possible.

What do you need a display for on a 4GB mp3 player? So you can see how little features it has and browse through your six albums? My ipod shuffle is five years old, never had a single problem with it, dropped it hundreds of times and I don't have some tatty cheap screen to crack when I'm doing weights in the gym.