Works out at £2.40 per steak, you won't need any sort of codes, just fill out the details on the page and order. It's not very often you see free delivery on lower priced orders from places like this.
*******
Aged for 28 Days
All natural
No artificial ingredients or added hormones
SIMPLY THE BEST OF THE BEST.
We have rolled your favourite steaks into one STUNNING hamper for less than you would pay for supermarket budget steaks!
That’s right – grab 10 melt-in-your-mouth 6-7oz Rump Steaks for just £2.40 each, their bold, robust and hearty beefy flavours are a steak lover’s dream and ready for the best steakhouses and you!
What would you say to wrapping your chops around these beauties for ONLY £24.00. Not too shabby an offer - eh? A price point below every single supermarket… - Waitrose, Sainsburys, Tesco, ASDA… EVERYONE!
10% qudco ooh I feel all powerful editing Mods posts ;)
- exexpat
Not British meat. So not really cheaper then Sainsburys or Waitrose!
No other details on what country this comes from, how its been raised or any stamp of proof on how its been fed/raised.
Only the trimmed beef fillet states UK as source.
gobhoblin to groenleader
29 Nov 15#26
why would a foreign cow taste any different to a UK one?
ScubaDudes
29 Nov 152#2
6-7oz
wozie69
29 Nov 15#3
Is this place any good?
groenleader to wozie69
29 Nov 15#5
I doubt it. With no statement of where its come from, where its slaughtered . No info on how long its been frozen, how long between slaughter and processing, no details stamp or seals on antibiotics and hormone used.
It could be nice or flavourless and toxic.
If people think its nice its all subjective I suppose, if you can pick meat, getting it online is no good as you really need to take each bit on its own merit. Marbling, silver etc.
You spend your money and take your chances! If you want a quality assured bit of meat Waitrose is the place to go. If your spending over £70 they have had various money off coupons floating around.
stevebaxy1
29 Nov 15#4
Had a couple of orders from these, lovely meat
comriegold99
29 Nov 151#6
I haven't eaten the rump but OMG the fillet is amazing.
Chicken breast are gorgeous too x
6-7oz steaks but the picture on the thread is more like a 15oz+ steak.
exexpat to DrJogalog
29 Nov 153#10
LesD to DrJogalog
29 Nov 15#11
I reckon it's a doll's house plate!
Does anyone actually eat only 6-7 oz steaks (185g)? Not worth going to the trouble of cooking them.
By the way, as this was posted by a so-called 'MOD', you'd think they could get the weight right in the post heading. Any chance another so-called 'MOD' can correct it?
Opening post
*******
Aged for 28 Days
All natural
No artificial ingredients or added hormones
SIMPLY THE BEST OF THE BEST.
We have rolled your favourite steaks into one STUNNING hamper for less than you would pay for supermarket budget steaks!
That’s right – grab 10 melt-in-your-mouth 6-7oz Rump Steaks for just £2.40 each, their bold, robust and hearty beefy flavours are a steak lover’s dream and ready for the best steakhouses and you!
What would you say to wrapping your chops around these beauties for ONLY £24.00. Not too shabby an offer - eh? A price point below every single supermarket… - Waitrose, Sainsburys, Tesco, ASDA… EVERYONE!
10% qudco ooh I feel all powerful editing Mods posts ;)
- exexpat
Top comments
All comments (54)
No other details on what country this comes from, how its been raised or any stamp of proof on how its been fed/raised.
Only the trimmed beef fillet states UK as source.
It could be nice or flavourless and toxic.
If people think its nice its all subjective I suppose, if you can pick meat, getting it online is no good as you really need to take each bit on its own merit. Marbling, silver etc.
You spend your money and take your chances! If you want a quality assured bit of meat Waitrose is the place to go. If your spending over £70 they have had various money off coupons floating around.
Chicken breast are gorgeous too x
YUM!
Does anyone actually eat only 6-7 oz steaks (185g)? Not worth going to the trouble of cooking them.
By the way, as this was posted by a so-called 'MOD', you'd think they could get the weight right in the post heading. Any chance another so-called 'MOD' can correct it?