Dont let the 10mp sensor fool you. This is the same sensor as the S95 which has been praised and used by photography professionals for years as a pocket camera. Sensor quality, sensor size and the cameras image processor are more important than megapixels. In fact using megapixels as a measure is the most pointless reason for buying a camera and rarely has any impact on image quality. A 10 mp sensor can wipe the floor with a 40mp sensor if the 40mp sensor is tiny (most phone cameras) and has a poor image software processor. The lens on a Quality compact camera will have larger and more ground glass elements than any phone camera with its minute lens and sensor.
Way too much marketing garbage out there re: megapixels has fooled many into buying sub standard crap based on nothing but technobabble.
For the price this camera will give great results and in the right hands (like any camera) will produce superb images capable of making sharp prints up to 10" X 12". It will print acceptable images to twice that size but softness will start to be evident.
As for the argument that yo would be better off with a bridge camera, well maybe but if you buy a bridge camera then you would be better off with a DSLR and if you buy a DSLR then you would be better with a 645 Digital camera etc etc etc. Pointless argument. This is a pocket camera a bridge camera is not.
nomnomnomnom
24 Nov 153#16
Every single camera thread: Not enough megapixels, use your phone, I prefer X brand....
It's painful.
pavel76 to Proveright
24 Nov 153#10
I've been waiting for comments like this... simply stupid
All comments (22)
davedelaney1978
23 Nov 15#1
looks a decent camera, heat :smiley:
batemansxxxb
23 Nov 15#2
It"s a 2013 model,but OK for the price it"s £109 on Amazon
Show_Me_The_Money
24 Nov 15#3
The few sample pictures I've seen for this camera seem to display an aqua-marine coloured sky. Is it normal for Canon cameras to produce an aqua-marine sky or is it just this model?
TonyRoma2010
24 Nov 15#4
Is there anything better at this price? I'm no camera expert.
SaltyCDogg to TonyRoma2010
24 Nov 15#5
I seriously doubt it
anewman to TonyRoma2010
24 Nov 15#6
Problem with cameras at this end of the market is they're not much better than the best mobile phone cameras. Granted a phone with a decent camera on costs £300 to £600 and this is a mere £79, but if you already have one of those phones and it's in your pocket everywhere you go, this is a bit pointless. If you're serious about photography and want more than snapshots you need at least a 1" sensor, but I'd suggest micro four thirds or APS-C as a minimum. You can get a 35mm SLR for the money but have to pay for processing :smiley:
brilly
24 Nov 15#7
not really pointless, not many mobiles have 5 times zoom for a start
Proveright
24 Nov 15#8
Only 10meg and 5 x optical zoom.
You would be better off with a bridge camera , more meg more zoom . I prefer Fuji.
pavel76 to Proveright
24 Nov 153#10
I've been waiting for comments like this... simply stupid
pavel76
24 Nov 151#9
I couldn't imaging carrying my expensive smartphone everywhere with me on holidays, trips or giving to my children... would rather prefer £80 small compact camera able of making good quality photos. Many people using small compacts as a backup cameras which can carry all the time... so don't say this is pointless:)
phatbhoy
24 Nov 152#11
So you have a smart phone that is so expensive you dont carry it with you? Seriously?
Opening post
Spec:
http://www.canon.co.uk/for_home/product_finder/cameras/digital_camera/powershot/powershot_s200/
Top comments
Way too much marketing garbage out there re: megapixels has fooled many into buying sub standard crap based on nothing but technobabble.
For the price this camera will give great results and in the right hands (like any camera) will produce superb images capable of making sharp prints up to 10" X 12". It will print acceptable images to twice that size but softness will start to be evident.
As for the argument that yo would be better off with a bridge camera, well maybe but if you buy a bridge camera then you would be better off with a DSLR and if you buy a DSLR then you would be better with a 645 Digital camera etc etc etc. Pointless argument. This is a pocket camera a bridge camera is not.
It's painful.
All comments (22)
You can get a 35mm SLR for the money but have to pay for processing :smiley:
You would be better off with a bridge camera , more meg more zoom . I prefer Fuji.