Why the flood of Octavia deals? Is there a new one due.
afroylnt to OrribleHarry
21 Sep 17#8
they have released a new improved 1.5 petrol engine to replace the 1.4
Guferos to afroylnt
21 Sep 17#9
The 1.5 petrol engine has only slightly improved economy (combined from 54.3mpg to 57.7mpg) due to Active Cylinder Management system, otherwise than that it is basically the same engine. For £15 more monthly (£163.25 incl VAT ) you can have 1.5 TSI version, but is it worth it? I don't think so.
Simply doing more than 8 miles per month in a 1.5 TSI EVO will make it economically worth it...
Guferos to m5rcc
21 Sep 17#15
Could you enlighten me how did you come to that conclusion? If you do the 8k contract miles a year then it is 666 miles a month (nice number anyway).
666 miles / 57.7mpg = 11.54 gallons = 52.39 litres a month 666 miles / 54.3mpg = 12.26 gallons = 55.68 litres a month
Difference is 3.29 litres which gives you £3.91 savings a month (£1.19 avg price of unleaded atm).
So it does not make it economically worth it ....
m5rcc to Guferos
21 Sep 17#16
You've assumed I use standard unleaded...
CoeK to m5rcc
21 Sep 17#24
You must be using rocket fuel.
aizberg
21 Sep 17#4
what happen if the car got scratch or dents due to the lease? Do they charge extra?
Mada06 to aizberg
21 Sep 17#6
You are borrowing someone elses car so yes you will be penalised if you damage it. However there are fair wear and tear guidelines that most finance companies adhere to.
ollie87 to aizberg
21 Sep 17#7
If you think you're gonna cause damage you can get a specialist insurance policy to cover you.
collectorcol to ollie87
21 Sep 17#10
I highly doubt anyone sets out to cause damage.
ollie87 to collectorcol
21 Sep 17#22
That's not what I said though.
loofer
21 Sep 17#5
good find. Wasn't too sure about a 1.4 TSI in a car of this size but if it is indeed c150PS then still adequate and considering the price it's great.
m5rcc
21 Sep 17#11
This deal does not appear to exist: the 3+23 deal for this 1.4 TSI SE Technology is £163.20 per month or £4,542 total:
oobie38
21 Sep 17#13
Expired.
myjess
21 Sep 17#14
No company should be allowed to put the extra charges outside the monthly cost. "Processing cost" adds more than £10 extra per month to the cost. Same with the broadband shisters.
m5rcc to myjess
21 Sep 17#17
No law against it.
ezzer72 to myjess
21 Sep 17#29
That's the leasing company's 'wages'.
pablomalin
21 Sep 17#18
57mpg ? I don't think so, well be more like 38 , trust me they lie,
cuslund
21 Sep 17#19
AND YOU WILL BE THE ENVY OF ALL YOUR NEIHJBOIRS WITH A SKODA BADGE, hahahahaha NOT!!! My dad had a skoda in the 90s, JUST awful cars, it couldnt get up the hill. Spend a litrle more, Mercedes, BMW or Audi all day, EVERY DAY!!!
richrab to cuslund
21 Sep 17#21
and if you take your
blinkers off you will wake up in 2017.
I have just got an Octavia estate as a company car, previously
I had a BMW 320D.
The Skoda is comfier, has a far better stereo and media
system, is a smoother drive, adaptive headlights and has a lot more power, ok I
have the vrs diesel with 183bhp. The only plus for the BMW was the MPG, 55 v 45
for the Skoda.
ollie87 to richrab
21 Sep 17#23
Please don't feed the trolls, just report them to the Mods.
cuslund to richrab
22 Sep 17#31
But your driving a skoda and no one even looks at you, your now a no one. A BMW gave u respect!!!!!
118luke to cuslund
22 Sep 17#34
I find people tend to respect German cars a lot less on the motorway than Japanese or other European brands. Probably largely down to the Audi/BMW (i'm better than you mentality) stigma.
cuslund to 118luke
22 Sep 17#38
Its because i am better than you. Cars tell people alot about a person, My Merc tells everyone I have done well so you should get out my way with you nasty cheap leased skoda!l, thats NOT even yours!!!!! hi
118luke to cuslund
22 Sep 17#39
ok hun. Ill keep my (owned) RR Sport though, that lets people know i've done even better than a lowly merc.
collectorcol to cuslund
21 Sep 17#25
But this is not the 90s anymore.
My Octavia is a fantastic car. Comfy, well equiped, looks great, 60+ MPG easily with plenty of power when needed.
Oh, and grow up!
cuslund to collectorcol
22 Sep 17#32
Its a Skoda! Hahahahahahh, I will laugh wheb i drive pased u in my vw passat and your stuck in a hill hahaha, VW everyday!!!
cuslund to cuslund
22 Sep 17#33
.....And before u say there the same, THERE NOT, vw owns Lamborghini, doesnt mean u drive a Lamborghini if you drive a Skoda!!!!
fishmaster to cuslund
21 Sep 17#26
You can't spell, you have little knowledge of how grammar works, I would lay off the weed and concentrate on the basics in life. There's no way anyone would take your 'advice' seriously. I imagine the only Audi's, Mercs and BMW's you have laid your hands on are ones you've had for a few hours whilst the police have been chasing you.
luvsadealdealdeal to fishmaster
21 Sep 17#27
haha!
you could maybe have a look at how to form plurals yourself, fishmaster! :smile:
cuslund to fishmaster
22 Sep 17#35
I do my comments on my phone so dont sit there on my pc and your spell checker. U got the jist what I was saying hence your boring old person skoda reply!
sh041b95 to cuslund
21 Sep 17#28
Yeah? Why is the VA Group the biggest in the business? These Skoda are solid cars and practically Golf/A3s underneath
cuslund to sh041b95
22 Sep 17#36
THERE ARE NOT GOLFS AT ALL!!!
ezzer72 to cuslund
21 Sep 17#30
Ooooh, you sound like you really know your stuff - I'm sure nobody would have ever thought about grouping those three brands together.
I'd go and have words with that bloke in the pub who told you they were good if I was you.
cuslund to ezzer72
22 Sep 17#37
Who cares if there good, its the brand, it sayssays everything about u. U keep ur skoda, i will keep my merc! Life is all about impressng people and showing ng tour worth ;-)
joco202
21 Sep 17#20
Cuslund Your dad had a Skoda in the 90s, ha ha, it's 2017 now mate :wink:
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
[Update on 21/09/2017 11:47am]
Unfortunately the price went up. Still a decent deal.
23 x £148.54 incl VAT monthly rentals
23 x £163.20 incl VAT monthly rentals£445.61 incl VAT initial rental
£489.60 incl VAT initial rental£298.80 incl VAT processing fee
Total£4160.83
Total £4542.00A lot of car for the price!
Other versions and terms: [valid on 21/09/2017 1:10pm]:
39 comments
source: autoexpress.co.uk/sko…nge
666 miles / 57.7mpg = 11.54 gallons = 52.39 litres a month
666 miles / 54.3mpg = 12.26 gallons = 55.68 litres a month
Difference is 3.29 litres which gives you £3.91 savings a month (£1.19 avg price of unleaded atm).
So it does not make it economically worth it ....
I have just got an Octavia estate as a company car, previously I had a BMW 320D.
The Skoda is comfier, has a far better stereo and media system, is a smoother drive, adaptive headlights and has a lot more power, ok I have the vrs diesel with 183bhp. The only plus for the BMW was the MPG, 55 v 45 for the Skoda.
Probably largely down to the Audi/BMW (i'm better than you mentality) stigma.
Ill keep my (owned) RR Sport though, that lets people know i've done even better than a lowly merc.
My Octavia is a fantastic car. Comfy, well equiped, looks great, 60+ MPG easily with plenty of power when needed.
Oh, and grow up!
you could maybe have a look at how to form plurals yourself, fishmaster! :smile:
Oh, by the way, this;
express.co.uk/lif…nty
and this;
bbc.co.uk/new…210
I'd go and have words with that bloke in the pub who told you they were good if I was you.
Your dad had a Skoda in the 90s, ha ha, it's 2017 now mate :wink: