DENON AVRX3300WBlack Atmos AV Receiver was £799.00 now £479.00
The Denon AVR-X3300W 7.2 channel AV receiver delivers true 3D surround sound, with Dolby Atmos and DTS:X providing immersive surround sound, to get the most from advanced movie soundtracks. The overhead soundfield they create delivers a massively expanded sound space, for state-of-the-art surround sound.
As well as eight HDMI inputs, component and composite video, analogue and digital audio and USB, the AVRX3300W can also connect to your home network- wirelessly or wired- and has Bluetooth built in. You can view or listen to material from a multitude of sources with ease.
The 3300W can handle 4K and 3D signals, passing them through for stunning images from your television or projector. It also offers the power of the Audio Return Channel, so the AVRX3300 can handle the sound from broadcast television with the same power as with other sources. With seven channels of 180 watt amplification and two subwoofer outputs, the AVRX3300W delivers stunning sound, whatever the source.
The AVR-X3300W also gives you the option of 5.1-channel surround in one room whilst also driving speakers in a second 'zone', which can be playing audio from another source. Alternatively, you can connect a separate amp and speakers to the Zone 2 pre-outs and enjoy 7 channels in the main room. There are also 7 channels of pre-out if you want to connect power amplifiers to drive your speakers.
The Denon AVR Remote App lets you control the AVR-X3300W with your smartphone or tablet, whether iOS or Android. Access the set-up menu, the receiver's status, and more, with ease.
High power, multi source audio and video from the Denon AVRX3300W.
Latest comments (53)
Figo_Rulz11
18 Jul 17#42
I also wanted towers at the front I noticed the Zensor don't have them in towers
rev6 to Figo_Rulz11
18 Jul 17#43
Zensor 5 and Zensor 7 are floorstanding speakers.
jumpinoffthbed to rev6
28 Aug 17#44
I only have a pair of 8ohm front floor speakers so far, can you tell my if it's possible to use the surround sound speakers from a Blu-ray home cinema system for part of the setup until I can afford the rest of the speakers I want or do they have to be 8ohms?
rev6 to jumpinoffthbed
28 Aug 17#45
Usually not no. You can run say 6ohm and 8ohm speakers but these theatre systems have strange rated speakers.
jumpinoffthbed to rev6
29 Aug 17#46
Ah ok thanks
ro53ben to jumpinoffthbed
29 Aug 17#47
You should be fine, take a look at the user manual:
Page 34 of the PDF download states you can use any speakers from 4-16 Ohms - I'd be surprised if any of your speakers are outside of this range. Just wire them up and let auto-tuning do its best.
yeah I did see that post was going to ask you what sub you use & what speaker wire. my amp won't be delivered untill next week but I found this..
"the AVR-X3300W also has low impedance drive capability, to provide operational stability with speakers down to 4 ohms" so I'll play with a few different speakers.
rev6 to jumpinoffthbed
1 Sep 17#51
There's a hidden menu to change the ohms setting for the Denon AV. I'd leave it at 8 ohms though.
jumpinoffthbed to rev6
1 Sep 17#52
oh it doesn't do it automatically then? i guess that means you can't use some 6 and some 8 ohms then
rev6 to jumpinoffthbed
1 Sep 17#53
Well you don't need to change that setting really. That's why it's hidden. It just restricts the amp to be honest. It will drive less than 8 ohms.
Figo_Rulz11
17 Jul 17#37
I'm looking at the monitor audio bronze b5 or silver 5.1 system, anyone had any experience with them?
rev6 to Figo_Rulz11
17 Jul 17#38
The Silver's are nice speakers. They need a lot of room to get the most out of them. Bronze aren't that great, prefer Zensor.
Figo_Rulz11 to rev6
17 Jul 17#39
Thanks, I'm going to head down to richer sounds and get them to demo both of them for me.
rev6 to Figo_Rulz11
17 Jul 17#40
Try the Zensor range too. Above the Bronze to me.
Figo_Rulz11 to rev6
18 Jul 17#41
I'm looking for a walnut colour for my speakers too. But at 980.00 that's quite a bargain. Lets hope richersounds have this on demo.
kas786
17 Jul 17#36
Sorry for the late reply been busy liaising with Sony to try to sort out my HDMI issue (the drop-outs). Need 3, 1 for tv, 1 for projector last one for our front room (so we can port over whatever channel we want to that tv too). Yes you can get the wireless senders. But having that extra hdmi really does help. BUT worst case we'll have to get one with 2 only.
FunkiestMonkey
16 Jul 17#34
1500 quid on. 5.1 speaker system TO GO WITH AN AV RECEIVER, will give you better music reproduction.
Only worth spending 1500 quid on a speaker pair for stereo music if you are sending similar on a stereo amplifier.
If anyone tells you different they are regurgitating wisdom from the 90s and have not heard or do not appreciate a well set up mid range receiver with a well balanced 5.1 system using all channel stereo for example.
I know because I have had a couple since 2007 and they blow all stereo systems I have heard in demo rooms worth around the same price out the water all day long AND you can listen to SACD, Blu Ray music, Dvd music, movies.
No brainer.
rev6 to FunkiestMonkey
16 Jul 17#35
Only worth spending £1500 on speakers if you're spending £1500 on a stereo amplifier? I am confused. If anything. You could buy some fantastic stereo speakers, say the Monitor Audio Silver 10's (£999 right now in walnut), and then buy a decent AV to power them. What's wrong with doing that? No need to spend £1500 on a stereo amplifier, for that price budget anyway. I am pretty sure the 10's will play music better than any 5.1 system you can buy for £1000, but I guess that's my opinion.
ro53ben
14 Jul 17#31
You entirely missed my point.
Clearly spending the same money on two speakers as you would five speakers is going to give you two speakers which are better. I'm just not likely to spend £800 on two speakers, but spending it on 5 and a sub doesn't feel wrong and usually results in better speakers than I would buy for music.
rev6 to ro53ben
14 Jul 17#32
It wasn't that I missed the point. Your priorities are clearly not on stereo music alone, so sure you would benefit more buying a 5.1 setup. That was the point!
TomScrut to ro53ben
15 Jul 17#33
Still not a win win to somebody who prioritises music, as they would be better off with the stereo pair. That's why the ratio matters even if it doesn't apply to you
ro53ben
14 Jul 17#27
From my perspective, I've always been able to justify more budget on the home cinema system than on a music system - we spend way more time watching TV in that room than listening to music.
So I spend a decent amount on a 5.1 system and end up with better speakers than I would if I bought a music system. Win Win.
rev6 to ro53ben
14 Jul 17#30
You could buy better speakers if you went stereo. More money for it. It depends on the ratio.
Well :sunglasses:
Figo_Rulz11
12 Jul 17#13
Guys what are your thoughts on 5.1 speaker system for £1500 or pair of stereo standing speakers for £1500? Lately all I've been seeing is stereo speakers!
rev6 to Figo_Rulz11
12 Jul 17#14
Depends. What's your music/movie ratio?
Figo_Rulz11 to rev6
14 Jul 17#29
95% movies ha.
TomScrut to Figo_Rulz11
13 Jul 17#18
What are you driving them with? Generally with speakers they do get better the more you spend (as long as you buy speakers that are good at that price point). But if you want surround sound for movies then stereo won't cut it. I run stereo 2.2 and don't miss surround for films having had it in the past. I prioritise music so would rather have the two better speakers than 5 inferior ones.
Figo_Rulz11 to TomScrut
14 Jul 17#28
I currently have old school set of kefs 5.1 stereo system two big towers at front...just the colour doesn't go with the new house which is a shame as I love these speakers and the Denon amp I have isn't 4k or hdr compatible so I need to upgrade that too. I watch more movies then listen to music so I'd be pointing more towards 5.1 system.
mrew42
14 Jul 17#26
Bingo
FunkiestMonkey
13 Jul 17#24
For 1500 you can have an amazing 5.1 system that will give you better sound than a two channel system if using the Denon.
rev6 to FunkiestMonkey
13 Jul 17#25
For stereo music, £1500 would get you a better 2.0 music system than 5.1 I think that's what they're asking.
mrew42
13 Jul 17#23
Yeah - i used to do that with my Naim pre-power setup, Yamaha acting as centre and rears. Got too messy though
RexNoctis
13 Jul 17#21
I compromised, I have a pair of decent Mission floorstanders for music and then added a low-mid range 5.1 set to make up the 7.1 set for movies. The Missions are fantastic for music and compensate somewhat for the cheaper surround speakers in films.
TomScrut to RexNoctis
13 Jul 17#22
Yes I used to run a stereo pair with lesser centre and rears and it was OK. I ended up going back to stereo though so I could concentrate my money into that, as I was effectively running 2 systems, a stereo system with an input from my surround system with HT bypass on.
FunkiestMonkey
13 Jul 17#20
Why do you need 3 hdmi outs???
FunkiestMonkey
13 Jul 17#19
Voted hot even though I dispute the WAS price my 4300 was the same price 4 months ago.
kas786
13 Jul 17#16
Anyone got any advice on what amp is needed if I need 3 hdmi outs, I know you can buy hdmi splitters but the cost of decent 4k splitters tends to be quite onerous. Currently using a Sony 1050. But noticed a number online having issues with intermittent drop outs when watching anything (via hdmi). Just want to future proof myself
rev6 to kas786
13 Jul 17#17
Usually reserved for the more premium models. A splitter is probably the cheapest way to go about it sadly.
wingatewood
12 Jul 17#15
The main reason why I purchased this model over the 2300 was because it had pre amp outs. I have a pair of floorstanding front speakers which I power from a separate HiFi amp and output the sound to the surrounds and centre via the Denon. This for me produces a far better sound than simply running all channels via the receiver. Pre outs these days are limited to the higher cost AV receivers unfortunately. I am however extremely pleased with the 3300!
jumpinoffthbed
12 Jul 17#10
That's what I would expect, if a mid range amp wasn't much better than the entry level alternative denon wouldn't be doing a very good job of things and their reputation is obviously very important to them.
rev6 to jumpinoffthbed
12 Jul 17#12
Indeed. They could have just improved features. Not sound quality. Like XT32 for example. I know that in turn improves sound, my tests were done Pure Direct. The 2300 is very good for it's current price too. "Lifeless" might have been a bit harsh.
ro53ben
12 Jul 17#11
Bought this last weekend with a set of Q Acoustic 7000i Plus speakers.
Very happy with the result.
Replaces a Sonos set-up of PLAYBAR/SUB/2xPLAY:3 and sounds considerably better - especially with DTS support!
rr9054
12 Jul 17#5
what does this sound like compare to the 2300?
rev6 to rr9054
12 Jul 17#9
Much better. Feature wise they're very similar (apart from auddyssey version. It's worth it for that alone.
I've heard both and.l there's definitely a fidelity improvement. The 2300 sounded a bit lifeless to me. Certainly didn't make good speakers sound how they should.
This is 5.2.1 but the 3300 sounds noticeably better to me.
rr9054
12 Jul 17#8
I got the Pioneer sclx501 which great for music but mixed feelings on Movie watching, maybe thinking of selling it so im just looking at other options.
jumpinoffthbed
12 Jul 17#7
Btw you should take the 799 out of the title as that was last year, voted hot tho
jumpinoffthbed
12 Jul 17#6
A lot better according to whathifi. This is the model I'm after but I'm hoping to get it for closer to 400 as I'm not in any rush, if it becomes unavailable tho I'm stuffed lol.
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
The Denon AVR-X3300W 7.2 channel AV receiver delivers true 3D surround sound, with Dolby Atmos and DTS:X providing immersive surround sound, to get the most from advanced movie soundtracks. The overhead soundfield they create delivers a massively expanded sound space, for state-of-the-art surround sound.
As well as eight HDMI inputs, component and composite video, analogue and digital audio and USB, the AVRX3300W can also connect to your home network- wirelessly or wired- and has Bluetooth built in. You can view or listen to material from a multitude of sources with ease.
The 3300W can handle 4K and 3D signals, passing them through for stunning images from your television or projector. It also offers the power of the Audio Return Channel, so the AVRX3300 can handle the sound from broadcast television with the same power as with other sources. With seven channels of 180 watt amplification and two subwoofer outputs, the AVRX3300W delivers stunning sound, whatever the source.
The AVR-X3300W also gives you the option of 5.1-channel surround in one room whilst also driving speakers in a second 'zone', which can be playing audio from another source. Alternatively, you can connect a separate amp and speakers to the Zone 2 pre-outs and enjoy 7 channels in the main room. There are also 7 channels of pre-out if you want to connect power amplifiers to drive your speakers.
The Denon AVR Remote App lets you control the AVR-X3300W with your smartphone or tablet, whether iOS or Android. Access the set-up menu, the receiver's status, and more, with ease.
High power, multi source audio and video from the Denon AVRX3300W.
Latest comments (53)
manuals.denon.com/AVR…php
Page 34 of the PDF download states you can use any speakers from 4-16 Ohms - I'd be surprised if any of your speakers are outside of this range. Just wire them up and let auto-tuning do its best.
hotukdeals.com/com…173
my amp won't be delivered untill next week but I found this..
"the AVR-X3300W also has low impedance drive capability, to provide operational stability with speakers down to 4 ohms"
so I'll play with a few different speakers.
Only worth spending 1500 quid on a speaker pair for stereo music if you are sending similar on a stereo amplifier.
If anyone tells you different they are regurgitating wisdom from the 90s and have not heard or do not appreciate a well set up mid range receiver with a well balanced 5.1 system using all channel stereo for example.
I know because I have had a couple since 2007 and they blow all stereo systems I have heard in demo rooms worth around the same price out the water all day long AND you can listen to SACD, Blu Ray music, Dvd music, movies.
No brainer.
I am pretty sure the 10's will play music better than any 5.1 system you can buy for £1000, but I guess that's my opinion.
Clearly spending the same money on two speakers as you would five speakers is going to give you two speakers which are better. I'm just not likely to spend £800 on two speakers, but spending it on 5 and a sub doesn't feel wrong and usually results in better speakers than I would buy for music.
So I spend a decent amount on a 5.1 system and end up with better speakers than I would if I bought a music system. Win Win.
It depends on the ratio.
Well :sunglasses:
I think that's what they're asking.
Got too messy though
The 2300 is very good for it's current price too. "Lifeless" might have been a bit harsh.
Very happy with the result.
Replaces a Sonos set-up of PLAYBAR/SUB/2xPLAY:3 and sounds considerably better - especially with DTS support!
I've heard both and.l there's definitely a fidelity improvement. The 2300 sounded a bit lifeless to me. Certainly didn't make good speakers sound how they should.
This is 5.2.1 but the 3300 sounds noticeably better to me.
This is the model I'm after but I'm hoping to get it for closer to 400 as I'm not in any rush, if it becomes unavailable tho I'm stuffed lol.