But I was able to achieve a similar vibe on an Allcast App (my personal choice mind?, though others do also exist etc?) on an 'oldish' Chinese Doogee X5 Pro Phone same way? (via a Google Chromecast).
So, similar can be achieved of (sorts?) regardless?. :-)
rob@bpool
21 Apr 17#32
Selling off possibly due to the Tab 4 being released in May. Check out the spec on the Plus models both 8" & 10" models head & shoulders better than this tab & the price is ment to be reasonable when released.
MazingerZ
21 Apr 17#31
Spec doesn't state RAM? I'm guess this does suck
squeakybot
21 Apr 17#30
I have 8"version and cannot find it anywhere. great 8" tablet though and think its android 6.0 out a the box
newmann
21 Apr 17#29
Damn you HUKD! (and OP of course!). I'll use the £10 voucher from the GoPro deal last week and I also have another £10 voucher from something else so £79.99 is a no brainer!
Shakeyyy
21 Apr 17#28
But that's not the point, the point is 3 years since the Hudl 2 was released, we are STILL paying premium prices for 1080p screens. It should be the norm. 3 years and we don't even get a 1080p screen on a tablet for £100? Not justification for it at all.
itsonlymee
21 Apr 17#27
How do they pay difference as I bought it last month. It's not been a month though
Thanks
MrPuddington
21 Apr 17#7
Not even Full HD - I would avoid it.
PAULTRD to MrPuddington
21 Apr 172#11
Not that you would notice HD on a 10.1 screen.... Sky isn't full HD but people still pay for the HD channels
What?
It's a great comparison.
My Nexus 7 would be upset if it heard you say it wan't much more than a mobile :man:
algloster
21 Apr 17#24
It was 8.3 inches which makes it larger than a phone. I also picked up a Hudl2, easter 3 years ago for £70 refurbished following a deal on here and its still going strong.
Ive been contemplating an upgrade for the past 6 months as Im looking for a 10 inch plus tablet to read PDF magazines so will need 1080P at a minimum. Shakeyy's spot on when questioning the price of this tablet. I purchased a Tab 2? off here last January as a present for £120 and that had a 1080P screen, albeit slightly flakey wifi.
So why is this viewed as a good deal? (It may be for the current market but historically its not and I'm accounting for the currency changes following the referendum). Rant Over
Shakeyyy
21 Apr 171#15
The Hudl 2 which is years old cost £99 at the time, had a fantastic CPU/GPU for the price and a Full HD 1080p screen that still runs smoothly to this day. Why on Earth are Tablets more expensive for less spec?!
steed to Shakeyyy
21 Apr 17#19
If I recall correctly, the HUDL2 was 8 inches. Making it little better than a decent mobile. This is 10.1 inches. That's a LOT more screen space and makes it a LOT more useful as an alternative to your mobile screen. So not really a good comparison.
JumpMan1980 to Shakeyyy
21 Apr 17#23
Great question! I dunno :neutral_face:
JumpMan1980
21 Apr 17#22
Does an extra 2 inches make all that much of a difference Ladies? :smirk:
Spudboy
21 Apr 17#8
Bought last week at £119.99 :disappointed:
XxLeahxX to Spudboy
21 Apr 17#12
If it was with Argos and within 30 days they will refund you the difference
JumpMan1980 to Spudboy
21 Apr 172#21
Buy it again, returning the unopened one to the £119 retailer ... Fight the power! <3
markt63
21 Apr 17#18
I bought one last week at 129 really good speakers
jeczap to markt63
21 Apr 17#20
:confused:
viniteng
21 Apr 17#17
Heat ... good one OP
commenter14
21 Apr 172#16
Sorry I didn't realise that you watch tablets from across a room.
PAULTRD
21 Apr 17#14
Very much depends on the content you are viewing and where you are viewing it from.
commenter14
21 Apr 171#13
Completely untrue! You'll be inches away from the screen so of course you'll notice it. 720p looks crappy on a 10" tablet. Just go to PC World and compare, it's very obvious.
Also people pay for the HD Sky channels because they're 1080x1920 (albeit interpolated) as opposed to the Sky SD resolution of 544x576. Not really sure what you're getting at there? It's a huge difference. Sky SD looks like someone rubbed butter on the screen.
scubascuba3
21 Apr 17#9
Which Android is it?
madnlooney to scubascuba3
21 Apr 17#10
Q&A says 5.1
Steve1205
21 Apr 17#6
Great price, I bought one last time at this price.
ahhbisto
20 Apr 17#3
it went back up a few weeks back glad to see it back at 99. cheers op
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Top comments
Latest comments (33)
But I was able to achieve a similar vibe on an Allcast App (my personal choice mind?, though others do also exist etc?) on an 'oldish' Chinese Doogee X5 Pro Phone same way? (via a Google Chromecast).
So, similar can be achieved of (sorts?) regardless?. :-)
Thanks
https://www.specsavers.co.uk/
It's a great comparison.
My Nexus 7 would be upset if it heard you say it wan't much more than a mobile
:man:
Ive been contemplating an upgrade for the past 6 months as Im looking for a 10 inch plus tablet to read PDF magazines so will need 1080P at a minimum. Shakeyy's spot on when questioning the price of this tablet. I purchased a Tab 2? off here last January as a present for £120 and that had a 1080P screen, albeit slightly flakey wifi.
So why is this viewed as a good deal? (It may be for the current market but historically its not and I'm accounting for the currency changes following the referendum). Rant Over
Also people pay for the HD Sky channels because they're 1080x1920 (albeit interpolated) as opposed to the Sky SD resolution of 544x576. Not really sure what you're getting at there? It's a huge difference. Sky SD looks like someone rubbed butter on the screen.