it's a good low range model. Can accept and process HDR content but as it does not meet UHD Premium certification you won't get the ideal experience.
Samsung 6400 I think is comparable
All comments (29)
*Sloman*
28 Jan 173#1
it's a good low range model. Can accept and process HDR content but as it does not meet UHD Premium certification you won't get the ideal experience.
Samsung 6400 I think is comparable
cyclonus10 to *Sloman*
28 Jan 17#3
lol what? Samsung 4k, this isn't a 4K tv, no matter what LG say.
maxi78 to *Sloman*
28 Jan 171#6
you mean the Samsung UE49KU6400? I was going to pay 519 when very had it and purchase from John Lewis. arghhh. what to do
jozski
28 Jan 172#2
this might help- UHD vs ULTRA HD
Technically, "Ultra High Definition" is actually a derivation of the 4K digital cinema standard. However while your local multiplex shows images in native 4096 x 2160 4K resolution, the new Ultra HD consumer format has a slightly lower resolution of 3840 X 2160.
omz89
28 Jan 171#4
I can't believe LG have stop making 3D tv's
maxi78 to omz89
28 Jan 17#5
they realised 3d just isn't worthy for another 20 years or so. decent quality picture in 2d comes first
KareemSaid to omz89
28 Jan 17#7
What?!! Stop the press. Shocking!!
Then again don't know anyone who has one and if it's anything like the cinema just a complete waste of time IMO
ws007 to omz89
28 Jan 171#9
WOW didn`t realize that the technology had become that thin, do they use special connectors on these due to the thinness? :wink:
MikeLondon
28 Jan 171#8
Can't find and decent 4K UHD 10bit 55" + TVs for under £1K at the moment. Dam Brexit.
Clunton to MikeLondon
29 Jan 171#15
I've been waiting for about 6 months for that and finally can't be arsed to wait any longer.
chriscarterstevens
28 Jan 171#10
I have the LG UH55661V which I bought for £600.
It looks like this is a very similar spec, and in my opinion mine is an excellent TV. If this has web os 3.0 then you will be able to use the LG app to replace the remote by using a smartphone which avoids looking for remote control in the dark! Overall a great TV!
spritey
28 Jan 171#11
HDR Pro.... Ok...
rickinyorkshire
28 Jan 172#12
UHD premium just means 10 bit. for a 10 bit panel you're going to pay lots more.
Having bought my similar 50"UH635, I've realised what nonsense this whole 8 vs 10 bit 4K nonsense is! The grand tour in 4K looks stunning as does pretty much everything else I can watch on it so it's hard to see how it can be discernably better IMO. Given 10 bit sets cost hundreds of pounds more, it's madness to keep bleating on about what flavour of 4K youre buying as the image quality for 95% of people will be as good as they can imagine.
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Don't go crazy if it's not as I'm no tech expert
Top comments
Samsung 6400 I think is comparable
All comments (29)
Samsung 6400 I think is comparable
Technically, "Ultra High Definition" is actually a derivation of the 4K digital cinema standard. However while your local multiplex shows images in native 4096 x 2160 4K resolution, the new Ultra HD consumer format has a slightly lower resolution of 3840 X 2160.
Then again don't know anyone who has one and if it's anything like the cinema just a complete waste of time IMO
It looks like this is a very similar spec, and in my opinion mine is an excellent TV. If this has web os 3.0 then you will be able to use the LG app to replace the remote by using a smartphone which avoids looking for remote control in the dark! Overall a great TV!
This is 4k Res (3840 x 2160)
http://www.lg.com/uk/tvs/lg-55UH605V#tech-specs
For the price this is hot!