very good car seat I bought it for my daughter few weeks back same price it's very good quality and she loves it.
Top comments
Biggushlong
3 Jan 179#1
Voting COLD....Leave the car door open overnight and save £33.75!
gidsterc to nitro228
3 Jan 179#10
what a foolish comment. Try keeping any 2-4 year in a rear-facing seat (if you can find one to fit that age...!), and you'll have one of two things: either a crying/shouting/complaining child OR the seat (in which you put it) being kicked/worn/damaged.
AND before you say "well, that's better than the child being hurt" I can assure you it is very impractical and off-putting when driving. :stuck_out_tongue:
qwerta369
3 Jan 173#9
You were hoping for loads of likes for this hilarious comment that you typed in bold, weren't you. Oops, awkward.
All comments (40)
Biggushlong
3 Jan 179#1
Voting COLD....Leave the car door open overnight and save £33.75!
dani80
3 Jan 17#2
I ordered this last week but delivery has been delayed :disappointed:...What was it like to fit?
jdRiggs
3 Jan 17#3
These are the Nania Imax SP Disney Group 1+2+3 Car Seat , Nania don't have a reputation for quality in crash test results.
They used just have sponge under the fabric cover to add comfort but not any protection. The ones with styrofoam or the newer memory foam give some level of impact protection. But each to their own I guess.
[
nitro228
3 Jan 172#4
Cold. Front facing group 1 seats are not safe. Children should remain rear facing until at least 4 years old. This is OK as a high back booster once the child is over 4 but should not be used before that. Car seats are for saving a child's life. Buy a seat based on how safe it is, not which cartoon character is printed on it.
jdRiggs to nitro228
3 Jan 17#5
It is not a group 1 seat. It is a multi stage seat, agreed not the most suitable for group 1 but it does cater for group 2 (high back booster). Group 3 the backless booster is not of much consequence given the backless booster is not recommended if you can avoid it and given it comes with a backrest and all the classmates will now be encouraged to stay in the high back booster for longer it comes with a backrest so I don't see an advantage to removing it.
gidsterc to nitro228
3 Jan 179#10
what a foolish comment. Try keeping any 2-4 year in a rear-facing seat (if you can find one to fit that age...!), and you'll have one of two things: either a crying/shouting/complaining child OR the seat (in which you put it) being kicked/worn/damaged.
AND before you say "well, that's better than the child being hurt" I can assure you it is very impractical and off-putting when driving. :stuck_out_tongue:
daisysmama to nitro228
3 Jan 17#11
They are safe. They are just not as safe as ERF seats
andreah903
3 Jan 17#6
Not a good buy, it's a very basic car seat, it won't fit well in a lot of cars (wide flat shape of the bottom and back of the seat won't suit sculpted or shaped vehicle seats) and it's very often fitted incorrectly. It's the seat used in the Watchdog tests last year (where they were investigating the fitting and sale of child seats on the high street), it didn't fare well! In one video the headrest actually detached from the rear of the seat.
chattwali
3 Jan 171#7
I did not know about all these safety checks. If it is unsafe then should not be on for sale
nitro228 to chattwali
3 Jan 171#15
Unfortunately most people don't know about the risks associated with front facing seats. The law is slowly catching up with research but it will be many years before it becomes compulsory to have rear facing toddlers, during which time hundreds will have been killed unnecessarily as a result of front facing. Many European countries, in particular Scandinavia have kept their children rear facing for longer for decades.
chattwali
3 Jan 17#8
dani80 it is very comfortable car seat and I'm not surprised that ur package is delayed that's mother care for u
qwerta369
3 Jan 173#9
You were hoping for loads of likes for this hilarious comment that you typed in bold, weren't you. Oops, awkward.
Opening post
Top comments
AND before you say "well, that's better than the child being hurt" I can assure you it is very impractical and off-putting when driving. :stuck_out_tongue:
All comments (40)
They used just have sponge under the fabric cover to add comfort but not any protection. The ones with styrofoam or the newer memory foam give some level of impact protection. But each to their own I guess.
[
AND before you say "well, that's better than the child being hurt" I can assure you it is very impractical and off-putting when driving. :stuck_out_tongue: