The 6ms response time is what made me post this tbh.
15 comments
DAZZ2000
27 Nov 164#1
It's a decent price but 4K resolution on a 24" monitor seems overkill. I'd be looking at 27" minimum for that resolution and even then I doubt I'd get the absolute best of the resolution. Obviously viewing distance is an important factor.
Leonintelex
27 Nov 161#2
If your planning on using it for gaming don't bother unless you can afford a £600 gtx 1080. 1440p would be a wiser choice. Good price for general use.
CampGareth to Leonintelex
27 Nov 16#3
*gaming at native resolution, rendering the game at 1080p then upscaling would be just fine, although no better than a 1080p display.
I run a UHD monitor at 2560x1440 to fit in with my other monitors for instance.
captainjon
27 Nov 162#4
Get a Hisense 4k 40 inch for 250 instead
Hotmeal to captainjon
28 Nov 16#7
Sold out ages ago :disappointed:
stuartturrell
27 Nov 16#5
are uhd monitors all hdr ready?
TomScrut to stuartturrell
28 Nov 161#9
This article, if correct (from September) states no HDR monitors are available at all.
Chuggee
27 Nov 16#6
1440p on a 4K native screen. What a waste of pixels. :neutral_face:
ronaldmacdonald
28 Nov 161#8
Hang on, isn't this the same as the acer 24" we got a few months ago from scan/ebuyer for £160?
BaronFanhope
28 Nov 16#10
Only a 60Hz refresh rate... :disappointed:
loiterer
28 Nov 16#11
Is this suitable for gaming using a high-end (top GPU) PC?
TomScrut to loiterer
28 Nov 16#13
The 6ms might be an issue, and I would say for a 24" monitor you ought to go with 1440p. If it was a 27" or 32" then the argument for 4k is stronger. 60hz probably isn't an issue given the struggle you will have getting significantly more than 60fps on anything worthy of a high end rig. Not sure there are any 4k monitors above 60hz anyway?
BaronFanhope
28 Nov 16#12
Not for high-end gaming imo because of 60hz and 6ms refresh.
As mentioned you'd better having a 2560x1440 resolution (which needs only a GTX 1070 as opposed to the GTX 1080 needed to run 4K) with 100hz+ (ideally 144hz) with 1ms refresh.
lrbaumard to BaronFanhope
11 Dec 16#15
1070 can handle 4k. I have one, running 4k no issue
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
15 comments
I run a UHD monitor at 2560x1440 to fit in with my other monitors for instance.
As mentioned you'd better having a 2560x1440 resolution (which needs only a GTX 1070 as opposed to the GTX 1080 needed to run 4K) with 100hz+ (ideally 144hz) with 1ms refresh.