Good for him! It's unlikely that such young children should show any negative signs of aging, but still...
All comments (23)
matedodgy
9 Oct 16#1
never again for aoc for me
Batch to matedodgy
9 Oct 16#2
Why?
A1M to matedodgy
9 Oct 16#6
I got a 17" AOC that I bought for over £300 over 10 years ago that's still in use by my dad. I paid the premium for the extra inches when 15" flat screens weren't even main stream yet.
haritori to matedodgy
10 Oct 16#10
Both my boys have AOC monitors one is 3 years old now, still looks fantastic.
hitman007
9 Oct 161#3
FreeSync Range 40-60Hz
gta15
9 Oct 16#4
This not the usual price for this?
farazfastian
9 Oct 16#5
usual is £300, and its the cheapest 4k monitor you can get with decent reviews!
I got an aoc 27" 1440p monitor last year and it is brilliant, cracking quality build too. hot!
ST30
10 Oct 16#9
Better to wait for 32inch to come down for 4k resolution. Too small with out scaling on 28inch monitor and scaling an issue with apps on Windows
siliconbits to ST30
10 Oct 16#12
Everything is subjective. I am using that very monitor on 100% (not 125%) and I can live with it. Others - including some of my younger colleagues - can't.
The_Hoff
10 Oct 16#11
Unless you need this for workspace (editing) reasons, just grab a decent 1440p monitor.
farazfastian
10 Oct 16#13
is there a decent 4k 27 monitor under £300? No! so this should be hot!
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
VGA, DVI, HDMI, DisplayPort
1ms Response Time
Flicker Free
FreeSync Technology
Top comments
All comments (23)