Lowest price from Amazon for a great card, which doesn't run hot :smiley:
Top comments
cartsp to Panda221
31 Aug 164#18
lol
All comments (53)
catbeans
30 Aug 161#1
Usually dispatched in two to three weeks?
payday just a day away :disappointed:
KiretoX
30 Aug 16#2
Ordered... but i dont need it? Oh, well.
Szabster to KiretoX
30 Aug 16#3
What are the lead times quoted for delivery? My Asus 1060 was 18 of August to 15th of September.
7777777 to KiretoX
31 Aug 16#6
will comfort you, yes, you need it :smiley:
Nate1492
30 Aug 16#4
Would be nice if they were actually selling these rather than pre-order.
Price is coming back down, but stock isn't easy to find.
deanlfc
30 Aug 16#5
Great price, got mine for £209 and loving it.
absulute2012
31 Aug 16#7
Paid more than that for a Nitro+ 470
Hot
keepitonthelow
31 Aug 16#8
Good card but don't overlook the 970 still a good card can be had for £170
Coulomb_Barrier to keepitonthelow
31 Aug 162#39
Nope, check how the 970 performs in new games like DOOM, Deus Ex or Warhammer. The 480 has a massive performance advantage and the 970 struggles to offer decent framerates. I wouldn't recommend the 970 in 2016. It's old and is getting fast left behind by Nvidia. I would recommend a 470 over a 970 too.
KiretoX
31 Aug 161#9
Thank you for the support :smile: I almost dont play games, but that doesn't matter, right? I will at least appreciate the full sized displayport.
hessy1984
31 Aug 16#10
im looking to build a gaming PC, where does it lie in spec and what are you using it with?
wolfy001
31 Aug 161#11
I have a msi r9 390 is this any better?
rev6 to wolfy001
31 Aug 16#12
Not really.
Panda221
31 Aug 16#13
970 all day over this !
cartsp to Panda221
31 Aug 164#18
lol
garybb to Panda221
31 Aug 16#40
Agreed not much point upgrading to either a rx 470/480 over a GTX 970. Considering you can get a 970 for £140 the performance isn't worth it.
ProjectChaos
31 Aug 16#14
Excellent deal, nice one OP!
MT_128
31 Aug 16#15
Thank you. I'd been wanting one of these (for the right price) :smiley:
ProjectChaos
31 Aug 16#16
Also the memory (at users own risk) can unlock to 8gb :smiley:
deanlfc to ProjectChaos
31 Aug 16#17
Not with this you can't, that was only reference models.
ProjectChaos
31 Aug 16#19
Well it all depends whether or not it has the 8 samsung memory chips on the board, if it has then happy days :smiley: This will of course invalidate your warranty!
deanlfc
31 Aug 16#20
No custom cards can be flashed to 8GB, it's just reference ones.
ProjectChaos
31 Aug 16#21
Custom? You mean Retail? And I beg to differ.
deanlfc
31 Aug 161#22
I mean custom as in not reference design like the Nitro+ isn't. Reference RX480s look like this. If these have the Samsung Ram then it is probably flashable to 8GB.
You can beg to differ all you want but can you link me to one example of someone flashing a 4GB custom card (so it doesn't look like the picture I linked) to 8GB?
Don't buy this card if you expect to be able to flash it to 8GB, it won't work.
GAVINLEWISHUKD
31 Aug 161#23
+1
GPU-Z screenshot from the very card. It uses SK Hynix chips.
Just Wondering
31 Aug 16#24
I guess they haven't read reviews and studied the benchmark results.
Noclouds
31 Aug 16#25
Hopefully these will continue to drop in price with the run up to Christmas, especially with the introduction of the competing 3GB 1060 cards. The cheapest I can find the 8GB version of the RX 470 OC Nitro is £220, around £30 more. The cheapest I can find the MSI AMD Radeon RX 470 GAMING X is £217.The 8GB version of the RX 480 Nitro seems to be £260. I appreciate the advantage of the 8GB cards but I find it hard to reconcile the current price difference. Have some more heat.
Szabster to Noclouds
31 Aug 16#27
Agreed. If we wanna wait for these sort of dispatched within 1-2 months like my 1060 it's worth going for that instead. 6gb for 230 is OK. As much as I used to love my amd I'm not paying 250 for the 8gb card... 4gb is not that future proof anymore.
I have looked my self to get 2 of them for crossfire - on paper will look very good 2 x card some games scales very well but the issues is drivers and studering etc ... This what holds me to get AMD cards Thinking to leave AMD got to NVIDIA
Thinking maybe
2 x GTX 980 for £250 x 2 but then you can get GTX 1080
2 x GTX 970 4GB for £170 x 2 But then GTX 1070 for same money
I have PS4 and old crossfire HD 7970 and day to day Im more happy to play on PS4
Yes PS4 up scaling everything to 1080 p maybe 30 fps + but games experience PS4 I think for the price is very good
Now next year xbox scorpio "4K" coming + PS 4.5 as well so does it worth to buy 2 x RX 480 ??? for nearly £400 pounds ?
HD 7970 the GPU is very powerful the problem is ram only 3GB it cannt do ultra high details on 2k
Maybe will stay on PS4 as steam games can not be traded like PS4
+ next Year PS4 can be traded to xbox scorpio etc ..... So I can get some money back .
What I mean PS4 better for money value Games can traded , and bought second hand
Asunai
31 Aug 16#31
I have currently a HD7970, is this or the 8gb rx worth upfrading to?
Rhythm to Asunai
31 Aug 161#33
Performance on both is largely the same, although 8GB has a very slight edge. However, as Digital Foundry and many other places have pointed out, 8gb doesn't really make a lot of sense for this card. 8gb gives it the memory needed for 1440p and 4k, but the speed of the card isn't really suitably matched to those resolutions. This is a 2K (1080p) card
Advice from most buying sites has been to avoid the 8gb card unless you have very specific requirements
BritishDragon
31 Aug 16#32
Just doing a build atm. Going to have Core i5-6500 3.2GHz. I had budgeted for GFX at £250 or thereabouts but now wondering if I should get this card & spend the saving on a bigger SSD, or maybe a Kraken watercooler (I won't be OC the cpu - it's just that I find air coolers rather cumbersome & ugly). Had I intended to OC I would be going for the 6600K chip instead.
Any thoughts? More expensive GFX card or spend elsewhere?
bigmanpackerfan to BritishDragon
31 Aug 16#34
I would personally put the extra money towards a better GPU. Maybe a 1060?
Rhythm to BritishDragon
31 Aug 16#35
If you're gaming at 1080p then this or even a 470 would suffice. If you're ever looking at going higher res then pick a different card, but bear in mind cards with any future in 1440p or 4k are £350 up as you need to be looking at a 1070 or higher
ctcs95
31 Aug 16#36
Damn too late ! it's up to £223.20 + £5.28 delivery :disappointed:
Gkains to ctcs95
31 Aug 16#38
That's from Scan. Amazon themselves has gone up but 'only' to £209.99. Which is still £22+ more making this not so great value. So that unless also planing to get a variable sync monitor (since FreeSync is way cheaper than GSync), the 6GB GTX1060 might a better bet.
Gkains
31 Aug 161#37
The 1060 isn't a better GPU really. The thing to do is to avoid the GTX 1060 3GB which is not only slower (less shaders) but 3GB is really pushing it already in 2016 and will probably age poorly.
Both this and the 1060 perform about the same. Certainly no more than ±10% unless in some game which heavily favours one architecture or the other (Doom running Vulkan for AMD, or similar outliners which favour Nvidia). Actually, Computebase.de recently did a custom 480 vs custom 1060 and the average was 5% in favour of the GTX1060. Since the GTX1060 3GB is best avoided, and dual fan* 6GB versions are ~ £240+ this is good value.
* dual fan is a bit less relevant for the GTX1060 since it does use about 40W less power, but the cheaper single fan GTX1060 look a bit too cheaply made to me.
MitchellT
31 Aug 16#41
Back up to £209.99
AtomicTurban
31 Aug 16#42
would this be a good upgrade from a GTX 750ti 2gb - playing games at 1080p ?
Thanks.
Coulomb_Barrier
31 Aug 162#43
The 970 won't see you out at the highest settings for the next year, even at the best case scenario. So you'd be spending £140 on a card with 3.5GB memory and offering poor performance at high settings with the latest games:
And that's in DX11 mode, where the 970 used to excel. It can't take advantage of any perf advantages in DX12 or Vulkan either.
So if I'm spending £140 (it's still £140, fair bit of money for an old card) you may as well spend another £40-50 for a 4GB 480 that will last you a couple years. Getting a 970 now is not the best advice unless you only do light gaming.
Incognitoso
31 Aug 16#44
Just advice if you you want to save money just get PS4 with 1TB or 500GB and replace HDD to 1-2 TB
Now for PC gaming you need to buy GPU by your monitor resolution
if you have 1080p monitor why waste money on 100 fps graphic card if you can see only 60fps anyway this is 60Hz monitor refresh rate as well
If you can run your games native res monitor with your GPU at 60fps average frame rate this I think the best experience
So most of you will have 1080p monitors and 60 Hz Why you want GPU 200 fps + just for ...?
Now 4K gaming is for rich children or if you have lot of money and do not know where to spend
catbeans to Incognitoso
31 Aug 16#50
Just advice, if you want to save money don't buy a PS4, go buy cup and ball, maybe down the line replace your handle with a nice laminated oak one and your string with a braided cord. Cup and ball the fun never ends.
Seriously though ps4 doesn't play games at 1080p 60fps anymore, let alone at the settings this card will. Why buy a card that can do 100fps for a 60fps monitor? Because in three or four years time on ultra/high setting in triple AAA games that will translate to around 60fps
BritishDragon
31 Aug 161#45
I've had a flubit price offered at £183.92 delivered. I'm thinking I'll be having it at that.
I'll be playing stuff like fallout 4 & witcher 3 on a 24 or 27" 1080 monitor
derp1664
31 Aug 161#46
I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying just that showing that particular benchmark on the topic of nvid vs amd is a little biased as that game was built using a modified Glacier 2 engine which heavily favours amd cards. Just sayin
BritishDragon
31 Aug 16#47
I've noticed in the amazon spec it's rated at 500W
I've got the EVGA 650 GQ power supply. Will I have any problems? It'll be a core i5-6500, Samsung 850 SSD, 2TB HDD, DVD re-writer, card reader, & a few fans/led's
deanlfc to BritishDragon
31 Aug 161#48
Be fine with that, I have this card, a 6600k and at 650W power supply and it works great.
BetaRomeo
31 Aug 16#49
Well, I don't think the 970 used to excel in DX11 mode in AMD-sponsored games, did it? Or did you not know DX:MD was AMD-sponsored?
I don't mean to be picky, but given the fact that Nvidia's memory management is more efficient than AMD's, surely you'd have to agree that 3.5GB of full-speed VRAM on a 970 is roughly equivalent to 4GB on a 470 or 480? Or had you also not come across the differences in their memory allocation before?
As a result, there's no real advantage in choosing the 4GB 480 in real-world VRAM usage. They have similar performance in games, the 480 often has an advantage in most DX12 titles but also consumes more power, and is about 20-30% slower in SteamOS or Linux. If there's such a thing as a £140 970, then I can absolutely see why someone would take that over a £185 4GB 480 - similar performance and broader compatibility and a 25% price saving.
I haven't seen this fabled £140 970, though. So I like the 4GB 480, albeit at closer to £150 (a bit like this), where seeing it start to be handicapped by its memory next year would be much easier to swallow for the price. At a whisker off £200, though? Not good value. That's where the 8GB 480 should be.
Asunai
31 Aug 16#51
Thanks! :smiley: I'll try to hold out abit longer with mine, it has been randomly stopping lately in game. Apart from that i have bern quite satisfied although its getting old..
RyanBest
31 Aug 16#52
PS 4.5, now i've heard it all.
craigtumilty
13 Nov 16#53
the comments on here about waiting a few months until these drop further. because of the drop in the pound these have gone up by £30!
Opening post
Top comments
All comments (53)
payday just a day away :disappointed:
Price is coming back down, but stock isn't easy to find.
Hot
You can beg to differ all you want but can you link me to one example of someone flashing a 4GB custom card (so it doesn't look like the picture I linked) to 8GB?
Don't buy this card if you expect to be able to flash it to 8GB, it won't work.
GPU-Z screenshot from the very card. It uses SK Hynix chips.
http://www.hardwareunboxed.com/gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-in-6-year-old-amd-and-intel-computers/
I have looked my self to get 2 of them for crossfire - on paper will look very good 2 x card some games scales very well but the issues is drivers and studering etc ... This what holds me to get AMD cards Thinking to leave AMD got to NVIDIA
Thinking maybe
2 x GTX 980 for £250 x 2 but then you can get GTX 1080
2 x GTX 970 4GB for £170 x 2 But then GTX 1070 for same money
I have PS4 and old crossfire HD 7970 and day to day Im more happy to play on PS4
Yes PS4 up scaling everything to 1080 p maybe 30 fps + but games experience PS4 I think for the price is very good
Now next year xbox scorpio "4K" coming + PS 4.5 as well so does it worth to buy 2 x RX 480 ??? for nearly £400 pounds ?
HD 7970 the GPU is very powerful the problem is ram only 3GB it cannt do ultra high details on 2k
Maybe will stay on PS4 as steam games can not be traded like PS4
+ next Year PS4 can be traded to xbox scorpio etc ..... So I can get some money back .
What I mean PS4 better for money value Games can traded , and bought second hand
Advice from most buying sites has been to avoid the 8gb card unless you have very specific requirements
Any thoughts? More expensive GFX card or spend elsewhere?
Both this and the 1060 perform about the same. Certainly no more than ±10% unless in some game which heavily favours one architecture or the other (Doom running Vulkan for AMD, or similar outliners which favour Nvidia). Actually, Computebase.de recently did a custom 480 vs custom 1060 and the average was 5% in favour of the GTX1060. Since the GTX1060 3GB is best avoided, and dual fan* 6GB versions are ~ £240+ this is good value.
* dual fan is a bit less relevant for the GTX1060 since it does use about 40W less power, but the cheaper single fan GTX1060 look a bit too cheaply made to me.
Thanks.
And that's in DX11 mode, where the 970 used to excel. It can't take advantage of any perf advantages in DX12 or Vulkan either.
So if I'm spending £140 (it's still £140, fair bit of money for an old card) you may as well spend another £40-50 for a 4GB 480 that will last you a couple years. Getting a 970 now is not the best advice unless you only do light gaming.
Now for PC gaming you need to buy GPU by your monitor resolution
if you have 1080p monitor why waste money on 100 fps graphic card if you can see only 60fps anyway this is 60Hz monitor refresh rate as well
If you can run your games native res monitor with your GPU at 60fps average frame rate this I think the best experience
So most of you will have 1080p monitors and 60 Hz Why you want GPU 200 fps + just for ...?
Now 4K gaming is for rich children or if you have lot of money and do not know where to spend
Seriously though ps4 doesn't play games at 1080p 60fps anymore, let alone at the settings this card will. Why buy a card that can do 100fps for a 60fps monitor? Because in three or four years time on ultra/high setting in triple AAA games that will translate to around 60fps
I'll be playing stuff like fallout 4 & witcher 3 on a 24 or 27" 1080 monitor
I've got the EVGA 650 GQ power supply. Will I have any problems? It'll be a core i5-6500, Samsung 850 SSD, 2TB HDD, DVD re-writer, card reader, & a few fans/led's
Eh? Wouldn't that be game-specific, depending on the DX11 bottleneck? Otherwise, how did the 970 get a ~25%+ performance boost from the DX12 patch for Total Warhammer? http://www.pcgamer.com/total-war-warhammer-benchmarks-strike-fear-into-cpus/
I don't mean to be picky, but given the fact that Nvidia's memory management is more efficient than AMD's, surely you'd have to agree that 3.5GB of full-speed VRAM on a 970 is roughly equivalent to 4GB on a 470 or 480? Or had you also not come across the differences in their memory allocation before?
As a result, there's no real advantage in choosing the 4GB 480 in real-world VRAM usage. They have similar performance in games, the 480 often has an advantage in most DX12 titles but also consumes more power, and is about 20-30% slower in SteamOS or Linux. If there's such a thing as a £140 970, then I can absolutely see why someone would take that over a £185 4GB 480 - similar performance and broader compatibility and a 25% price saving.
I haven't seen this fabled £140 970, though. So I like the 4GB 480, albeit at closer to £150 (a bit like this), where seeing it start to be handicapped by its memory next year would be much easier to swallow for the price. At a whisker off £200, though? Not good value. That's where the 8GB 480 should be.