even tho I have one from before (same price if I remember...ah "£47.49" that was the price I got it for)
This can go into my phone!
plewis00
23 Jul 16#5
It's because 256GB is on the horizon, though this is a good price and not far off the current £/GB price of the 64 and 128 cards - I've found I'm nowhere near filling my 128 still though!
waynester21
23 Jul 16#6
I need one of these. I also need £60 :smiley:
Guy_With_Beard
23 Jul 16#7
Too small.
captainbeaky to Guy_With_Beard
23 Jul 165#8
Buy a magnifying glass .... & have a shave.
mikerr
23 Jul 162#9
Wonder why it's 200GB, not the normal 256 ?
Maybe wait for it to drop a tenner again:
drnkbeer to mikerr
23 Jul 16#12
I think there was a production issue in that at the time of production fitting 256gb on a chip was seemingly impossible, it's amazing they've fit 200GB on it. Cracking price too.
Just read up and apparently.
"the reason this card is 200gb, and not 256gb, is simply that the control circuitry used in microsd cards is still too large to allow for more than 200gb of flash memory cells"
ally8971
23 Jul 16#10
Same price at Argos... The 256gb one will be an insane price when it becomes available.
harveybq
23 Jul 16#11
all I can say is their must be some profit in these memory cards for the makers.
aceuk
23 Jul 162#13
Only double the price (so not that insane)... :laughing:
I am looking forward to devices that use Samsung's new UFS cards which make all microSD cards look sluggish with read/write speeds of 530MB/s and 170MB/s respectively. :smile:
aceuk
23 Jul 161#14
Not any more. See above.
davetherave00
23 Jul 16#15
And I'm guessing Sandisk also realised they can make a lot more money by introducing the 200gb version, instead of going straight from 128gb to 256gb.
drnkbeer
23 Jul 16#16
Indeed I saw, why I said at the time of production. I'm surprised we haven't had a comment about "imagine losing X amount of data" yet ha
Dave_1973
23 Jul 161#17
Heat, even though I got it for £49.99 at the beginning of June (sold direct by Amazon, not market place), going great in my S7
ally8971
23 Jul 16#18
It makes no sense to pay double the price for an increase of only 56GB from 200GB.
plewis00
24 Jul 16#19
That's your opinion. Phones only have one slot, so you won't bother carrying multiple cards and risk losing them, you'll just have one big card and pay for the premium.
ally8971
24 Jul 16#20
I think the "premium" you alude to is a rip off. Maybe if the card was 320GB they could justify asking double the price. As it is the card is worth another £20 tops.
Edit
having llooked further, the 256GB Card you linked to http://www.play-asia.com%2Fsamsung-microsdxc-evo-plus-256gb-uhs-i-u3class-10%2F13%2F70a5g5
a much higher speced UHS U3 one with much better write speeds than this deal so it may be with it after all!
Kafeen
24 Jul 16#21
200 GB Micro SD and some mobile phone are still limiting their devices to 16 GB with no expansion available. Makes you wonder why.
Opening post
Top comments
All comments (21)
even tho I have one from before (same price if I remember...ah "£47.49" that was the price I got it for)
This can go into my phone!
Maybe wait for it to drop a tenner again:
Just read up and apparently.
"the reason this card is 200gb, and not 256gb, is simply that the control circuitry used in microsd cards is still too large to allow for more than 200gb of flash memory cells"
http://www.play-asia.com/samsung-microsdxc-evo-plus-256gb-uhs-i-u3class-10/13/70a5g5
SanDisk's 256GB microSD cards will be a lot cheaper.
http://blog.mymemory.co.uk/256gb-sandisk-microsd/
I am looking forward to devices that use Samsung's new UFS cards which make all microSD cards look sluggish with read/write speeds of 530MB/s and 170MB/s respectively. :smile:
Edit
having llooked further, the 256GB Card you linked to http://www.play-asia.com%2Fsamsung-microsdxc-evo-plus-256gb-uhs-i-u3class-10%2F13%2F70a5g5
a much higher speced UHS U3 one with much better write speeds than this deal so it may be with it after all!