refurbs via lg 30 day return 1 year return to base warranty poss 4.4% tcb
Top comments
kay1992
30 May 169#4
Waiting for the 4k, hdr, vestel police... :man:
loadsavmoney
31 May 164#9
i've been waiting years for OLED because of the problems we get with LCD so a bit longer won't hurt
I understand where you're coming from but i don't want a comprimise, i want the full shebang
Someone shared this gif here a few weeks ago, i haven't looked at the LG logo the same since :laughing:
marathonic
31 May 163#27
And, like with HD, Sky won't likely broadcast in full 4K quality. If you compare a movie watched in Sky HD to one on Blu-Ray which, in theory, should be of the same quality, you'll see the impact of poor compression on Sky broadcasts.
Just think, a Sky Q Silver Bundle has an 18-month contract at £71 per month if you include Sky Movies. I'm guessing the average price over 18-months will be closer to £85 p/m when you include inevitable price rises and the additional cost of 4K when released.
With a Netflix 4K subscription costing £9 p/m, the additional cost of Sky over Netflix would be £1,368 over 18 months - more than enough to cover a 4K blu-ray player and 4 discs per month.
One option leaves you with nothing if you choose to cancel at the end of 18 months. The other leaves you with a 4K bluray player and a collection of over 70 movies.
marathonic
31 May 163#8
The problem with technology is that there's always something better around the corner.
If you decide to wait for the latest and greatest you've read about, you'll never buy anything.
Therefore, you can't wait for the latest and greatest - at some point you just need to decide that current technology represents enough of advancement over your current technology to make the outlay worthwhile. For a lot of people, an £899 outlay means that the jump from LCD/LED is very worthwhile.
All comments (45)
cleverguy12
30 May 16#1
looks like a great price!
loadsavmoney
30 May 161#2
so is it a flat panel again now it's been refurbished? :laughing:
i'm STILL waiting for direct-emission OLED TVs :smirk: i read samsung haven't given up, they've just been delayed
EDT:for those who don't know:
direct-emission OLEDs do not use a filter, LG use WRGB (White-OLED with color filters, or WOLED-CF)
noiren
30 May 162#3
The LG 950 version looks so good every time I got into Currys wish it was 70" and more importantly I had the money for it :smiley:
kay1992
30 May 169#4
Waiting for the 4k, hdr, vestel police... :man:
shahidali47
30 May 162#5
non 4k with 100ms input lag
LukeStone
30 May 162#6
HDR comments incoming :smirk:
addyb
30 May 16#7
The 910 is £999 from the same supplier as well.
ben141 to addyb
31 May 16#12
What's the difference between the 930 and 910?
marathonic
31 May 163#8
The problem with technology is that there's always something better around the corner.
If you decide to wait for the latest and greatest you've read about, you'll never buy anything.
Therefore, you can't wait for the latest and greatest - at some point you just need to decide that current technology represents enough of advancement over your current technology to make the outlay worthwhile. For a lot of people, an £899 outlay means that the jump from LCD/LED is very worthwhile.
Opening post
Top comments
I understand where you're coming from but i don't want a comprimise, i want the full shebang
Someone shared this gif here a few weeks ago, i haven't looked at the LG logo the same since :laughing:
Just think, a Sky Q Silver Bundle has an 18-month contract at £71 per month if you include Sky Movies. I'm guessing the average price over 18-months will be closer to £85 p/m when you include inevitable price rises and the additional cost of 4K when released.
With a Netflix 4K subscription costing £9 p/m, the additional cost of Sky over Netflix would be £1,368 over 18 months - more than enough to cover a 4K blu-ray player and 4 discs per month.
One option leaves you with nothing if you choose to cancel at the end of 18 months. The other leaves you with a 4K bluray player and a collection of over 70 movies.
If you decide to wait for the latest and greatest you've read about, you'll never buy anything.
Therefore, you can't wait for the latest and greatest - at some point you just need to decide that current technology represents enough of advancement over your current technology to make the outlay worthwhile. For a lot of people, an £899 outlay means that the jump from LCD/LED is very worthwhile.
All comments (45)
i'm STILL waiting for direct-emission OLED TVs :smirk: i read samsung haven't given up, they've just been delayed
EDT:for those who don't know:
direct-emission OLEDs do not use a filter, LG use WRGB (White-OLED with color filters, or WOLED-CF)
If you decide to wait for the latest and greatest you've read about, you'll never buy anything.
Therefore, you can't wait for the latest and greatest - at some point you just need to decide that current technology represents enough of advancement over your current technology to make the outlay worthwhile. For a lot of people, an £899 outlay means that the jump from LCD/LED is very worthwhile.