Philips 49 Inch 4K Ultra HD Freeview HD TV for only
£329!
Top comments
bemaniac
27 Apr 1615#14
Why bother making cheap screens with crap angles, bulky surrounds, terrible processing, awful upscaling, fake brand naming, 4k but not good enough for 4k BR, dirty screen effect on horizontal and stripes on vertical panning. Jesus you might as well put the money down as a deposit on something good. Also 1080p looks bad on this. I returned mine.
sdutton007
28 Apr 164#38
It's a lot smaller, a lot more expensive and it does a lot less... what's your definition of "better" ?
Hartlepool
27 Apr 164#15
avoid this pile of dog poo at all costs you have been warned
djhazardous
27 Apr 164#27
I don't see the point in buying a 4KTV yet for a number of reasons:
1. All TV providers like Sky/FreeviewHD are still all running 720p/1080i streams
2. There's not alot of content, only streaming services like Netflix/Amazon Prime
3. By the time 4K gets bigger, due to 4K Blu-rays releasing the technology will get better and cheaper.
Latest comments (69)
Rellika
14 May 16#69
No nothing like that at all, I'm still loving mine with no issues. I'd take it back if that's what you're seeing (maybe to another branch as these things are usually shipped in batches) :wink:
LuFc6686
11 May 16#68
Just got one I can see vertical faint lines on it in bright areas. Any of yours?
marklonsdale
30 Apr 16#67
I got this in store at 349.99 and can't recommend it enough. Just make sure you follow update process carefully by downloading the correct file from the Philips site and extract it to the root directory of a USB drive, pop it in the back of the TV and switch on and it will automatically detect the update and give on screen instructions. Once TV reboots just adjust the sound and picture settings to your liking. The whole process takes less than 10 minutes. I just use a tutor watching TV and have no idea how it performs as a gaming screen and what any of the other technical specs are for the 4k screen, all I know of it looks perfectly fine to me and betterquality than my previous 1080p screen.
mivanpy
29 Apr 16#66
If it's just a TV then just get a cheaper 720p set. Why get this!
gjgbarclay
28 Apr 161#65
Yes, the EPG comes through the aerial, there are a couple of channels in it that are broadcast via the Internet. Not sure of top of my head, in the 200's I think.
sdutton007
28 Apr 16#64
I had a Freeview HD TV about 6 years ago. I'm sure it had an EPG without an internet connection?
TheDon31
28 Apr 16#63
I'm amazed u found it good. I bought the 43" and took it back within 3 days. Really poor SD picture IMO
conorcasey8
28 Apr 16#62
Bought the 55" version of this, this morning. It all seems good to me, haven't tried any native 4K stuff yet but after a bit of adjusting my PS4 games are looking good as is my Netflix etc. Think people are forgetting just how cheap these actually are. £439 for a 55" 4K TV, ludicrous value for money unless you want to have the best of the best. End of the day it's a TV
The wifi dongle is purely to update the freeview channels and for an epg, thats it. No other smart functions. It also wont work out of the box, you need a firmware update, which you need to manually download and put on a usb to get it updated.
Markgranto
28 Apr 16#59
bought it for £350 the day ebay did the 20% off voucher. All i wanted was a tv that had a decent panel, not interested in the sound function or any smart addons as have that already. Picked it up, home and got it out of the box and noticed just how cheap and bulky it looked. Pretty much as soon as i turned it on noticed the screen had banding on it. Back int he box and got a replacement. Home, same issues. Even at that the display was pretty poor quality. Decided to cut my losses and got something else. Woman in argos mentioned that a few people had brought them back. You get what you pay for I suppose.
gjgbarclay
28 Apr 161#58
Nope, for freeview channels in the EPG that are delivered via internet.
It has seperate dongle that allows you to connect to your router, not sure why if it doesn't have Smart Apps etc?
captain_cab
28 Apr 16#54
Yes its cheap but for a reason. Do your own research as people want different things. I don't believe this even has wifi.
sausager_
28 Apr 161#53
I agree. I'm waiting for a 4K OLED to become affordable in a few years. Until then I'm sure my 1080p plasma gives superior picture quality to these budget 4K screens people are getting suckered in by.
ST3123
28 Apr 162#52
they are becoming the standard maybe but I wouldn't choose one TV over another for Smart features, which can be added to any TV for the price of a £10 Now TV box, if your existing equipment doesn't already provide a far better experience e.g. any current gen or even last gen games console will provide a better range of apps and performance than the limited selection on most Smart TVs.
To me Smart TV is a gimmick to get the average consumer to think the TV with the Smart features offers something over the one without, when in reality it offers very little and you would probably be better off with the none smart one because the money might have gone towards important features like quality of the panel you actually watch rather than pointless bells and whistles....
bellboys
28 Apr 162#51
Given the fact it has a much smaller screen and costs 220 quid more it should be better don't you think? :stuck_out_tongue: It's akin to posting a link to a BMW 5 series on a Ford Focus thread. In other words, pretty unhelpful.
biuro74
28 Apr 16#50
I will never buy UltraHD TV until the are "full" UltraHD, which means motion resolution = 2160 lines. Soap opera effect (SOE) is not what I want paying plenty of money, sorry... Now TVs insert black frames or do interpolation, but it's still not enough... ridiculous if majority of TVs have motion-resolution BELOW (!!!) FullHD (1080p) standard, like 900 lines or so. They will not make me a "simpel" money-donor for FullHD-like TV and picture-frame-UltraHD in one.
I was wishing it was OLED :disappointed: Which of us had the biggest wish win?
mtc1
28 Apr 16#46
I'm using the 43" version as my pc monitor and for me it's perfect. It looks every bit as good as the 28" monitors it replaced and picture quality in 4K is fantastic. I haven't experienced any of the issues others have mentioned. As for the it's not proper 4K ??? 4K is the resolution, HDR is High Dynamic Range - nothing to do with resolution.
rasdonny
28 Apr 16#45
smart TVs are the way to go nowadays really :smiley:
chaz_187
28 Apr 16#44
really considering this
cameronmlewis
28 Apr 161#43
Not everyone can afford a better one, it's a good price for what you get!
Bigfootpete
28 Apr 16#42
That's what I thought when I bought a Digihome 40" screen years ago - it was dirt cheap, and once I got it, I realised that I'd thrown my money down the drain, you need to see it first before you buy.
barryallott
28 Apr 16#41
Thats what She said
KopCity
28 Apr 16#40
Maybe your TV was just plain cr*p? a TV is a TV..can't be that bad!
checkley73
28 Apr 16#39
Size isn't everything !
sdutton007
28 Apr 164#38
It's a lot smaller, a lot more expensive and it does a lot less... what's your definition of "better" ?
Just get this it's much better, no one watches TV any more through an ariel any ways.
deeky
28 Apr 162#36
It doesn't matter how much you like it, you won't get your hands on one unless you buy one from Europe. I was on the phone only yesterday asking why you can't get their high-end TVs in this country. She said the only place that stocks them in UK is Euronics. Called Euronics and they said they know nothing about it :laughing:
sdutton007
27 Apr 161#35
What do you mean by not "real 4K" ? I thought all 4K TVs had the same resolution (which is significantly lower than 4K).
Rellika
27 Apr 161#34
I bought this and love it, upscaling is fine and comes down to what's being upscaled... PS4 and XBOX One look amazing, 4k media player is blindingly good, normal tv (non hd) fine, hd brilliant. Picture is darker in Eco mode (no surprise there) switch to Movie mode for vivid pictures. Paid £379.99 for mine and not a regret so far. Also have a Samsung curved and UHD Sony so not a case of not knowing any better :stuck_out_tongue:
revua
27 Apr 16#33
But how much do they cost? If they are the same price then great but as with all technology it probably double the price and as I find the 43" picture on this excellent I would be amazed if HDR made that much of a difference. I've just looked up HDR is anyone is interested http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/hdr-tv-high-dynamic-television-explained
Maybe I have different eyes to others but most days I look at my TV and think isn't that picture excellent :-) so I would suggest others try this for themselves and return if its not up to their quality before judging some of the views on here.
revua
27 Apr 16#32
I cant believe that you think the TV picture is shocking unless you had a broken TV. I have had many TV's over the years and currently have a Samsung and LG 32" Full HD in other rooms and the picture quality of the 43" Philips is definitely the best of all three whatever the input. I was worried when I purchased it due to other comments on here and I was looking for faults as I would have returned it if I found any but I cant fault the 43" version one bit.
revua
27 Apr 16#31
I purchased the 43" and its an excellent TV for the money, image quality is excellent imo. My wife and I often comment on the quality of the picture on normal TV and with HD channels its excellent so maybe you see something I don't or there are different batches of screens.
cameronmlewis
27 Apr 16#30
free fast track collection in store
toner84
27 Apr 16#29
£3.95 delivery....
garethcollins925
27 Apr 16#28
But if u return it, surely u must also return the voucher if u get a refund? :smirk:
djhazardous
27 Apr 164#27
I don't see the point in buying a 4KTV yet for a number of reasons:
1. All TV providers like Sky/FreeviewHD are still all running 720p/1080i streams
2. There's not alot of content, only streaming services like Netflix/Amazon Prime
3. By the time 4K gets bigger, due to 4K Blu-rays releasing the technology will get better and cheaper.
motionwerk
27 Apr 16#26
Please, do not buy it directly from a store. Pay for it online, and pick up in a store. This way you can return it if unhappy without problems - believe me this is crap TV. Saying this, price is quite shocking (like a picture). Secondly you still can collect a voucher.
garethcollins925
27 Apr 16#25
Yh your right, I think the time frame is 30 days.
mivanpy
27 Apr 161#24
But what do you really think?
stephen0205
27 Apr 16#23
just watch with the voucher sometimes you gotta spend within a time frame
venu44
27 Apr 16#22
It's not a good set people. The 4K HDR protocol is only really on the marquee sets and this year's models. Your better going for the 2016 Hisense range if you want value for money.
stephen0205
27 Apr 16#21
not worth its salt
Evouk
27 Apr 162#16
The HDMI issue has apparently been fixed with a software update, but it's not a 'real' 4K tv.
stephen0205 to Evouk
27 Apr 16#20
all lies fixed for some not for others
Hartlepool
27 Apr 164#15
avoid this pile of dog poo at all costs you have been warned
stephen0205 to Hartlepool
27 Apr 16#19
agreed pure crap
bemaniac
27 Apr 1615#14
Why bother making cheap screens with crap angles, bulky surrounds, terrible processing, awful upscaling, fake brand naming, 4k but not good enough for 4k BR, dirty screen effect on horizontal and stripes on vertical panning. Jesus you might as well put the money down as a deposit on something good. Also 1080p looks bad on this. I returned mine.
stephen0205 to bemaniac
27 Apr 16#18
so many other folk had as well
beljim7419
27 Apr 162#17
I had the latest firmware and experienced hdmi issues, but only when manually pulling the hdmi cable out then putting back in. (no picture). Had to restart the device. Not a big deal and not many would need to do it.
It has a great picture in daylight use so if using as a compute monitor only its great. If you intend watching a lot of Movies/TV on it unfortunately the Black levels are poor in low lighting which is why mine got sent back and i expect the reason this model has dropped in price a lot recently. Myself and many others returning i mean.
It had poor angles too. It Had a yellowish tint in the top right and left corner at not lo large an angle. Again only really visable in low lighting.
nathan18k
27 Apr 16#13
Heat!!
stephen0205
27 Apr 162#12
**** TV so many come back to be sent back as a damaged item. poor pannel quality , flickering , HDMI issues you name it
castaway666
27 Apr 162#11
Non Smart but with that price , you can pick up a fire stick etc.. Cheap enough or even plug into a console/PC for the features. Heat added.
garethcollins925
27 Apr 16#10
Better to go straight to Argos to get this and claim a free £10 voucher in process, a lot of stores have it in stock to take home straight away :smile:
Snakeyes646
27 Apr 161#1
Wish it was amberlight!
MBeeching to Snakeyes646
27 Apr 162#9
An amberlight would drive me crazy :stuck_out_tongue:
I like the sound of the AmbiLux feature on their new sets though. Could be a while until we see those going for £329 though.
Opening post
£329!
Top comments
1. All TV providers like Sky/FreeviewHD are still all running 720p/1080i streams
2. There's not alot of content, only streaming services like Netflix/Amazon Prime
3. By the time 4K gets bigger, due to 4K Blu-rays releasing the technology will get better and cheaper.
Latest comments (69)
I had a Freeview HD TV about 6 years ago. I'm sure it had an EPG without an internet connection?
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/lg-49lf590v-49-inch-full-hd-freeview-hd-smart-tv-argos-399-00-2296970?page=2#comments
http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Search/searchTerm/3912339.htm?cmpid=AR867BDY02075TJ3&_$ja=tsid:11693|prd:|cat:AR867&ET_cid=5367215&ET_rid=5877423
To me Smart TV is a gimmick to get the average consumer to think the TV with the Smart features offers something over the one without, when in reality it offers very little and you would probably be better off with the none smart one because the money might have gone towards important features like quality of the panel you actually watch rather than pointless bells and whistles....
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/tx50cx700b-201506054122.htm
(search motion resolution)
http://www.cnet.com/news/why-ultra-hd-4k-tvs-are-still-stupid/
Haven't you heard of Freeview? Or are you one of the Sky users who gets he Sky basic package and pays for the same channels?!!
True, but where can you buy a 4K 49" PC / Laptop monitor for less than £2k that also
has tv features built in ;-)
>>>>>
Correct full philips manual for all who want to see the spec prior to buying it
at this silly, will be gone soon price, for a big 4K set!
http://docdro.id/qAoZKip
Just get this it's much better, no one watches TV any more through an ariel any ways.
Maybe I have different eyes to others but most days I look at my TV and think isn't that picture excellent :-) so I would suggest others try this for themselves and return if its not up to their quality before judging some of the views on here.
1. All TV providers like Sky/FreeviewHD are still all running 720p/1080i streams
2. There's not alot of content, only streaming services like Netflix/Amazon Prime
3. By the time 4K gets bigger, due to 4K Blu-rays releasing the technology will get better and cheaper.
It has a great picture in daylight use so if using as a compute monitor only its great. If you intend watching a lot of Movies/TV on it unfortunately the Black levels are poor in low lighting which is why mine got sent back and i expect the reason this model has dropped in price a lot recently. Myself and many others returning i mean.
It had poor angles too. It Had a yellowish tint in the top right and left corner at not lo large an angle. Again only really visable in low lighting.
I like the sound of the AmbiLux feature on their new sets though. Could be a while until we see those going for £329 though.
http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/4489531.htm
No brainer, good brand too (I have a standard full HD Phillips)
Heat