Currently the cheapest pre-order for an amazing film on Blu-Ray
Top comments
pennyfarthing88
19 Mar 1612#1
Didn't enjoy the film much probably tarantino's worst' don't get me wrong it has its moments but overall poor.
Not voting just thought I'd give my quick review :smiley:
golfer2007
19 Mar 165#3
almost 3 hours long and it flew by - a wild west reservoir dogs
fishmaster to Houstieboy
20 Mar 163#25
Formulaic Tarantino:
1. Use the word N*&ger as many times as its irrelevant to do so
2. Violent - obviously
3. Male rape - definitely
4. Overly verbose dialog, you can imagine Tarantino dreaming like Rik in the Young Ones about his dialog, never ever as good as you imagined it to be Quentin!
5. Use the same actors you've worked with before in other films
6. Usually about 1 hour long than the film needs to be.
7. Have about 30 minutes in a film that is actually worth watching.
How can a director that did Pulp Fiction just amble on by for the rest of his career? It's happened to other directors I guess Orson Welles - Citizen Kane.
I think Tarantino got lucky with Pulp Fiction and he had help, a lot of help from Roger Avery.
Tarantino a massively over rated director and massively under productive, making films that are usually a massive waste of your time watching.
Watch The Revenant instead, excellent performances from Tom Hardy (better than Di Caprio who won an Oscar) and Di Caprio, a really violent film in context (in context!), set in a similar period with 70mm photography which is actually useful in the film unlike in Hateful Eight where they spend most of their time indoors.
I wonder if you can tell that I really disliked this hopeless effort of a film and that's 3 b'stard hours I wasted on this substandard effort from a director that hasn't really done anything worthwhile since Pulp Fiction over 20 years ago. CRAP! GRRR!
fuzzydunlop
19 Mar 163#5
Loved it personally, amazing perfomances (especially Goggins).
All comments (36)
pennyfarthing88
19 Mar 1612#1
Didn't enjoy the film much probably tarantino's worst' don't get me wrong it has its moments but overall poor.
Not voting just thought I'd give my quick review :smiley:
once_upon_a_tyne to pennyfarthing88
19 Mar 16#4
I'm a big fan of QT, but yeah - it's not his best. It's better than "Death Proof" and his part of "Four Rooms" though.
Franzkill to pennyfarthing88
20 Mar 161#28
Tarantino's worst!? So are we forgetting 'Deathproof' didn't exist? :stuck_out_tongue:
Tequila to pennyfarthing88
5 Apr 16#34
Watched it and really enjoyed it,much better than Dingo and Inglorious.I don't agree with you at all.
kb1921
19 Mar 16#2
Great film, heat from me :smiley:
golfer2007
19 Mar 165#3
almost 3 hours long and it flew by - a wild west reservoir dogs
cannycoyote to golfer2007
20 Mar 16#29
thats good to know. been put off watching it due to the run time..afraid ill fall asleep hehe. will have to give it a go tho if it flies by
fuzzydunlop
19 Mar 163#5
Loved it personally, amazing perfomances (especially Goggins).
tywyn
20 Mar 16#6
3 hours in one room. Very boring film.
DJ Mole
20 Mar 162#7
Not as good as his last 2 however still great and worth buying.
kawsar17 to DJ Mole
20 Mar 16#9
Definitely agree. One of his weakest films but still better than most films these days. I'd give it a 6.5 out of 10.
ohblobbything
20 Mar 16#8
Felt like the whole cinema was on edge throughout, full attention was given to what happens next. Not to mention hilarious, at times.
Tarantino is (still) a breath of fresh air.
Horrorwood
20 Mar 16#10
I enjoyed it, but I don't think its the kind of film I'd watch again.
cbatten
20 Mar 16#11
didn't even watch it all, found it boring tbh
aseddon130
20 Mar 16#12
Nowhere near as good as Django and Inglorious, nice throwback to Reservoir Dogs though, just WAAAAY too long.
Tarantino needs an editor.
dsuk
20 Mar 16#13
The guy is under the floorboards.
fishmaster
20 Mar 16#14
An absolutely dire film, so bad I never want to see anything this director does again.
koppyking
20 Mar 16#15
'you've gotta nail it shut' urghh. Tiresome.
loop
20 Mar 161#16
Amazing soundtrack - Morricone
condemmedman
20 Mar 16#17
I won't watch it again like I did with django and inglorious but the last 30 mins sort of made up for the wait
tom6195
20 Mar 16#18
I thought it was a good watch had me on edge every word waiting to see what happens next but in the broader sense yeah not as good as his previous 2 films.
Houstieboy
20 Mar 16#19
I made 3 attempts at watching this because of the good reviews. Eventually watched it all but bored the hell outta me.
fishmaster to Houstieboy
20 Mar 163#25
Formulaic Tarantino:
1. Use the word N*&ger as many times as its irrelevant to do so
2. Violent - obviously
3. Male rape - definitely
4. Overly verbose dialog, you can imagine Tarantino dreaming like Rik in the Young Ones about his dialog, never ever as good as you imagined it to be Quentin!
5. Use the same actors you've worked with before in other films
6. Usually about 1 hour long than the film needs to be.
7. Have about 30 minutes in a film that is actually worth watching.
How can a director that did Pulp Fiction just amble on by for the rest of his career? It's happened to other directors I guess Orson Welles - Citizen Kane.
I think Tarantino got lucky with Pulp Fiction and he had help, a lot of help from Roger Avery.
Tarantino a massively over rated director and massively under productive, making films that are usually a massive waste of your time watching.
Watch The Revenant instead, excellent performances from Tom Hardy (better than Di Caprio who won an Oscar) and Di Caprio, a really violent film in context (in context!), set in a similar period with 70mm photography which is actually useful in the film unlike in Hateful Eight where they spend most of their time indoors.
I wonder if you can tell that I really disliked this hopeless effort of a film and that's 3 b'stard hours I wasted on this substandard effort from a director that hasn't really done anything worthwhile since Pulp Fiction over 20 years ago. CRAP! GRRR!
Jimmy67
20 Mar 163#20
a masterpiece, it flew by for me
utopiangames
20 Mar 16#21
Umm mixed reviews...undecided now :smiley:
centurion
20 Mar 16#22
watched yesterday. ok film. everyone dies. wouldnt watch again
rev6
20 Mar 161#23
Spoiler alert...
blue1971
20 Mar 16#24
Yeh a bit slow for me too,only enjoyed the last hour,wouldn't buy as it's only worth watching once.
rev6
20 Mar 16#26
You didn't enjoy Django Unchained or Inglorious Basterds?
fishmaster
20 Mar 161#27
Inglorious Basterds refer to point #7 which is the first 30 minutes. Django Unchained - Di Caprio totally miscast.
stockodeal
20 Mar 16#30
Great film
micky64
20 Mar 16#31
not that great a film
johnmcglinchey
21 Mar 16#32
Formulaic Taratino? So where was obligatory close up of a foot?
dannyjones106
23 Mar 16#33
I actually thought Di Caprio was much better in Django. For me, the Revenant was completely over hyped. Don't get me wrong, it was good - just not the way it was hyped up. I think his Oscar award makes people think it's better than it is. Anyway, back to voting deals not film reviews. Heat for this one!
Tequila
5 Apr 16#35
Thats really talking nonsense calling it the worst.
the movie is actually great and much better than his last 3 for sure.
TornadoShaun
4 May 16#36
I think if you have a slightly twisted sense of humour you will enjoy any Tarantino film.. Deathproof was decent if you ask me, it just had a rather unsatisfying ending. I love westerns and I am a bit of a Tarantino fan so will definately pick this up.
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Currently the cheapest pre-order for an amazing film on Blu-Ray
Top comments
Not voting just thought I'd give my quick review :smiley:
1. Use the word N*&ger as many times as its irrelevant to do so
2. Violent - obviously
3. Male rape - definitely
4. Overly verbose dialog, you can imagine Tarantino dreaming like Rik in the Young Ones about his dialog, never ever as good as you imagined it to be Quentin!
5. Use the same actors you've worked with before in other films
6. Usually about 1 hour long than the film needs to be.
7. Have about 30 minutes in a film that is actually worth watching.
How can a director that did Pulp Fiction just amble on by for the rest of his career? It's happened to other directors I guess Orson Welles - Citizen Kane.
I think Tarantino got lucky with Pulp Fiction and he had help, a lot of help from Roger Avery.
Tarantino a massively over rated director and massively under productive, making films that are usually a massive waste of your time watching.
Watch The Revenant instead, excellent performances from Tom Hardy (better than Di Caprio who won an Oscar) and Di Caprio, a really violent film in context (in context!), set in a similar period with 70mm photography which is actually useful in the film unlike in Hateful Eight where they spend most of their time indoors.
I wonder if you can tell that I really disliked this hopeless effort of a film and that's 3 b'stard hours I wasted on this substandard effort from a director that hasn't really done anything worthwhile since Pulp Fiction over 20 years ago. CRAP! GRRR!
All comments (36)
Not voting just thought I'd give my quick review :smiley:
Tarantino is (still) a breath of fresh air.
Tarantino needs an editor.
1. Use the word N*&ger as many times as its irrelevant to do so
2. Violent - obviously
3. Male rape - definitely
4. Overly verbose dialog, you can imagine Tarantino dreaming like Rik in the Young Ones about his dialog, never ever as good as you imagined it to be Quentin!
5. Use the same actors you've worked with before in other films
6. Usually about 1 hour long than the film needs to be.
7. Have about 30 minutes in a film that is actually worth watching.
How can a director that did Pulp Fiction just amble on by for the rest of his career? It's happened to other directors I guess Orson Welles - Citizen Kane.
I think Tarantino got lucky with Pulp Fiction and he had help, a lot of help from Roger Avery.
Tarantino a massively over rated director and massively under productive, making films that are usually a massive waste of your time watching.
Watch The Revenant instead, excellent performances from Tom Hardy (better than Di Caprio who won an Oscar) and Di Caprio, a really violent film in context (in context!), set in a similar period with 70mm photography which is actually useful in the film unlike in Hateful Eight where they spend most of their time indoors.
I wonder if you can tell that I really disliked this hopeless effort of a film and that's 3 b'stard hours I wasted on this substandard effort from a director that hasn't really done anything worthwhile since Pulp Fiction over 20 years ago. CRAP! GRRR!
the movie is actually great and much better than his last 3 for sure.