I LOVE these movies, at just a fiver, they are well worth a buy!
Double bill of futuristic nightmare scenarios. Danny Boyle directs '28 Days Later' (2002), a look at what could happen after a viral attack. The virus is so deadly that within seconds the infected person is taken over by a murderous rage, permanently. After 28 days there is only a handful of non-infected survivors, but the virus is not the only thing they have to contend with... In the sequel, '28 Weeks Later' (2007), directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, it's six months later and the US military have managed to restore order in the population. Unfortunately, one of the returning refugees is carrying the virus, and it won't be long before a pandemic spreads.
All comments (16)
mercslkman
19 Feb 16#1
yes i agree these are good movies
P_Nappa
19 Feb 16#2
Ordered, have some heat.
jim_bob64
19 Feb 16#3
I thought Boyle directed both?
Franzkill to jim_bob64
19 Feb 16#4
Nah he just produced the sequel. Speaking of which is he still planning 28 Months later?
Lord vader
19 Feb 162#5
Great films but the HD is a bit redundent due to the way it was filmed. However, the extras are pretty decent and its both films so hot from me, just dont expect super HD quality.
Bobbite
19 Feb 16#6
I found this in HMV Edinburgh for £4 in the clearance basement, if anybody's looking for it
dappodan1
19 Feb 16#7
Best zombie movie, the fast infected changed the genre fit the better
Franzkill to dappodan1
19 Feb 16#8
Grr hate it when people call this a zombie film!
veyrox
19 Feb 16#9
It is a zombie movie. Granted, the zombies can run in this, but they're still zombies. They don't talk, have a vacant expression, and a taste for human flesh. That's pretty much zombie 101.
Franzkill
19 Feb 16#10
Really you gonna get me into this!? Zombie 101: They have to die first THEN come back to life (albeit not living of course) as the Walking..you get the picture.
Your right zombies DON'T talk. If you pay attention in the film you can hear the boy who attacks Jim saying ''I HATE YOU'' thus hes infected..with a virus! Not a zombie! Haven't watched the film in a while but which scene showed one of the infected eating human flesh? Don't they just violently beat the living daylight out of any normal person they see hence it being called the 'Rage' virus?
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Double bill of futuristic nightmare scenarios. Danny Boyle directs '28 Days Later' (2002), a look at what could happen after a viral attack. The virus is so deadly that within seconds the infected person is taken over by a murderous rage, permanently. After 28 days there is only a handful of non-infected survivors, but the virus is not the only thing they have to contend with... In the sequel, '28 Weeks Later' (2007), directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, it's six months later and the US military have managed to restore order in the population. Unfortunately, one of the returning refugees is carrying the virus, and it won't be long before a pandemic spreads.
All comments (16)
Your right zombies DON'T talk. If you pay attention in the film you can hear the boy who attacks Jim saying ''I HATE YOU'' thus hes infected..with a virus! Not a zombie! Haven't watched the film in a while but which scene showed one of the infected eating human flesh? Don't they just violently beat the living daylight out of any normal person they see hence it being called the 'Rage' virus?
Please correct me if I'm wrong!