Looked around and most other dealers looking for £900 so this looks like a great deal, just a pity i cant justify buying another speaker but i hope it helps someone else.
Comes with 6 YEAR GUARANTEE INCLUDED and available in shop or on line.
Top comments
Jimbo123
6 Jan 1648#13
Remember hi-fi is a damaging addiction that can destroy your wallet. Happiness does not come from walnut veneers over engineered driver units . I am speaking as a hi-fi survivor. I got clean so can you. Be strong
dishmachine888
5 Jan 1622#2
Nah, Richardsounds is much better
xmikebx to kester76
6 Jan 1615#23
really? :confused: you may as well post on a topic about cornflakes and suggest they buy cheese instead.
GazmoX
6 Jan 166#15
That must be the reason for all the £2000 amps.
All comments (97)
jw021979
5 Jan 16#1
May want to change the title to Richer Sounds
gazza40 to jw021979
5 Jan 161#4
thanks for the heads up, corrected
dishmachine888
5 Jan 1622#2
Nah, Richardsounds is much better
joey046
5 Jan 162#3
Looks amazing, Richard always makes the best sounds. Bargain if your not skint after Christmas :smiley:
dragonrockster
5 Jan 16#5
Great deal
Red Devil
5 Jan 16#6
Hot deal !! I'm going to get in ether tomorrow to try these out. Does anyone know if these can be used on their own to start with or do they need satellites to go with it? If they can be used in their own, what do you reckon the sound would be like?
danpetre to Red Devil
6 Jan 16#11
they take care of voice in a 5.1 system, so you need at least 5 more. it only makes sense if you buy the matching stuff.
arferdaily
5 Jan 161#7
Hi, thinking the same thing myself - a pair could make an interesting stereo set up.
Looks like Tannoy have discontinued these, hence the sudden price drop. Build quality should be very good.
Worth a go.
talksalot81
5 Jan 16#8
I feel obliged to say that this is a high end piece of kit and you need equipment to match, to get anything like the right level of performance. This sounds snobbish but to use this on the back of a £200 amplifier is a bit like putting economy unleaded into a formula one car - it will probably work, to an extent but chances are you would beat that combination using a high performance road car.
ggilfedder to talksalot81
6 Jan 16#14
an amp is an amp, you are being a snob imo. difference between £200 amp and £1000 amp in terms of sound quality is not much
rev6 to talksalot81
6 Jan 163#24
That analogy is on the extreme side :smile:
What you get paying more is a more powerful amplifier. The amount of 7.2 AV's on the market with a 500w power supply is concerning.
Mid/high-end speakers can be damaged with a weak amplifier that can't provide enough power at high volumes. Read up on clipping.
Even though more money may reward extra features, most of time those features require better hardware that costs more.
Which costs money to implement. Read above.
If you can't bi-amp that's fine just connect the speaker the same as any other speaker.
A good set of headphones are great but a high-end sound system is something else, not just more expensive :smile:
Don't forged the amplifier and sub. It would sound great :smiley:
a6unx
5 Jan 16#9
I was looking for a replacement centre speaker for a while for my Q ACOUSTICS
2050 setup. This should do a great fit to the existing setup.
ajavaid92
6 Jan 16#10
How would you connect this to the amp? This speaker is fitted with 5 connections at the back - my current centre speaker only has two...
BulletRizz to ajavaid92
6 Jan 161#16
You only need to use 2 wires to connect the speaker.
The speaker has 2 extra connection if you want to bi-wire/bi-amp.
The fifth connection is useless/ground???
rossysaurus to ajavaid92
6 Jan 16#19
It is designed for Bi-wiring - High Frequency (HF) Left, Low Frequency (LF) Left, HF right, LF right - plus a dedicated grounding connector. It will probably come with a HF-LF connector bridge to make it standard left and right otherwise just bridge them with a scrap of cable. You do not have to use the dedicated ground.
Scorpion to ajavaid92
6 Jan 16#40
like so:
mistafaz
6 Jan 164#12
Is this currently the best speaker in the world right now?
smugjojo to mistafaz
6 Jan 16#25
Please go to the beginners section for speakers.
hanzosteel to mistafaz
6 Jan 161#42
No; this is just a tribute.
Jimbo123
6 Jan 1648#13
Remember hi-fi is a damaging addiction that can destroy your wallet. Happiness does not come from walnut veneers over engineered driver units . I am speaking as a hi-fi survivor. I got clean so can you. Be strong
fwert464343 to Jimbo123
6 Jan 161#21
I never ventured from realm of headphone audiophilia; much wiser hobby.
dean_brfc to Jimbo123
6 Jan 162#45
Agreed. I've simplified to Spotify Premium + Google Chromecast + roughly £200 amp + speakers.
Think I'm enjoying music more now than when I was fretting about DACs and lossless compression.
Even though this is a great reduction, the RRP was obviously inflated. And how much would a decent set of matching speakers cost?
Schwarzenegger
6 Jan 16#20
Just had a quick search on the site, and pair of Tannoy matching speakers (Precision) would set you back £399 (RRP £899). So for a 5.0 package you'd be spending £1100 (RRP £2800). My Yamaha All in One will do me fine thank you very much.
marti2nez to Schwarzenegger
6 Jan 16#53
Here you are a decent speakers for audiophile were 2k before now dropped again if i could sell my DaliZensor 5 5.1 i definitely would go for it. And your Yamaha is like comparing Peugeot 106 to Nissan 350 lol.
Looks nice but I think most people would be better off buying a decent subwoofer.
xmikebx to kester76
6 Jan 1615#23
really? :confused: you may as well post on a topic about cornflakes and suggest they buy cheese instead.
zzzz
6 Jan 16#26
smugjoojoo - please go to to the beginners section on how to post A DEAL .
onlineo
6 Jan 16#27
was just about to ask if these would go nicely with a telly. Then remembered my budget for a new telly is £300 so if I bought these no new telly. anyway I think the answer will be no as people are talking about needing a £2000 amp!
rev6 to onlineo
6 Jan 16#29
You don't need to buy a £2000 amplifier to benefit from these speakers. Just don't buy an underpowered one.
bigsky
6 Jan 161#28
I love hi-fi posts: So many "experts" :sunglasses:
anonymoose1
6 Jan 16#30
You can probably use this as a tv stand...
anonymoose1
6 Jan 16#31
Put a hundred hifi fans in a room with them and they'll hear a hundred different things. There's no such thing as best in a world where fools pay £100's for a better mains cable, presumably to ensure all the spikes and noise on the mains reaches their sound kit better :wink:
Even if they were the best, they still have to be reasonably matched to at least the front pair or even the cloth eared should notice something's not right.
mistafaz
6 Jan 161#32
Well if it was £999 I'd want it to be the best.
rev6
6 Jan 16#33
Even then, It wouldn't be the most expensive centre and probably not the best sounding either :smiley:
princeprecious
6 Jan 161#34
Is this only a speaker or it has built-in 42 inch LCD for this price??? :disappointed:
JohnnyUtah
6 Jan 16#35
**** to be precise.
fredan
6 Jan 16#36
very nice speakers
Parallax
6 Jan 16#37
I see. So I guess you also spend £1K on digital cables and so on then, since you believe price is directly correlated to quality and vice versa. It must simplify your life, since you never have to read reviews of anything or research a purchase, you just pay for the quality you want. :smirk:
ajavaid92
6 Jan 16#38
Would I notice any difference if I'd replaced the centre speaker of a Q Acoustics 3000 5.1 package with this centre speaker? In other words, would it be worth it?
Waspkiller86
6 Jan 16#39
I personally have Teufel speakers but tannoy make great stuff. Voted hot, great price
bodas73
6 Jan 16#41
This is a corking deal. just be aware the the speaker for a centre is a monster, it's huge. Would have,went for this but getting the Dali Opticon centre after trailing that range against the precisions
rev6
6 Jan 16#43
Nigelhg
6 Jan 16#44
Actually there are massive differences but it depends on the rest of your system- it's only as good as it's weakest link.
rev6
6 Jan 16#46
With encodes, once you get to a certain quality it's pretty much transparent.
Loudspeakers still have their own distinctive sound, frequency range, soundstage, etc.We're not talking 0's and 1's here.
dean_brfc
6 Jan 16#47
I know I know, but once I start worrying about that, I start fretting about the rest of the equipment in the chain.
rev6
6 Jan 16#48
The best upgrades are speakers and room conditioning. I know what you mean though.
CapricaSix
6 Jan 161#49
For people who aren't sure, this speaker (singular) is designed to work with a 5.1 (or 7.1 etc) surround sound setup. This is a dedicated centre channel speaker not intended to be used on its own, ie it's not like a soundbar. :smiley:
Thoughtful
6 Jan 16#50
For anyone considering buying this, first make sure that it will fit under the TV !
For some reason the makers of TV stands / cabinets don't seem to want to make anything that will accommodate a large centre speaker.
With this one, it appears the top is curved so the TV can't be stood on top of it.
That might be the reason why it's being sold off cheap !
matlock67 to Thoughtful
6 Jan 16#52
most decent centre speakers are quite heavy , they wont sit on top of a tv, mine is above my tv, but my tv is in a large cabinet.
matlock67
6 Jan 16#51
Ive got the tannoy eyris centre which has 5 posts, just connect to the + and - with normal half decent speaker cable, leave the bottom one unconnected if your amp hasn't a earth (mine hasn't).
capriboycraig
6 Jan 16#54
Fantastic buy, I've a pair of DC6 floor mounts as my main hifi speakers, and the matching bookshelf ones in the box ready for when the man cave get's finished. Tannoy's DC drivers are some of the best I've heard at prices the average working person could afford.
I've debated going back to a moderately hi end home cinema set up again, but after investing heavily in the early days of Dolby Digital, for me, it's just not worth it. I very much appreciate the better quality a good well thought out system brings to Music (even Spotify has it's place here!), but it never hit the spot for me with movie soundtracks and for anything else it was a complete waste (sports, tv etc). Ymmv of course, but if I do multi-channel again it will be with a system based on reasonable AV amp and discreet speaker package like the Q2000's.
kester76
6 Jan 16#55
You got something against cheese ? :wink: Merely stating that you're better off buying a better subwoofer than upgrading from a reasonable centre speaker to this. It's more worth while off cutting off bass at 75Hz on a centre and diverting it to the sub.
DudleyGuy
6 Jan 161#56
Cheap chinese make, it was never £999.
You can get a much better Sony for £299, proven audio quality.
Uridium to DudleyGuy
6 Jan 16#57
Are you a pseudonym of Loughboro guy?
dannymcfc1992 to DudleyGuy
7 Jan 16#60
founded in Scotland, now part of a Danish group
tannoy was one of the first loudspeaker brands and got their name from developing the systems in the world war...
not cheap crap at all
matlock67
7 Jan 16#58
The centre speaker is the main speaker in 5.1 system, however the whole system needs to be evenly matched, your system is only as good as your weakest component.
anonymoose1
7 Jan 161#59
For music a centre speaker is pretty pointless, most of it's stereo and your amp is making up the other channels, invariably badly.
xmikebx
7 Jan 16#61
I love cheese but if I have it for breakfast it spoils my day, some would say cornflakes do the same but err, let's move on :wink: I don't do the lottery but if I did, and won, I'd ask my neighbour to sell their house to me, so I can buy a better subwoofer :smirk:
kester76
7 Jan 16#62
Read the spec of these and some of the things quoted are pretty strange. Ok, main speakers quote 29Hz due to the 'Twin auxcillary bass radiators' which is just a passive radiator or a speaker without a driver but no mention of the dB audio level at that frequency. Also wtf is Auxcillary is it like Auxiliary ? http://www.monitoraudio.co.uk/company/technology/abr <= checked with Monitor Audio and they use Auxiliary :confused:
Joking aside it looks like a real good deal at face value due to the massive discounts but why are they so cheap ?
marti2nez
7 Jan 16#63
Well they are cheap if you consider the RRP price. For 1400 you can buy Dali Zensor 5 5.1 if you are lucky Dali Zensor 7 5.1 which includes great subwoofer while Tannoy does not. On top of that you need a really good amplifier to run them. I would say this is a very realistic price. They looks awesome for the price i never had chance to hear them playing thou.
kester76
7 Jan 16#64
Too much. I bought 4x Q acoustics 1030s,1x Q acoustics 1000c and a B.K. Electronics XLS200-DF for £625 which is more than enough for a sitting room :smiley: For that price I could get a couple of these Link
rev6
7 Jan 16#65
For some, a soundbar is. It's a personal thing :smiley:
kester76
7 Jan 16#66
Never under stood why people love sound bars as most are just stereo speakers with no centre :smiley:
rev6
7 Jan 16#67
Maybe they just don't know. Marketing can be very deceiving :stuck_out_tongue:
Plasmachaser
7 Jan 16#68
Why waste your money on this dudes?
Last week i had for £400 at richer sounds
Pair of Tannoy V4I floor standers - for the fronts
Tannoy VCI centre - centre
Tannoy v4i's big book shelf speakers. - rears
Pair of nice stands for the rears
And 20 metres of speaker cable all for £400.
Basically the above, minus the sub all in for £400 including stands for the rears
rev6 to Plasmachaser
7 Jan 161#69
Why waste money on this?
Because the range in the OP sounds better.
Plasmachaser
7 Jan 16#70
Seems like overpriced stuff to be honest.
I had an absolute bargain with the Tannoy stuff. unlike this
matlock67
7 Jan 16#71
Plasma, if you happy with your kit that's good, as someone said early in the thread hifi can be addictive, generaly the more you pay the better the quality, but 4 times the cost doesnt mean 4 times better.
kester76
8 Jan 16#72
Diminished returns ?
rev6
8 Jan 16#73
What's the optimal setup, does it even exist? The absolute most borderline of diminishing return per cost. I've always thought speakers are a personal thing. It's not just the biggest or deepest that make them but the whole package. Not just volume or bass, but clarity, soundstage, power requirements, appearance/size, cost.
I'm sure a lot of people would say that what you or he bought was expensive and not worth it, including AV, etc, but you wouldn't agree with them. I guess you could say the same for an even more expensive setup. I know there will a point of diminishing returns but where does it start, and what are the parameters for it, as a soundbar and a sub can produce sound and bass, or the Wharfedale DX1 if you go the AV route with discrete surround sound. I guess you'd have to demo a lot of speakers to work that out :smiley:
All I'm saying, in my opinion, is that you shouldn't say a product is a waste of money just because you can get another cheaper.
kester76
8 Jan 16#74
I must contest this statement due to the challenge even if I'm wrong :wink: lol. The idea of Hifi to produce the best amplified accurate audio representation of the original signal with as small as possible distortion. Obviously we all have dodgy hearing at some frequencies so we adjust the sound to compensate for this frequency loss and also add on to this the fact most people prefer positive distortion i.e. tube amp/record enthusiasts but I digress.
This is a centre speaker so It's not a something stereo audiophile or a 5.1 music audiophile would choose due to it being a centre in the 1st place :smiley: SACD/DVD-Audio setups normally require matched front speakers so the centre is same type of speaker as the two fronts. See Link plus it's at the wrong height :smiley:
Therefore it's aimed towards Film/TV where it's mostly used for lead vocals and some sound effects. A bit of a overkill just to hear such a narrow audio band. So with statistics that I've made up in my head on the fly that state the ratio of cost per performance I provide my argument :smiley: I give no workings out though as this would probably prove the downfall of this statement.
rev6
8 Jan 16#75
I wasn't really talking about center speakers, more like speakers in general. If my budget was £400 i definitely would prefer what they posted instead of just a center :smile:
I'm not sure what you mean by "This is a centre speaker so It's not a something stereo audiophile or a 5.1 music audiophile would choose due to it being a centre in the 1st place"
kester76
8 Jan 16#76
I don't understand what I meant either to honest :smiley: Only got 3 hours worth of sleep due to nightshift lol :wink:
Joking aside I think a lot of these speakers are very over priced as they drop like bricks when they are trying to shift them. Unless you're trying to hit subwoofer frequencies then you don't need to pay that much out. It's mostly the sub 50Hz frequencies that bump up the price of a good pair of speakers and unless you're using the speakers in a PA system or live in a mansion you don't need 180 watt rms speakers as you're probably only going to run them up to 60 watt rms maximum. The main consumption of watts is when you're driving large drivers slowly, i.e. the bigger surface of air you're pushing the more power you need. Little treble/tweeter speakers hardly use any power and as for the electronics in the crossovers it's not like they cost a fortune.
i think my Tannoy speakers deal i've pasted above along with picture is winning this thread tbh
matlock67
9 Jan 16#79
Plasma, yours is a budget set of speakers, whilst its better than some of the packaged systems its still budget kit, what amp have you got it paired to?
Your system would be blown away by a tannoy precision setup with a very good Av amp.
Plasmachaser to matlock67
10 Jan 16#80
I wouldnt call mine a budget setup
Also using Harmon Kardon AV 171
blue-note
10 Jan 16#81
Tannoy Dual Concentric gear is VERY nice. Think I'd be looking for the older, made in Britain gear if it was my choice (Tannoy D750C) but at £300, certainly a bargain. IIRC centre speakers always tend to get reduced quite heavily- Hyperfi are well known for knocking out massively reduced Celestion, Tannoy and Kef centre speakers. My guessing is that centre speakers are harder to shift, therefore the manufacturer has a backlog and needs to get them out of the warehouse much more quickly.
rev6
10 Jan 16#82
It's low-end, fairly cheap, so you could say budget. The AV seems underpowered for your speakers too.
matlock67
10 Jan 16#83
Plasma , what are v4i book shelf speakers? I can't find them, I presume you mean vri's or v1i's, rs have your speaker setup for about £280 to £310 or so, so not such a good deal for £400, rs always overcharge for cables that's why I never buy mine from there.
Your kit is still fairly budget especially centre and rears, ask tannoy to compare your centre speaker with the OP and they will say there is no contest I'm afraid.
Why not post your deal and see how hot it gets? Let the public decide?
Plasmachaser to matlock67
10 Jan 16#84
It was originally £310 all in which i still think is a better deal than this, but if you'd have read my post properly. i paid an extra £60 on stands for the rears; and £20 on cabling.
meaning it was just under £400
matlock67
10 Jan 16#85
Plasma, Post your deal?, see if it gets hotter, they still have stock at RS.
Your comparing apples with oranges, for some your deal will be good for others who want better quality it won't, I don't own any of the components either from your system or the op's, however my speakers in my 5.1 are older model tannoy's except the sub which is a miller and kreisel. if i was in the market for a new centre speaker i would definately audition the 6c rather than the vci as 6c would likely be a slight upgrade to my tannoy eyris centre.
WalterSmith to matlock67
10 Jan 16#86
I concur. I have Tannoy 613 fronts and Tannoy 611 rears and am definately considering this upgrade to my Tannoy Arena centre. The other deal is a good deal but as the old adage goes .. you get what you pay for.
Oh REL Q100E sub too in my setup.
Plasmachaser to matlock67
10 Jan 16#87
Just posted it!
WalterSmith
17 Jan 16#88
Only a wee left, none for mail order. I managed to bag one and picking it up tomorrow
WalterSmith to WalterSmith
20 Jan 16#89
When I took the box into the house the wife near fainted, she's never seen one that big before!
Unboxed and sitting resplendant on my AV-unit under my wall mounted plasma.
Hopefully I'll have enough energy to biwire it up tonight and give it a birl.
Only a handful left in the UK now.
rev6
20 Jan 16#90
Bi-wire :confused:
WalterSmith
21 Jan 16#91
Yeah - my yahama Av-Amp only has two binding posts for the Centre Speaker, so I use two sets of speaker cable, wrapping them together at the amp end and splitting them out at the Speaker.
It separates High and low frequencies.
I bi-amp my fronts using my rear surrounds as the amp allows for that,
vanbling
1 Mar 16#92
How are users getting on with this monster centre speaker?
WalterSmith to vanbling
4 Mar 16#93
Looks the part:
Sounds fantastic!
vanbling
6 Mar 16#94
You have the same projector screen as me.
I'd be interested to know your setup?
vanbling
6 Mar 161#95
I also bought one. ✌
WalterSmith
12 Mar 16#96
1. Optima HD200X PJ + screen
2. Pioneer 436 Plasma
3. Yahama A840 Am Receiver
4. Tannoy 613 Fronts
5. Tannoy 611 Rears
6. Tannoy 6C centre!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
7. REL Q100E sub
8. Amazon Fire
9. WDTV
10. Sony Blu Ray
11. XBOX 360
12. Alphason 1250 cabinets x 2 - superb BTW!!
vanbling
18 Mar 16#97
I have a Rel Strata5, superb and transformed my system.
I now have the 5c centre and will update the front and rears as money allows.
Projector, I have an infocus IN80eu on 120" and for everyday viewing a Pioneer Kuro 5090 through Pioneer amp and blu-Ray (models elude me right now).
Opening post
Comes with 6 YEAR GUARANTEE INCLUDED and available in shop or on line.
Top comments
All comments (97)
Looks like Tannoy have discontinued these, hence the sudden price drop. Build quality should be very good.
Worth a go.
What you get paying more is a more powerful amplifier. The amount of 7.2 AV's on the market with a 500w power supply is concerning.
Mid/high-end speakers can be damaged with a weak amplifier that can't provide enough power at high volumes. Read up on clipping.
Even though more money may reward extra features, most of time those features require better hardware that costs more.
Which costs money to implement. Read above.
If you can't bi-amp that's fine just connect the speaker the same as any other speaker.
A good set of headphones are great but a high-end sound system is something else, not just more expensive :smile:
Don't forged the amplifier and sub. It would sound great :smiley:
2050 setup. This should do a great fit to the existing setup.
The speaker has 2 extra connection if you want to bi-wire/bi-amp.
The fifth connection is useless/ground???
Think I'm enjoying music more now than when I was fretting about DACs and lossless compression.
In terms of sound quality not much difference.
http://www.cnet.com/uk/topics/av-receivers/buying-guide/
http://www.richersounds.com/package/speakers/speaker-packages/pah012960
Even if they were the best, they still have to be reasonably matched to at least the front pair or even the cloth eared should notice something's not right.
Loudspeakers still have their own distinctive sound, frequency range, soundstage, etc.We're not talking 0's and 1's here.
For some reason the makers of TV stands / cabinets don't seem to want to make anything that will accommodate a large centre speaker.
With this one, it appears the top is curved so the TV can't be stood on top of it.
That might be the reason why it's being sold off cheap !
I've debated going back to a moderately hi end home cinema set up again, but after investing heavily in the early days of Dolby Digital, for me, it's just not worth it. I very much appreciate the better quality a good well thought out system brings to Music (even Spotify has it's place here!), but it never hit the spot for me with movie soundtracks and for anything else it was a complete waste (sports, tv etc). Ymmv of course, but if I do multi-channel again it will be with a system based on reasonable AV amp and discreet speaker package like the Q2000's.
You can get a much better Sony for £299, proven audio quality.
tannoy was one of the first loudspeaker brands and got their name from developing the systems in the world war...
not cheap crap at all
http://www.monitoraudio.co.uk/company/technology/abr <= checked with Monitor Audio and they use Auxiliary :confused:
Joking aside it looks like a real good deal at face value due to the massive discounts but why are they so cheap ?
Last week i had for £400 at richer sounds
Pair of Tannoy V4I floor standers - for the fronts
Tannoy VCI centre - centre
Tannoy v4i's big book shelf speakers. - rears
Pair of nice stands for the rears
And 20 metres of speaker cable all for £400.
Basically the above, minus the sub all in for £400 including stands for the rears
Because the range in the OP sounds better.
I had an absolute bargain with the Tannoy stuff. unlike this
I'm sure a lot of people would say that what you or he bought was expensive and not worth it, including AV, etc, but you wouldn't agree with them. I guess you could say the same for an even more expensive setup. I know there will a point of diminishing returns but where does it start, and what are the parameters for it, as a soundbar and a sub can produce sound and bass, or the Wharfedale DX1 if you go the AV route with discrete surround sound. I guess you'd have to demo a lot of speakers to work that out :smiley:
All I'm saying, in my opinion, is that you shouldn't say a product is a waste of money just because you can get another cheaper.
This is a centre speaker so It's not a something stereo audiophile or a 5.1 music audiophile would choose due to it being a centre in the 1st place :smiley: SACD/DVD-Audio setups normally require matched front speakers so the centre is same type of speaker as the two fronts. See Link plus it's at the wrong height :smiley:
Therefore it's aimed towards Film/TV where it's mostly used for lead vocals and some sound effects. A bit of a overkill just to hear such a narrow audio band. So with statistics that I've made up in my head on the fly that state the ratio of cost per performance I provide my argument :smiley: I give no workings out though as this would probably prove the downfall of this statement.
I'm not sure what you mean by "This is a centre speaker so It's not a something stereo audiophile or a 5.1 music audiophile would choose due to it being a centre in the 1st place"
Joking aside I think a lot of these speakers are very over priced as they drop like bricks when they are trying to shift them. Unless you're trying to hit subwoofer frequencies then you don't need to pay that much out. It's mostly the sub 50Hz frequencies that bump up the price of a good pair of speakers and unless you're using the speakers in a PA system or live in a mansion you don't need 180 watt rms speakers as you're probably only going to run them up to 60 watt rms maximum. The main consumption of watts is when you're driving large drivers slowly, i.e. the bigger surface of air you're pushing the more power you need. Little treble/tweeter speakers hardly use any power and as for the electronics in the crossovers it's not like they cost a fortune.
I'm curious about who would buy these speakers for £11.7k
Your system would be blown away by a tannoy precision setup with a very good Av amp.
Also using Harmon Kardon AV 171
Your kit is still fairly budget especially centre and rears, ask tannoy to compare your centre speaker with the OP and they will say there is no contest I'm afraid.
Why not post your deal and see how hot it gets? Let the public decide?
meaning it was just under £400
Your comparing apples with oranges, for some your deal will be good for others who want better quality it won't, I don't own any of the components either from your system or the op's, however my speakers in my 5.1 are older model tannoy's except the sub which is a miller and kreisel. if i was in the market for a new centre speaker i would definately audition the 6c rather than the vci as 6c would likely be a slight upgrade to my tannoy eyris centre.
Oh REL Q100E sub too in my setup.
Unboxed and sitting resplendant on my AV-unit under my wall mounted plasma.
Hopefully I'll have enough energy to biwire it up tonight and give it a birl.
Only a handful left in the UK now.
It separates High and low frequencies.
I bi-amp my fronts using my rear surrounds as the amp allows for that,
Sounds fantastic!
I'd be interested to know your setup?
2. Pioneer 436 Plasma
3. Yahama A840 Am Receiver
4. Tannoy 613 Fronts
5. Tannoy 611 Rears
6. Tannoy 6C centre!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
7. REL Q100E sub
8. Amazon Fire
9. WDTV
10. Sony Blu Ray
11. XBOX 360
12. Alphason 1250 cabinets x 2 - superb BTW!!
I now have the 5c centre and will update the front and rears as money allows.
Projector, I have an infocus IN80eu on 120" and for everyday viewing a Pioneer Kuro 5090 through Pioneer amp and blu-Ray (models elude me right now).