Is this the cheapest for this particular 2015 model?
Amazon £899.00
John Lewis £899.00
Laptops Direct £849.98
eBuyer £869.98
Top comments
burn2groundenquiries
18 Jan 1614#41
I go between windows and OsX every day. Amazes me the "I hate windows" or "I hate OsX" comments. They both work incredibly well and are both incredibly stable.
paulj48
11 Jan 166#10
that's why I asked how do these run :smirk:
Conflict2142 to carlroberts143
18 Jan 165#33
Apple do not recommend these machines for Logic Pro or Final Cut Pro, as the integrated graphics card is not suitable for transcoding video (yes, Final Cut Pro uses the graphics card processor not the CPU).
They are more than capable of handling photo editing on Adobe Creative Cloud, however there's a major drawback to the 2015 21.5" iMacs.
No memory upgrades (soldered) - Default 8GB configuration.
No hard disk upgrades (unless you want to take a hair dryer and crack open the front bezel)
Also the 1TB non-Fusion drive is going to be incredibly slow.
Voted hot for what it it is, but it's not a video workhorse. Sorry.
Houstieboy to ammywalker
18 Jan 163#20
Yes "it come with warranty"....
All comments (78)
watfordguy
11 Jan 16#1
do you need to add vat to this?
watfordguy
11 Jan 161#2
sorry just looked... vat added
willhay555
11 Jan 161#3
Very sorry, hit cold by mistake.
This is a great deal.
BuzzDuraband to willhay555
11 Jan 161#4
We'll go halves on my vote. Call it 2.5 degrees each from myself and willhay, OP :smile:
Heated.
horizon-in
11 Jan 161#5
Excellent price for an excellent iMac with 2 year warranty. Good deal OP
mshakil
11 Jan 161#6
Great products
ftbf444
11 Jan 161#7
Looks great thank
paulj48
11 Jan 16#8
how do these run with a 1.6Ghz processor? my 2012 MacBook i7 2.2Ghz isn't exactly a beast
xela333 to paulj48
11 Jan 16#9
You cannot compare processors by clock speed, too many other factors
dcpp4 to paulj48
18 Jan 16#55
It won't run any better. The cpu/gpu on this machines is extremely weak, basically they are fancy-looking web browsing/light office work computers. It does not have an ssd so it will also have subpar boot and app-launching time. If anybody is considering this I would strongly recommend going the extra mile and buying the 2.8ghz quad core, if not the retina, as they are much better value propositions. I can't think of any scenario besides bulk buying where this particular version of what is otherwise a great machine would be a smart buy.
paulj48
11 Jan 166#10
that's why I asked how do these run :smirk:
ajgrahamdotcom
11 Jan 16#11
It'll run fine for everything except more intensive stuff like gaming, video editing, etc.
Voted hot as it's a good office desktop, but it's limited longer term as you can't upgrade the RAM (27" version you can) and the gfx card is basic.
ramraideruk
11 Jan 16#12
Won't John Lewis price match?
toonarmani to ramraideruk
18 Jan 16#49
I'd rather have warranty from Costco than John Lewis - although JL are very good, Costco are even better IMO. :smiley:
Also, don't forget an additional 2% cashback for Costco Executive Card holders, make it even cheaper.
jomppa
11 Jan 16#13
Apparently John Lewis will not price match :disappointed: It says that Costco is an online retailer only .. weird.
davidg_croydon
11 Jan 16#14
And they don't match the stores as you have to pay to join.
jomppa
12 Jan 16#15
Can anyone order this or a business only?
Dave_c to jomppa
12 Jan 16#16
Ive ordered from this site a few times and im not a member.
p4pankaj to jomppa
18 Jan 16#68
If you are not a member then Costco charges 5% extra for website orders.
ammywalker
18 Jan 16#17
Is it come with warranty?
loop to ammywalker
18 Jan 16#19
Says 2 year warranty in the title
Houstieboy to ammywalker
18 Jan 163#20
Yes "it come with warranty"....
loop
18 Jan 16#18
Wow great price I am very tempted, need to replace an ancient Dell Vostro, but don't know if I'd be better off buying a MacBook Pro?
citynotutd123
18 Jan 162#21
Some apple products are alright, like the macbook pro, but this is wayyyyy too overpriced imo
delboyd to citynotutd123
18 Jan 161#23
If people will pay it why not charge it I guess...
Always cracks me up how most of my "anti capitalist" mates use these haha.
msnmp
18 Jan 16#22
Poor processor speed.
topss to msnmp
18 Jan 161#24
It has a turbo. Just put on some go faster stripes and no one will ever know.
loop to msnmp
18 Jan 16#26
Costco also have the version with the quad-core processor but it's £999.99 Not such a good deal
citynotutd123
18 Jan 161#25
Yeah I'm not blaming apple for anything they have a great business plan but you can get a much more powerful PC for less.
For example faster CPU, faster ram, better GPU (still not great though), Bigger HDD, free game and £100 less
carlroberts143
18 Jan 16#27
Would this run Final Cut Pro?
Conflict2142 to carlroberts143
18 Jan 165#33
Apple do not recommend these machines for Logic Pro or Final Cut Pro, as the integrated graphics card is not suitable for transcoding video (yes, Final Cut Pro uses the graphics card processor not the CPU).
They are more than capable of handling photo editing on Adobe Creative Cloud, however there's a major drawback to the 2015 21.5" iMacs.
No memory upgrades (soldered) - Default 8GB configuration.
No hard disk upgrades (unless you want to take a hair dryer and crack open the front bezel)
Also the 1TB non-Fusion drive is going to be incredibly slow.
Voted hot for what it it is, but it's not a video workhorse. Sorry.
philouk
18 Jan 16#28
New ones due this year, possibly March.
loop to philouk
18 Jan 16#29
Won't be this price though will they?
topss
18 Jan 16#30
Just a reminder that you need to be a Costco member for this price. You can avoid the full membership cost (£25 + VAT annually) if you become an online subscriber (£15 per year inc VAT) or can pay an additional 5%+ VAT surcharge.
Incognitoso
18 Jan 16#31
If will be my decision this IMac or Macbook pro 13.3
As they nearly same price range 799 or 899
I will be getting macbook pro 13.3 and buy external monitor if need bigger screen
w_orbit to Incognitoso
18 Jan 16#38
Macbook and external screen without a doubt IMO.
It gives you so much more flexibility and can be upgraded with SSD and memory memory.
I wouldn't buy this for reasons in my previous (and others) posts.
sancheez
18 Jan 16#32
They used to do a day pass for £1? No idea if they still do.....
carlroberts143
18 Jan 16#34
Thank you for the info really is a massive help :smiley:
m5rcc
18 Jan 161#35
There is no positive correlation between buying an iMac and a "good deal"
w_orbit
18 Jan 16#36
Not as hot as you think. It's only £35 off the normal retail.
Fairly slow processor and I can't seem to find any info on how easy it is to fit an SSD or upgrade the memory on to this model and whether it voids your warranty.
An SSD really transforms the feel on any desktop or laptop and personally I wouldn't even consider any machine which I couldn't easily upgrade with one, especially a Mac as it's so easy to reinstall OSX after changing the drive (it automatically boots, downloads and installs the OS when you boot with a drive without it installed)
I wouldn't leap at this model to be honest and suspect people are just seeing iMac relatively cheap (for Apples over inflated prices) and voting hot without delving into this.
"Apple 21.5-inch iMac review (late 2015) - still the all-in-one standard
Ever-so-slightly under-powered and expensive to upgrade, but the smaller 2015 iMac is still a great all-in-one"
BattleCat
18 Jan 163#37
Doesn't run OSX. Buying a Mac is more than just the hardware
Depends on what you're really looking for in a PC though - I have a Mac Pro but it spends almost all it's time running Windows. Can't stand OSX and I only use it when I have to. A Windows-based all-in-one would make more sense than this for most people who aren't tied into Apple as you get more hardware for your money.
burn2groundenquiries
18 Jan 1614#41
I go between windows and OsX every day. Amazes me the "I hate windows" or "I hate OsX" comments. They both work incredibly well and are both incredibly stable.
topss to burn2groundenquiries
18 Jan 161#43
Up till this comment, no-one has actually made any comment like that on this deal - apart from you :laughing:
buddn071 to burn2groundenquiries
18 Jan 16#62
Agreed, and 9 times out of 10 issues people have are with separate software, rather than the actual OS.
bbbazman
18 Jan 16#42
Great information, thanks.
Not for me as I'm already kitted out, but out of interest would you suggest spending the extra £100 for THIS if potential buyers are looking to use Final cut Pro or Logic Pro ? It's not a huge additional premium in the long term.
I just can't keep up with the pros & cons of the processor and graphics combinations now. It was much easier when Spectrums ruled the roost. ( Key for BBC vs Spectrum debate)
loop
18 Jan 161#44
It's £200 more and that is the standard price, so not really a good deal. Better to buy from John Lewis or Amazon.
fishmaster
18 Jan 161#45
Logic Pro doesn't require video card acceleration.
fishmaster
18 Jan 161#46
"Pre-loaded with Mac OS X 10.8 El Capitan"
El Capitan is 10.11, I'd make sure they have all the specs right before you make a purchase.
GDB2222
18 Jan 16#47
That is a far more capable machine. Personally, I steer clear of all in ones, but some people value the neatness. I prefer the ease of upgrade and repair of a conventional desktop.
Nexusfifth
18 Jan 161#48
It is a perfectly capable processor for 99% of people. If you are serious about video editing or gaming than this is not a machine for you.
This processor has a TDP of 15W (it is basically a laptop model) so it is super power efficient and most likely very cool - so no fans and whisper silent operation (ok not quite as this specific pc has a hdd instead of ssd).
All in all for people using these as general purpose pcs it is a far more reasonable choice than a quad core using 105W and costing 200£ more which they would never actually use to the full potential.
For example I have a NUC with i3-5010U, so about 3000 at cpu bench and it is perfectly capable of running Windows and being used as a main pc by my family as well as always running to act as a plex server etc, all this with about 6W idle power consumption and about 20W when in active use.
All that said this is (in line with usual apple policy) overpriced for what it is.
buddn07
18 Jan 16#50
So it'll run fine for web browsing, office docs and listening to music?
lilbeastie
18 Jan 161#51
Sure. £800 seems a lot for basic tasks like that though - personally I'd be looking to a laptop (then at least you gain portability over this device), but you pays your money, you takes your choice...
the__cat
18 Jan 161#52
Agree 100%. I sold my iMac and bought a MacBook Pro. Connected to my 2 25" 4K monitors it's a much better experience and offers much more flexibility.
shakerstevens
18 Jan 16#53
Voted hot. Price drop may be due to a revision in the iMac range soon. The laptop range is due a refresh this spring, perhaps the iMacs too. But if your happy with the spec of this one its a great price.
bbbazman
18 Jan 161#54
I never was that good at arithmetic. All these 'deals' that I keep persuading my wife to let me buy, are bargains generally arising from my inability to count. :man: It's then not technically a lie.
sm-1991
18 Jan 16#56
Very good computer, it WILL last you, my old one is still going strong 6 years later, never had to upgrade hardware, only batteries for the mouse and keyboard.
dcpp4 to sm-1991
18 Jan 16#58
Sorry but this is nothing like your 6 yo imac.
lilbeastie to sm-1991
19 Jan 161#70
I have a 6 year old Mac Pro too that's still going strong. It's the base model (so although it was more expensive than this 'deal', it's not a high-end dual cpu beast or anything) and it's still running OK now although it is getting a little long in the tooth.
But then the CPU in my old Mac is twice as fast as the CPU in this iMac - I'm not sure this hardware has the grunt to keep up with the next few revisions of OSX, let alone last another 6 years.
Personally I don't blame Apple for this - I think Intel should make it a little clearer what family of CPUs each is from. I think most people see the 'i5' in the title and assume this must be a capable machine rather than one that's running a netbook-class processor.
dcpp4
18 Jan 16#57
I see what you meant above but I think its quite the opposite case, this is a machine for people that are aware of its limitations and do not care, so there is no way in the world that this is 'fine for 99% of the people', as it will struggle with literally anything that is not web browsing and writing a word doc. This is a desktop pc, sold at a premium price, that will age at smartphone speeds (i.e. obsolete/too slow to run its own OS in 2/3 years). Yes it's quiet, but how important is low consumption when you have to wait around for things to happen? There is no way that this is better than its quad core bigger brother for general use. This is literally a case of apple pulling its marketing weight
xeroc
18 Jan 16#59
I think his point was as to the durability and longevity of Apple computers generally. No one is suggesting that this is the computer you would buy for CPU/GPU intensive tasks - but 'most people' do only need a computer for general web browsing and productivity!
Incognitoso
18 Jan 16#60
Macbook pro 13.3 The price looks high agree but : )
People do not know that macbook pro screen is the best in laptops (color gamut etc ... )
I have compared amoled samsung top quality screen to macbook pro 13.3 and I can say that macbook with lcd technology a not so sharp but colors gama better Blacks yes amoled better but macbook not far from this as well
For me screen is the 1 thing now for laptop to buy
Second is design how it is looks feels Macbook pro alum case give these premium feel . Where after 2 Years plastic laptop looks like ........
Third everything works in hardware level Where windows .......driver o drivers ......
Do i like mac operating system NO - not really but it works Do I like windows 7 O Yes but it is not safe "web"
Macbook pro 13.3 is people to work not gaming laptop
Want games buy PS4 end enjoy
buddn071
18 Jan 16#61
That's what I was getting at. If it was me, for those tasks I'd look at a cheap i3 laptop and if you wanted iPad. A friend has key bought the 5k retina one of these, and it's just sat in his spare room upstairs. I recommended a number of other devices, but he was adamant he wanted this. Each to their own.
RustySpoons
18 Jan 16#63
It is totally overpriced and Apple know they can get away with it, £800 for a Passmark of just over 3000 is taking the Mick a bit, no wonder people build Hackintoshes.
Nexusfifth
18 Jan 16#64
I was not arguing pricewise, I just wanted to defend what is imo a decent processor. (Not going into price details that it costs under a 100£...)
For example you can get a better species machine with a larger monitor for less than 300£, even if you are looking for a small device you can build/buy a powerful nuc plus better screen and fit it at the back of the monitor for less than 400£.
I never said this was a good deal and have voted cold actually because it is overpriced. But if you must have Apple and want something like this should be good enough for most.
RustySpoons
18 Jan 16#65
No me either, totally agree with you, nothing wrong with the actual CPU and it's fine for a lot of things, but Apple are really having one over on the consumer.
defard
18 Jan 161#66
Just to bring some balance. I was a hardcore PC user for many years (and hated macs so much I bought a MacBook and took it back a few days later as I couldn't get used to the OS). When I got my iPad I decided to give it a second try so when I got iMac in 2009 I formatted 80% of the drive for PC use (people forget that the Mac can run both operating systems as standard). Within 6 months I found that I didn't use the PC side at all. People say this one here won't transcode video or play games, well my 2008 one does both and I'm sure this one will as well! Of course this won't be like a dedicated custom built gaming or video rig, but will suffice for 90% of the public.
Glesgabear
18 Jan 16#67
Have some heat to break the 500 degrees barrier!
Conflict2142
18 Jan 16#69
I don't know what the performance will be like, I run FCPX on a discrete AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4096 MB on my iMac and it runs better than the system I myself with 2 x Quad Core Xeons.
Bought my missus a similar iMac 21.5" to the one at Costco but with the 4K think it's the same integrated video (it's 1.5GB memory on the card, but pretty sure I recall it's something like 1GB is dedicated and the other 512MB is VRAM).
I just downloaded Heaven 4.0 benchmark (running with defaults - medium settings) and with a 3.1GHZ processor and the same video card, I am getting FPS: 18.2 Score: 459 Min FPS: 8.8 and Max FPS:36.3 at 2048x1152 Medium.
For apparently an integrated card I reckon that's pretty good, but you should check out other vendors systems online for comparison (Unique Heaven is a cross-platform benchmark).
Certainly the faster CPU is recommended for LPX according to some posts, so £100 is worth the spend there.
Opening post
Amazon £899.00
John Lewis £899.00
Laptops Direct £849.98
eBuyer £869.98
Top comments
They are more than capable of handling photo editing on Adobe Creative Cloud, however there's a major drawback to the 2015 21.5" iMacs.
No memory upgrades (soldered) - Default 8GB configuration.
No hard disk upgrades (unless you want to take a hair dryer and crack open the front bezel)
Also the 1TB non-Fusion drive is going to be incredibly slow.
Voted hot for what it it is, but it's not a video workhorse. Sorry.
All comments (78)
This is a great deal.
Heated.
You cannot compare processors by clock speed, too many other factors
Voted hot as it's a good office desktop, but it's limited longer term as you can't upgrade the RAM (27" version you can) and the gfx card is basic.
Also, don't forget an additional 2% cashback for Costco Executive Card holders, make it even cheaper.
Always cracks me up how most of my "anti capitalist" mates use these haha.
Not such a good deal
http://www.pcworld.co.uk/gbuk/computing/desktop-pcs/desktop-pcs/lenovo-ideacentre-aio-700-23-8-touchscreen-all-in-one-pc-10138331-pdt.html
For example faster CPU, faster ram, better GPU (still not great though), Bigger HDD, free game and £100 less
They are more than capable of handling photo editing on Adobe Creative Cloud, however there's a major drawback to the 2015 21.5" iMacs.
No memory upgrades (soldered) - Default 8GB configuration.
No hard disk upgrades (unless you want to take a hair dryer and crack open the front bezel)
Also the 1TB non-Fusion drive is going to be incredibly slow.
Voted hot for what it it is, but it's not a video workhorse. Sorry.
As they nearly same price range 799 or 899
I will be getting macbook pro 13.3 and buy external monitor if need bigger screen
It gives you so much more flexibility and can be upgraded with SSD and memory memory.
I wouldn't buy this for reasons in my previous (and others) posts.
Fairly slow processor and I can't seem to find any info on how easy it is to fit an SSD or upgrade the memory on to this model and whether it voids your warranty.
An SSD really transforms the feel on any desktop or laptop and personally I wouldn't even consider any machine which I couldn't easily upgrade with one, especially a Mac as it's so easy to reinstall OSX after changing the drive (it automatically boots, downloads and installs the OS when you boot with a drive without it installed)
I wouldn't leap at this model to be honest and suspect people are just seeing iMac relatively cheap (for Apples over inflated prices) and voting hot without delving into this.
http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/pcs/pc-systems/1404067/apple-215-inch-imac-review-late-2015-still-the-all-in-one-standard/page/0/1
"Apple 21.5-inch iMac review (late 2015) - still the all-in-one standard
Ever-so-slightly under-powered and expensive to upgrade, but the smaller 2015 iMac is still a great all-in-one"
That might have been acceptable in 2008.
Not for me as I'm already kitted out, but out of interest would you suggest spending the extra £100 for THIS if potential buyers are looking to use Final cut Pro or Logic Pro ? It's not a huge additional premium in the long term.
I just can't keep up with the pros & cons of the processor and graphics combinations now. It was much easier when Spectrums ruled the roost. ( Key for BBC vs Spectrum debate)
El Capitan is 10.11, I'd make sure they have all the specs right before you make a purchase.
This processor has a TDP of 15W (it is basically a laptop model) so it is super power efficient and most likely very cool - so no fans and whisper silent operation (ok not quite as this specific pc has a hdd instead of ssd).
All in all for people using these as general purpose pcs it is a far more reasonable choice than a quad core using 105W and costing 200£ more which they would never actually use to the full potential.
For example I have a NUC with i3-5010U, so about 3000 at cpu bench and it is perfectly capable of running Windows and being used as a main pc by my family as well as always running to act as a plex server etc, all this with about 6W idle power consumption and about 20W when in active use.
All that said this is (in line with usual apple policy) overpriced for what it is.
But then the CPU in my old Mac is twice as fast as the CPU in this iMac - I'm not sure this hardware has the grunt to keep up with the next few revisions of OSX, let alone last another 6 years.
Personally I don't blame Apple for this - I think Intel should make it a little clearer what family of CPUs each is from. I think most people see the 'i5' in the title and assume this must be a capable machine rather than one that's running a netbook-class processor.
People do not know that macbook pro screen is the best in laptops (color gamut etc ... )
I have compared amoled samsung top quality screen to macbook pro 13.3 and I can say that macbook with lcd technology a not so sharp but colors gama better Blacks yes amoled better but macbook not far from this as well
For me screen is the 1 thing now for laptop to buy
Second is design how it is looks feels Macbook pro alum case give these premium feel . Where after 2 Years plastic laptop looks like ........
Third everything works in hardware level Where windows .......driver o drivers ......
Do i like mac operating system NO - not really but it works Do I like windows 7 O Yes but it is not safe "web"
Macbook pro 13.3 is people to work not gaming laptop
Want games buy PS4 end enjoy
For example you can get a better species machine with a larger monitor for less than 300£, even if you are looking for a small device you can build/buy a powerful nuc plus better screen and fit it at the back of the monitor for less than 400£.
I never said this was a good deal and have voted cold actually because it is overpriced. But if you must have Apple and want something like this should be good enough for most.
Bought my missus a similar iMac 21.5" to the one at Costco but with the 4K think it's the same integrated video (it's 1.5GB memory on the card, but pretty sure I recall it's something like 1GB is dedicated and the other 512MB is VRAM).
I just downloaded Heaven 4.0 benchmark (running with defaults - medium settings) and with a 3.1GHZ processor and the same video card, I am getting FPS: 18.2 Score: 459 Min FPS: 8.8 and Max FPS:36.3 at 2048x1152 Medium.
For apparently an integrated card I reckon that's pretty good, but you should check out other vendors systems online for comparison (Unique Heaven is a cross-platform benchmark).
Certainly the faster CPU is recommended for LPX according to some posts, so £100 is worth the spend there.
FCPX Supported video specs
https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT202239
LPX Specs...
http://www.apple.com/uk/logic-pro/specs/
Hope you get what your looking for :sunglasses: