Been waiting for this to come down in price. With Mary inspiring my Mrs she wants a decent mixer and this seems just the trick! Plus standard John Lewis servicing guarantee of 5 years!! Can't go wrong!
Thanks to Basualdo I've just found out you can also claim a Free Joseph Joseph Index Chopping Board with knives & Scales worth £125!
An excellent cupboard filler to go with the bread maker and ice cream maker
andrsnh
15 Dec 155#45
I'm a trained professional baker, had the Classic mixer for a number of years before getting the 6.9L bowl lift. I've used the Classic/Artisan/6.9L bowl lift.
Yes this price is fantastic, however time for a little clear up of people giving advice that the Artisan is a far superior mixer.
The Classic and Artisan have the following in common:
They both use the same nylon gears, these tend to fail under abusive heavy mixing (hence 500g flour restriction for bread).
They both have the same diecast metal bodies/same footprint/same aesthetics.
The Whisk/Paddle/Dough Hook attachments are the same for the Classic and Artisan, they're interchangeable between models as are the bowls, hub attachments, as well as accessories such as the ice cream bowl.
Differences:
The Classic motor on paper is marginally less powerful, in real world usage it's not really noticeable and neither should exceed 500g of flour when making bread due to the nylon gears.
The Classic bowl is brushed (hides scratches), the Artisan bowl is polished.
The Classic bowl doesn't have a handle - in my experience this is a little bit annoying HOWEVER with what you save you can pick up a second bowl.
The Classic bowl is 500ml smaller than the Artisan - this difference is unnoticeable unless you're running the mixer filled to the brim (not recommended because again nylon gears) in which case you should consider a larger mixer such as the 6.9L.
The Classic mixer doesn't have a splash guard - I personally don't like the guards they don't really work and they rattle.
The Classic mixer only comes in white.
All comments (52)
sheilajay
15 Dec 15#1
Great price but only available in raspberry ice. Lovely colour but would not suit my kitchen.I am sfter the almond cream colour. Still at £363.69
An excellent cupboard filler to go with the bread maker and ice cream maker
argosextra to gr8h8me
15 Dec 15#17
You spend £300 just to fill your cupboard that's a waste of money then
Fredi1428
15 Dec 15#12
When we have finished squabbling over the colour :wink: these are awesome. I have two! I'm a cake designer and mine get used pretty much daily.....they certainly get put through their paces! Would always recommend :smile: xx (Had my first one about 5 years and still going strong) x
JonN
15 Dec 151#13
Usual price unfortunately, this is the KitchenAid Classic model as opposed to OP's deal which is the KitchenAid Artisan. Not as good a model!
alexpriest
15 Dec 153#14
Plus only a 2 year warranty compared to big John's 5 year bonanza!
bargain1979
15 Dec 151#15
we make cakes professionally and had one of these to start with. however we soon found that the jug was not big enough for our needs and we had to make buttercream in multiple batches. was considering buying a bigger kitchen aid until research showed that Kenwood 1000W mixers are the way to go. jug is half as big again so we can now get away with fewer batches. plus Kenwood more powerful
michaelb1967
15 Dec 15#16
Very good price for Artisan machine. Bought 2 years ago. It's excellent.
mr_waazo
15 Dec 15#18
I really want onebut can't justify spending that much. I think I might just have to go for the kenwood kmix. Any reviews guys? Is there a big difference
adhkarzf to mr_waazo
15 Dec 151#19
I've got the kmix and it gets used regularly it's mixed everything I've needed it too and I bake a lot. I used to want the kitchenaid but now I've got the kmix I'm more than happy.
brilly
15 Dec 15#20
better than spending RRP surely?
plus...wait for it... its called a joke
Quantic
15 Dec 15#21
Great deal - paid £470 for this in John Lewis 6 months ago!
WheresMeNuts
15 Dec 15#22
300 w power, that can't be right ?
brilly to WheresMeNuts
15 Dec 151#27
its direct drive so uses less energy - like the direct drive washing machines i guess
how they compare with traditional models i dunno but i have never seen anyone complain about the power of these
neri29
15 Dec 15#23
Great price
oldpal
15 Dec 15#24
Look at Andrew James mixers. Much cheaper and they look good. They are more powerful than KitchenAid and some have a much bigger capacity. I chose a large one and can mix 3lb of flour in it for bread. Most kitchenAids I have seen can't do that. I think you are paying more for the name.
oldpal
15 Dec 15#25
My Andrew James is loads cheaper and more powerful. Delighted with it.
DB2k
15 Dec 15#26
There's an Ice Cream maker attachment from what I recall. Got my candy apple red one a while ago when it was on sale somewhere, and price matched at JL, and it came with a huge glass mixing jug and the food processor with blades for free so it was a great offer :smiley:
Pleased with it. Don't use it a huge amount but I do use it for food processing when im cooking a big meal or making a cake/meringue.
This is the deal clincher for me ...any hesitation in buying has now gone...thanks alot
jgtuk to Basualdo
15 Dec 15#34
Top man... Already ordered for my Wife but this makes it even sweeter.
Many thanks to you and the op.
alexpriest to Basualdo
15 Dec 151#46
Great shout I'll add this to the post!
rich_1986
15 Dec 15#29
I can vouch for the KitchenAid Artisan. Its a class leader by far. If you want bigger mixes/batches you can buy bigger bowls for it (in a variety of materials like metal, glass etc) multiple attachments and heads for pretty much any culinary requirement. And the thing is made of solid metal from head to base. No cheap plastic like the Kmix and other brands. Easy to use and clean, and an absolute must for any baker, casual or otherwise. Again, I have mentioned before on HUKD, the 'classic' model is physically smaller and less powerful as the Artisan. So make sure, if you do purchase, that it is the correct model you want to buy.
adhkarzf to rich_1986
15 Dec 15#49
Which kmix have you been looking at that's made of cheap plastic? Mines all metal as far as I can tell except for the dial. Kitchenaid is prettier I'll give you that but the kmix is great my friend has the kitchenaid but there's not much actual difference between the two when you use them.
lck1986
15 Dec 15#30
Fantastic price! If only I could even now afford it!!
Sim
15 Dec 15#31
Fantastic price and I know my Wife would love it but we just don't have enough room for it
cam8
15 Dec 15#33
Great find, black one ordered for the missus. It's what she wanted for xmas. Had looked at the factory seconds on ebay from Belgium at around same price but JL 5 year warranty makes this a great deal. Heat added.
neilgreig
15 Dec 15#35
A great deal OP,voted hot shame the freebies have changed from the last offer which was Free Food Processor Attachment & Glass Bowl which I would have found more useful.
Dotty3
15 Dec 15#36
Brilliant deal, have wanted one for so long but just could not afford it, won a £25.00 voucher for JL last week and have now put it towards the cost of the mixer, making it £275.00, thanks op
wobblywitch
15 Dec 15#37
Fantastic! Thanks so much perfect timing for me.
getmeone
15 Dec 15#38
Careful, Within a given manufacturer's product lineup, it is an indicator of how powerful the motor will be, but the wattage indicated is the power consumed by the mixer, not the power produced by the motor. It's a marketing gimmick, pure and simple.
Given two motors that perform equally well (say the 325 watt motor in the KitchenAid Pro 500 vs. the 800 watt motor in the Cuisinart SM-55), it's actually better to pick the one with lower wattage, as it produces equal results with less than half the power consumption!
brilly
15 Dec 15#39
me be careful>!!?!?
obviously within a range using same tech - more watts = more mixing power
but thats the thing - we cant compare these directly between manufacturers on wattage alone as they dont use the exact same tech
you apparently have knowledge on how 325 watt motor in the KitchenAid Pro 500 compares vs. the 800 watt motor in the Cuisinart SM-55 - great but most dont so they cant then choose the lower wattage one automatically
sam1970
15 Dec 15#40
sadly and after speaking to the Mrs, she wants the almond cream colour which is £64 dearer. It looks like it will be a long wait for an offer on that colour
chrishamblin
15 Dec 15#41
Thanks OP. I've been after one for a while. Why? Not sure, but they sure do look cool.
The chopping boards etc. will be very handy too :smiley:
Once again, this is a dangerous website.
FreakyFloss
15 Dec 15#42
Still waiting for the Empire red to come down to this sort of price.......
damn7547 to FreakyFloss
15 Dec 15#44
If that came down wouldn't of cared what colour the kitchen was would have jumped on that
damn7547
15 Dec 15#43
Been looking at this for months, bought one for the wife/myself
shame only in black though
many thanks
andrsnh
15 Dec 155#45
I'm a trained professional baker, had the Classic mixer for a number of years before getting the 6.9L bowl lift. I've used the Classic/Artisan/6.9L bowl lift.
Yes this price is fantastic, however time for a little clear up of people giving advice that the Artisan is a far superior mixer.
The Classic and Artisan have the following in common:
They both use the same nylon gears, these tend to fail under abusive heavy mixing (hence 500g flour restriction for bread).
They both have the same diecast metal bodies/same footprint/same aesthetics.
The Whisk/Paddle/Dough Hook attachments are the same for the Classic and Artisan, they're interchangeable between models as are the bowls, hub attachments, as well as accessories such as the ice cream bowl.
Differences:
The Classic motor on paper is marginally less powerful, in real world usage it's not really noticeable and neither should exceed 500g of flour when making bread due to the nylon gears.
The Classic bowl is brushed (hides scratches), the Artisan bowl is polished.
The Classic bowl doesn't have a handle - in my experience this is a little bit annoying HOWEVER with what you save you can pick up a second bowl.
The Classic bowl is 500ml smaller than the Artisan - this difference is unnoticeable unless you're running the mixer filled to the brim (not recommended because again nylon gears) in which case you should consider a larger mixer such as the 6.9L.
The Classic mixer doesn't have a splash guard - I personally don't like the guards they don't really work and they rattle.
The Classic mixer only comes in white.
OB1
15 Dec 15#47
Great post, thanks.
Have you had a Kenwood Chef? Interested how the Kitchenaid compares.
Nesima
15 Dec 15#48
Nylon gears, how long are they going to last ?
adhkarzf
15 Dec 15#50
I'm happy for you and I'm just as happy with my kmix :wink:
mnet
16 Dec 15#51
Why expired? For me stills showing as £299.95, also competed my checkout after midnight with 299.95 paid, thanks op.
alexpriest
16 Dec 15#52
They must have been late shutting it down. Definitely expired now. Got in there in the nick of time!
Opening post
Thanks to Basualdo I've just found out you can also claim a Free Joseph Joseph Index Chopping Board with knives & Scales worth £125!
http://www.kitchenaidredemptions.co.uk/mixer_joseph.php
Top comments
http://www.kitchenaidredemptions.co.uk/mixer_joseph.php
Yes this price is fantastic, however time for a little clear up of people giving advice that the Artisan is a far superior mixer.
The Classic and Artisan have the following in common:
They both use the same nylon gears, these tend to fail under abusive heavy mixing (hence 500g flour restriction for bread).
They both have the same diecast metal bodies/same footprint/same aesthetics.
The Whisk/Paddle/Dough Hook attachments are the same for the Classic and Artisan, they're interchangeable between models as are the bowls, hub attachments, as well as accessories such as the ice cream bowl.
Differences:
The Classic motor on paper is marginally less powerful, in real world usage it's not really noticeable and neither should exceed 500g of flour when making bread due to the nylon gears.
The Classic bowl is brushed (hides scratches), the Artisan bowl is polished.
The Classic bowl doesn't have a handle - in my experience this is a little bit annoying HOWEVER with what you save you can pick up a second bowl.
The Classic bowl is 500ml smaller than the Artisan - this difference is unnoticeable unless you're running the mixer filled to the brim (not recommended because again nylon gears) in which case you should consider a larger mixer such as the 6.9L.
The Classic mixer doesn't have a splash guard - I personally don't like the guards they don't really work and they rattle.
The Classic mixer only comes in white.
All comments (52)
plus...wait for it... its called a joke
how they compare with traditional models i dunno but i have never seen anyone complain about the power of these
Pleased with it. Don't use it a huge amount but I do use it for food processing when im cooking a big meal or making a cake/meringue.
http://www.kitchenaidredemptions.co.uk/mixer_joseph.php
Many thanks to you and the op.
Given two motors that perform equally well (say the 325 watt motor in the KitchenAid Pro 500 vs. the 800 watt motor in the Cuisinart SM-55), it's actually better to pick the one with lower wattage, as it produces equal results with less than half the power consumption!
obviously within a range using same tech - more watts = more mixing power
but thats the thing - we cant compare these directly between manufacturers on wattage alone as they dont use the exact same tech
you apparently have knowledge on how 325 watt motor in the KitchenAid Pro 500 compares vs. the 800 watt motor in the Cuisinart SM-55 - great but most dont so they cant then choose the lower wattage one automatically
The chopping boards etc. will be very handy too :smiley:
Once again, this is a dangerous website.
shame only in black though
many thanks
Yes this price is fantastic, however time for a little clear up of people giving advice that the Artisan is a far superior mixer.
The Classic and Artisan have the following in common:
They both use the same nylon gears, these tend to fail under abusive heavy mixing (hence 500g flour restriction for bread).
They both have the same diecast metal bodies/same footprint/same aesthetics.
The Whisk/Paddle/Dough Hook attachments are the same for the Classic and Artisan, they're interchangeable between models as are the bowls, hub attachments, as well as accessories such as the ice cream bowl.
Differences:
The Classic motor on paper is marginally less powerful, in real world usage it's not really noticeable and neither should exceed 500g of flour when making bread due to the nylon gears.
The Classic bowl is brushed (hides scratches), the Artisan bowl is polished.
The Classic bowl doesn't have a handle - in my experience this is a little bit annoying HOWEVER with what you save you can pick up a second bowl.
The Classic bowl is 500ml smaller than the Artisan - this difference is unnoticeable unless you're running the mixer filled to the brim (not recommended because again nylon gears) in which case you should consider a larger mixer such as the 6.9L.
The Classic mixer doesn't have a splash guard - I personally don't like the guards they don't really work and they rattle.
The Classic mixer only comes in white.
Have you had a Kenwood Chef? Interested how the Kitchenaid compares.