Checkout price is £259.99 (+ 3-5 days Free Delivery)
£20 cashback from Asus
3.15% cashback by topcashback on £259.99 (not £239.99)
Free Game: Assassins Creed Syndicate or Tom Clancy Rainbow Six
Top comments
codnan
12 Dec 155#1
Good price , but I still think the current gen of gpus need a price reduction as the 970 has been around £250 for about a year now proving there is a stagnant market . Hopefully they will release something new , or amd release something better. Either way these cards need to price cuts imo
All comments (17)
codnan
12 Dec 155#1
Good price , but I still think the current gen of gpus need a price reduction as the 970 has been around £250 for about a year now proving there is a stagnant market . Hopefully they will release something new , or amd release something better. Either way these cards need to price cuts imo
K1LLER HORNET to codnan
12 Dec 151#2
Couldn't agree more.
I picked up a couple of Strix cards at launch around 15 months ago for only £290 each.
At the pace things are moving in the tech world, these should been superseded months ago.
REAL_DEAL
12 Dec 15#3
I keep reading the odd post on here, that a reduction is coming soon in the USA, but is wondering when it will hit Europe. And the UK, need it to happen fast
IIHEAT
14 Dec 15#4
Great cards and heapest price around but I agree they should be cheaper by now.
seb85a
15 Dec 15#5
Will my AMD Athlon x4 760k bottleneck this card?
dcpp4 to seb85a
15 Dec 15#10
although bottleneck is a word that gets thrown around way too often and without any real sense behind it, pairing a ~50£ cpu with a 230£ gpu is a bit imbalanced. i'd suggest you to look to pair it with a 380/x or a 960, maximum.
kev1986
15 Dec 152#6
I returned my 970 the week after I got it - 4GB MY ****! 3.5 GB usable the other 512mb is that crap it lags.
At £18 less than it was 8 months ago, and for a pathetic card - this is FREEZING
CatBusStop
15 Dec 15#7
The GTX 1000 series are still slated for mid-next year so guess nvidia are keeping up the prices of their current cards for a little while yet. Would be nice if they bumped up the memory on the 900 series though - 6 to 8GB of GDDR memory is rapidly approaching the norm for AMD cards.
wild_quinine
15 Dec 151#8
And what did you replace it with that was so much better? Because at the time it will have been a 290x (which is about the same but runs hotter and louder) or a 980 (which is approximately 10% better for an extra 200 quid, and rewards nVidia for their misdeeds).
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not defending nVidia's actions on the memory, but the number of people who act like the discovery of this issue months after release, which most people can still only replicate using third party software, somehow invalidated all the benchmarks up until that point.
There are plenty of reasons to be upset about the memory, and some people will have had good reasons to return their cards. But, seriously? It's a 'pathetic' card?
nVidia may have been pathetic, but the card is still knocking them out of the park. If it wasn't, you can bet your butt the prices would have dropped.
EDIT: April? You bought the card in April, 3 months after the 3.5gb controversy blew over? And then returned it when... what? It behaved exactly the same as in all the benchmarks?
Ferrari100
15 Dec 15#9
Nearly at the right price. With and 390 4Gb on the horizon that will be much better suited to the next wave of dx12 titles and VR (AMD GPUs are preferred by oculus rift due to having ASYNC compute). The 390 4GB will be around £220 and by far the best option around unless these 970s drop further in price, around £200
Opening post
£20 cashback from Asus
3.15% cashback by topcashback on £259.99 (not £239.99)
Free Game: Assassins Creed Syndicate or Tom Clancy Rainbow Six
Top comments
All comments (17)
I picked up a couple of Strix cards at launch around 15 months ago for only £290 each.
At the pace things are moving in the tech world, these should been superseded months ago.
At £18 less than it was 8 months ago, and for a pathetic card - this is FREEZING
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not defending nVidia's actions on the memory, but the number of people who act like the discovery of this issue months after release, which most people can still only replicate using third party software, somehow invalidated all the benchmarks up until that point.
There are plenty of reasons to be upset about the memory, and some people will have had good reasons to return their cards. But, seriously? It's a 'pathetic' card?
nVidia may have been pathetic, but the card is still knocking them out of the park. If it wasn't, you can bet your butt the prices would have dropped.
EDIT: April? You bought the card in April, 3 months after the 3.5gb controversy blew over? And then returned it when... what? It behaved exactly the same as in all the benchmarks?