As an Asus fan that's pretty much their way. You great great spec and a quality build for about £100 under the odds - via a few of the flashy but ultimately entirely pointless features missed off.
polly69
15 Nov 15#3
Cold
It looses some of the features of the 1st one and has bloatware on it, so its a step backwards from the original.
barijohn
15 Nov 15#4
Yeah it's lost the heart rate sensor but gained wifi.
Depends what you want it for really.
dillydilly
15 Nov 15#5
don't use either on my LG GWR, heart monitor always says around 75 if I'm sitting or running, and I'm rarely somewhere with WiFi without my phone in my pocket... for me, reliable Bluetooth connection, screen clarity and loads of watch faces to play with are my top 3 requirements
MrMakstar
15 Nov 15#6
This or the Moto 360, opinions please?
Thanks.
callum84 to MrMakstar
15 Nov 151#7
Purely on looks alone, the moto 360.
barijohn
15 Nov 15#8
All depends on what you want. The Moto G is lovely, just a bit too big for me.
Moto G also has a heart rate sensor so if you want one of those then again it's Moto G.
The overall experience will be similar as android wear is the same.
So looks is main thing and that's such a personal thing
aleem to barijohn
15 Nov 155#9
I think the Moto G strapped to anyone's wrist will be just a little big! :smirk:
Opening post
Seems a lot of watch for the money. Classic look and can be has in two sizes if big bulky watches aren't your thing it's worth a look.
Probably be around £150 when released here.
Top comments
All comments (22)
http://www.techradar.com/reviews/wearables/asus-zenwatch-2-1303267/review
Basically.... Not the best but great value
It looses some of the features of the 1st one and has bloatware on it, so its a step backwards from the original.
Depends what you want it for really.
Thanks.
Moto G also has a heart rate sensor so if you want one of those then again it's Moto G.
The overall experience will be similar as android wear is the same.
So looks is main thing and that's such a personal thing