It says: speeds up to 550MB/s read and 400MB/s write, but this is an external portable SD card connected via USB port. I'm currently looking at the the 2.5 internal SSD drives and they have similar read/write specs. How can that be? I woulkd have thought a drive connected directly to the MB would be faster than a USB port.
Any help appreciated, thanks.
McGoose to BeerGoggles
4 Sep 17#11
USB3.1 specs are up to 10gbit/s ~ 1.2Gigabytes second, there 's a review here with benchmarking at 3:27 -
Derek_Horatio_Shatwell to McGoose
4 Sep 17#13
Cool. Thanks for posting the video.
If you look on Amazon US in the reviews, there's someone claiming 645 MB for Write 720 MB for Read speeds. Maybe Photoshop played it's part, who knows?
eatmorefish
4 Sep 17#7
Looks ok to me. This review gives it good enough speeds. Thanks op.
berisford
4 Sep 17#3
Good reviews, but then they would be, all but one are from 'freebies'!
whelan189 to berisford
4 Sep 17#4
Would pay extra 16£ for a samsung evo personally
damcnaught to whelan189
4 Sep 17#5
This is a portable SSD with USB connector on.
Samsung don't do an EVO that competes with this - they do the Samsung T3 and T5, both of which costs a fair bit more than this.
whelan189 to damcnaught
4 Sep 17#6
hmm odd it qouted the wrong one the guy must of removed the comment, he asked if the ssd can be taken out enclosure for pc
kyleastley
4 Sep 17#2
Can the drive be stripped out and used in a laptop?
Opening post
was £160 now £129.99
@ Amazon
13 comments
petapixel.com/201…ny/
Any help appreciated, thanks.
If you look on Amazon US in the reviews, there's someone claiming 645 MB for Write 720 MB for Read speeds.
Maybe Photoshop played it's part, who knows?
Samsung don't do an EVO that competes with this - they do the Samsung T3 and T5, both of which costs a fair bit more than this.
I think there are on clearout as Micron announced they're closing down the Lexar division a couple of months ago.