I know it's not much of a deal but this is the cheapest 1070 mini price delivered as far as I can see. Personally I'd recommend a full size 107p but on a budget for a 1070 this is cheapest.
GTX 1070 Mini 8GB GDDR5 1708MHz Boost 1 x Dual-link DVI, 3 x DisplayPort, 1 x HDMI
Expected stock 30th August.
32 comments
unconfirmed
31 Aug 17#32
Right. Nice one ebuyer.
dealorama
31 Aug 17#27
Now available to Pre-order - 7th September delivery
unconfirmed to dealorama
31 Aug 17#28
And £369.99. It was never £339.98
dealorama to unconfirmed
31 Aug 17#29
it was this morning, i know because ive ordered one . bit cheeky from ebuyer
unconfirmed to dealorama
31 Aug 17#30
You couldn’t order one when it was £339.98
dealorama to unconfirmed
31 Aug 17#31
you couldn't is correct :blush:
unconfirmed
30 Aug 17#25
238° for a deal that doesn’t exist. Impressive.
bbfb123 to unconfirmed
30 Aug 17#26
Thanks man
Billythebubble
30 Aug 17#21
Interesting, seems others don't know how hukd works posting deals that don't work
bbfb123
30 Aug 17#18
Vega 56 is pants compared to a 1070. Runs hotter, uses more power, costs more, performs same if not worse...you'd have to be a fool to buy vega over nvidia.
julz333 to bbfb123
30 Aug 17#19
This mini 1070 itx will run hot as well. Vega 56 is close to gtx 1080 in performance and when undervolted consumes more or less the same power. Undervolting takes minutes literally. As always do your research before buying and check the latest benchmarks.
bbfb123 to julz333
30 Aug 17#20
Yeah I just checked benchmarks and it seems overclocked vega 56 at 2ghz is on par with stock vega 64. Which is decent. But my 1070 is running at 2.1ghz which surely puts it in 1080 territory. I'll do a benchmark today and report back with my results. I'll say this though it only runs at 60c even overclocked and I know the vega chips won't get anywhere near that. Nor use the same amount of power.
I'd also guess that the reviewer I'm reading got sent a golden same 56 I doubt all 56s will do that speed?
jaydeeuk1 to bbfb123
30 Aug 17#22
In performance/watt AMD can barely match the previous gen nvidia cards, let alone the current line. Think they were taken by surprise on how much of an improvement nvidia managed over the 900 series. The 1100 series could well see 1060 performance for under 80w!
steve_bezerker to jaydeeuk1
30 Aug 17#23
I mean in terms of PvP though AMD has been superior to gamers on a budget for many years. It's still a correct statement to say Nvidia are better at the top end though. The GTX 1080 is nearly unrivalled, let alone the 1080Ti.
jaydeeuk1 to steve_bezerker
30 Aug 17#24
I'd argue that they were at their best when they were ATI, the 4000 series were designed under ATIs leadership and was the last card made that was more efficient and cheaper than nvidias offerings. That 4670 was a superb card for the money and was far superior to the 8600, the 4850 and 4870 were great value and showed ATI they were back to their best after the poor 2000 and average 3000 series. I had a rage, then a radeon DDR while everyone else went geforce, then a 4670, a 5770. And then value and performance somewhat disappeared. Next gen cards became a rebrand of previous gen cards, mining started and amd lost their edge. Nvidia then released the interesting 750 ti for £100 so went for that - I've never spent more than £100 on a card as that is where the best value used to be, now its nearer £200, so have just bought a cut down 1060 3gb for £179 from Amazon.
AMD tried to be too many things at once, maybe they took too many resources away from ATI in the restructuring. They certainly seem to share the same marketing nowadays, months of synthetic benchmarks showing it battering whatever CPU or GPU was Nvidias/Intel's crown at the time, then getting released 12-24 months time by which time competition had either caught up or surpassed.
I want amd to get back in to their old ways, I love an underdog, but I also like VFM and while ryzen has that in bucket loads, the same can't quite believe said for the £300+ 580 Rx or buggy £500 Vega 64 when it's up against cheaper 1080s.
Szabster
30 Aug 17#13
It definitely does not add to cart and it's been like this for a while. :disappointed:
gummby
29 Aug 17#12
Yeah won't add to basket for me either. This was £10 cheaper a few weeks back.
Opening post
GTX 1070 Mini
8GB GDDR5
1708MHz Boost
1 x Dual-link DVI, 3 x DisplayPort, 1 x HDMI
Expected stock 30th August.
32 comments
I'd also guess that the reviewer I'm reading got sent a golden same 56 I doubt all 56s will do that speed?
AMD tried to be too many things at once, maybe they took too many resources away from ATI in the restructuring. They certainly seem to share the same marketing nowadays, months of synthetic benchmarks showing it battering whatever CPU or GPU was Nvidias/Intel's crown at the time, then getting released 12-24 months time by which time competition had either caught up or surpassed.
I want amd to get back in to their old ways, I love an underdog, but I also like VFM and while ryzen has that in bucket loads, the same can't quite believe said for the £300+ 580 Rx or buggy £500 Vega 64 when it's up against cheaper 1080s.
8 pin power connector
do I know how hukd works....nah only been a member for a few years!