Looks a fantastic deal for a 75 incher! The Hisense was this much money just a few weeks ago and got very hot!
Top features:
- 4K screen displays stunning pictures with impressive detail and clarity
- HDR supports the widest colour range currently available on a TV
- Comprehensive Smart functions cover all your catch-up and streaming needs
- Freeview Play makes catching up on missed programmes simple
4K display
The 4K screen delivers stunning picture quality from any compatible source, including 4K Blu-ray players, games consoles, and the built-in 4K streaming apps.
From nature documentaries to sports, you can expect sharp detail on everything you're watching.
Active High Dynamic Range (HDR)
Active HDR gives your pictures deeper contrast and brighter colours for natural and realistic colour reproduction.
You'll notice it in films and TV shows more, with blacks appearing much darker without muddying the screen and making it hard to see.
Comprehensive Smart
The UJ67 has all of the terrestrial catch-up TV services - BBC iPlayer, ITV Hub, All 4, and Demand 5, so don't need to plug anything else into it to catch up on all your new and favourite programmes.
There's also 4K versions of Netflix, Amazon Prime, and YouTube to help you take advantage of the TV's impressive picture quality.
Freeview Play
Freeview Play lets you scroll back through a week's worth of programmes and play them in your catch-up apps.
You don't need to open your app and search through them all to find something you've missed, just look back through the programme guide and click.
Don't forget your HDMI cables
Check out our range of HDMI cables to connect your input devices and to make sure your new TV has a perfect picture with improved transfer speeds.
Look out for the Sandstrom Silver Series HDMI cables with their lifetime warranty.
Wall mount your TV
Wall mounting is a great way to save floor space and accent your living room décor. If you want to wall mount this TV, browse our TV accessories to find the right 600 x 400 VESA mount.
All comments (70)
Wraggy1234
31 Aug 17#1
i would love to watch forest lose to the Rams on one of these beasts :raised_hand: :popcorn: .
Think it's still a bit pricey - but boy is it big!
blue_eyes777
31 Aug 17#2
Lol. It's the cheapest 75inch around
pavel76 to blue_eyes777
31 Aug 17#7
75inch RGBW panel - not so great really
lucyferror
31 Aug 17#3
Shame that its not 3D as well
Aldnoah to lucyferror
31 Aug 17#34
3D died a while ago. VR is next to die.
Gormond to Aldnoah
31 Aug 17#35
What do you mean by dead? Plenty of people still go and see 3D movies at the cinema, even with the silly premium charge.
And VR is excellent but very much in it's infancy. Give it several years to develop and it will become mainstream.
Dookie1985 to Gormond
31 Aug 17#36
I agree. I still watch Blu-ray/play games in 3D. LG seem to be the only company still releasing 4k passive 3D tv's. I've not looked too much into them but I believe they are both 55".
The one feature nobody ever took advantage of is dual play. Such a good concept!
Aldnoah to Gormond
31 Aug 17#39
There's a difference between commercial 3D at the cinema and 3D in the home. 3D in the home has been a fail. It didn't take off like they thought it would. People don't care about it. 4K w or w/o HDR is where it's at. And VR has been around for a long time. It comes and goes like a fad and never works out.
tjc2005 to Aldnoah
31 Aug 17#40
Yet films are still being released in 3D. And VR isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
Aldnoah to tjc2005
31 Aug 17#42
They're also still being released on DVD and VR will disappear in time just like it usually does. But anyways it's just one guys opinion, far be it from to stop anyone buying what they want.
Gormond to Aldnoah
31 Aug 17#43
That's because DVDs still sell, as do 3D BDs.
VR has never had such huge investment from multiple companies before. Also the fact that it's actually pretty good and very immersive.
tjc2005 to Aldnoah
31 Aug 17#46
Do you own a VR headset? And 3D blu rays are still being sold. Now they're becoming much more affordable for the average consumer, I don't think they'll fade like you think. There are quite a few cheaper ones on the way too.
lucyferror to Aldnoah
31 Aug 17#45
Are you feeling ok? Vr is just starting lol You have noooo idea lol
joel_69 to Aldnoah
31 Aug 17#55
Said by someone who I'd wager doesn't have VR.
I got my Oculus Rift a couple of weeks back and even in what is clearly the very early stages of VR, I can't put it down. Neither can any of the family. VR is going nowhere.
BassBassBass to lucyferror
1 Sep 17#56
Come on really? Who on earth watches anything in 3D, films aren't getting released in 3D anyomore and TV manufacturers have ditched 3D. 10 bit and HDR is only thing you want to be worried about.
lucyferror to BassBassBass
1 Sep 17#64
Really really lol. Movies are STILL released in 3D. I don't know where do you live :face_with_monocle:
BassBassBass to lucyferror
1 Sep 17#66
I live in london and work in film and TV, you will soon see a sharp drop in films being produced in 3D. 3D is on no producers mind anymore.
lucyferror to BassBassBass
1 Sep 17#67
You can still buy them and people have them at home as well.
BassBassBass to lucyferror
1 Sep 17#68
You can still buy minidisks and tape cassettes too. As mentioned to Master_Yoda, on a wide spectrum 3D wasnt done well. People dont want to sit with glasses on for 2hrs. The main films that are still in 3D are AAA blockbusters, and AAA blockbusters in general arent that good (review wise). Im not saying all blockbuster films are bad but in general the highest reviewed films will not have a 3D release.... I am generalising here. The new star wars were great in 3D, Im sure Alien Covenant and Dunkirk are also great in 3D, but there really isn't many films worth producing in 3D.
lucyferror to BassBassBass
2 Sep 17#69
That's a bit stupid comparison tbh. People don't want to sit with glasses for 2h? Somehow they still go to cinema and do it.
BassBassBass to lucyferror
2 Sep 17#70
3D won't succeed in the mainstream until it's glasses free. I'm on your side, I want it to succeed, but as mentioned quite a few times on this thread already, the widespread tech isn't there yet. I work around a lot of directors and producers who talk about this all the time. This isn't my opinion, this is widely regarded fact.
herby247
31 Aug 17#4
Don't waste your money, get the OLED!
lidds to herby247
31 Aug 17#12
If you are meaning a 75inch OLED dont be ridiculous However if you mean spend them same money on a 55inch OLED then I agree :smile:
blue_eyes777
31 Aug 17#5
Agreed. Manufacturers seem to have abandoned 3D
blue_eyes777
31 Aug 17#6
Oled 77 inch is 20 grand
blue_eyes777
31 Aug 17#8
Meaning?
pavel76 to blue_eyes777
31 Aug 17#14
This is not 4K Tv
blue_eyes777 to pavel76
31 Aug 17#15
Well your comment lacks any scientific detail or analysis. It appears that full UHD is available on the monochromatic and luminance . See this link: hdguru.com/lg-…ch/ which explains that: "Critics of the LCD approach to RGBW say the unusual sub-pixel arrangement prevents the panels from achieving full UHD color resolution, and therefore the displays do not meet the Consumer Technology Association’s (CTA) definition of a 4K Ultra HDTV – this requires 3840×2160 active pixels with 8-bit color (each pixel needing to carry a separate R, G and B subpixel across the screen). But LG has countered that its RGBW displays achieve full UHD monochromatic resolution and full resolution on the luma (brightness) channel, which is all that some other international standards organizations require for a 4K UHD designation."
uk_lawyer to pavel76
31 Aug 17#18
Actually this is a 4K tv. It's also HDR. The only issue is that it is an edge-lit TV rather than full-array or OLED. Personally I opted for a 65" OLED rather than a 75" LCD and couldn't be happier with my choice.
Size is important for the immersive aspect, but I couldn't justify it over the pure quality of the OLED. Look into the OLED65C7 which is what I went for and highly recommend.
wide_dub to uk_lawyer
31 Aug 17#26
I am looking at Oled65c7 how much did it set you back?
uk_lawyer to wide_dub
31 Aug 17#44
I got mine from Currys for £2999. Originally paid £4999 for the Sony OLED but once the price dropped I swapped it without hesitation. For being exactly the same panel and actually a much better UI on the LG, the £2000 cash back was welcomed!
If its anything like the 49 / 556400 inch then no. They have been having some terrible light bleed problems check out the thread on avforum, loads of people with issues
mastablasta
31 Aug 17#13
Pay a little but extra and get an Optoma UHD60. You can watch 4K on a screen over 100 inches like it should be viewed.
jaypr to mastablasta
31 Aug 17#20
Totally agree with this.
Even 75" isn't big enough for watching films.
Better off getting a 50-60" screen for every day use and a projector & screen that'll project a 100+" images for films.
Gormond to jaypr
31 Aug 17#33
Nonsense, it depends how close you are, I sit about 8 feet away from my 65 inch Samsung QLED and the picture is plenty big. If it's a movie I really want to see I would go to my local IMAX.
killerferret to jaypr
1 Sep 17#60
Agreed and set it up outside as well. Projector I use is only 720p (3000lumens) and has android / wifi + USB slot built into it so just power cable to hook up, and was less than £200. Works amazingly well. 1080p will be the next step when they drop in price a bit.
freakstyler
31 Aug 17#16
Personally
I wouldn't drop nearly two grand on a LCD based LG, OLED yes and take a 10 inch
screen cut on a 65" but this is overpriced in my opinion especially if its
using RGBW and not Full 4K. Every recent
example of an LG TV I've seen that uses an IPS panel has had noticeable issues,
as someone mentioned above backlight bleed being one of them - exacerbated by
the lack of contrast IPS is known for.
If the
curve doesn't bother you, a 78" Samsung ue78ku6500 can be had from
Crampton and Moore for £2400.
ReflexReact
31 Aug 17#17
Wow that's a good price, especially when coupled with Edenred vouchers giving you 6.5% off - making it about £1870!
(Edenred is childcare voucher scheme).
I'm highly tempted to get this - it's HDR 10. My room will only suit a 92" projector and this saves a lot of hassle, plus its 4k!
Only concern is no one has tested it!
Bigfootpete
31 Aug 17#19
Let me see - pay the plumber to install a new boiler - or a nice new big screen tv...hmmm
collectorcol
31 Aug 17#21
If you don't know what RGBW means you shouldn't be posting TV deals.
blue_eyes777 to collectorcol
31 Aug 17#23
Errr... I do and I explained it. Rude twit
pavel76 to blue_eyes777
31 Aug 17#25
Not rude at all... 75inch RGBW screen doesn't make any sense... well, at least don't get too excited. Better spend 2k on 55inch OLED than 75inch RGBW which is not able to display full colours correctly.
blue_eyes777 to pavel76
31 Aug 17#29
But it's horses for courses - some folk are happy enough with a monster for the same price. And it is rude to tell somebody not to post a deal. If it wasn't for posters, there would be no HUKD
pavel76 to blue_eyes777
31 Aug 17#30
You are right :smile:
Jinkz to collectorcol
31 Aug 17#27
The requirement for posting deals doesn't include being an expert in the product field. This is a general community forum, if you want to make smart comments head over to avforums.
Sir_Deadpool_of_Awesome
31 Aug 17#22
For all those tempted on this because of the size only, then projection is 100% the way to go.
You can spend £450-500 for the Benq w1070 and have a 120" inch screen from under 4 meters away. My personal fav purchase last year and when paired with a cheap projection screen you've got a decent 1080p home cinema. Of course if you have £2000 to spare you can get a considerably better image, but I've been over the moon with mine for movies and gaming.
Flynn_Lives to Sir_Deadpool_of_Awesome
31 Aug 17#31
How noisy is that Benq? I've been wanting to get a projector again, but I had an Optoma years ago and the noise bugged me a lot!
Sir_Deadpool_of_Awesome to Flynn_Lives
1 Sep 17#62
I sit by my benq and never feel distracted by the noise at normal volume. In eco mode its practically silent, just depends how bright you need to counter for ambient light. If you're watching with the sound at a mid level you'll never hear it anyway.
collectorcol
31 Aug 17#24
You responded with 'meaning?' Then came back with what looks like a half hour Google lesson :joy:
"But LG has countered that its RGBW displays achieve full UHD monochromatic resolution and full resolution on the luma (brightness) channel, which is all that some other international standards organizations require for a 4K UHD designation.
Note: LG Display, which manufactures the LCD panels with RGBW technology for LG Electronics, is one of the world’s largest suppliers of LCD TV panels. It sells RGBW panels to other television manufacturers and brands. So far, none of those panel customers have called out the use of RGBW panels in their 4K Ultra HDTVs in 2016, and most have refused to disclose whether they use RGBW panels or not".
LG is using 'some other international standards organisations' to claim UHD.
Another case of manufacturers trying to bamboozle customers into believing what they claim.
ReflexReact
31 Aug 17#28
Anyone know what the response time is likely to be on this? Any good for 4K gaming in HDR10?
chrisgunn123
31 Aug 17#32
Great deal. Been wondering what to do with this spare £2000 I had in my back pocket.
ichbinschnappy
31 Aug 17#37
Thats hot
Harry_Potter to ichbinschnappy
1 Sep 17#65
Stop spamming people's inboxes!
suchitmehta7
31 Aug 17#38
Few months ago I saw Hisense 65" for around £800
TheOak
31 Aug 17#41
Quidco is £70 for Tvs over £1k
atari001
31 Aug 17#47
For this price try and get hold of the 55" E6 instead. OLED and 3D and pretty good speakers as well for those without AV receivers. A true beast of a tele. (OLED55E6V)
xingxingww
31 Aug 17#48
Wow that is what i need
Master_Yoda
31 Aug 17#49
It annoys the hell out of me when people keep saying that 3D is crap and gimmicky and should be killed off etc. The Cinema 3D on my LG is absolutely STUNNING and is much better and more enjoyable than the 3D I've seen in the cinema. It's really stupid and idiotic that there's not more 3D content being shown when I see what my TV is capable of.
The negative stuff being said about 3D appears to be down to the fact that most 3D TVs sold were absolutely crap at doing 3D from what I've seen. Until I got my Cinema 3D LG, I thought 3D was gimmicky and crap (I honestly didn't even like it in the cinema) - the difference however is night and day. I had a Hisense 3D TV before my current TV and the 3D was absolute garbage in comparison. LG have done an amazing job with their 3D and seem to have perfected it just as everyone is trying to kill it off lol - I'm significantly more impressed watching 3D content on my LG TV, than watching HDR or 4K content - yet all people currently talk about is HDR and 4K and this is what is being pushed into people's living rooms. All the people who think 3D is crap - when you see 3D done well on a TV, you'll honestly be shocked at how good it is.
BassBassBass to Master_Yoda
1 Sep 17#57
Sad fact is, it generally wasn't done well and studios arent prepared to fork out that bit extra to produce films in 3D especially now manufactures arent making 3D Tv's. Your LG does sound good and I bet it is amazing, but again.. sadly, 3D wasn't enjoyable across the board :cry: 3D done well was a rarity. Better get on the 4K/8K HDR 10 bit wagon. Gaming in 4K is AMAZING :sunglasses: Yes, 10 minutes into a 4K film and you forget its 4K, but these are the cards we've been dealt.
Master_Yoda to BassBassBass
1 Sep 17#59
The weird thing is, my LG is 4K HDR 10bit AND has Passive 3D so I'm not missing out on anything, just benefiting from excellent 3D aswell. I find it ludicrous that most of these newer more expensive TVs can't even do what mine can do - people are missing out.
Yes Dookie - I can confirm 4K Passive 3D looks great on LG TVs - no issues with poor resolution. My Hisense was 4K and had Active 3D and it looked crap.
Dookie1985 to Master_Yoda
1 Sep 17#61
What model is your LG? Is it the 55UH850V or 55UH950V?
Master_Yoda to Dookie1985
1 Sep 17#63
Dookie - Mine is a 55UF860V
Dookie1985 to Master_Yoda
1 Sep 17#58
Yup. Again, I agree. I have a Toshiba and an LG 3D TV. The LG is way way better. It is about 2 or 3 years newer though. From what I have read, the reason 3D TV never really sold well is down to the technologies. Active 3D was just too expensive due to the glasses. Passive 3D was let down by resolution. Now 4K TV's are here, passive 3D is supposed to look much, much better on the few TV's that do have it. Now should be the moment manufacturers should be pushing 3D. I know that will be factored into my choice when I do get a 4k TV.
3D is dead my friends, just as this article said 3 years ago!!!
Smithy177
31 Aug 17#52
I got the 49" one of these for £600 when Currys has a deal on - absolutely stunning picture in my opinion for the money - loads better than my two year old Samsung that cost twice as much!! Couldn't be happier!!
vtec
31 Aug 17#53
Great. Now i just need to buy a house bigger than the tv
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Top features:
- 4K screen displays stunning pictures with impressive detail and clarity
- HDR supports the widest colour range currently available on a TV
- Comprehensive Smart functions cover all your catch-up and streaming needs
- Freeview Play makes catching up on missed programmes simple
4K display
The 4K screen delivers stunning picture quality from any compatible source, including 4K Blu-ray players, games consoles, and the built-in 4K streaming apps.
From nature documentaries to sports, you can expect sharp detail on everything you're watching.
Active High Dynamic Range (HDR)
Active HDR gives your pictures deeper contrast and brighter colours for natural and realistic colour reproduction.
You'll notice it in films and TV shows more, with blacks appearing much darker without muddying the screen and making it hard to see.
Comprehensive Smart
The UJ67 has all of the terrestrial catch-up TV services - BBC iPlayer, ITV Hub, All 4, and Demand 5, so don't need to plug anything else into it to catch up on all your new and favourite programmes.
There's also 4K versions of Netflix, Amazon Prime, and YouTube to help you take advantage of the TV's impressive picture quality.
Freeview Play
Freeview Play lets you scroll back through a week's worth of programmes and play them in your catch-up apps.
You don't need to open your app and search through them all to find something you've missed, just look back through the programme guide and click.
Don't forget your HDMI cables
Check out our range of HDMI cables to connect your input devices and to make sure your new TV has a perfect picture with improved transfer speeds.
Look out for the Sandstrom Silver Series HDMI cables with their lifetime warranty.
Wall mount your TV
Wall mounting is a great way to save floor space and accent your living room décor. If you want to wall mount this TV, browse our TV accessories to find the right 600 x 400 VESA mount.
All comments (70)
Think it's still a bit pricey - but boy is it big!
And VR is excellent but very much in it's infancy. Give it several years to develop and it will become mainstream.
The one feature nobody ever took advantage of is dual play. Such a good concept!
VR has never had such huge investment from multiple companies before. Also the fact that it's actually pretty good and very immersive.
Now they're becoming much more affordable for the average consumer, I don't think they'll fade like you think. There are quite a few cheaper ones on the way too.
You have noooo idea lol
I got my Oculus Rift a couple of weeks back and even in what is clearly the very early stages of VR, I can't put it down. Neither can any of the family. VR is going nowhere.
That's a bit stupid comparison tbh. People don't want to sit with glasses for 2h? Somehow they still go to cinema and do it.
However if you mean spend them same money on a 55inch OLED then I agree :smile:
hdguru.com/lg-…ch/ which explains that:
"Critics of the LCD approach to RGBW say the unusual sub-pixel arrangement prevents the panels from achieving full UHD color resolution, and therefore the displays do not meet the Consumer Technology Association’s (CTA) definition of a 4K Ultra HDTV – this requires 3840×2160 active pixels with 8-bit color (each pixel needing to carry a separate R, G and B subpixel across the screen). But LG has countered that its RGBW displays achieve full UHD monochromatic resolution and full resolution on the luma (brightness) channel, which is all that some other international standards organizations require for a 4K UHD designation."
Size is important for the immersive aspect, but I couldn't justify it over the pure quality of the OLED. Look into the OLED65C7 which is what I went for and highly recommend.
If the curve doesn't bother you, a 78" Samsung ue78ku6500 can be had from Crampton and Moore for £2400.
(Edenred is childcare voucher scheme).
I'm highly tempted to get this - it's HDR 10. My room will only suit a 92" projector and this saves a lot of hassle, plus its 4k!
Only concern is no one has tested it!
You can spend £450-500 for the Benq w1070 and have a 120" inch screen from under 4 meters away. My personal fav purchase last year and when paired with a cheap projection screen you've got a decent 1080p home cinema. Of course if you have £2000 to spare you can get a considerably better image, but I've been over the moon with mine for movies and gaming.
"But LG has countered that its RGBW displays achieve full UHD monochromatic resolution and full resolution on the luma (brightness) channel, which is all that some other international standards organizations require for a 4K UHD designation.
Note: LG Display, which manufactures the LCD panels with RGBW technology for LG Electronics, is one of the world’s largest suppliers of LCD TV panels. It sells RGBW panels to other television manufacturers and brands. So far, none of those panel customers have called out the use of RGBW panels in their 4K Ultra HDTVs in 2016, and most have refused to disclose whether they use RGBW panels or not".
LG is using 'some other international standards organisations' to claim UHD.
Another case of manufacturers trying to bamboozle customers into believing what they claim.
A true beast of a tele. (OLED55E6V)
The negative stuff being said about 3D appears to be down to the fact that most 3D TVs sold were absolutely crap at doing 3D from what I've seen. Until I got my Cinema 3D LG, I thought 3D was gimmicky and crap (I honestly didn't even like it in the cinema) - the difference however is night and day. I had a Hisense 3D TV before my current TV and the 3D was absolute garbage in comparison. LG have done an amazing job with their 3D and seem to have perfected it just as everyone is trying to kill it off lol - I'm significantly more impressed watching 3D content on my LG TV, than watching HDR or 4K content - yet all people currently talk about is HDR and 4K and this is what is being pushed into people's living rooms. All the people who think 3D is crap - when you see 3D done well on a TV, you'll honestly be shocked at how good it is.
Yes Dookie - I can confirm 4K Passive 3D looks great on LG TVs - no issues with poor resolution. My Hisense was 4K and had Active 3D and it looked crap.
3D is dead my friends, just as this article said 3 years ago!!!