Oculus Rift Touch Controllers Intel Core i5 Quad Core Up to 16GB DDR4 RAM Optional SSD 1TB SATA Hard Drive Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB Graphics Windows 10 64 Pre Installed
It seems to be fully configurable so you can upgrade if you want to, it's worth noting however that it doesn't come with any peripherals, no monitor, mouse or keyboard etc.
Top comments
Gambini to SimyJo
14 Jul 175#3
What are you talking about? That cpu/ram/gfx card combo is perfectly fine for VR - yes, not on ultra settings maybe but most competent Vr experiences are optimised more than the usual non-vr ports.
Some people with very small appendages might argue that you need to out and spend £600+ on a graphics card but they are talking out of the wrong end of their body,
Great price OP voted hot!
james_lfc
14 Jul 173#24
£999 and no free delivery, I'm out
SimyJo
14 Jul 173#1
That PC spec could only handle the most basic of VR. And Occulus Rift has just had a price cut I believe.
Latest comments (59)
Ev0lution
18 Jul 17#59
Well, you, being a member of the 'PC Master Race', would not know the first thing about having a wife so trying to explain things like how leaving your mum's basement and actually meeting women IRL can lead to relationships and not just on World of Warcraft or similar would be asinine.
But hey, 'projection at its finest' and all that.
scotia2
18 Jul 17#58
Cuck? Are you implying you like having your wife seen to by another man while you are humiliated in front of them?
Projection at its finest.
Ev0lution
18 Jul 17#57
You really sound like the sort of pointless idiot who googles the latest buzz words and attempts to add them into his posts in the belief that it makes you look intelligent. I'm actually surprised you haven't used cuck anywhere in your hilariously childish replies to other posters.
The fact is you probably know nothing at all about PCs beyond reading sites like Overclockers or Ebuyer and reviews of top tech on Anandtech, Toms Hardware etc where they feature hardware that you wish you could own.
Oh and I am far from being thin skinned or some kind of snowflake. I just don't like morons like yourself who deliberately sabotage decent threads for their own childish amusement.
GamingMango
17 Jul 171#56
For £269 more you can upgrade to the GTX 1080 like I did :smile:
Also if you e-mail customer service they will throw in an extra PCI-E wifi card for you.
I ordered mine on Saturday, advised delivery will be next Wednesday. Brilliant deal OP, just what I was looking for!
noizemaker
15 Jul 17#42
Can anyone tell me what VR games have you played more than 3 hours and still playing it/them? THANK YOU !
XP200 to noizemaker
15 Jul 17#44
Elite Dangerous, Star Trek Bridge crew, Rec room, Robot recall, Dead and buried, Google earth VR(this is almost limitless in places you can visit), Lunar Flight, Crystal rift, Eve Valkrie...........just a few of my play list at present that are keeping me coming back for more.
priceyrice to noizemaker
17 Jul 171#55
Sure.
Free games: rec room (50+ hours); the lab (20+ hours), google earth vr
Paid games: Racket Nx; Arizona sunshine; star trek bridge crew; battlezone; eve valkyrie; plenty more which names are not coming to me currently.
kester76
17 Jul 17#54
It's pretty a case of diminished returns with most games. VR == terrible visuals but great immersion. A lot of PC gamers hide behind the fact that they're highly framerate sensitive so have to spend more to get the same enjoyment.
This PC is aimed towards people that are just starting out with VR and PC gaming. It's not aimed towards someone that has built their own driving frame or owns a high tier hotas setup. The average PC game isn't going to need higher specs but certain games will require higher specs than this rig can handle. Then again VR display technology is pretty terrible compared to your average gaming monitor so where do you draw the line.
dudwood_fudwood
15 Jul 17#53
What are you rambling about? Looks like your comment was deleted so it appears the mods agreed that you were being pointlessly rude. Rudeness does not enforce your point. Quite the opposite. You look like a fool.
"PC master race".
scotia2
15 Jul 17#52
because there was nothing to action. it's constant moderation by thin skins like yourself that lead to the removal of "ladies and gentlemen" from underground announcements, and the enablement of "non-binary" idealisms in confused children.
pc master race has no room for hardware untermenschen.
dealsonmeals
15 Jul 17#51
Leave him be, he's John Snow.
lothburn
15 Jul 17#50
For VR casual games a 1060 is fine, however if you want to run DCS, IL46 BOM, Assetto corsa, Raceroom,iRacing Elite etc you really need the fastest card you can buy.
Gambini
15 Jul 17#49
This PC **** measuring contest is what turns off so many ppl from PC gaming.
A gtx 1060 is a perfectly acceptable graphics card it will easily get you 60fps on past titles at 1080p, and continue to do so going forward in reduced settings. The salient point here is that even on medium to high settings, you'll enjoy a much better fidelity than consoles which is the whole point of playing on PC.
If you can afford to go upto a 1070 or 1080, you'll get even more out of your system, but a 1060 is no slouch.
Oh, and as for VR, oculus' own recommended spec is a 1060 or higher. That's RECOMMENDED, Not minimum requirement which goes even lower (see link above)
I reported it but it seems the mods couldn't care less.
There are plenty of forums he can argue till his little heart is content on regarding PC specs. This is a deal site and for what it is the deal is more than decent.
khirsah
15 Jul 171#46
Lot of snobbery here around Pc specs but there is some partial truth in the mess above in that buying a PC that can run games 'fine' or 'but not on max settings' now is fine for now but not very future proofed at all. Tech moves pretty quick with computers and dropping £600 on a machine that's just adequate for current specs isn't a great idea in my view but ymmv.
scotia2
14 Jul 17#40
It all went a little bit twilight zone after post #35.
Not worth mentioning the multiple accounts spouting the same bile, but the fact stands - 1060 is **** for VR. Get over it, girls.
dudwood_fudwood to scotia2
15 Jul 171#45
Can you not argue your point without being disgustingly rude?
Some people with very small appendages might argue that you need to out and spend £600+ on a graphics card but they are talking out of the wrong end of their body,
Great price OP voted hot!
MR1123
14 Jul 17#39
Werent these guys banned forever
stevej1976
14 Jul 17#38
Had a 970 when the Cv1 was first released last year, it was ok but not brilliant. Upgraded to a 1070, was a big upgrade but still couldn't play decent games on the highest settings. Just bought a 1080ti and i think it's the sweet spot for what's to come.
Graham1979
14 Jul 17#37
He knows how to go WHAAAAA WHAAAAAA WHAAAAAA
Graham1979
14 Jul 17#36
hA HA HAHAHA Are you going to cry a little more now?
Leonintelex
14 Jul 172#35
Yeah my gtx 1080ti really struggles with fun house.
Clearly from your comments your rocking a TNT Riva. It's like when blokes boast about how well endowed they are when they are packing a tiddler.
Now crawl back under your bridge little troll.
daudiamd
14 Jul 171#34
i5-7400 and 8GB RAM, in case anyone is misreading that it has 16GB
robodan918
14 Jul 171#33
Pretty terrible pc
jg213
14 Jul 17#32
1060 or higher is the recommended GPU for Rift.
scotia2
14 Jul 17#31
By the very fact you are promoting a 1060 for anything, let alone VR, makes your points of view completely redundant when it comes to graphical fidelity.
Take a step back boys. Your patter is akin to console kids defending their product as a viable competitor to PCs. Step it up.
Anything designed for VR from the ground up is polygon hell. Any games retrospectively adjusted to work with VR is stutter hell without a decent card. Go play nvidia funhouse to see if your card is worthy. If its left wanting, good luck with Fallout VR when it's out.
benrobertsno1
14 Jul 171#30
Keep on digging Mr know it all. You are so very wrong. " videophile" pah from your comments I can tell you know sweet f a.
Leonintelex
14 Jul 17#29
What a load of tosh.
Super sampling makes it look marginally better but it's very minimal. It doesn't impact the experience whatsoever.
Had both a 970 and 1080 so speak from experience. Lol what a troll
jamhops
14 Jul 17#28
Looks like an ok price nothing amazing?
Joshimitsu91
14 Jul 17#27
It's a good price for the system + VR gear if you are into that.
One thing I would check before buying is some reviews of the PSU and who the OEM is. Last thing you want in an expensive PC is a crap power supply. Perhaps ask OCUK to put a better one in for you for a cost.
Leonintelex
14 Jul 172#26
From someone who upgraded from a 970 to a 1080 (after hearing comments like the above) I can say the difference was slight at the most for VR.
Yes I could use super sampling games which produced a slightly higher fidelity but trust me it wasn't worth the upgrade, not for VR anyway.
Basically a 970/1060 are more than sufficient and provides an almost identical experience. It was flawless for me and regret wasting money on such a pointless upgrade, at least none VR games look better
slayermatt
14 Jul 17#25
That's where you've probably wrong, I reckon the PC was this price (e.g. a little pricey) before the spike - prebuilds seem relatively unaffected from what I can gather. It's still pricey, but if you're looking at this kind of spec right now its probably cheaper than you could build (depending on the Mobo used/RAM used obviously). Win 10 already installed is a nice touch for those that want something that will just work too.
james_lfc
14 Jul 173#24
£999 and no free delivery, I'm out
TehJumpingJawa
14 Jul 172#23
Doesn't seem that great of a spec for the price.
You're paying quite a premium for today's inflated GPU prices and convenience of prebuilt.
Bad time to be building a new pc for vr.
Joehawkins609
14 Jul 17#22
No one is disputing games will look better on a titan xp over a 1060, but current VR titles on a 1060 work well, The experience is extremely enjoyable.
90FPS in the 5/6 games I've tested, occasional dip to mid 80s haven't noticed the dips so far after around 10hours game play
scotia2
14 Jul 17#21
Sure ladies, come back when you've attempted to render something more than Job Simulator and Lucky's Tale blockfests.
preacher
14 Jul 171#20
*cough* **** *cough*
Rhythmics
14 Jul 171#19
Nvidia themselves tout the 1060 as a direct replacement for the 980 and there's only a hair's breadth between them when measured . Sometimes the 980 wins out, sometimes it's the 1060, but they are basically at parity.
The 1070 is a better card, of course, but the 1060 is more than enough for VR, moreso now that devs are learning how to optimise (to the point where Nvidia have *reduced* their minimum VR spec from a 970 to a 960).
Sawb
14 Jul 17#18
Saying x/y/z can run vr games is meaningless, what frame rates are you getting?
dealsonmeals
14 Jul 171#17
You know nothing.
Justme1969
14 Jul 17#16
I was researching the 1060 a couple of months ago and the difference between the 970 & the 1060 is slight, infact, I noted some charts, where under specific conditions, with specific titles, the 970 nudged ahead (not often, but yeah) ... so? I see the 1060 as a minor upgrade to the 970 and a way for Nvidia to cater for that end of the market, as most of us can't afford to drop 500 notes on a GPU ... being the peasants that we are.
priceyrice
14 Jul 172#15
Please noone listen to this nonsense. Supersampling is nice and I can push around 2 on my 1080ti, however, it's nowhere near essential and does not make as drastic a difference at your suggesting.
A 1060 will run almost all games at standard setting. My only concern would be whether it could handle fallout 4vr.
benrobertsno1
14 Jul 171#14
Yet another pc dumbo that knows not what they speak of.
CosmicAero
14 Jul 17#13
the specs of the PC are near enough the same as mine i got an Intel i5 7500 same gpu no idea what PSU it has 16gb RAM but I also got a 240gb SSD. total is around £760 so this isn't too bad
Joehawkins609
14 Jul 17#12
Think you're getting confused between a 980 and the 980Ti
XP200
14 Jul 17#11
I have a GTX970 myself and have been enjoying VR without any real issues, so that 1060 should be fine, not like VR games are pushing 4k textures anf resolutions.........YET!.
I do have a icore 7 though so that might be helping somewhat.
1060 is basically the same spec as a 980 so can max nearly everything at 1080 and max most vr games (which tend to be pretty basic graphically) you can also play nearly everything at 2k on high to max. 1070 is certainly better but then again so is a 1080ti, where do you stop?
xtrem3x to badasschris
14 Jul 172#8
1060 is nowhere near 980... 970 maybe but not 980
SimyJo
14 Jul 173#1
That PC spec could only handle the most basic of VR. And Occulus Rift has just had a price cut I believe.
Gambini to SimyJo
14 Jul 175#3
What are you talking about? That cpu/ram/gfx card combo is perfectly fine for VR - yes, not on ultra settings maybe but most competent Vr experiences are optimised more than the usual non-vr ports.
Joehawkins609 to SimyJo
14 Jul 171#5
Wrong. I can run every VR game I've tried so far on high if not highest settings:
i5 7600k
1060 6GB
8GB memory
Bumnut53 to SimyJo
14 Jul 171#6
You won't be maxing out a lot of games with a 1060 but will be able to play any VR game, I would pay the extra for a 1070.
Alethia
14 Jul 17#4
This is a nice deal - perfect base for further upgrades later and no hassle of building a PC (along with all the liabilities).
Opening post
Oculus Rift
Touch Controllers
Intel Core i5 Quad Core
Up to 16GB DDR4 RAM
Optional SSD
1TB SATA Hard Drive
Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB Graphics
Windows 10 64 Pre Installed
It seems to be fully configurable so you can upgrade if you want to, it's worth noting however that it doesn't come with any peripherals, no monitor, mouse or keyboard etc.
Top comments
Are you 12? Or 45 and very lonely?
Getting to what matters, saving people money (as this is a deals forum afteralll) the 1060 will be fine for VR -
http://riftinfo.com/gtx-1060-powerful-enough-for-oculus-rift-and-htc-vive
Some people with very small appendages might argue that you need to out and spend £600+ on a graphics card but they are talking out of the wrong end of their body,
Great price OP voted hot!
Latest comments (59)
But hey, 'projection at its finest' and all that.
Projection at its finest.
The fact is you probably know nothing at all about PCs beyond reading sites like Overclockers or Ebuyer and reviews of top tech on Anandtech, Toms Hardware etc where they feature hardware that you wish you could own.
Oh and I am far from being thin skinned or some kind of snowflake. I just don't like morons like yourself who deliberately sabotage decent threads for their own childish amusement.
Also if you e-mail customer service they will throw in an extra PCI-E wifi card for you.
I ordered mine on Saturday, advised delivery will be next Wednesday. Brilliant deal OP, just what I was looking for!
Free games: rec room (50+ hours); the lab (20+ hours), google earth vr
Paid games: Racket Nx; Arizona sunshine; star trek bridge crew; battlezone; eve valkyrie; plenty more which names are not coming to me currently.
This PC is aimed towards people that are just starting out with VR and PC gaming. It's not aimed towards someone that has built their own driving frame or owns a high tier hotas setup. The average PC game isn't going to need higher specs but certain games will require higher specs than this rig can handle. Then again VR display technology is pretty terrible compared to your average gaming monitor so where do you draw the line.
"PC master race".
pc master race has no room for hardware untermenschen.
A gtx 1060 is a perfectly acceptable graphics card it will easily get you 60fps on past titles at 1080p, and continue to do so going forward in reduced settings. The salient point here is that even on medium to high settings, you'll enjoy a much better fidelity than consoles which is the whole point of playing on PC.
If you can afford to go upto a 1070 or 1080, you'll get even more out of your system, but a 1060 is no slouch.
Oh, and as for VR, oculus' own recommended spec is a 1060 or higher. That's RECOMMENDED, Not minimum requirement which goes even lower (see link above)
https://support.oculus.com/help/oculus/1773584749575567?refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fsupport.oculus.com%2F
There are plenty of forums he can argue till his little heart is content on regarding PC specs. This is a deal site and for what it is the deal is more than decent.
Not worth mentioning the multiple accounts spouting the same bile, but the fact stands - 1060 is **** for VR. Get over it, girls.
Are you 12? Or 45 and very lonely?
Getting to what matters, saving people money (as this is a deals forum afteralll) the 1060 will be fine for VR -
http://riftinfo.com/gtx-1060-powerful-enough-for-oculus-rift-and-htc-vive
Some people with very small appendages might argue that you need to out and spend £600+ on a graphics card but they are talking out of the wrong end of their body,
Great price OP voted hot!
Clearly from your comments your rocking a TNT Riva. It's like when blokes boast about how well endowed they are when they are packing a tiddler.
Now crawl back under your bridge little troll.
By the very fact you are promoting a 1060 for anything, let alone VR, makes your points of view completely redundant when it comes to graphical fidelity.
Take a step back boys. Your patter is akin to console kids defending their product as a viable competitor to PCs. Step it up.
Anything designed for VR from the ground up is polygon hell. Any games retrospectively adjusted to work with VR is stutter hell without a decent card. Go play nvidia funhouse to see if your card is worthy. If its left wanting, good luck with Fallout VR when it's out.
Super sampling makes it look marginally better but it's very minimal. It doesn't impact the experience whatsoever.
Had both a 970 and 1080 so speak from experience. Lol what a troll
One thing I would check before buying is some reviews of the PSU and who the OEM is. Last thing you want in an expensive PC is a crap power supply. Perhaps ask OCUK to put a better one in for you for a cost.
Yes I could use super sampling games which produced a slightly higher fidelity but trust me it wasn't worth the upgrade, not for VR anyway.
Basically a 970/1060 are more than sufficient and provides an almost identical experience. It was flawless for me and regret wasting money on such a pointless upgrade, at least none VR games look better
You're paying quite a premium for today's inflated GPU prices and convenience of prebuilt.
Bad time to be building a new pc for vr.
90FPS in the 5/6 games I've tested, occasional dip to mid 80s haven't noticed the dips so far after around 10hours game play
The 1070 is a better card, of course, but the 1060 is more than enough for VR, moreso now that devs are learning how to optimise (to the point where Nvidia have *reduced* their minimum VR spec from a 970 to a 960).
A 1060 will run almost all games at standard setting. My only concern would be whether it could handle fallout 4vr.
I do have a icore 7 though so that might be helping somewhat.
Not a huge amount in it.
High and stable Frame rate is really important to prevent motion sickness in VR.
https://www.roadtovr.com/vr-ready-gpu-benchmark-comparison-nvidia-gtx-1080-ti-1080-1070-1060-amd-rx-480-fcat-vr/
for example see here where they try to see whats better an overclocked 980 or 1060. You can see both before and after the OC they are near identical
http://www.babeltechreviews.com/rx-480-vs-gtx-1060-vs-gtx-980-overclocked-showdown/3/
Wrong. I can run every VR game I've tried so far on high if not highest settings:
i5 7600k
1060 6GB
8GB memory