Slightly cheaper at ebuyer but now so sure about the warranty there. Also, same price at Richer Sounds with 6 year warranty but only if your local store has stock as it is out of stock online.
Latest comments (17)
evilmingdoctor
26 Jul 17#17
i'd like to see some proper reviews of this in the future - particularly in comparison to the 43m3000 - this could end up being quite a good tv - but just scouring the internet at this early stage - not many people seem to have one
as a 43m3000 owner i'm curious of the difference in hdr and the backlighting technology of it
main detractor of 43m3000 is occasional discrepancies in the backlight when there's movement - otherwise it's been pretty good for the money (though i did pay £240 for my tv so even with it's minor flaws it's been a good buy)
43m3000 was edge lit and this is direct lit - so i'm wondering if that will make a difference - will have to keep an eye out for this one in shops to see what the picture is like
the1stcoke
24 Jul 17#16
The Hitachi model of this TV (exactly the same, but with different name stuck on) was only £250 not so long ago, so seems steep...
spenspuma
22 Jul 17#15
When Hisense started selling goods.
spenspuma
22 Jul 17#12
Remember the saying...."Hisense makes no sense"....ROFL
Alvie to spenspuma
22 Jul 17#14
When did that become a saying?
Anthonis
22 Jul 17#13
Not trying to put somebody off but every shop I visited hisense tv's always looked not as bright as LG, Samsung and Panasonic in simlar price range? Is this the way they configure them or its just not worth it?
microbar
22 Jul 17#11
Expensive for just a Hisense 43ins uhd tv I paid £400 a month ago for a 50ins.
PhilK
22 Jul 17#10
Theres 49" and even a 55" Hisense at Fenwicks in Newcastle cheaper than this
apdjdj
22 Jul 17#6
Is it me or is this not as good as the recent M7000? Seems to not be and certainly doesnt look as good.
EndlessWaves to apdjdj
22 Jul 17#9
I believe the M7000 is being replaced with the NU8700 so this is several steps down the range.
parabootz
22 Jul 17#8
You can generally guess because of the price too
vtailor
22 Jul 17#7
How does this compare to the 43m3000 that is frequently seen on HUKD ?
EndlessWaves
22 Jul 17#5
Displayspecs just harvest data from around the web so it's not uncommon for them to be wrong, take anything listed there with a pinch of salt.
Although in this case it doesn't matter, A 10-bit panel is just a small but expensive refinement found in high end TVs. It would be an absurd waste of money to put a 10-bit panel in something at this price, it's only worthwhile when all the more influential hardware is top spec.
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Latest comments (17)
as a 43m3000 owner i'm curious of the difference in hdr and the backlighting technology of it
main detractor of 43m3000 is occasional discrepancies in the backlight when there's movement - otherwise it's been pretty good for the money (though i did pay £240 for my tv so even with it's minor flaws it's been a good buy)
43m3000 was edge lit and this is direct lit - so i'm wondering if that will make a difference - will have to keep an eye out for this one in shops to see what the picture is like
Although in this case it doesn't matter, A 10-bit panel is just a small but expensive refinement found in high end TVs. It would be an absurd waste of money to put a 10-bit panel in something at this price, it's only worthwhile when all the more influential hardware is top spec.