So pleased we waited a couple of days as the price dropped £50 between us deciding we wanted one and making our way to the store. Quite a few other significant deals as well on Chromebooks at Currys.
It's a 2016 Model I believe. The processor I checked out and based on Octane scores, seems to be about twice as fast as the 3060. Power uptake is lower than other (2830?) processors too.
Garstonk to gorgo2015
25 May 17#16
I have one, performance is an issue for me, my old Acer C720 performs much better and it's from 2013.
plewis00 to gorgo2015
25 May 171#19
Is this deliberately poor trolling or are you actually one of those people who looks at Ghz only and nothing else and makes a purchase decision based on that? In which case if you're the latter I have plenty of 3.6Ghz Pentium 4 desktops to offer for the bargain price of £200 and I'll even throw in a 15" LCD, that's even less than this terrible 1.6Ghz laptop and with an inch bigger display!
fishmaster to gorgo2015
25 May 17#20
Clueless comment. Processor architecture is the important factor not GHz. Get with the times, it's been this way since 2004 or so.
hemp
24 May 17#2
I'm happy with mine, bought it last December.
cigar
24 May 17#4
Same price on Amazon too. Nice Chromebook.
zairs
24 May 17#5
great chromebook, do not confuse these with Windows devices. these are great for surfing the web and remoting into high powered windows machines it will also be getring android apps soon. plus will last 10hrs+ between charges.
sam_of_london
24 May 17#6
No Touchscreen. Big Negative. Android apps /Play store only work correctly with touchscreen.
Nothing I'd want less on a chromebook than a touchscreen.....All chromebooks (just like all other laptops) have this nifty pointing device called a "touchpad" for navigating a pointer around the screen....
Unless your playing games (so buy a tablet) a touchscreen on a chromebook is pretty irrelevant
sam_of_london
25 May 17#9
Chromebooks have very few native google apps. I returned a Chromebook in past due to lack of communication apps like in Windows or Android or IOS. They only make sense now if Android apps work on them . Android apps need touchscreen to work properly.
It's been cheaper, but still a great price for a very impressive piece of kit.
Uridium
25 May 171#12
Chromebooks have always made sense , Android apps are adding something to Chrome OS but are not the be all, its still a useful OS even without them....
It is a browser based OS with predominantly browser based apps.....If Android apps are the priority for you then you should buy an Android OS based machine....
Chrome is NOT Android
SunTzu
25 May 171#13
I have the 2017 version of this and love it, it's instant on and the screen is fantastic, whenever I want to just surf the web, send emails or watch some youtube videos etc it's perfect. Also, having easily installed Linux via Chronos I can switch between the 2 environments and work on it if I need to test something etc.
jeeeeeez
25 May 17#14
Uh that only has an 11" screen. You are shopping for something very different to what's been posted here. Suggest you get a tablet.
Agharta
25 May 172#15
To you but clearly not to others. Simple to grasp really.
Garble
25 May 172#17
Chromebooks are so rubbish.
afc82
25 May 171#18
I am liking the deal but has anyone had dealing with Currys and Pcworld recently with customer service and returning faulty items ? they were never good with these things 10yrs ago or so and I found them to be rude while window shopping and I stopped using them. :stuck_out_tongue:
Garstonk
25 May 171#21
That may need true but the performance from the N3160 is far from stellar.
Garstonk
25 May 17#22
Anyone who has owned the Acer Chromebook C720 from 2013 will notice a drop in performance when using the Acer Chromebook 14, battery life is great, performance is mediocre at best.
Garstonk
26 May 17#23
Interested to know where you got your octane scores from, from my research the n3160 has octane score of 8200, n3060 is 8600. The n3160 is not twice as fast as the n3060...unless I'm missing something?
fishmaster
26 May 171#24
I wasn't replying to the performance I was replying to the false information that GHz is the primary designator of CPU performance, you have to take in to consideration the CPU architecture, which has vastly improved in the 16 years since 2001. This is true of any technological advances, car engines for example, we're able to get more power out of less CC, so comparing 1 litre engines in cars now and 2001 there's a big difference in some cases etc etc. You wouldn't see a Ford Mondeo with a 1 litre engine 15 years ago but you do now.
Pondlife
26 May 17#25
A screen that is lower Res too
growler123
28 May 17#26
got one for my wife. been looking for a full hd chromebook for a while. performance very good for internet browsing.
great speakers, nice looking with aluminium chassis. miles better than windows, occasional updates take seconds.
£229 good price.
Would recommend
TheOak
1 Jun 17#27
I am sitting on one as I type and I'm very happy with mine, the whole chromebook/cloud idea does seem like the way forward. Only downer for me is 4gb of ram maybe not enough when i have a lot of browsing windows open. If anyone knows of any 8gb or more chromebooks on offer, I would like to know
Garstonk to TheOak
2 Jun 17#28
Are you sure it's a lack of ram? I reckon it's the processor.
Opening post
4GB Memory, 32 GB internal storage
Top comments
All comments (28)
Unless your playing games (so buy a tablet) a touchscreen on a chromebook is pretty irrelevant
http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/computing/laptops/laptops/acer-chromebook-r-11-cb5-132t-2-in-1-touchscreen-white-10156150-pdt.html?intcmpid=display~RR
It is a browser based OS with predominantly browser based apps.....If Android apps are the priority for you then you should buy an Android OS based machine....
Chrome is NOT Android
:stuck_out_tongue:
great speakers, nice looking with aluminium chassis. miles better than windows, occasional updates take seconds.
£229 good price.
Would recommend