Thanks Batista. There are no stupid questions. Thanks.
Great deal for 5 x 60 W equivalent lamps.
Description
• Average life 25000 hours
• 180° beam angle
• Equivalent to 60W
• Warm white 3000K
• Non dimmable
• Energy class A+
14 comments
Nicolas
19 May 17#13
What's the diff between these and the normal energy saver ones which are about 8 or 9w and they give an equivalent 60w yet cost much less to buy?
Also the pound store has leds for a pound each they r 3 w and give off 25w
getmeone to Nicolas
19 May 17#14
By energy saver I think you are referring to "Fluorescent" tube type ones. Not sure if you noticed how long they take to get to full brightness, but I find it incredibly annoying. Your point about the pound shop ones is that they are 3w. 25/30W equivalent in a bedroom might be OK for you but in the lounge or kitchen I prefer to see what I am doing. There may also be a difference in the electronic controls for those other 3W lamps. Some of the cheaper ones have been reported to give off high levels of interference due to the poor circuitry. Not saying that is the case for the PS ones, but could be.
blobbythin
17 May 17#12
Would these be as good as the Phillips master led bulbs?
FearOne
17 May 17#10
How do these compare to screwfix ones?
getmeone
17 May 17#9
You are welcome. Added a credit for you in the title. No stupid questions, just stupid answers.
darren93
17 May 177#8
It's easy to compare efficency. The more Lumens per Watt the better. This is 810 Lumens, and is 10W, 81 Lm per W. Checked Amazon, the first two Edison best selling bulbs are 88 Lm/W, and 100lm/W. However they're £4.50 and £5.00 a bulb respectively. That is about the same light of 800lm in an 9W bulb, and a 8W bulb. A 1W difference left on 24/7, costs about a £1.00 a year. Or for 6 hours a day 25p a year. Would take 15 years to pay the difference in efficency alone. The comment above complaining about efficency is not something to take seriously. I would worry more about spectrum coverage, build quality and colour temperature.
hotdealseeker to darren93
17 May 17#11
Thanks darren93. Given your figures.
81Lm/W v 88Lm/W or 100Lm/W would equate 8% less and 19% less efficient respectifively.
However anonymoose1 suggests they are at least 20% less efficient, so would you be using a different methodology?
hotdealseeker
17 May 17#7
May I know how can you tell these are at least 20% less efficient? Many thanks.
anonymoose1
16 May 17#6
As well as looking really ugly, these are 20%+ less efficient than the least efficient filament LED bulbs. It pays to do the arithmetic, the lifetime cost is dominated by electricity charges and some filament LEDs are claimed to be 60% more efficient!
And just in case - really ugly:smiley:
shug119
16 May 17#5
Good find.
getmeone
16 May 174#3
One is Edison Screw and the other is Bayonet
ES Edison screw
BC Bayonet
batista to getmeone
16 May 17#4
thank you
batista
16 May 17#2
Hi does anyone know what the difference between 10W ES 810lm
Opening post
http://www.toolstation.com/shop/Lighting/d220/LED+GLS+Lamps/sd3382/LED+GLS+Non+Dimmable+Lamp/p37727
Thanks Batista. There are no stupid questions. Thanks.
Great deal for 5 x 60 W equivalent lamps.
Description
• Average life 25000 hours
• 180° beam angle
• Equivalent to 60W
• Warm white 3000K
• Non dimmable
• Energy class A+
14 comments
Also the pound store has leds for a pound each they r 3 w and give off 25w
81Lm/W v 88Lm/W or 100Lm/W would equate 8% less and 19% less efficient respectifively.
However anonymoose1 suggests they are at least 20% less efficient, so would you be using a different methodology?
And just in case - really ugly:smiley:
ES Edison screw
BC Bayonet
http://www.toolstation.com/shop/Lighting/d220/LED+GLS+Lamps/sd3382/LED+GLS+Non+Dimmable+Lamp/p37727
and
10W BC 810lm
http://www.toolstation.com/shop/Lighting/d220/LED+GLS+Lamps/sd3382/LED+GLS+Non+Dimmable+Lamp/p39839
ordered and heat :smiley: