Been looking for a decent 27" monitor for quite a while and spotted this. Full 1080p with a built-in tuner with Picture in Picture feature, and 5ms response time which is perfect for gaming also :smiley:
Technical Specification
Display
Screen Size: 27"
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Panel Type: PLS
BLU Type: LED
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Peak Luminance Ratio: 97 %
Contrast Ratio: 1000:1
Dynamic Contrast Ratio: Mega ∞
Resolution: 1920x1080
Response Time: 5(G to G)
Viewing Angle (Horizontal/Vertical): 178°/178°
Colour Support: 16.7 M
General Feature
Picture-In-Picture Plus+
Sports/Football Mode
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
ConnectShare™ (USB 2.0)
EPG
Teletext (TTX)
OSD Language: 27 European Languages
Anynet+ (HDMI-CEC)
Caption (Subtitle)
Interface
D-Sub
HDMI x2
RF In
USB
Component In (Y/Pb/Pr)
Composite In (AV)
CI Slot
Scart
Audio In
Headphone
Audio
Speaker: 5Wx2
Sound Solution: Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Pulse, DTS Studio Sound, DTS Premium Sound 5.1
Set Dimension with Stand (WxHxD): 625.4 x 467.1 x 209.8 mm
Set Dimension without Stand (WxHxD): 625.4 x 378.9 x 31.6 mm
Top comments
No8
10 Apr 176#11
£100?! You're deluded mate.
Sid.Harper
10 Apr 173#3
so it's a telly ! :smiley:
Latest comments (25)
LazyBBB
18 Apr 17#25
So... is it a good deal or not??
Multieman
15 Apr 17#24
That's not the point you fool...
No8
12 Apr 17#23
Hredknapp
12 Apr 17#22
strawman is standard A level philosophy.
No8
12 Apr 17#21
In a Classics staff-room at Oxford, possibly; on a post on HUKD, it is exactly the same.
CampGareth
12 Apr 17#20
That's my point, you've straw manned his original comment:
"No good for 1440p or 4k"
"I would expect it if I was spending over 100"
That is not the same as "I expect 4K when I spend £101 pounds". That is the straw man statement.
I think it means "If I were going to spend greater than £100 pounds on a monitor, I'd want it to have a higher resolution than 1080p". Expect's just a poor choice of words. If I expect the postman to deliver some free gold bars, that's silly. If I want the postman to deliver free solid gold bars, that's sensible.
No8
12 Apr 17#19
I think you may have taken my reply out of the context of the original comment made by coventgamer, that he would expect a 4K monitor for £100. He has yet to provide an example. I'm not strawmanning at all.
CampGareth
12 Apr 17#18
You're straw-manning. The point is that 1080p's a fine resolution for a monitor that costs less than £100. If I were spending more money I'd want a higher resolution too. 2560x1440 for instance would be a good resolution for a 27" display.
No8
11 Apr 17#17
Not 4K though, is it?!
RyanBest
11 Apr 172#16
Your mum was cheaper, got her for £30, she was on sale at home bargains
AwesomeDawson
11 Apr 17#15
I brought this for this price in 2014
Still have it
coventgamer
11 Apr 17#14
Got a 1440p for 40 quid of Gumtree
taras
11 Apr 171#13
cold, 1080 tv with a dvb t tuner - so no hd tv :stuck_out_tongue:
JustExtreme
11 Apr 17#12
You can "expect" it all you like but you won't get one with that resolution for anywhere near that price.
No8
10 Apr 176#11
£100?! You're deluded mate.
Northerndave
10 Apr 17#10
Definitely a telly with a 5ms response time !
montyburns56
10 Apr 171#9
There isn't a single 4K monitor available on the Ebuyer site for less than £240.
MBeeching
10 Apr 171#8
5ms grey-to-grey. So... what's the input lag?
coventgamer
10 Apr 17#7
I would expect it if I was spending over 100
coventgamer
10 Apr 17#5
No good for 1440p or 4k
No8 to coventgamer
10 Apr 171#6
Who said it was..? I think the post quite clearly states that it's full HD/1080p. Jees...
Sid.Harper
10 Apr 173#3
so it's a telly ! :smiley:
rooney10 to Sid.Harper
10 Apr 17#4
If you read the title / post you can see it isn't just a telly is it :wink:
tawse57
10 Apr 17#1
Most of the reviews on ebuyer are from 2014 for it so it would appear to be quite old technology?
msmyth to tawse57
10 Apr 171#2
Older model for sure, but tbh the specs are pretty decent and you aren't missing out compared to equivalent 2017 LED PLS HD monitor. The technology for these panels hasn't really moved in last few years so you can get a decent saving. :smiley:
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
Technical Specification
Display
Screen Size: 27"
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Panel Type: PLS
BLU Type: LED
Brightness: 300cd/m2
Peak Luminance Ratio: 97 %
Contrast Ratio: 1000:1
Dynamic Contrast Ratio: Mega ∞
Resolution: 1920x1080
Response Time: 5(G to G)
Viewing Angle (Horizontal/Vertical): 178°/178°
Colour Support: 16.7 M
General Feature
Picture-In-Picture Plus+
Sports/Football Mode
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)
ConnectShare™ (USB 2.0)
EPG
Teletext (TTX)
OSD Language: 27 European Languages
Anynet+ (HDMI-CEC)
Caption (Subtitle)
Interface
D-Sub
HDMI x2
RF In
USB
Component In (Y/Pb/Pr)
Composite In (AV)
CI Slot
Scart
Audio In
Headphone
Audio
Speaker: 5Wx2
Sound Solution: Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Pulse, DTS Studio Sound, DTS Premium Sound 5.1
System
DTV Reception: DVB-TC
DTV Tuner Built-in
DTV Certification: CI+, Comhem, RiksTV, Labwise, YouSee, Stofa
Analog Tuner
Design
Color: Black
Stand Type: Square
Tilt: Yes( -1°~ 20°)
Wall Mount: Yes(75x75)
Power
Power Supply: AC220-240V 50/60Hz
Power Consumption (Max): 45 W
Power Consumption (Typical): 28 W
Power Consumption (Stand-by): 0.3 W
Dimension
Set Dimension with Stand (WxHxD): 625.4 x 467.1 x 209.8 mm
Set Dimension without Stand (WxHxD): 625.4 x 378.9 x 31.6 mm
Top comments
Latest comments (25)
"No good for 1440p or 4k"
"I would expect it if I was spending over 100"
That is not the same as "I expect 4K when I spend £101 pounds". That is the straw man statement.
I think it means "If I were going to spend greater than £100 pounds on a monitor, I'd want it to have a higher resolution than 1080p". Expect's just a poor choice of words. If I expect the postman to deliver some free gold bars, that's silly. If I want the postman to deliver free solid gold bars, that's sensible.
Still have it