I'd be tempted to have a single 4K display rather than 2 1080p ones but the problem is games tends to look crap rendered at lower res and scaled and there's no way I'd want to pay out for a Rig that could render native 4K.
Donuts123
17 Apr 171#32
Now £299.98 from Amazon. They're currently out of stock but you can still order for delivery when they get more in.
quackstar84
17 Apr 17#31
I just want an oled 24" at around 144hz with gsync ='( lol
Seanspeed
17 Apr 17#30
Biggest advantage with IPS in my opinion is FAR better colors. Much more vibrant. TN screens look highly washed out by comparison.
Any multimedia will benefit from IPS because of this.
VA is another alternative, as that other person mentioned. Its colors aren't quite as good as IPS, but they're still way better than TN. VA's big advantage is contrast. It is capable of some fairly deep blacks and gives the image really nice depth.
paule23
17 Apr 17#26
Is 4k beneficial in a 27" monitor? DO you really notice the difference between 4K and say HD for this size screen?
friar_chris to paule23
17 Apr 17#29
Can't speak for 27", but at 24" I just found myself transfixed on how beautiful the screen looked up close. The pixels were really hard to pick out. Even on a 32" monitor, the pixels will be noticeably smaller than those on 24" @1080p, so I can't see why it wouldn't be beneficial at 27"
thekanester
17 Apr 171#28
Funny, I was thinking a lot more. Like waaaay more.
misa426
17 Apr 17#27
Im confused. Yu saying it aint 60 hurts,? I need 75 hurts minamum
misa426
17 Apr 17#20
Its 60 hurts
EDIT Its 60 hurts
thekanester to misa426
17 Apr 17#25
Sorry to be that guy, but I gotta call you on this.
It's Hertz, with a capital H. It's an SI unit of measurement for frequency, named after Heinrich Hertz.
I apologise for being pedantic if English isn't your first language. There is no offence meant, but if not then it doesn't hurt to know the correct word. No pun intended.
rooney10
17 Apr 17#24
Great Advice , much appreciated.
My current monitor 'works' still but with horrible banding , viewing angles are not going to be a problem as the monitor is dedicated to just my study and this will be at eye level 3 feet from my chair.
The current resolution is set at 1900x1200 and I am looking for something larger with higher resolution so I can be blown away by the quality/sharpness/colour representations , may extend the budget if needs be but I am not wanting to throw good money away if I am not going to benefit especially as I am not a gamer and I believe many of these monitors are aimed at gamers.
I would hope that my new monitor will be energy efficient as my current one is not and it is on 60-70 hours a week on average.
friar_chris
17 Apr 171#23
If you are replacing a 12 year old monitor, I doubt it matters which you upgrade to but....
IPS is 'generally' considered to be 'better' than TN (the cost strongly indicates this).
IPS has far greater viewing angles without all that contrast and colour changing nonsense. Not usually a problem if you are sat infront of the monitor, but if the screen is larger or if you (as I do) use it as a TV and view from bed (lower than usual viewing angle) then this may become an issue. Is this an issue for you currently? If not go TN.
IPS has superior colour representation for people who edit photos / work in 'multimedia'.
TN displays have faster refresh times, is is apparently important for games. They are also consume energy at a slower rate (for a given screen size).
There are also VA screens out there which are a sort of bridge between the two, but I know nothing about them..... most annoying thing is that shops rarely specify what sort of monitor it is, so you should use sites like this if you are looking for an IPS or VA monitor. Have a google, but if you have kept you 12 year old monitor this long, I'd just get a cheap 1080p TN.
rooney10
17 Apr 17#22
Stupid question probably but would movies be displayed with the black bands on either side when viewing a standard widescreen movie on a ultra wide monitor ?
Have seen quite a few of these that £ wise fit the bill but unsure as to whether I'd get on with one and would it provide much more real estate than my current Dell (visible screen size 14" height x 23" width) ? Thanks in advance ..
rooney10
17 Apr 17#21
Oh right , what are the advantages of IPS then that would be of benefit to me ?
Any help is appreciated as I am at a loss as to which monitors I should be looking at. Its a big upgrade for me , replacing my ageing power hungry 12+ year old Dell which cost me around £600 back then iirc , and that was cheap !
RedRain
17 Apr 17#19
waiting on a ultra wide 1440p dont think its going to happen how would 1440p look on a 4k screen
Seanspeed
17 Apr 17#18
If you watch movies and view photos a fair bit, you'll still want IPS ideally.
If you're not gaming, TN literally has zero advantages.
weiran
17 Apr 17#17
Check out the ultra wide monitors for that size range, but normal 16:9 computer monitors rarely go above 30" now and I would not recommend using TVs either.
rooney10
17 Apr 17#16
anyone recommend a good monitor around 32" min - 40" max with 4k resolution. Not bothered whether IPS or TN as I sit approx. 3 feet away from the screen directly it front of it.
My use is mainly browsing Internet, Spreadsheets , Viewing Photos uploaded from Camera , occasional film watching. No gaming other than the odd cheeky game of stronghold crusader 2 when the mood takes :wink:
Currently have a 12 year old 27" Dell which has developed banding lines top to bottom on one side (very annoying) and looking for something a little bigger when upgrading .
Budget upto £400 ish but would prefer something under this .......
misa426
17 Apr 17#9
How many hurts is this ?
thekanester to misa426
17 Apr 174#10
A whole load.
rooney10 to misa426
17 Apr 171#15
That would depend on your marital situation , I am guessing those that are married will no doubt suffer the most when wifey gets wind of what you have spent her shopping money on :wink:
weiran
17 Apr 172#14
4K is an awkward resolution on 27", you'll prob need to run at 1.5x size otherwise text will be too small.
plewis00
17 Apr 171#13
Probably is. I've had a number of LG monitors and they always seem to suffer uneven backlighting, especially on the IPS models. We ended up keeping a number of them at work because most people could tell or didn't know what I had a problem with (and most office work is on light backgrounds when you don't really notice). But if you're spending a lot on a monitor for you, then good even backlighting is essential.
basergorkobal
17 Apr 17#12
So what you're saying is that you got unlucky and got a unit that should not have passed quality control. It may suggest LG QC is not strict enough on the backlight bleed front.
No reason to vote a deal cold or is it?
specialoffers
17 Apr 171#11
i got one 6 months ago send it back reason is very bad backlight bleeding,cold ,:disappointed: but if you happy with backlight bleeding that is well designed monitor.. :wink:
Phnarr
16 Apr 17#8
The AOC is a TN screen rather than IPS. IPS has better viewing angles, TN has better response rate, just a question of what you value more.
Opening post
Next nearest reputable price on PriceSpy £324.97 (link)
Seen on HUKD two weeks ago at £312.11 here
Link to manufacturer's website here
Happy shopping!
Top comments
Latest comments (35)
Any multimedia will benefit from IPS because of this.
VA is another alternative, as that other person mentioned. Its colors aren't quite as good as IPS, but they're still way better than TN. VA's big advantage is contrast. It is capable of some fairly deep blacks and gives the image really nice depth.
EDIT Its 60 hurts
It's Hertz, with a capital H. It's an SI unit of measurement for frequency, named after Heinrich Hertz.
I apologise for being pedantic if English isn't your first language. There is no offence meant, but if not then it doesn't hurt to know the correct word. No pun intended.
My current monitor 'works' still but with horrible banding , viewing angles are not going to be a problem as the monitor is dedicated to just my study and this will be at eye level 3 feet from my chair.
The current resolution is set at 1900x1200 and I am looking for something larger with higher resolution so I can be blown away by the quality/sharpness/colour representations , may extend the budget if needs be but I am not wanting to throw good money away if I am not going to benefit especially as I am not a gamer and I believe many of these monitors are aimed at gamers.
I would hope that my new monitor will be energy efficient as my current one is not and it is on 60-70 hours a week on average.
IPS is 'generally' considered to be 'better' than TN (the cost strongly indicates this).
IPS has far greater viewing angles without all that contrast and colour changing nonsense. Not usually a problem if you are sat infront of the monitor, but if the screen is larger or if you (as I do) use it as a TV and view from bed (lower than usual viewing angle) then this may become an issue. Is this an issue for you currently? If not go TN.
IPS has superior colour representation for people who edit photos / work in 'multimedia'.
TN displays have faster refresh times, is is apparently important for games. They are also consume energy at a slower rate (for a given screen size).
There are also VA screens out there which are a sort of bridge between the two, but I know nothing about them..... most annoying thing is that shops rarely specify what sort of monitor it is, so you should use sites like this if you are looking for an IPS or VA monitor. Have a google, but if you have kept you 12 year old monitor this long, I'd just get a cheap 1080p TN.
Have seen quite a few of these that £ wise fit the bill but unsure as to whether I'd get on with one and would it provide much more real estate than my current Dell (visible screen size 14" height x 23" width) ? Thanks in advance ..
Any help is appreciated as I am at a loss as to which monitors I should be looking at. Its a big upgrade for me , replacing my ageing power hungry 12+ year old Dell which cost me around £600 back then iirc , and that was cheap !
If you're not gaming, TN literally has zero advantages.
My use is mainly browsing Internet, Spreadsheets , Viewing Photos uploaded from Camera , occasional film watching. No gaming other than the odd cheeky game of stronghold crusader 2 when the mood takes :wink:
Currently have a 12 year old 27" Dell which has developed banding lines top to bottom on one side (very annoying) and looking for something a little bigger when upgrading .
Budget upto £400 ish but would prefer something under this .......
No reason to vote a deal cold or is it?
http://www.144hzmonitors.com/knowledge-base/panel-types-tn-vs-ips/