Never mind the Selects debate on pretty art work Vs cost Vs ugly art work vs budget vs original more collectible game.

What about the constant issue of retailers misleading/misadvertising the games. So many instances now for a long time, and so many retailers at it, passing of Select games as the originals. Of course this is not Nintendo's fault, but they could just get rid of this Selects nonsense all together and recognise it really does not give consumers any benefit. RRP on games can be adjusted changed, to reflect time passed or market conditions. Does not need a new ghastly printed cover in the game case to have a different price.

​​plus very.co.uk are truly the worst retailer ever.

That would be fine, however they didn't send returns label with it, and their phone number doesn't work for some reason, even emails they never respond to

I had the same problem with stupid gameseek, advertised as original, sent me bleeding selects

Is a fantastic game. Good for 1 player, absolutely brilliant multiplayer. Traditional Mario Party really.

What is the difference between selects and the original?

Maybe try contacting Very instead of whingeing about it on here?

The EAN that they used according to you is from the Selects whereas Very is advertising to be selling the Original and that isn't the case.

Not really mate. They've used the price, image and title that Very have provided.

I've just added additional info :smiley:

The OP's post needs to be fixed then.

Possibly selects?

Good price. Has a metacritic score of 57... which I know doesn't necessarily mean it can't be an enjoyable game. Have people bought and been pleasantly surprised, or is the score justified?