Yeah that's going to be a miss price plus it's order on demand !.
TonyRoma2010
16 Nov 16#7
Oh I want it, bit it's too close to Christmas. I must remain responsible :confused:
davver99
16 Nov 16#8
i think the delivery date on scan is 16th of december
RedRain
16 Nov 16#9
ard these the same as ssd but plug into motherboards and are new baords compatible
derp1664
16 Nov 161#10
Think this is going to be approx the going rate anyway (£115 after postage) as the RRP is $129USD.
Remember this is the EVO not the PRO (although still insanely fast ...3200MB read, 1500MB write !)
azzintheclass
16 Nov 16#11
Ordered this, this afternoon, had a delay of shipping notification tonight - expected shipment date of 28th November.
Agharta
16 Nov 16#12
Keep in mind that the sustained write speed of the 250GB version is similar to a 5 year old SATA SSD.
Not an issue or not noticeable for many but neither are the headline speeds either in daily usage.
Don't believe the hype.
I was really temped to get one of these a month ago when I built a new pc... in the end I got a Crucial MX3 SSD, and it's blazing fast (a lot faster faster than my previous Samsung 830). So be sure you have software that requires very high IOPS rather than use this to lower your windows boot from 2.5 to 3 seconds... but if .5 seconds from your boot are worth this much, then go for it :wink:.
derp1664
16 Nov 16#14
Yeah but to be fair...
Samsung claims peak performance at 3,200MB/s sequential read and up to 1,900MB/s sequential write. The write performance decreases after the SLC buffer, which Samsung calls TurboWrite. The 960 EVO uses a new version called Intelligent TurboWrite, but we don't have much information on the differences. The latest iteration does increase the SLC size and starts at a massive 13GB for the 256GB model. The largest capacity size, 1TB, can fit nearly a full Blu-ray ISO transfer in SLC, a recommendation we often make in our SSD reviews. It's rare for end users to transfer a single file larger than a Blu-Ray ISO.
The 960 EVO delivers more random performance than the 950 Pro, Samsung's only shipping retail consumer SSD. Peak performance for the 960 EVO comes in the largest capacity size, and users get up to 380,000 read IOPS and 360,000 write IOPS (4KB block sizes). That makes the 960 EVO second only to the 960 Pro in performance for (announced) consumer SSDs.
robodan918
16 Nov 16#15
Maybe I'm daft but it's hard to consider this a deal
I picked up the 950 pro 512gb when it first came out for 168 new. The 960 evo performs very similarly and the 256gb costs 109?
xavierzzz
17 Nov 16#16
Misco sounds very familiar so i searched my mailbox and found two orders with misco, one back in 2004 and one got cancelled in 2012.
SvenVA
17 Nov 16#17
How does this fair with the Z97 board that does not support M.2 PCI Express v3?
Anyone tested it for boot times etc?
SonicMR2 to SvenVA
17 Nov 16#19
Can the board actually support booting from an NVMe device? Not all Z97 boards can. Asus for example issued a BIOS update to add support for most of their Z97 line.
Loxust
17 Nov 16#18
outstanding find !!!
maltikism
17 Nov 16#20
if I put this in a USB 3 case, will it be faster than a standard USB 3 external drive?
derp1664 to maltikism
17 Nov 161#21
It depends what is inside your standard USB ext drive. Short answer, likely yes it will be slightly faster. Versus a fast SATA3 SSD inside a USB3.0 enclosure, no. It will be nowhere near the speed of internal though due to 5Gb/s limit of USB3.0 and the fastest SSD's out now already saturate SATA3 which is 6GB/s
SvenVA
17 Nov 16#22
Yup, Z97 Ranger which got that update.
hoomanitarian
18 Nov 16#23
That's what the speeds drop down to after you've written 13gb! of seq data at 1800MB/s to the drive. Where are you getting that data from? The only time you will hit that cache is if you are transferring 13+gb from one samsung nvme to another, you can;t get that bandwidth from anywhere else on the system. You will never hit that write cache in a desktop.
mikem1989
18 Nov 16#24
I didn't even realise this was out...
is it an upgrade on the 950 pro?
Opening post
Form Factor M.2 2280
Features TRIM support, sleep mode, Auto Garbage Collection Algorithm, TurboWrite Technology, V-NAND Technology, eDrive, NVM Express (NVMe) , S.M.A.R.T., 256-bit AES, IEEE 1667
Width 22.1 mm
Depth 80 mm
Height 2.28 mm
Weight 9 g
Device Type Solid state drive - internal
Capacity 250 GB
Encryption Algorithm 256-bit AES
Interface PCI Express 3.0 x4 (NVMe)
Hardware Encryption Yes
Manufacturer Warranty
Service & Support Limited warranty - 5 years / 100 TBW
Power
Power Consumption 1.2 Watt ( idle )
5.13 Watt ( average )
5 mW ( sleep )
Shock Tolerance (non-operating) 1500 g @ 0.5 ms
Performance
Internal Data Rate 3200 MBps (read) / 1500 MBps (write)
Maximum 4KB Random Write 330000 IOPS
Maximum 4KB Random Read 300000 IOPS
Reliability
MTBF 1,500,000 hours
Software & System Requirements
Software Included Samsung Magician Software
Expansion & Connectivity
Interfaces 1 x PCI Express 3.0 x4 (NVMe) - M.2 Card
Compatible Bay M.2 2280
All comments (26)
Remember this is the EVO not the PRO (although still insanely fast ...3200MB read, 1500MB write !)
Not an issue or not noticeable for many but neither are the headline speeds either in daily usage.
Don't believe the hype.
Drive Size - Sequential Write (sustained) - SLC cache size:
250GB - 300 MB/s - 13GB
500GB - 600 MB/s - 22GB
1TB - 1200 MB/s - 42GB
Samsung claims peak performance at 3,200MB/s sequential read and up to 1,900MB/s sequential write. The write performance decreases after the SLC buffer, which Samsung calls TurboWrite. The 960 EVO uses a new version called Intelligent TurboWrite, but we don't have much information on the differences. The latest iteration does increase the SLC size and starts at a massive 13GB for the 256GB model. The largest capacity size, 1TB, can fit nearly a full Blu-ray ISO transfer in SLC, a recommendation we often make in our SSD reviews. It's rare for end users to transfer a single file larger than a Blu-Ray ISO.
The 960 EVO delivers more random performance than the 950 Pro, Samsung's only shipping retail consumer SSD. Peak performance for the 960 EVO comes in the largest capacity size, and users get up to 380,000 read IOPS and 360,000 write IOPS (4KB block sizes). That makes the 960 EVO second only to the 960 Pro in performance for (announced) consumer SSDs.
I picked up the 950 pro 512gb when it first came out for 168 new. The 960 evo performs very similarly and the 256gb costs 109?
Anyone tested it for boot times etc?
is it an upgrade on the 950 pro?