Boost your PC’s performance up to 28x with an easy and affordable upgrade to SanDisk Ultra® II SSD. You’ll enjoy no-wait boot up and shorter application load and data transfer times than your traditional hard drive ever delivered—plus longer battery life and much cooler, quieter computing, too. No matter how you use your PC, SanDisk’s nCache 2.0 technology makes for a better experience, delivering consistent high speed and endurance.
PLus don't forget £10 voucher on amazon spends over £100
timefortea
15 Jun 163#25
great, thanks for letting me know
Farhan007 to GwanGy
15 Jun 163#8
I think having Amazon's customer service with worth paying the extra £10 for though :smiley:
tokamo
15 Jun 163#1
Looks like the best price so far:
Latest comments (57)
Sheza1
16 Jun 16#53
I have been thinking of getting a new SSD for a while now. I was comparing the 840 EVO that I currently have, to this SanDisk and the 850 EVO I might have bought.
I have been reading plenty of reviews and discovered that budget range SSDs fall down in several areas when it comes to performance - but it's very confusing because so many of the benchmarks are suited for different use cases. I randomly clicked on one and it said 'This benchmark result is ideal for servers'. That doesn't help me. I also don't do video editing / large file writing. My use case is for games - I have no idea what 'IOPS' or '4K RANDOM READ' etc benchmarks apply to the quick loading of games, but seeing that the benchmarks vary so greatly between different brands and ranges, I didn't want to be unlucky and end up getting an SSD that, as it turns out, is nowhere near as fast as another model for loading games, because it happens to be much faster elsewhere, like for server operation.
I specifically didn't ask about M.2 etc drives because I'm pretty sure my motherboard doesn't have the slot for it.
So yes, while the average person will see improved performance no matter which SSD they purchase, that's a generalisation. I was asking if anybody knew whether this SSD was specifically good for the type of usage scenario I described. I know that the ADATA budget range sometimes falls to 0 when writing large files, which is the sort of poor performance I want to avoid in my usage scenario which is reading (small? or large?) game files.
You're right about one thing, though, I have learnt a lesson about deals. Though I cannot help myself but point out that I did not at all think the deal lasted 'forever'. In fact, I thought it lasted for about 5 more hours. per the countdown on Amazon's website. Hardly 'forever'.
manlikeronald to Sheza1
21 Jun 16#57
Will this survive by rubbing vms 24/7? In a vsan cluster?
pcm
20 Jun 16#56
Indeed.. So sad :disappointed:
HoDee
16 Jun 16#55
so sad that no deals for Pro versions with such capacities
Lonyo
16 Jun 16#54
£6 difference to the previous sale price. Hardly "nowhere near".
moogle
16 Jun 16#52
Good, I'm sure you would have starved delaying your dinner by the 5 mins it would have taken you to purchase it. It doesn't matter how long the deal was up, the longer you wait the higher the chance it will have expired. Maybe you'll have learned a lesson from it.
If you have knowledge of other types of SSD, what's so hard about knowing about a standard SATA one? Maybe if you didn't need to wait for some form of validation from other HUKD'ers to tell you how to use it with your existing SSD, you'd have one by now.
Oh and as for not answering your question, I don't understand how I can make it clearer to you. If a faster NVME/M.2 SSD drive doesn't make a noticeable difference compared to a normal SSD, comparing your normal EVO SSD to this one is negligible in terms of responsiveness and speeds. All that extra crap where it may beat it in benchmarks amount to zero real world performance. You're not going to notice that extra 100ms you saved booting up into your system.
So if you still don't get it I'll spell it out clearly for you.
IT DOES NOT MATTER
Asking about the 'Best plan of action for its use'. It's an SSD, just use it how you like. One would think you've never seen one in your life before with phrases like that. I can see why you missed the deal if you were pondering about how you're going to use it. You make it sound like you're making a lifelong commitment to it.
There's nothing more annoying than someone who'll sit and not act on a deal, yet then whine about it because they missed out. You've only got yourself to blame, not Amazon.
So now I'm going to do like everyone else and not bother to reply to your posts. Maybe next time you'll remember you missed out on this deal and not make the same mistake of thinking every deal lasts forever.
Sheza1
16 Jun 16#51
Well excuse me for getting a bit hungry and wanting to eat dinner first!
The deal had been up for 18 hours and was still up when I first saw the deal. So actually, there was nothing immediately 'urgent' to me, I had just thought that it would be available until the end of the daily deal timer, which was at 6 hours before I had dinner.
Also, you didn't really answer my question. I was asking about its suitability as a drive for games and also what the best plan of action for its use would be, considering my existing SSD. I am aware of the other types of faster SSD... but that's simply not what I asked.
moogle
15 Jun 16#50
First off, I'm not flaming you but you are moaning/getting upset about the deal ending when you had plenty of time to get one. You don't have to be on every day looking at the same SSD go on a deal, you were here whilst it was still on offer for that price and you didn't grab your chance.
No one owes you a reply to your query, and if you do wait for a reply the deal can expire like most do.
If you want to know, there are faster drives out there but they're more expensive and have faster writes and reads (NVME drives, PCI-E/M.2 drives that aren't SATA based).
However, they make very little difference in terms of making your system faster (than a normal SATA 3 SSD) except in certain workload scenarios that most people won't ever run into. I'd buy a drive and use it in my system just to get rid of the traditional hard drive.
So buying a faster SSD with 1000+ MB/s read and write speeds won't make your system boot noticeably faster than it does with a normal SSD, you'll just be able to copy and write at faster speeds.
Sheza1
15 Jun 16#49
Nowhere near as good a price as today.
Sheza1
15 Jun 16#48
Alright mate, I know this is *hot* UK Deals but can you turn the flame down a bit? Yes I did post in the thread earlier - nice to note that nobody bothered replying to my queries there, yet you're all too happy to flame me now?
Point is the deal had been up for ages and yet went down in the half an hour gap when I had dinner. Bit miffed at that. Also I am sorry I am not on HUKD every day looking at the same SSD go on a deal.
FdjC
15 Jun 16#47
Really annoyed i missed this :disappointed:
moogle
15 Jun 161#45
Then buy it next time instead of faffing about... You seem to have had plenty of time to see the deal and post in the thread did you not?
Lonyo to moogle
15 Jun 162#46
So just wait a 1-3 weeks for the next deal on this exact same SSD to be posted.
This deal ended prematurely which I am incredibly upset about...
Nesima
15 Jun 16#43
Who isww
Who is Shawsenegger ? Anyway no self respecting Brit should do anything to support the bombers.
Sheza1
15 Jun 16#42
Good drive to replace a 120GB 840 EVO and enable me to run ALL my programs and games off?
Or should I stick with the 840 EVO for OS and run games off the Sandisk
Or should I get an 850 EVO for games?
rizlaw
15 Jun 16#41
people wake up do not ever buy sandisk, worst company and products ever. these only last a few months and die. its like buying marshmellow tyre for your car , nice and sweet cheap tyre but burn out after first trip.
alasky86
15 Jun 16#40
Arghhhh. Paid £150 two weeks ago. :sunglasses:
badass70
15 Jun 161#39
50% more performance for 50% more money - so get what you pay for!
Still several hundred percent better than a 5.2k spindle....
The Evo is SO. MUCH. BETTER. Heat for the low price and space, but honestly if you're looking for speed the Evo is the one, makes this look like a HDD not an SSD!
EDIT: if you look at the 1TB Evo vs this 960GB specifically the difference is even bigger!
If it's a non-retina (these models still have a DVD drive), yes.
ljboath
15 Jun 16#35
Will this be OK to put in my Dell Vostro 3900?
Lx
fishmaster
15 Jun 16#34
I'm boring saying this but M.2 NVMe SSDs are technically a lot better, but many people won't have the M.2 connection, also you'd need the workload to tax an M.2. The sequential read/write and IOPS are a lot faster. I notice the speed difference, but it depends on your workload, you won't get 960GB for £139.99 yet on M.2.
LouG
15 Jun 16#33
Ordered this on Amazon last week for £174, so gutted!
lp76
15 Jun 16#32
Would this fit in a 2013 Macbook Pro?
ezzer72
15 Jun 162#31
That's a very bold statement, and a cool story, bro.
28081947
15 Jun 16#30
Have been looking for a large size SSD for a while, Thanks OP heat added.
CHAOSEN3
15 Jun 16#29
The enclosure would fit but the speeds would be poor due to having no UASP.
Fish2013
15 Jun 16#28
Very tempting. I already have a Samsung 250Gb SSD for my OS and temporary storage. This would be excellent for downloading big files.
Y44SNN
15 Jun 16#27
thanks been looking for one of these at as good price!
grovearmada
15 Jun 161#26
My pleasure.
timefortea
15 Jun 163#25
great, thanks for letting me know
grovearmada
15 Jun 16#24
this will be my new game drive. OS runs on a separate drive.
frownbreaker
15 Jun 16#23
Top drive much faster than the lower capacity SSDs.
Excellent Heat+
glam1
15 Jun 162#22
I ordered this a few weeks ago at £145...great buy at that so this is a top deal.
Currently have Samsung 850 PROs in my desktop and there is no massive real world difference between them and the Sandisk...it's a great SSD especially for the price.
People that pick over benchmark scores need to chill and understand that most SSDs perform well enough for the average punter these days.
I run a photography business and using SSDs allow me to use all of my memory heavy programs with ease.
Buy this with confindence:-))
GwanGy
15 Jun 162#21
adam laless ? he is a Legend ... Truly , a man with no name, who rights wrongs. If you combined Edwood Woodward, Steven Seagal and Shawsenegger you would nt even come close to the deal-making capacity this man has
GwanGy
15 Jun 16#5
aDAM laless is doing it for £129 inc postage (from Ireland) .... but this is a good price ....
Farhan007 to GwanGy
15 Jun 163#8
I think having Amazon's customer service with worth paying the extra £10 for though :smiley:
quidstretchy to GwanGy
15 Jun 16#20
who?
lkl265
15 Jun 16#19
Great price. Ordered.
senor_eggnogs
15 Jun 16#18
Can confirm that its the lowest price ever.
with 5% off amazon prime/nus discount price is £132.99.
alababaju
15 Jun 16#17
This is a brilliant price. I have the 240gb version from about a year or two years ago works well. Absolutely brilliant deal as this price. Heat added.
Spectral
15 Jun 16#10
Does anyone know how this compares the Samsung 850 EVO? I was going to get the 500GB Evo for £111 but the extra capacity from this is tempting. Is this the better buy?
tariq3877 to Spectral
15 Jun 161#11
I have used them both in many different variants and to be honest you won't ever see any difference except for Kingston SSD NOW all SSD s are amazingly fast and hardly any different go for extra disk space
ontheqt to Spectral
15 Jun 161#16
I have thid hdd and an evo and I havent noticed a perfomance difference
wong_go_wild
15 Jun 16#15
had mine for over 6months no problems. bought this to replace a raid 5 setup with Samsung 840pro. slight performance drop but this is definitely more stable.
Spectral
15 Jun 16#14
I already do regular backups, but a drive crapping out would still be massively inconvenient even if it is covered by warranty. Especially as it'll be the boot drive so the PC would be useless until a replacement arrived. That said I also know no model is immune to failure. I've personally seen one of the Sansungs die too.
larry27
15 Jun 16#13
Make sure you backup important files.
Also 3 year warranty when you register product on the SanDisk website.
Spectral
15 Jun 16#12
Thanks, I was leaning towards this one given the price and capacity. I wont be doing a lot of file copying anyway other than the initial OS and then game installs. So max speeds aren't the be all and end all anyway so much as the read speed/random access, which seems more or less comparable across any but the oldest SSD's.
Although after reading through some of the Amazon reviews it looks like these may suffer from reliability problems. A lot of reviews reports drives DOA or dieing after a couple of months use.
christianschmeer
15 Jun 16#9
Don't get that enclosure, it's slow for SSDs. Inatek FE2005 is the way to go, got me 100+ more MB/s that the Orico.
Opening post
Top comments
PLus don't forget £10 voucher on amazon spends over £100
Latest comments (57)
I have been reading plenty of reviews and discovered that budget range SSDs fall down in several areas when it comes to performance - but it's very confusing because so many of the benchmarks are suited for different use cases. I randomly clicked on one and it said 'This benchmark result is ideal for servers'. That doesn't help me. I also don't do video editing / large file writing. My use case is for games - I have no idea what 'IOPS' or '4K RANDOM READ' etc benchmarks apply to the quick loading of games, but seeing that the benchmarks vary so greatly between different brands and ranges, I didn't want to be unlucky and end up getting an SSD that, as it turns out, is nowhere near as fast as another model for loading games, because it happens to be much faster elsewhere, like for server operation.
I specifically didn't ask about M.2 etc drives because I'm pretty sure my motherboard doesn't have the slot for it.
So yes, while the average person will see improved performance no matter which SSD they purchase, that's a generalisation. I was asking if anybody knew whether this SSD was specifically good for the type of usage scenario I described. I know that the ADATA budget range sometimes falls to 0 when writing large files, which is the sort of poor performance I want to avoid in my usage scenario which is reading (small? or large?) game files.
You're right about one thing, though, I have learnt a lesson about deals. Though I cannot help myself but point out that I did not at all think the deal lasted 'forever'. In fact, I thought it lasted for about 5 more hours. per the countdown on Amazon's website. Hardly 'forever'.
If you have knowledge of other types of SSD, what's so hard about knowing about a standard SATA one? Maybe if you didn't need to wait for some form of validation from other HUKD'ers to tell you how to use it with your existing SSD, you'd have one by now.
Oh and as for not answering your question, I don't understand how I can make it clearer to you. If a faster NVME/M.2 SSD drive doesn't make a noticeable difference compared to a normal SSD, comparing your normal EVO SSD to this one is negligible in terms of responsiveness and speeds. All that extra crap where it may beat it in benchmarks amount to zero real world performance. You're not going to notice that extra 100ms you saved booting up into your system.
So if you still don't get it I'll spell it out clearly for you.
IT DOES NOT MATTER
Asking about the 'Best plan of action for its use'. It's an SSD, just use it how you like. One would think you've never seen one in your life before with phrases like that. I can see why you missed the deal if you were pondering about how you're going to use it. You make it sound like you're making a lifelong commitment to it.
There's nothing more annoying than someone who'll sit and not act on a deal, yet then whine about it because they missed out. You've only got yourself to blame, not Amazon.
So now I'm going to do like everyone else and not bother to reply to your posts. Maybe next time you'll remember you missed out on this deal and not make the same mistake of thinking every deal lasts forever.
The deal had been up for 18 hours and was still up when I first saw the deal. So actually, there was nothing immediately 'urgent' to me, I had just thought that it would be available until the end of the daily deal timer, which was at 6 hours before I had dinner.
Also, you didn't really answer my question. I was asking about its suitability as a drive for games and also what the best plan of action for its use would be, considering my existing SSD. I am aware of the other types of faster SSD... but that's simply not what I asked.
No one owes you a reply to your query, and if you do wait for a reply the deal can expire like most do.
If you want to know, there are faster drives out there but they're more expensive and have faster writes and reads (NVME drives, PCI-E/M.2 drives that aren't SATA based).
However, they make very little difference in terms of making your system faster (than a normal SATA 3 SSD) except in certain workload scenarios that most people won't ever run into. I'd buy a drive and use it in my system just to get rid of the traditional hard drive.
So buying a faster SSD with 1000+ MB/s read and write speeds won't make your system boot noticeably faster than it does with a normal SSD, you'll just be able to copy and write at faster speeds.
Point is the deal had been up for ages and yet went down in the half an hour gap when I had dinner. Bit miffed at that. Also I am sorry I am not on HUKD every day looking at the same SSD go on a deal.
It's a regular occurrence.
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sandisk-ultra-ii-ssd-960-gb-sata-iii-2-5-inch-internal-ssd-145-99-amazon-deal-day-2455845
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sandisk-ultra-ii-ssd-960-gb-149-99-amazon-2454743
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sandisk-ultra-ii-ssd-960-gb-sata-iii-2-5-inch-internal-ssd-up-550-mb-s-155-46-amazon-2450216
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sandisk-ultra-ii-ssd-960-gb-sata-iii-2-5-inch-internal-ssd-159-99-amazon-2427709
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sandisk-ultra-ii-ssd-960-gb-159-99-amazon-2405366
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sandisk-ultra-ii-960gb-163-79-amazon-spain-2407152
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sandisk-960gb-ultra-ii-sata-6gb-s-2-5-solid-state-drive-159-99-delivered-dabs-2398278
http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/sandisk-ultra-ii-ssd-960-gb-sata-iii-2-5-inch-internal-ssd-up-550-mb-s-154-98-amazon-2351926
Who is Shawsenegger ? Anyway no self respecting Brit should do anything to support the bombers.
Or should I stick with the 840 EVO for OS and run games off the Sandisk
Or should I get an 850 EVO for games?
Still several hundred percent better than a 5.2k spindle....
The Evo is SO. MUCH. BETTER. Heat for the low price and space, but honestly if you're looking for speed the Evo is the one, makes this look like a HDD not an SSD!
EDIT: if you look at the 1TB Evo vs this 960GB specifically the difference is even bigger!
http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/SanDisk-Ultra-II-960GB-vs-Samsung-850-Evo-1TB/3582vs3576
Lx
Excellent Heat+
Currently have Samsung 850 PROs in my desktop and there is no massive real world difference between them and the Sandisk...it's a great SSD especially for the price.
People that pick over benchmark scores need to chill and understand that most SSDs perform well enough for the average punter these days.
I run a photography business and using SSDs allow me to use all of my memory heavy programs with ease.
Buy this with confindence:-))
with 5% off amazon prime/nus discount price is £132.99.
Also 3 year warranty when you register product on the SanDisk website.
Although after reading through some of the Amazon reviews it looks like these may suffer from reliability problems. A lot of reviews reports drives DOA or dieing after a couple of months use.
PLus don't forget £10 voucher on amazon spends over £100
But contemplating getting this larger version, but would the enclosure fit?