Johnson Sensitive Baby Wipes, 12 pack box reduced to clear £4 at Asda Blackpool.
Probably store specific dependant on stock, but worth a look if your there anyway!
Top comments
crd67
12 May 1610#2
Oops *Ooops should be Oops!
Jetpac
12 May 163#12
CHEMOPHOBICS ASSEMBLE!
The body of evidence behind the talc claim in not in any way significant enough. The accepted evidence is asbestos containing talk which is carcinogenic if inhaled but isn't used anymore. The Johnsons case is based on procedure and lack of awareness from J&J rather than much scientific backing.
As for dangerous chemicals.. people on here are probably referencing formaldehyde... which if they are concerned about highlights lack of education with regards to biochemistry, How formaldehyde is used, why and limitations regarding its use.
But what do i know.... i read peer review rather than websites of 'wellbeing gurus' who think everything is killing us and consistently misuse and misappropriate the term 'toxin' and 'detox'.
Latest comments (30)
Satele
12 May 162#22
Sadly, some people will always put cheapness and saving money for booze before doing right by their child. Seriously, plain water on a clean muslin is better than these. Oh wait, I guess that's too much hassle for some new parents.
Horrific product. Freezing cold.
Shaydog to Satele
14 May 16#30
yubious
14 May 16#29
aldis are much better than these and were available for just a pound more a couple of weeks ago (probably still are)
but i appreciate aldis isn't that convenient for everyone.
Some people have read on the Internet that these may cause cancer. As their obscure conspiracy websites are obviously right and something something big pharma something something, even saying the name 'J*****n' actually makes you die probably. Just to be safe, vote to leave Europe too. They might sell these on the continent and we can't have that.
ads_williams to SteveDave4
13 May 161#26
LOL you just won the Internet
yas212
13 May 16#24
I use the extra sensitive wipes
whitechick58
13 May 16#23
Great find. Don't see what all the fuss is about. I've always used these for my children & wouldn't use any other brand. Hot for me!
newportbob
12 May 16#21
I can't find the deal in the link, has it gone?
crd67
12 May 1610#2
Oops *Ooops should be Oops!
AStonedRaichu to crd67
12 May 16#20
Brilliant. :smile:
RedmanDealer
12 May 16#19
Looks a good price but we stick to the alcohol free ones which are usually a little bit more (Huggies were 3 for £2) or the ownbrand stuff
kat_1990
12 May 161#17
Cancer
Shaydog to kat_1990
12 May 16#18
BigBen75020
12 May 16#16
Johnson and Johnson poor quality ingredients
doyley78
12 May 161#15
I need a box of these, I got a bit of a sweat on when I seen the price. Great find OP!
Heat, heat, heat!!!!
s21helly
12 May 16#10
Sorry why shouldn't people use Johnson's baby stuff? I have always used all the products with both my children and never had a problem?
TCH74 to s21helly
12 May 16#11
I think this has to do with a recent study that found Johnson's Talc Powder having carcinogenic properties.
Sharsan to s21helly
12 May 16#14
Google the ingriendients full of chemicals people use these wipes to take paint off there hands or mechanics use it to take greese off that's how strong these wipes are
smarkmith
12 May 162#13
Asda little angels sensitive wipes are a lot better in my opinion. Thicker, better resealable packaging and they don't come out in twos or threes when you want one. Bought 12 for £6 yesterday. More expensive than this deal but cheaper than normal prices, and nationwide
Jetpac
12 May 163#12
CHEMOPHOBICS ASSEMBLE!
The body of evidence behind the talc claim in not in any way significant enough. The accepted evidence is asbestos containing talk which is carcinogenic if inhaled but isn't used anymore. The Johnsons case is based on procedure and lack of awareness from J&J rather than much scientific backing.
As for dangerous chemicals.. people on here are probably referencing formaldehyde... which if they are concerned about highlights lack of education with regards to biochemistry, How formaldehyde is used, why and limitations regarding its use.
But what do i know.... i read peer review rather than websites of 'wellbeing gurus' who think everything is killing us and consistently misuse and misappropriate the term 'toxin' and 'detox'.
NorthLondonN1
12 May 162#7
Check the ingredients for this. It's awful, should go nowhere near the human body.
Sharsan to NorthLondonN1
12 May 161#9
I know nothing of johnsons should go on a human body especially a baby!!!
scaffolder
12 May 16#8
If that deal is legit then that's a bargain , Amazon are selling these for £7 ..
Opening post
Probably store specific dependant on stock, but worth a look if your there anyway!
Top comments
The body of evidence behind the talc claim in not in any way significant enough. The accepted evidence is asbestos containing talk which is carcinogenic if inhaled but isn't used anymore. The Johnsons case is based on procedure and lack of awareness from J&J rather than much scientific backing.
As for dangerous chemicals.. people on here are probably referencing formaldehyde... which if they are concerned about highlights lack of education with regards to biochemistry, How formaldehyde is used, why and limitations regarding its use.
But what do i know.... i read peer review rather than websites of 'wellbeing gurus' who think everything is killing us and consistently misuse and misappropriate the term 'toxin' and 'detox'.
Latest comments (30)
Horrific product. Freezing cold.
but i appreciate aldis isn't that convenient for everyone.
Some people have read on the Internet that these may cause cancer. As their obscure conspiracy websites are obviously right and something something big pharma something something, even saying the name 'J*****n' actually makes you die probably. Just to be safe, vote to leave Europe too. They might sell these on the continent and we can't have that.
Heat, heat, heat!!!!
The body of evidence behind the talc claim in not in any way significant enough. The accepted evidence is asbestos containing talk which is carcinogenic if inhaled but isn't used anymore. The Johnsons case is based on procedure and lack of awareness from J&J rather than much scientific backing.
As for dangerous chemicals.. people on here are probably referencing formaldehyde... which if they are concerned about highlights lack of education with regards to biochemistry, How formaldehyde is used, why and limitations regarding its use.
But what do i know.... i read peer review rather than websites of 'wellbeing gurus' who think everything is killing us and consistently misuse and misappropriate the term 'toxin' and 'detox'.