at Tesco,Was £1.99 Now £1.25, Great Value for money, gluten free no artful colours and Halal
Top comments
Moonmonkeys
19 Mar 1662#8
Pity you said Halal, that means an automatic downvote from some. I'll counteract that a bit.
lawllb
19 Mar 1654#25
If I was to be killed I couldn't care less if you slit my throat with a sharp blade or stun me before killing me because they are both painful, in fact being stunned is more painful (as proven by countless research articles and videos widely available).
Halal slaughter is more humane than stunning an animal, but lets not get into that debate because there is plenty of material available about that.
Anyway I voted this HOT!
qwerta369
19 Mar 1648#9
I didn't vote cold because it's halal. In fact, the absence of boiled up pig bones in children's sweets is a bonus for most people, irrespective of what flavour of religion they prefer. Everyone can get diabetes, infidel or not.
Loeeza
19 Mar 1634#10
Hot because it's halal. No nasties ie;artificial additives.
Latest comments (118)
kelx
21 Mar 16#118
Fantastic find op! Its hard to find halal sweeties that the price hasnt been pumped up on just because they are halal! Haribo charge twice the price for halal sweets.
A lot of haters on here it seems people need to grow up x
arvy1
21 Mar 16#117
The way I look at this is as what the deal is, good that it is halal however I don't eat these sweets cos of sugar content but based upon rrp then it's a good deal. This is what the hukd website is for and not for unrelated ,trouble and scare-mongering comments.
Cavity
21 Mar 16#116
How come my response to katestewart has been deleted but her comments still stand?
muddypie
20 Mar 161#112
I would definately buy halal sweets - I like to know they don't contain boiled up pig skin, cartilage or bones.
dreamager to muddypie
20 Mar 16#115
But it's ok if it's from cows?
ssuk100
19 Mar 167#5
Halal?? I'd rather have a bowl of Coco Pops
Aprilfool1 to ssuk100
20 Mar 161#71
You do realise Coco Pops are halal too. Just check the box :man:
msiddiq1989 to ssuk100
20 Mar 161#114
Cocopops are halal too :smiley:
Veedub_heaven
20 Mar 16#113
Hot :stuck_out_tongue:
Sid87
20 Mar 164#111
Quite depressing reading some of these comments. People seem to turn rabid when the word halal is mentioned.
MikeT
20 Mar 16#110
Ive just deleted a whole bunch of posts and posts quoting that didnt comply with our code of conduct.
This is a deal thread stick to that or move over to Misc where you may get a bit more rope.
magicjay1986
20 Mar 16#109
Thread has been tidied. Apologies to any members who had quoted posts caught up in the tidy.
No further taking this thread off topic please. Lets leave it there. Thanks.
yrreb88
20 Mar 161#108
No offence but I'd prefer the vets that belong to the BVA, RSPCA etc to dismiss the studies and there's also the FAWC's own observations. As a doctor, you shouldn't find it surprising that slicing several large nerves and various tissues will cause some pain, given that unconsciousness likely isn't instantaneous. Anatomically, cows have it worse off due to different vasculature.
dw94
20 Mar 163#107
Sad to see that people are voting cold based on their own views and beliefs towards Halal.
Vote based on the price and the fact that it's a deal?
saq2
20 Mar 161#106
Voted hot. Most of the food we eat these days is halal without us knowing. Tastes great!
tazinio
20 Mar 16#105
I'm a doctor myself so I know how to interpret the studies by the societies you refer to. It's difficult to measure pain in humans neve mind animals.
adamsedge
20 Mar 16#104
cold
365pizza
20 Mar 16#103
I expect the lemon was still alive when they slit it!
365pizza
20 Mar 163#102
If you are going to criticise grammar, it's probably wise not to reply with multiple errors. It makes you look a numpty otherwise. ... oh wait!
I would suggest that you might want to check your spelling on that sentence. Check your ahem 'english'.
How can it be conflicting custom? Is there something that you aren't telling us ? Seems like your sentences/points are conflicting in my viewpoint.
What if the 'minority' as you put it was christian or secular ?
k13
20 Mar 16#99
Dog eat dog world!
EN1GMA
19 Mar 16#62
Love the halal threads. Always brings out the usual comments. Still quality read though to pass some time.
airfix to EN1GMA
20 Mar 16#98
I have a very simple test to determine my attitude to this question. It is to ask myself whether faced with death by having my throat cut I would prefer to have it done whilst I remained fully conscious or only after I had been rendered unconscious. A totally unscientific test I know but I suspect one that were it to be applied to followers of Islam and Judaism would produce exactly the same answer. The only difference then is that I apply it to animals and they don't.
snowflake75
19 Mar 1610#42
i see the racists are out again!!!
bytemaster to snowflake75
19 Mar 163#63
I don't think it is a question of racism. Any culture that practices FGM, and protects its perpetrators is simply asking for flack. I lack the words to express my loathing for anyone who can support this evil activity. They should all have their throats cut.
nublets2k to snowflake75
20 Mar 165#73
Islam isn't a race...
airfix to snowflake75
20 Mar 163#97
How many times do we have to hear the race card being played, i don’t care if you’re from Mars, the practice is inhumane. This really goes to show how primitive some people are.
k13
20 Mar 161#91
When I saw halal in the title thought I read some of the comments (ignorance of people) if you are not muslim then eat what you want and if you are muslim then enjoy this deal. Simple!
I wish some of the comments were made in a room with people sitting face to face the half the stuff won't be said!
I wish there was no hatred between religions/Creeds/casts and cultures.
We are the same species just like the animals and other living beings. And everyone should respect that.
Educate yourselves. If you have been to Primary school there is a subject called RE (religious education).
Respect, love and accept eachother.
norfolkbroadslim to k13
20 Mar 161#96
That's a very nice idealistic view of things, but unfortunately it would never happen. Humans have been in conflict since the beginning of man.
lawllb
19 Mar 1654#25
If I was to be killed I couldn't care less if you slit my throat with a sharp blade or stun me before killing me because they are both painful, in fact being stunned is more painful (as proven by countless research articles and videos widely available).
Halal slaughter is more humane than stunning an animal, but lets not get into that debate because there is plenty of material available about that.
Anyway I voted this HOT!
tfish to lawllb
19 Mar 1617#29
Funnily enough the RSPCA doesn't agree with you.
atrixo to lawllb
19 Mar 161#37
its the fact that some people enjoy killing animals that way, totally bloodthirsty.
mrsuperjolly to lawllb
19 Mar 16#39
Most halal meat is pre stunned before being prepared, and even if not the action of slitting the throat acts as a stun making the animal unconscious very quickly.
katestewart9279 to lawllb
20 Mar 165#80
That's why the Humane society,vets society,RSPCA want it banned. But hey that ignorant bloke who couldn't care less knows better. Anyone who has watched videos of an animal being hacked to death whilst its conscious and says that's better than at least being stunned so the animal is not aware( I know sometimes it doesn't work) is missing a brain cell or two. I despair at the human race.
abonio to lawllb
20 Mar 162#86
Why say 'let's not get into that debate' when you're clearly in that debate. Let's get this clear, slaughter without stunning is cruel. The RSPCA is opposed to it.
In fact, though, nearly 90% of Halal slaughter is stunned. More to the point, it's exactly the same as non-Halal slaughter except the animal is blessed. The question to ask yourself is, do you want to risk buying the 10% of Halal meat that's been slaughtered cruelly? If you're bothered, do your research first (Tesco, for example, claim all their Halal meat is stunned), and don't take a chance if you can't be sure. You can be Halal and kind.
airfix to lawllb
20 Mar 16#94
I am curious. Why do minorities immigrate to predominately Christian or secular countries if they wish to retain often conflicting or controversial customs?
norfolkbroadslim to lawllb
20 Mar 162#95
Well that's a good one. You make a sweeping statement that halal slaughter is more humane than stunning an animal and then immediately say you don't want to get into debate about it.
Stunning an animal before slaughter is more humane than traditional halal slaughter, but lets not get into a debate because there is plenty of material available about that.
Anyway I voted this cold!
airfix
20 Mar 163#93
What I want to know is why are they labeling pathetic bags of sweets correctly and not the meat in supermarkets?
I want to avoid the inferior quality halal meat and I don't want to eat meat from an animal which has suffered by non stun death. Get your priorities right and label the meat, this way there will be a huge decline in the trade of Halal meat, trust me.
davep393
20 Mar 16#92
I think this is a case of the fact we buy meat for our shops from all over the world. Automatically any we import from Islamic countries will be Halal. The rest can choose but for the sake of a blessing they can sell to anyone, so it makes sense to do it. It's probably cheaper to bless everything than try to do separate processes.
As said by others mostly it's stunned anyway so it makes not real difference.
As a atheist I'm not technically in favour of religious meat, but it makes sense as a business so why worry it will taste the same!
MRPRO_MO2012
19 Mar 161#61
Halal/kosher is the prophetic and natural way wheather you like it or not! Majority of the animals slaughtered today are 99.9% stunned which is even more painful for the animal.
By the way OP is this certified by HMC? (halal monitoring committee) As this is the only one I know of which does not allow stunning the rest from my research stun.
wendy07 to MRPRO_MO2012
19 Mar 163#68
90% of all halal is pre stunned. 100% of kosher is not stunned.
issue with stunning is that if not done accurately , and most of the time it isnt, the animal suffers greatly and for longer.
katestewart9279 to MRPRO_MO2012
20 Mar 166#82
Prophetic and natural. Get away from the mediaeval times man. Evolve. Firstly natural does not equal Good when it involves killing. No evidence that God exists so why do animals have to suffer more for some unproven belief?! As for the prophet Mohammed. Ahem. With his dubious record I suggest we don't go there. Anyways we do what's better for the animal judged by science not some wandering bloke from the past. Grow up human race.
norfolkbroadslim to MRPRO_MO2012
20 Mar 161#90
"The natural way" according to who?
mittromney
20 Mar 16#89
I guess that would be the research funded by petro dollars. Funnily enough there's also plenty of similar funded research extolling the virtues of circumcision.
samwants2save
20 Mar 161#88
Ugggggh... The fippin debates on here. Just vote hot or cold..
kamenitzabrit
20 Mar 162#87
Why should my meat be blessed, when I have not asked for it to be done, and am often not given the choice due to political correctness giving preference to minorities.
There's an old expression about when in Rome, and sadly we who have ancestors who lived within the British Isles around the year 1066, are now sometimes being virtually forced to accept things we don't want and were never asked to accept, due to recently arrived wanderers who passed through safe countries because ours gives them more freebies.
kamenitzabrit
20 Mar 163#85
What I really find fascinating about these threads nowadays is how the balance of 'membership' appears to be shifting or even have already shifted over the past year or so - far more votes in favour of all things relating to certain cultures and beliefs than there used to be.
As for having a choice whether or not to eat certain foods - I have friends living in an area which has seen the well-publicised arrival of people from a certain country. The local schoolchildren have lost their bacon sandwiches from menus due to the influence of less than 1% of the population, but the adults of a certain belief still get their free government handouts from a cashpoint machine..... without wondering if a workman has just used the machine after eating a bacon buttie from a nearby takeaway ! Makes me chuckle.
abdi12346
20 Mar 165#79
Lots of EDL members voting cold.
katestewart9279 to abdi12346
20 Mar 164#84
I'm not an EDL supporter just hate ignorance and needless cruelty. Halal videos are shocking. The animals are aware when their throats are half gashed and gouged. Anyone who is ok with this and uses religion to justifiy it,is evil imo. Others been plenty of exposure by mainstream videos and the animals don't lose consciousness at first cut like claimed on here by deluded religious people living in cuckoo land.Prefer to remain ignorant to please their God who must be nasty to allow suffering of his creatures like this. Don't even have to eat halal. There's alternatives to meat so no justification to obey an archaic religious law or advice.
kamenitzabrit
20 Mar 16#83
I lived and worked in an Eastern European country for several years, where there were many Turkish muslims from the Ottoman empire times. When travelling through villages, I would often see animals being butchered at the side of the road or at someone's front gate (due to the metal frame to hang them from) - please don't try to convince me that these animals were all stunned first, in isolated villages which make up a big proportion of these countries.
In rural areas of at least one EU country it's an everyday fact of life - make of that what you will.
tazinio
20 Mar 162#72
The argument between stunning and halal/kosher slaughter baffles me. Unless we bring the animal back to life, we'll never know which was more painful. Either way this is the last moment of the animal. Why isn't the focus on the rest of the animal's life?
The way animals are treated in the meat industry is shocking, yet we are arguing which slaughtering method causes less pain. I wonder how much pain the chickens are in because their legs snap due to their unnatural weight.
katestewart9279 to tazinio
20 Mar 162#81
Why can't we discuss both is the logical answer to another idiotic post. We do know what causes most distress by observing the animals and by listening to vets assov,RSPCA,humane society etc who want it banned. Also I'd rather be unconscious and slaughtered then alive to witness it. Educate yourself and don't believe for a second you care about any of the process the animals go through. Just come on to defend halal. Another ignoramus spouting immature nonsense.
Cavity
20 Mar 161#78
Islam isn't a race, but for some reason most islamophobes are racist
dreamager
20 Mar 16#77
Racist toward delicious lil piggies, cold
amzzzzyyyy
20 Mar 161#76
Doesnt stop many off you eating or drinking what you want to eat. so why moan if someone chooses to eat halal or kosher, thats there own choice and beliefs let them be
nazma
20 Mar 16#75
They taste amazing. Thanks. Hot hot hot for me
gooby74
20 Mar 16#74
You guys really need to get off your lazy asses and get outside more instead of sitting on here commenting on how an animal is slaughtered, it's a deal for some damn sweets get over your bigoted selfs. An animal is still dying if your eating meat no matter how its slaughtered, if you love the animals so much go become vegetarian and for once in your life don't preach about stuff you barely have any knowledge of
liamf12
20 Mar 161#70
It's actually 84% last year, whether it's halal, kosher or any other form of religious slaughter, if it's not humane it shouldn't be allowed. People have a choice not to eat meat if not slaughtered in what we deem a humane way.
Just goes to show, some people think if it's halal it's vegetarian. If it doesn't contain artificial colour or flavours it's natural (preservatives?) I eat meat, I don't like the fact things die for it but they shouldn't suffer. I eat sausages and black pudding etc, if things die then use it all. Religion shouldn't allow exceptions to law, either it's wrong or right. As for sweets, they shouldn't contain meat or derivatives. Don't often vote, occasionally comment but this shouldn't be hot, it should be vegetarian.
kingronaldo
20 Mar 161#69
this deal should not be voted hot or cold based on any religiously correct ingreidiants. base it on pricr alone. some ppl need to get a grip and realise we are all humans. grow up
wendy07
19 Mar 164#67
this thread is about sweets that happen to be also suitable for muslims.
fgm is practised by christians, muslims and the non religious - mostly across africa. it is cultural not religious.
true its not a question of racism its a question of ignorance.
luckyshtyler
19 Mar 163#66
Tragic when you get racism based on ignorance. Do your research on FGM, it's a cultural thing and unheard of outside of certain countries.
tfish
19 Mar 1612#28
I prefer my sweets not to have been involved in an religious ceremony
Borat to tfish
19 Mar 162#30
LOL!
snowflake75 to tfish
19 Mar 165#51
You're funny mate!!!....not!!
wendy07 to tfish
19 Mar 162#65
all bottled (and tap) water is halal, as is milk and as is the air you breathe .. #justsaying
luckyshtyler
19 Mar 16#64
Hot!
Cavity
19 Mar 161#55
Its "Ha, Lol". At least get that bit right
Rid1 to Cavity
19 Mar 16#60
You're aren't funny, at least not to the majority of decent people. "Ha, lol" :smile:
Jonnyblock
19 Mar 161#59
Not sure sure I want my sweets drained of blood thanks.
hass123
19 Mar 161#58
Halal wah wah, Kosher yay yay /s
At least it's not a KFC deal lol it would have got over a 100 halal fight comments by now
eripmav
19 Mar 16#57
You guys do realise that most pig based jellies don't get their gelatine from bones. It's actually from the skins:)
mebzz
19 Mar 162#56
someone send a box of these to trump
bigly96
19 Mar 16#54
Air is halal too, and water! Heat!
obsydian
19 Mar 161#53
Err think you will find it does contain gelatin but from halal meat
UnknownConcept
19 Mar 16#52
Hi,
Be careful though, because sometimes it means that the gelatine is still from animals so it is derived zabiha slaughtered animals which is perfectly halal, but not vegetarian.
Always check for the vegetarian label.
someguy003
19 Mar 16#50
Firstly, I have never seen a Kosher deal on HUKD. Secondly, there is no half-baked irrational hatred of those who eat kosher food. If such a deal did appear, I would vote on the basis of the deal only.
yrreb88
19 Mar 163#49
What is this far more reputable research?
I would have thought the RSPCA, BVA (British Veterinary Association) and the FAWC would have reviewed said evidence when coming to their conclusions.
In what respect are the RSPCA rather cruel?
Gollywood
19 Mar 165#48
There isn't an anti-kosher agenda to be fair.
Pretty strong lobby groups keep the kosher meat discussion a 'non-discussion'.....even though kosher has to be 100% unstunned.
nublets2k
19 Mar 162#47
Do you vote kosher deals hot too?
snowflake75
19 Mar 163#46
nice one... well said!!
nublets2k
19 Mar 16#45
No you can't. These use beef gelatine.
amzzzzyyyy
19 Mar 162#44
Voted hot taste yummy:P
mrsuperjolly
19 Mar 163#38
I tend to respect people's beliefs and what they find important regardless of what I believe myself. Animals have never been given the same rights as humans, they probably never will. I can see how some people can see how the killing process for halal meat is unnecessary but then again the same could be said for a lot of religious acts.
Billions of animals are killed each year, and the majority of people are ok with that. Ironically the outrage isn't that the animals aren't being given a chance at life but instead how some of their final moments are worse than others. Morals have to be different when it comes to animals we like to eat, it has to be that way for society to function.
If their is any redemption to the anti halal argument it's that maybe the people against it would be psychologically happier if it was banned. Nothing to do with how the animals think, I don't think they know enough about their future to be depressed.
someguy003 to mrsuperjolly
19 Mar 1619#43
I don't think that these people who are against halal would be " psychologically happier if it was banned". They would be psychologically happier if muslims were banned. Their hatred is for muslims only- their trade and agenda is hate. That is why I vote every halal deal hot on HUKD- it winds them up even more!
spilmilk
19 Mar 161#41
what is this country coming to.
Fahim
19 Mar 165#40
for those who are a bit lost regarding 'halal meat' i really recommend to watch this short video, our very own british reporter investigates this and its really very informative:
Now that is just simply silly, taken from the ingredients list "Halal Beef Gelatine". Being a vegie, not good at all for us!
Hamster7
19 Mar 1616#34
It doesn't matter what the RSPCA say about halal meat because far more reputable research states that it is more humane than stunning an animal. Also you can see it with your own eyes via youtube videos. In addition, the RSPCA are rather cruel to animals themselves, which is rather ironic ... I guess I will agree to disagree with the RSPCA.
malachi
19 Mar 16#33
Double yum, shame i stop eating sweets all together.
parvezdabest
19 Mar 164#32
HALAL HEAT! :wink:
rafalution2
19 Mar 16#31
Yum
adamnsu
19 Mar 16#27
price is hot
shabbird
19 Mar 16#26
aah its the halal beef gelatine. heat given but would never buy this because of sugar.
crazymonkey
19 Mar 166#24
'no artful' - just Kosher black & white then?
Voted hot - just for the fact that there is just a cheap option and for the way the animal is slaughtered, blood and disgusting stuff drained :smiley:
It's been done for thousands of years - it works :smiley:
Anyway I am going to go and hug a tree now
alien911
19 Mar 165#23
<3 halal heat
ghost101
19 Mar 161#22
That isn't true. A lot of halal sweets use halal beef gelatine.
Otherwise it would just be vegetarian.
Haven't voted either way.
MarVell
19 Mar 161#21
It's the 21st century people...
mailtotahera
19 Mar 1632#20
The good thing about sweets being halal is that you can be sure that it doesn't contain any gelatine made from animals.
Good for all vegetarians as well. Hot! <3
Edit: Yes, Sorry I apologize. Point noted that all halal sweets are not vegetarian. Some of the sweets are also labelled halal because they use agar or vegetarian gum/gel.
crysta1
19 Mar 162#19
same old crap posted in the halal deals. If you don't like it..vote cold and move along
flame6969
19 Mar 1617#18
Maybe you should if said KOSHER rather than HALAL maybe then it would of got more votes
kelar
19 Mar 16#17
Got them In My local yesterday
airfix
19 Mar 162#16
So these sweets have suffered?
COLD!
Mermoo
19 Mar 162#14
But no artful colors: are these going to be some boring brown sweets...?
nublets2k to Mermoo
19 Mar 161#15
Nah cause they've got them natrul colors
lawllb
19 Mar 161#13
HOT!
jamalhc
19 Mar 1611#1
Halal
nublets2k to jamalhc
19 Mar 164#12
Halal mate!
Are boiled up cow bones actually any better?
qwerta369
19 Mar 1648#9
I didn't vote cold because it's halal. In fact, the absence of boiled up pig bones in children's sweets is a bonus for most people, irrespective of what flavour of religion they prefer. Everyone can get diabetes, infidel or not.
Moonmonkeys to qwerta369
19 Mar 16#11
I'm confused. You've voted cold because it contains gelatin? Because they're sweets?
Loeeza
19 Mar 1634#10
Hot because it's halal. No nasties ie;artificial additives.
Moonmonkeys
19 Mar 1662#8
Pity you said Halal, that means an automatic downvote from some. I'll counteract that a bit.
Opening post
Top comments
Halal slaughter is more humane than stunning an animal, but lets not get into that debate because there is plenty of material available about that.
Anyway I voted this HOT!
Latest comments (118)
A lot of haters on here it seems people need to grow up x
This is a deal thread stick to that or move over to Misc where you may get a bit more rope.
No further taking this thread off topic please. Lets leave it there. Thanks.
Vote based on the price and the fact that it's a deal?
http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/malaysian-company-launches-halal-mineral-water-lumin-spring
How can it be conflicting custom? Is there something that you aren't telling us ? Seems like your sentences/points are conflicting in my viewpoint.
What if the 'minority' as you put it was christian or secular ?
I wish some of the comments were made in a room with people sitting face to face the half the stuff won't be said!
I wish there was no hatred between religions/Creeds/casts and cultures.
We are the same species just like the animals and other living beings. And everyone should respect that.
Educate yourselves. If you have been to Primary school there is a subject called RE (religious education).
Respect, love and accept eachother.
Halal slaughter is more humane than stunning an animal, but lets not get into that debate because there is plenty of material available about that.
Anyway I voted this HOT!
In fact, though, nearly 90% of Halal slaughter is stunned. More to the point, it's exactly the same as non-Halal slaughter except the animal is blessed. The question to ask yourself is, do you want to risk buying the 10% of Halal meat that's been slaughtered cruelly? If you're bothered, do your research first (Tesco, for example, claim all their Halal meat is stunned), and don't take a chance if you can't be sure. You can be Halal and kind.
Stunning an animal before slaughter is more humane than traditional halal slaughter, but lets not get into a debate because there is plenty of material available about that.
Anyway I voted this cold!
I want to avoid the inferior quality halal meat and I don't want to eat meat from an animal which has suffered by non stun death. Get your priorities right and label the meat, this way there will be a huge decline in the trade of Halal meat, trust me.
As said by others mostly it's stunned anyway so it makes not real difference.
As a atheist I'm not technically in favour of religious meat, but it makes sense as a business so why worry it will taste the same!
By the way OP is this certified by HMC? (halal monitoring committee) As this is the only one I know of which does not allow stunning the rest from my research stun.
issue with stunning is that if not done accurately , and most of the time it isnt, the animal suffers greatly and for longer.
There's an old expression about when in Rome, and sadly we who have ancestors who lived within the British Isles around the year 1066, are now sometimes being virtually forced to accept things we don't want and were never asked to accept, due to recently arrived wanderers who passed through safe countries because ours gives them more freebies.
As for having a choice whether or not to eat certain foods - I have friends living in an area which has seen the well-publicised arrival of people from a certain country. The local schoolchildren have lost their bacon sandwiches from menus due to the influence of less than 1% of the population, but the adults of a certain belief still get their free government handouts from a cashpoint machine..... without wondering if a workman has just used the machine after eating a bacon buttie from a nearby takeaway ! Makes me chuckle.
In rural areas of at least one EU country it's an everyday fact of life - make of that what you will.
The way animals are treated in the meat industry is shocking, yet we are arguing which slaughtering method causes less pain. I wonder how much pain the chickens are in because their legs snap due to their unnatural weight.
Just goes to show, some people think if it's halal it's vegetarian. If it doesn't contain artificial colour or flavours it's natural (preservatives?) I eat meat, I don't like the fact things die for it but they shouldn't suffer. I eat sausages and black pudding etc, if things die then use it all. Religion shouldn't allow exceptions to law, either it's wrong or right. As for sweets, they shouldn't contain meat or derivatives. Don't often vote, occasionally comment but this shouldn't be hot, it should be vegetarian.
fgm is practised by christians, muslims and the non religious - mostly across africa. it is cultural not religious.
true its not a question of racism its a question of ignorance.
At least it's not a KFC deal lol it would have got over a 100 halal fight comments by now
Be careful though, because sometimes it means that the gelatine is still from animals so it is derived zabiha slaughtered animals which is perfectly halal, but not vegetarian.
Always check for the vegetarian label.
I would have thought the RSPCA, BVA (British Veterinary Association) and the FAWC would have reviewed said evidence when coming to their conclusions.
In what respect are the RSPCA rather cruel?
Pretty strong lobby groups keep the kosher meat discussion a 'non-discussion'.....even though kosher has to be 100% unstunned.
Billions of animals are killed each year, and the majority of people are ok with that. Ironically the outrage isn't that the animals aren't being given a chance at life but instead how some of their final moments are worse than others. Morals have to be different when it comes to animals we like to eat, it has to be that way for society to function.
If their is any redemption to the anti halal argument it's that maybe the people against it would be psychologically happier if it was banned. Nothing to do with how the animals think, I don't think they know enough about their future to be depressed.
ENJOY
Voted hot - just for the fact that there is just a cheap option and for the way the animal is slaughtered, blood and disgusting stuff drained :smiley:
It's been done for thousands of years - it works :smiley:
Anyway I am going to go and hug a tree now
Otherwise it would just be vegetarian.
Haven't voted either way.
Good for all vegetarians as well. Hot! <3
Edit: Yes, Sorry I apologize. Point noted that all halal sweets are not vegetarian. Some of the sweets are also labelled halal because they use agar or vegetarian gum/gel.
COLD!
Are boiled up cow bones actually any better?