Just in time for Valentines
Great bargain on quality stuff. It is Victoria Secret after all no need to say more.
Top comments
zx636r
28 Jan 1635#20
I think it's sad when they airbrush out the muff......not like the Freemans catalogue from the seventies..some of the models looked like they had a rasta hiding in their knickers.
zx636r to dinosteveus
28 Jan 1627#7
Call me shallow, but I don't want to see these undergarments stretched to their limits over the ar5e of a Brontosaurus....
Bendown
28 Jan 1618#1
My favourite word, Panties
kane7990
28 Jan 1617#12
I'm sorry but I know plenty of girls that have a naturally slim figure and eat as much as me. The girl in the pic doesn't look underweight she just looks healthy. I have nothing against plus sized models as they can be very attractive but it's getting to the point where your basically telling people it's ok to be overweight as long as your happy with yourself but that can ultimately lead to health problems
All comments (61)
Bendown
28 Jan 1618#1
My favourite word, Panties
learoy1 to Bendown
28 Jan 16#51
my favourite 2 words...no panties
Kev`
28 Jan 16#2
Add on delivery charges then duties and tax, not to mention waiting a month for delivery.....not such a great deal.
anibinni to Kev`
28 Jan 16#45
waiting a month for delivery? or 9 months? :wink:
dinosteveus
28 Jan 162#3
Nah, most of the models look like they need a good meal.
Cold for not using 'real' people.
LOUGHBORO GUY to dinosteveus
28 Jan 162#4
I agree
Vanderlust to dinosteveus
28 Jan 162#5
Even you realised how silly that comment was, which is why you used the inverted commas.
zx636r to dinosteveus
28 Jan 165#6
I've got a chipolata she can have.......:disappointed:
zx636r to dinosteveus
28 Jan 1627#7
Call me shallow, but I don't want to see these undergarments stretched to their limits over the ar5e of a Brontosaurus....
car_igo to dinosteveus
28 Jan 16#9
£8.36 for delivery and customs, hope that helps the nit pickers........<3
topss to dinosteveus
28 Jan 163#14
She looks real enough to me.....
rohitmkiller to dinosteveus
28 Jan 161#28
voted hot for sexy models
Virtute to dinosteveus
28 Jan 16#32
That's hilarious, body positivity but only for bodies you approve - right?
fishmaster to dinosteveus
28 Jan 16#35
They don't use 'real' vegetables in the supermarkets, they want cosmetically perfect ones as near as possible because people won't buy them. Same for clothes I guess.
581d to dinosteveus
28 Jan 16#49
They are real people and they eat meals, difference is they don't eat 10,000 calories a day.
DanTheManc
28 Jan 163#8
My least favourite word, panties.
LOUGHBORO GUY
28 Jan 165#10
You mean Gemma Collins ??
g8spur
28 Jan 163#11
It's would be more useful as at least it would show what it would look like once the wife put it on.
kane7990
28 Jan 1617#12
I'm sorry but I know plenty of girls that have a naturally slim figure and eat as much as me. The girl in the pic doesn't look underweight she just looks healthy. I have nothing against plus sized models as they can be very attractive but it's getting to the point where your basically telling people it's ok to be overweight as long as your happy with yourself but that can ultimately lead to health problems
zx636r to kane7990
28 Jan 169#17
Plus size models are still good looking women who are carrying a bit of excess...I was referring to the sort of women I see mooching round Asda who resemble the Gruffalo.
pookypony
28 Jan 16#13
[/quote]£8.36 for delivery and customs, hope that helps the nit pickers........<3[/quote]
'Nit' pickers :confused: you would hope they would be clean :wink:
Jugram
28 Jan 16#15
look at her photoshoped legs
topss to Jugram
28 Jan 16#18
What for :laughing:
jasee
28 Jan 165#16
Not always :wink:
Ceejay1974
28 Jan 163#19
Photo-shopped is a word that get's mentioned a lot, so I've taken upon it myself to study it.
I've just spent the last 6 hours studying the models wearing lingerie on theses pages.
All in the name of science of course !!
zx636r
28 Jan 1635#20
I think it's sad when they airbrush out the muff......not like the Freemans catalogue from the seventies..some of the models looked like they had a rasta hiding in their knickers.
Quids to zx636r
28 Jan 16#24
LOL+++
I'll be laughing all day at that. Thanks. :smiley:
bankersarebankers to zx636r
28 Jan 161#36
I just got a warning for commenting 'sport is boring', wtf?!
DealJourno to zx636r
28 Jan 16#42
We get really upset in Donegal, Ireland when they airbrush it out on the map.
LOUGHBORO GUY
28 Jan 161#21
I cannot understand why Susanna Reid didn't get rear of the year last year she looks gorgeous on good morning britain
blue1971 to LOUGHBORO GUY
28 Jan 161#29
She sure is :confused:
Bad Actor to LOUGHBORO GUY
28 Jan 16#46
She's a trogg. Hate those chunky mottled legs.
Kate Garraway oozes a certain dirty aura and I miss Penny Smith.
wisle77
28 Jan 16#22
your right they need a good meal i've got something they could chew on
zx636r to wisle77
28 Jan 16#23
Beansprout?
alecoddlyiv
28 Jan 16#25
extra fifteen pound in shipping, very misleading. COLD
fireman1
28 Jan 16#26
surely models by definition are a bit more better looking than the average person on the street.
If we always claimed that companies should use 'real' models what's to stop absolutely anyone becoming a model. Apart from the fact that sales would plummet when we saw how things would actually look on us and nobody bought them. it's called advertising, make someone think they would look that great if they wore the same.
It's the same as asking for a haircut of someone famous. We have a deranged idea that we will actually look like that person if our hair is similar.
I am guessing all the 'real' women fanatics are either just jealous or trying to come across as morally/politically correct to try and look good.
And the day a man does not want to see a good looking woman in panties is the day the world needs to end :-)
if the bottom female pic isn't shopped ill eat my hat
dinosteveus
28 Jan 16#34
I ain't got a clue what you are on about.
I looked at the models in the link, guess you didn't.
jimmyk1889
28 Jan 16#37
What about P&P? Is that free? I can't see where it says it is so this needs to be added to the title.
junior37311
28 Jan 16#38
I hope that no one say( I'm a simple man i see boobs and i click like) :disappointed:
zx636r
28 Jan 16#39
Not suprised, language of the gutter.............:neutral_face:
zx636r
28 Jan 16#40
In both scenarios, we demand nice firm looking melons...................
jimmythehat
28 Jan 16#43
Just walked past the store at Westfield Stratford City and there was a small sign in the window saying they are offering 5 for £20 in the store. Hope this helps someone out.
itty89
28 Jan 16#44
expensive panties lol
spenspuma
28 Jan 16#47
Wtf
Enochoo
28 Jan 16#48
my ex :smile:
simonspeakeasy
28 Jan 162#50
I'm afraid that don't see this as promoting a positive body image.
logohigh to simonspeakeasy
28 Jan 16#54
I thought this sort thing had been stopped by advertising standards
wozukSilencer
28 Jan 16#52
Not entirely true , some people have a fast metabolism and can eat loads and never gain weight
boostii
28 Jan 16#53
If I thought I stood any chance with the VS models then I would be straight in there.
If I thought I stood any chance with the larger ladies I'd still be right in there too.
If I didn't think I had any chance with anyone, I'd probably come on ukhd dissing the models and bigging the fatties in the hope of getting some sympathy votes from the lower echelons of the fatties.
intranix
28 Jan 16#55
delivery is extra, please amend title
Ituke
28 Jan 16#56
It is regular "deal" in any Victoria Secret store in London: 5 for 20£
LOUGHBORO GUY
29 Jan 161#57
I agree about Kate and think she could be dominant in the bedroom
Bendown
29 Jan 16#58
Even better, lol
Simplysimone
29 Jan 16#59
Hey, I'll be able to wear my new panties riding my bike! :-)
xxx
LOUGHBORO GUY to Simplysimone
29 Jan 16#60
Enjoy
Simplysimone
29 Jan 16#61
Hey, thanks young fella.... I'm sure I will!!! :-) :-) LOL x
Opening post
Great bargain on quality stuff. It is Victoria Secret after all no need to say more.
Top comments
All comments (61)
Cold for not using 'real' people.
'Nit' pickers :confused: you would hope they would be clean :wink:
I've just spent the last 6 hours studying the models wearing lingerie on theses pages.
All in the name of science of course !!
I'll be laughing all day at that. Thanks. :smiley:
Kate Garraway oozes a certain dirty aura and I miss Penny Smith.
If we always claimed that companies should use 'real' models what's to stop absolutely anyone becoming a model. Apart from the fact that sales would plummet when we saw how things would actually look on us and nobody bought them. it's called advertising, make someone think they would look that great if they wore the same.
It's the same as asking for a haircut of someone famous. We have a deranged idea that we will actually look like that person if our hair is similar.
I am guessing all the 'real' women fanatics are either just jealous or trying to come across as morally/politically correct to try and look good.
And the day a man does not want to see a good looking woman in panties is the day the world needs to end :-)
I looked at the models in the link, guess you didn't.
If I thought I stood any chance with the larger ladies I'd still be right in there too.
If I didn't think I had any chance with anyone, I'd probably come on ukhd dissing the models and bigging the fatties in the hope of getting some sympathy votes from the lower echelons of the fatties.
xxx