OEM I7-6700K for £275.99 is very cheap. The prices on these have recently been as high as £360 and most other retailers still selling for >£300. Also includes free shipping on your entire basket, which from OcUK is a very nice bonus.
It's back so quickly! Same offer as I posted earlier this week that was originally a one day deal. Still free shipping on entire basket!
All comments (64)
polly69
3 Feb 16#1
Why didnt you just ask for your original post to be unexpired?
xfaxfa to polly69
3 Feb 16#2
Kind of defies the purpose. Plus I didn't know you could lol. Oh well, it's not the end of the world.
MrBrightside1987
3 Feb 16#3
If you need a motherboard too then it might be better to get a bundle deal from Dabs, which includes the Retail version of the CPU (3 year warranty instead of 12 months with OEM).
I'm considering the ASUS Z170-A which is £405.22 including this CPU. The mobo is £121.74 alone, so works out to £283.48 for the CPU.
There's also the MSI deal for £456.29 (£436.29 after MSI £20 cashback) if you're after a different board.
EDIT: Obv. voted hot because it's the cheapest price for the OEM CPU alone.
xfaxfa to MrBrightside1987
3 Feb 16#5
Overclockers also offer bundles. This is just one they have that's been overclocked by the retailer which offers an extra layer of protection as technically overclocking voids any warranty. Link provided incase it interests anyone. SM951 NVMe is a beauty SSD, especially when placed in PCIe x4
I've not compared prices, can't be bothered lol. Had I seen this when I was upgrading I would have made this purchase.
Built last week:
Intel Core i7-6700K
Scythe Kotetsu 79.0 CFM CPU Cooler
Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3400 Memory
dabooj to scotbruce
2 Mar 16#62
How much for each component? And from where? Please.
fishmaster
3 Feb 16#6
Yes a friend of mine did a X99 i7-5820K build with an M.2 NVMe Samsung SM951 boots in about 4 seconds. It's excellent.
fo_sho_yo
3 Feb 162#7
Voted cold because xfaxfa is so defensive of his/her deals.
xfaxfa to fo_sho_yo
3 Feb 162#8
Great reasoning!!
fo_sho_yo to fo_sho_yo
3 Feb 16#10
Previous post was a joke BTW :smile: Voted hot...
xp3200
3 Feb 16#9
Better to spend the Extra £20 and get a retail version for the extra 2 years warranty.
moneybag to xp3200
3 Feb 16#31
Out of curiosity has anyone ever needed to use the warranty on any CPU ever? I've never had a CPU fail on any PC or Mac I have ever used in nineteen years working in computing even hugely overclocked stock air-cooled rubbish? Fans, HDD's, optical drives, PSU's, mobo's, RAM modules, expansion cards and peripherals all die routinely of course.
bountyhunter53
3 Feb 16#11
The 950 Pro is even faster.... There isn't any loading screens anywhere LOL
xfaxfa
3 Feb 16#12
Samsung 950 pro?
fo_sho_yo
3 Feb 16#13
Apparently the new Bond movie is called Skylake.
fishmaster to fo_sho_yo
3 Feb 16#14
Apparently the next Intel CPU is going to be called Spectacles. Was it funny? Nope :stuck_out_tongue:
MrBrightside1987
3 Feb 16#15
Nice one. CPU for £276? CPU and mobo for £405? No, sod it just get this beast for £760 because I can't be bothered comparing the price.
CampGareth
3 Feb 162#16
Not strictly relevant but I was looking at building a desktop recently and thought "hold on a minute, 280 for a CPU (okay 275 now) plus 120 for a motherboard? That's a bit expensive" and thought outside the box.
Ended up looking at used workstation motherboards and CPUs, picked up a pair of xeon e5-2670s for 280 pounds (so that's 16 x 2.6GHz sandybridge cores plus hyperthreading and turbo up to 3.3GHz). 64GB of RAM is 120 pounds. Dual socket motherboard from a dell T7600 is 150 pounds.
It's definitely not for everyone since it lacks sli/crossfire, and video games will generally only use the first four cores, but in my opinion it's way better bang for buck than skylake.
You're good at answering your own questions and judging things. I agree your joke wasn't funny.
fishmaster
3 Feb 161#18
Well at least I didn't intend my 'joke' to be funny :smiley: Aww I feel like I kicked a puppy, sorry hehe.
fo_sho_yo
3 Feb 16#19
You are a mind reader too. Wasn't intended as a joke... or was it?
fishmaster
3 Feb 16#20
I've no idea, are you Paul Daniels? If you are magic me up one of these bundles :smiley:
No hard feelings dude, I was just being light hearted, if I upset you I'm sorry.
SpencerUk
3 Feb 16#21
I got my 5820k for less than that! Skylake sadly isn't as great as what it was hyped up to be
BluesFanUK to SpencerUk
17 Feb 16#61
A genuinely great CPU, six core beast which can be OC'd to 4.2Ghz min
fishmaster
3 Feb 16#23
Yeah workstation RAM can but not always be cheap. I've got a HP XW6600 and it has 32GB RAM as the RAM was dirt cheap for it. However having that much RAM is only if you NEED it! I'd rather trade RAM for the I/O of modern chipsets such as M.2 Gen 3 and USB 3.1.
I expect to sell the XW6600 this year and use the money for a Skylake build which will only have 16GB RAM.
CampGareth
3 Feb 161#24
Compare it to DDR4 prices and it's not bad, 37 pounds for an 8GB DDR4 2400MHz stick, I paid 17 pounds per stick, 8 sticks.
Anyway, M.2, USB 3.1, they're all doable with add-in cards if you have the PCIE lanes which you do when your CPUs have 40 lanes of PCIE 3.0 each instead of 16 with skylake.
fishmaster
3 Feb 16#25
Got any links for those parts? I just had a quick look on eBay, no T7600 mobo unless you import from USA. I work in IT refurbishing but usually get the complete workstations.
ChampionshipManager
3 Feb 161#26
Waste of money unless you're running Prime95 all day.
Ah yeah I know MCSCOM. Might bulk buy a few bits from them, see if I can get a discount.
fishmaster
3 Feb 16#32
CPUs definitely do die, or die in a semi working state as in doing weird stuff. You pays your money you takes your chance.
Agharta
3 Feb 161#33
They have sold two this year but no stock right now; eBay alerts are great for such things. :smiley:
Agharta
3 Feb 16#34
I had one replaced on a laptop once.
fishmaster
3 Feb 16#35
I'm work in IT refurbishing so we get all manner of workstations and stuff come in, but I don't know any of the suppliers as the warehouse which is a separate but related company supplies the shop I work in. I get ex corp HP XW workstations, Dell Workstations etc some decent stuff but never a motherboard separately I guess as everything is bought as a job lot on a pallet.
sparkyIreland
3 Feb 16#36
Been waiting on a 6700k deal. Spent the last hour on flubit adding multiple cards (All declined)
6700k £278.02
Asus Z170i Pro gaming mini itx £109.19
I thought £278.02 was a pretty good price, just a pity they won't take my money. Was gonna jump at this but glad I read the comments about the warranty. I'm one of those unlucky sods that will make it fail 2 days out of warranty.
How long is a piece of string, but are we likely to see any good deals on the retail version any time soon?
check the bundles out £10 more but you get a retail 3 year warranty CPU
sparkyIreland
3 Feb 16#39
£21.06 difference to flubit :smiley: Anyone any experience with Dabs, what's their support like? Or flubit for that matter. I dropped them a message, but I'm sure the offers will have expired by the time they get back to me. Then delivery wise, I've no idea. Dabs is certainly looking like a contender.
Don't know if I should just go for it now or wait until Amazon get stock next week. I take it that it's unlikely for Amazon to do a price drop next week. I know that's not easy to predict.
12% quidco on Dabs? :smiley:
RufusG
3 Feb 16#40
only 4% quidco for components
CampGareth
3 Feb 162#41
Worked in a datacentre actually so know how cheap the CPUs we bought for older systems were. Jeez though he's gone back in time there, those chips he's using are the same architecture as second gen core 2 quads right? They might be cheap as chips (teehee) but there's no need to go that far back. Pcie 3.0 kicked in with the sandy bridge era chips and they're still pretty cheap. Check eBay for 'xeon e5' and ignore the v2 or v3 stuff unless it's super cheap.
ABTTh
3 Feb 16#42
Isn't amazo cheaper?
LeonCR
3 Feb 16#43
I'm waiting for Amazon, but then I'm still waiting on my ram
Nice! Thanks for the find man. Just bought it and now I got to wait for my next pay check so I can get the motherboard for it... :laughing:
bountyhunter53
4 Feb 16#49
Yup
WelshJester
4 Feb 16#50
£270 for the retail version this morning with flubit, not sure if possible to get now. There's 2 retail 6700k's listed on Amazon, have to try to flubit with both.
sparkyIreland to WelshJester
5 Feb 16#51
As a matter of interest does it have to be stocked by Amazon, or would fulfilled by Amazon do? Might try this later
oranj
5 Feb 16#52
Cold. Get a 5820k for less. 6 cores > 4 cores.
xfaxfa to oranj
5 Feb 16#53
More cores doesn't mean better performance. It entirely depends on what you're going to do on a PC and as most people are talking gaming, then less cores at a faster clock is a much better option as gaming doesn't take advantage of multi-core unless you're playing RTS games, which a 6700K would have no problem handling either.
And we'd like to know where you found a 5820k for less. After a quick search I'm seeing £320. Not to mention that with a 5820k you're forced into using a GPU therefore increasing the effective price of the unit.
Nate1492 to oranj
6 Feb 16#55
This is absolutely not the case for gaming. If you are doing rendering, or something that can use the cores perfectly, maybe. But even then, in general, multi core utilization is something most applications are terrible at.
Unless you have some very detailed reasons for a CPU, the 6700k will outperform the 5820k.
There's also another page with it listed at £298 but flubit only puts it down to £285, not sure why some products that are exactly the same have 2 different pages & links.
Smosekum
12 Feb 16#56
Hi folks,
What advantages would this processor give me against an intel i7 950 with 16 GB Ram?
I mainly do encoding, but like a PC that don't freeze on me.
Very serious on upgrading, just making sure I am on the right path.
Cheers
xfaxfa to Smosekum
12 Feb 161#57
This would give you a performance increase and much better power consumption. However, if you're building for strictly encoding then a 6700K probably isn't the path you want to walk down. X99/5820K is better suited for purely encoding. Z170/6700K would be better suited to a gamer with side projects of encoding. X99 is also better for multiple GPUs.
Easy2BCheesy
13 Feb 16#58
I'm a bit confused about this 6700K vs 5820K comparison. Seems to be a lot of conflicting information.
* Pretty sure both can be overclocked to 4.5GHz/4.6GHz so while the 6700K may be faster for games at stock, they both OC to much the same frequency - certainly to within margin of error. And who buys a K chip if not to overclock it.
* A lot of people dismiss the 6700K for not being that much faster than 4790K, but the 5820K is based on the same Haswell architecture as the 4790K and it's got a theoretical +50% in processing power plus quad-channel memory bandwidth plus access to faster DDR4 vs DDR3 on the quad.
* The idea that games don't use more than four threads is a myth - virtually every major modern game does because the engines are based on multi-core tech designed for PS4 and Xbox One. The Division beta even used 12 threads - my mate has a 3930K who observed this.
So here's what I don't get. I can understand that the 6700K at stock speeds could possibly beat the 5820K. But if both are overclocked to the same frequency and both are running the latest games, I don't see how the 5820K *can't* win - unless you accept that Skylake is a huge upgrade over Haswell.
WelshJester
13 Feb 16#59
The 6700k has a bit better IPC, other than that x99 is better overall yes. I chatted to a guy over email who is involved at Digital Foundry, he is planning to test the 5820k. But basically what he said was that the 6700k's advantage vs the 4790k in their results was a mix of the bandwidth that DDR4 brings as well as IPC, so if you look at DF's results for gaming you can't use the 4790k to take the place of a 5820k to judge performance.
He seems to think the 5820k will be better once overclocked, and he also mentioned the division using 12 threads, which i never knew about either. I myself went with the 5820k back in last March.
Smosekum
13 Feb 16#60
Thank you guys
scotbruce
2 Mar 16#63
@ dabooj
£295 from eBuyer and £23, £140 and £165 respectively, all from Amazon for ease.
Try PCPartpicker.
Not cheap, but it'll probably be my last re-build, other than maybe eventually doubling the RAM. N no, I'm not a gamer, I just like a fast PC!
Opening post
It's back so quickly! Same offer as I posted earlier this week that was originally a one day deal. Still free shipping on entire basket!
All comments (64)
I'm considering the ASUS Z170-A which is £405.22 including this CPU. The mobo is £121.74 alone, so works out to £283.48 for the CPU.
There's also the MSI deal for £456.29 (£436.29 after MSI £20 cashback) if you're after a different board.
EDIT: Obv. voted hot because it's the cheapest price for the OEM CPU alone.
I've not compared prices, can't be bothered lol. Had I seen this when I was upgrading I would have made this purchase.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/8pack-approved-elite-tier-skylake-atx-bundle-intel-i7-6700k-4.50ghz-z170-viii-hero-16gb-ddr4-bu-044-as.html
Intel Core i7-6700K
Scythe Kotetsu 79.0 CFM CPU Cooler
Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 ATX LGA1151 Motherboard
G.Skill Ripjaws V Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3400 Memory
Ended up looking at used workstation motherboards and CPUs, picked up a pair of xeon e5-2670s for 280 pounds (so that's 16 x 2.6GHz sandybridge cores plus hyperthreading and turbo up to 3.3GHz). 64GB of RAM is 120 pounds. Dual socket motherboard from a dell T7600 is 150 pounds.
It's definitely not for everyone since it lacks sli/crossfire, and video games will generally only use the first four cores, but in my opinion it's way better bang for buck than skylake.
A Time Machine?
No hard feelings dude, I was just being light hearted, if I upset you I'm sorry.
I expect to sell the XW6600 this year and use the money for a Skylake build which will only have 16GB RAM.
Anyway, M.2, USB 3.1, they're all doable with add-in cards if you have the PCIE lanes which you do when your CPUs have 40 lanes of PCIE 3.0 each instead of 16 with skylake.
http://techreport.com/news/29608/msi-releases-updated-mobo-firmware-for-skylake-freezing-bug
6700k £278.02
Asus Z170i Pro gaming mini itx £109.19
I thought £278.02 was a pretty good price, just a pity they won't take my money. Was gonna jump at this but glad I read the comments about the warranty. I'm one of those unlucky sods that will make it fail 2 days out of warranty.
How long is a piece of string, but are we likely to see any good deals on the retail version any time soon?
check the bundles out £10 more but you get a retail 3 year warranty CPU
Don't know if I should just go for it now or wait until Amazon get stock next week. I take it that it's unlikely for Amazon to do a price drop next week. I know that's not easy to predict.
12% quidco on Dabs? :smiley:
And we'd like to know where you found a 5820k for less. After a quick search I'm seeing £320. Not to mention that with a 5820k you're forced into using a GPU therefore increasing the effective price of the unit.
Unless you have some very detailed reasons for a CPU, the 6700k will outperform the 5820k.
There's also another page with it listed at £298 but flubit only puts it down to £285, not sure why some products that are exactly the same have 2 different pages & links.
What advantages would this processor give me against an intel i7 950 with 16 GB Ram?
I mainly do encoding, but like a PC that don't freeze on me.
Very serious on upgrading, just making sure I am on the right path.
Cheers
* Pretty sure both can be overclocked to 4.5GHz/4.6GHz so while the 6700K may be faster for games at stock, they both OC to much the same frequency - certainly to within margin of error. And who buys a K chip if not to overclock it.
* A lot of people dismiss the 6700K for not being that much faster than 4790K, but the 5820K is based on the same Haswell architecture as the 4790K and it's got a theoretical +50% in processing power plus quad-channel memory bandwidth plus access to faster DDR4 vs DDR3 on the quad.
* The idea that games don't use more than four threads is a myth - virtually every major modern game does because the engines are based on multi-core tech designed for PS4 and Xbox One. The Division beta even used 12 threads - my mate has a 3930K who observed this.
So here's what I don't get. I can understand that the 6700K at stock speeds could possibly beat the 5820K. But if both are overclocked to the same frequency and both are running the latest games, I don't see how the 5820K *can't* win - unless you accept that Skylake is a huge upgrade over Haswell.
He seems to think the 5820k will be better once overclocked, and he also mentioned the division using 12 threads, which i never knew about either. I myself went with the 5820k back in last March.
£295 from eBuyer and £23, £140 and £165 respectively, all from Amazon for ease.
Try PCPartpicker.
Not cheap, but it'll probably be my last re-build, other than maybe eventually doubling the RAM. N no, I'm not a gamer, I just like a fast PC!