**EXPIRED** OEM I7-6700K for £275.99 is very cheap. The prices on these have recently been as high as £360 and most other retailers still selling for >£300. Also includes free shipping on your entire basket, which from OcUK is a very nice bonus.
This deal has now expired. I've clicked the button but nothing has changed.
Top comments
xfaxfa to garryallen
31 Jan 1627#5
It's hot if you don't have one! :stuck_out_tongue:
darkclouds
31 Jan 1610#65
Xfaxfa has got the same mentality/attitude of the staff at ocuk
And Xfaxfa when you buy a item under the soga your contract is with the retailer and not the manufactuer but ocuk seem to think other
darkclouds
31 Jan 168#27
It didn't take me so long it took them 29 days for them to replace it as overclockers will NOT/DO not replace stock from there own inventory they send everything back to their supplier for replacement
This is my opinion is very poor
keepitonthelow
31 Jan 166#16
Hard to justify this at that price when the i5 6500 is well over a £100 cheaper this should be £250 Max.
All comments (145)
jackcrack
31 Jan 16#1
don't know why it's cold, heat from me! good supplier, good product
spaceinvader to jackcrack
31 Jan 162#57
Nothing but problems with OCUK, shoddy service, they always palm you off to the manufacturer when they ship a defective product, despite their legal obligations. Getting a replacement from the USA/China is an exercise in patience. After several problems over a few builds I just wont take a chance shopping with them, Amazon are often cheaper and refund/replace with no hassle.
aLV426
31 Jan 16#2
Why so cold? Have some heat!
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#3
I have no idea why it's cold. I keep getting notifications that it has been voted hot. It's my first deal post.
garryallen
31 Jan 16#4
It's hot if you already have a heatsink and cooler. Maybe that's why people are voting cold? Heat from me anyway.
xfaxfa to garryallen
31 Jan 1627#5
It's hot if you don't have one! :stuck_out_tongue:
devilsadv0cate to garryallen
31 Jan 16#30
I'm pretty sure the retail unlocked 'K' CPUs don't come with a heatsink either.
Elevation to garryallen
31 Jan 16#56
Who doesn't just go out and buy that anyway? The Intel stock ones have always been utter crap.
bobo53
31 Jan 162#6
why is so expensive compared to the 4790K?? same power but can someone briefly explain the advantages?? I know it takes dd4 etc.. and might only be no more that 5% better
xfaxfa to bobo53
31 Jan 162#8
At this price it's the same price as the 4790K. It's smaller manufacture process, less power consumption, more efficient. Not to mention the Skylake platform supports the Z170 chipset amongst other things. I think ideally someone on the 4790K will continue to use that until the next design, unless you're one of those that need the latest. Tick-Tock
Just as a note though, oem tray processors only come with 1yr warranty as opposed to retail boxed with come with 3yr. I guess it's because oem are for system builders who usually only give usual year warranty.
garryallen
31 Jan 162#9
lol touche!
LeonCR
31 Jan 161#10
If this was a retail version it would be hot, oem not so much
xfaxfa to LeonCR
31 Jan 16#11
£308.99 if you want the extra 2 year warranty. This deal is aimed towards builders and entusiasts and typically we only offer 12 months anyway, as previously stated by enigmatik33
LeonCR
31 Jan 162#12
300 on Amazon, may have to wait a little longer for it but it's what I would do
LeonCR
31 Jan 16#13
I'm looking at one myself just waiting for it to drop a little
tempt
31 Jan 163#14
We? Are you from OCUK? Are these tray processors abused on your test bench for stress testing and subjected to high voltages or are they brand new from Intel?
xfaxfa
31 Jan 161#15
We = Builders
Please try not to take things out of context. This deal is aimed towards builders and entusiasts and typically we only offer 12 months anyway
keepitonthelow
31 Jan 166#16
Hard to justify this at that price when the i5 6500 is well over a £100 cheaper this should be £250 Max.
xfaxfa to keepitonthelow
31 Jan 162#19
The K is key here! This chip is unlocked. Not to mention it's base speed is much faster and it handles twice the amount of threads.
SmashingK to keepitonthelow
31 Jan 162#33
I believe the i5 doesn't have hyperthreading. I think it also has a lower stock speed too.
If you happen to be someone who uses software that makes use of hyperthreading this is a great deal. Everyone else should be looking at the i5.
enigmatik33
31 Jan 16#17
Think the language on the question is over the top. You'd have to assume some might be tested for people wanting overclocked builds, but first test would be trying the chips and seeing which runs standard with lowest setting, that gives good indication they will reach good clocks with lower voltage. No builder of any skill will want to abuse a component they are going to sell with warranty. It makes no sense. They want the best or specific clock for lowest voltage so the chip lasts a respectable time. Over volting would be counter productive and bad for reputation.
Assume chips might be tested and best over clocking ones binned for a companies own over clocked builds.
xfaxfa
31 Jan 161#18
Also like to add that this CPU can easily be overclocked by 15% with minimum user input, much further by someone with the knowledge. Just have a good cooler.
paulrwarner
31 Jan 162#20
4th gen picture 6th gen deal! Tut tut
xfaxfa to paulrwarner
31 Jan 161#22
Sorry, just took it direct from the page. It's just a stock Intel chip photo. But for the sake of this post being accurate to the advert I found... lol
xfaxfa
31 Jan 161#21
Not to mention OcUK has a huge reputation in the computer industry. Do you think they need to hire people to plug them on a site like this? :laughing:
keepitonthelow
31 Jan 16#23
The fact you have just said that means you must know very little about the current CPUs on offer which can now all be over clocked safely with the base clock there is no point buying a k chip this time round if a non k one is available.
darkclouds
31 Jan 164#24
Imo ocuk's customer support and returns policy are awful 29 days to replace a Blu Ray drive is awful
And the staff Instore are terrible
xfaxfa to darkclouds
31 Jan 16#26
I've never had an issue with staff. They've always been very helpful to me. I've only ever returned one product to overclockers and I had a refund so I can't comment on the exchange policy and why it may have taken you so long.
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#25
Shows what you know as this chip can be down in smaller increments now whereas the others can not.
darkclouds
31 Jan 168#27
It didn't take me so long it took them 29 days for them to replace it as overclockers will NOT/DO not replace stock from there own inventory they send everything back to their supplier for replacement
This is my opinion is very poor
stuellis
31 Jan 16#28
The non K cannot overclock as far and you loose some features, on some motherboards you loose hyperthreading so effectively making an i7 an i5
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#29
Maybe you should do some reading and find out the differences in overclocking.
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#31
I'm pretty sure about this too. They presume you'll be putting your own in anyway, especially as it's aimed at overclockers, not newbies! :laughing: No stock cooler will be any good with this. I have an AIO watercooler on mine.
paulrwarner
31 Jan 16#32
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#34
Don't tell me, tell OcUK marketing team lol
Weenie Beenie
31 Jan 16#35
IMO unless you're doing something that takes full advantage of the extra threads like video encoding then the i5 6600k is the better buy with current prices, especially if you're overclocking as is expected if buying a K chip. £75 cheaper currently, which is a big difference.
xfaxfa to Weenie Beenie
31 Jan 16#36
That might be so, but the point of this post is to advertise that the i7-6700K is on sale and where people interested in the flagship intel processor can find it.
Hredknapp
31 Jan 161#37
Buy from amazon and get instant faulty returns and new product next day no questions asked ..... that is the lesson learnt from buying from overclockers and scan etc.
For this price, I would put £10 more towards a 5820K for 6 cores 12 threads.
hitman007 to ManiKz
31 Jan 161#42
Sounds like a good idea.
ScoobyStoo to ManiKz
1 Feb 16#110
Slower single threaded performance though, and in the vast majority of applications unfortunately it's still single threaded performance that acts as the bottle neck.
pibpob
31 Jan 161#41
It wasn't taken out of context - what you said was ambiguous and I read it the same way as enigmatik33. But thanks for clarifying - all fine now. :smiley:
ChampionshipManager
31 Jan 16#43
Dropping 276 bones on a processor is crazy money.
Spod to ChampionshipManager
31 Jan 162#46
Take a look at the price of an 8 core processor or a Haswell Xeon 2600 series chip. This isn't all that expensive and price performance is pretty good if you need a high performance over-clockable chip. It's not even necessarily the most expensive part of a good gaming system - take a look at the cost of a GTX 980 or 980ti graphics card - and you need a good processor to feed one of them.
BigYoSpeck to ChampionshipManager
31 Jan 161#49
There's a point of diminishing returns in price/performance yes but if you're looking to build something high end with no compromises anyway with a view to using with say Oculus Rift then an extra £100 or so in the grand scheme of the total system costs isn't a big deal. Just looking at the price/performance ratio of the individual component doesn't always make sense. No this isn't 100% faster than a CPU half the price, but when dropped into a top of the line SLI/Crossfire system it maybe only represents a 10% increase in total system cost and does give 5-10% more performance.
If you're happy gaming at 1080p around 60fps with high settings then chances are you're good with an i3, maybe even just a Pentium series. But for someone who games heavily and possibly does some CPU intensive productivity work it begins to make more sense going for one of these.
And then you have your hot rodders who just enjoy building top end systems, overclocking them and running benchmarks. An odd past time I know, but they enjoy it.
randomnut
31 Jan 16#44
Pair this with a corsair H80i/H100 watercooling rig and it's a dream setup.
Spod
31 Jan 161#45
Well then how about you get in your time machine and buy some? Since then the pound has tanked against the dollar and that's not helping component prices in the UK. This is the best price right now. The best price 5 months ago is irrelevant.
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#47
It amazes me how many trolls are online critical of just about everything. This is a brilliant price for this particular CPU at this moment in time. Well said regarding the time machine. Anyone know of any offers on one? :laughing:
Ego-X
31 Jan 16#48
Actually, Your context is incorrect. The people that offer the warranty aren't the builders.
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#50
If a customer asks for a build from me then their contract is with me and I offer them 12 months on the entire system.
tsimehC
31 Jan 16#51
Under EU law, the minimum you should offer is 2 years. No?
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#52
2 year guarantee on EU sold products isn't as black and white as you may think. There is a difference between a warranty and a guarantee. Besides, this post is only here to point people (that are interested in this particular item) in the right direction for a good, limited time offer.
tempt
31 Jan 16#53
Thanks for the clarification. Hope you achieve your target.
Target? I don't know what you're trying to imply. I am not employed by or affiliated to OcUK in any way other than occasionally being a customer of theirs. Simply pointing people in the direction of a good offer.
Yeah, I can use google, thanks OCUK employee. So why did OCUK force me to appeal to Phanteks for a replacement when my case arrived damaged? Why did they tell me to contact XFX a few years ago when my PSU was DOA?
Did I join this forum 8 years ago and post 5000 comments just to appear legit when I finally chose my time to falsely besmirch the good name of your company on a mediocre deal for an i7 CPU that most people don't need?
Sammy360
31 Jan 16#60
Great deal if you want to get a 1 year warranty, even tho technically covered by 2 years EU law (also always buy on credit card for section 75 protection for goods above £100).
I'd rather keep the box and a guaranteed 3 years warranty for £299 on amazon.
For this reason i vote cold.
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#61
Good for you. 1,565 reviews at 94% positive.... pretty trustworthy to me.
If you did experience something wrong then you should have stood up for your rights. A shop is only obliged to replace an item under 28 days old, afgter 28 days it can send the item off and make you wait. If you settle for a bogus claim then fault can only be with the consumer for being so submissive.
What are you trying to achieve by making rediculous claims that I'm an employee of OcUK and do you really think they need to be plugged on HotUKDeals? :laughing: lol
Who said need? People want things like this!
noss88
31 Jan 16#62
nice but for know i will stay with 4790k for 4 years no point to change it
xfaxfa to noss88
31 Jan 161#63
You're absolutely right. Going from the i7-4790K to this makes little sense. For people with an older and less powerful CPU then this is a very worthy contender for the new build. Z170 chipsets rock!
headworx
31 Jan 16#64
just so peeps know, even the retail version doesn't come with a cooler. luckily id bought an ectra cooler anyhows otherwise id have been caught out
darkclouds
31 Jan 1610#65
Xfaxfa has got the same mentality/attitude of the staff at ocuk
And Xfaxfa when you buy a item under the soga your contract is with the retailer and not the manufactuer but ocuk seem to think other
xfaxfa to darkclouds
31 Jan 16#69
I have the right attitude.... Oh look, Ignore button ---->
jellybomb1980 to darkclouds
31 Jan 16#74
Wow stop generalising about the staff, they have guidelines to follow from higher up and since OCUk was sold on to Case King, I have found their motivation and enthusiasm has picked up
skyda
31 Jan 16#66
I have a 4790K overclocked to 4.8ghz @ 1.275 volts and I'm doing just fine... don't need to upgrade any time soon! :smiley:
nowent
31 Jan 16#67
decent price
SnakeTbh
31 Jan 16#68
Damn, Good price. I paid £10 less on Amazon for my i7 4790k just last month.
xfaxfa
31 Jan 161#70
Wouldn't be needed from an i7-4790K. Tick-Tock and all!
Wubb
31 Jan 16#71
That was not my recent experience. I bought a PC Case/PSU combo and the PSU was noisy. I had stupidly thrown the packaging away, and was surprised when I was told that ill not be an issue. I received an email to return FOC and was supplied a better PSU for no extra cost. From phone call to replacement was 4 days. Excellent service for me.
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#72
I think some people just like to be contrary. I was refunded on hardware that wasn't even faulty, it was the software being used that was in early development causing my problem. Whole process was effortless.
darkclouds
31 Jan 16#73
Xfaxfa you seem to have a vested interest is trashing people's views that have had bad experiences with ocuk or are knocking the item why is that ??
Oh and I take it as long as you and wubb have had good service that ocuk are good ??
And what for the ones on trust pilot who have had bad experiences
darkclouds
31 Jan 16#75
That could well be the case but once you've been messed about by a company would you use them again ??
trabzonunal
31 Jan 162#76
Seems to me that xfaxfa is trying to sell this product. Not buying it pal... FREEZING COLD!
xfaxfa to trabzonunal
31 Jan 16#78
No, I'm just giving accurate advice to people that think they know what they're talking about. The point of this site and this post is to notify people where they can find specific items at a very competitive price. I think that has clearly been achieved. Like I've already said, do you think OcUK need to hire people to plug their business? I really don't! They have 8PACK working with them!
LeonCR
31 Jan 16#77
Lol this is not a hot deal, wish people would actually look at what the item is properly
rev6
31 Jan 161#79
A hot deal is subjective. Best price available doesn't mean it's hot, for me anyway.
Arcana
31 Jan 16#80
What would suitable components for i7-6700k cost?
I'm not interested in graphics as I'm an audio guy.
£600? £1000? More?
rev6 to Arcana
31 Jan 16#81
£400+
xfaxfa
31 Jan 16#82
How is £275.99 vs £304.00 not a good deal?
rev6
31 Jan 16#83
Not specific to this deal. Just in general.
magicpork
31 Jan 16#84
for gamers like me it's probably better to go with i5 and spend the money on a better GPU.. but it's a good price for people who want i7's horsepower.. voted hot.
rev6 to magicpork
31 Jan 16#85
That's right :smiley:
tempt
31 Jan 161#86
The cheapest boxed version is £292.50. The extra £20 is worth the additional two year warranty from Intel.
I don't get what you're saying. The link you provided is with 12 months warranty. People need to understand the difference between warranty and guarantee and also the rules on this EU 2 year deal. In theory whichever you choose, 1 year or 3 year, you could only end up getting 6 months. A warranty only protects you if you read and follow the OEMs small print. With a K Intel CPU I imagine many people would not, therefore voiding your warranty. Extended warranties have always been a way to make a few extra £'s out of people. There are plenty of articles online regarding this.
Gkains to tempt
31 Jan 16#96
Have to say that I have never had CPU die on me. Motherboards and graphic cards yes (most of them with the notorious Nvidia solder-defect chips - good thing Nvidia are out of the motherboard chipset market now), but never a CPU.
Unless clocking like crazy with really high voltages, a CPU should be fine for at least 10 years, that is long enough to actually become obsolete (although if the last five year are any indication, ten years may not bring much CPU performance boost any more).
IF something were to go wrong, it would most likely happen in the first few months (some defect in the manufacturing). Otherwise it should keep going. Plenty of Pentium 4s, 3s, 2s and even the original were only thrown out after they became too slow. Ditto for 486, 386 etc. CPUs generally do not die unless in overclocking 'suicide' runs.
BigYoSpeck
31 Jan 164#87
Threads like this tickle me. It's like people want to put off first time posters.
Product is available here cheaper than it is from other providers. The value of the product versus alternative products is a subjective debate.
People accusing the guy of working for the seller is hilarious, he made one comment that people picked up on using the word 'we' and all of a sudden oh he's staff.
And negative feedback from the seller is good information to provide to people, but it's worth considering that when dealing with high volumes of customers, some are going to be left unhappy, and with vendors selling at cut throat prices, it's pretty typical that customer service can take a hit from it. I wouldn't for example order all components for a full computer build from ebuyer, but the odd bargain that crops up there I'd take a chance on.
All I'd say to the original poster is the deal still went hot, you saw a bunch of posts by people you can now stick on the ignore list, and with a lot of things on this site it brings the 'experts' out of the woodwork making sure everyone knows how much they know by hating on high end gear because OMG such and such a thing is way better who would buy this!
This is intel's current price list for these. Even with the devalued pound this is a tough conversion price wise. That being said it's hard to get the i5 6600k below £200.I can't see anyone on a i7 Haswell upgrading to this for 5% performance. On plus side £275 is much cheaper than £350. I don't see Kabylake offering more than 3-5% performance boost on this. I guess if you want this product £275.00 seems a good price compared to market prices. Guessing Intel is still struggling to make these.
BigYoSpeck to gummby
31 Jan 16#92
Intel just has no competition at the high end and with the last generation of consoles coming out with pretty low end CPU's games just aren't crying out for much power at the moment.
I still happily game on my Phenom II X4 from 2009! The last high end PC I built was an i7 2600K in 2012 and this is only best case scenario 50% faster.
They've got no drive to chase performance or bring down pricing while AMD is still so far behind.
aszu
31 Jan 16#90
Even at £275.99 i7-6700K is still a bad value. For essentially the same price, you can get i7-5820K, which is a proper six-core CPU with a much superior X99 platform.
sk1881 to aszu
31 Jan 16#94
I was originally going to get the 6700k but from the reviews the 5820k makes more sense in terms of better overclocking and performance. The cheapest 5820 is around £310 from a reputable UK retailer. Where did you see this CPU at the same or similar price?
jellybomb1980
31 Jan 16#91
A valid point :smiley:
hitman007
31 Jan 16#93
Lets hope that changes this year.
bountyhunter53
31 Jan 161#95
Only a undoubtedly insane or just utter stupid person would pair this with a board other than a Z170...
This chip is K'd for a reason, easy overclocking, gaming and getting more bang for your buck.
e.g
5820k doesn't overclock better, it just has more cores... No game utilises that. Per core 6700k is stronger.
wacko911
31 Jan 16#97
When was the last time someone had a cpu fail? In 20 years I've never seen one fail unless it arrived doa. Don't waste extra money on 3 year warranty when u will never need it.
rev6
31 Jan 16#98
I agree about the warranty situation. CPU's rarely fail.
Gaming is mostly limited by current API's, it should get better in the future. Faster cores should still prevail though.
The positive here is that we dont need a new CPU every few years.
118luke
31 Jan 16#100
last CPU i had die on me was an AMD Duron 1300 Mhz - and even that was only because i had mounted the cooler the wrong way round.
CPUs are the most reliable part of a computer
thesnowdog
31 Jan 16#102
Great deal, I got one of these for £285 in November. Very happy with it. Just running it at stock speed at the moment with a Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo, will upgrade my Evo to a Noctua DH-15 when I start overclocking it in the not too distant future.
koahhe to thesnowdog
1 Feb 16#103
You might not need to upgrade your cooler. Give it a try first and see what temperatures you are getting with the 212 Evo. I overclocked my 6700 K very easily to 4.7 Mghz @ 1.37 V by following this guide https://youtu.be/7pL_n5l4gWU. I have a Noctua u14s with one fan and I get temperatures of max 70 when running Prime 95.
idbirch
1 Feb 161#104
Having just upgraded from a 4770k @ 4.6GHz to a 5820k @ 4.6GHz, I can tell you there are, in fact, quite a few games that benefit from the additional cores.
rev6
1 Feb 16#105
It might take bites out of them, but does it really benefit overall gaming?
This shows otherwise but as you said, I guess it depends on the game as well.
talhaimam325
1 Feb 16#106
Really good deal .just ordered one . thanks for sharing
mercutio98uk
1 Feb 16#107
In an effort to MAYBE encourage some better prices (less folks upgrading) take a look here or here. The basic point being, the TINY performance difference between generations.
Unless there's a specific chipset feature you need from a later generation, you might as well save some cash and buy an older generation. It may produce a few more sale prices for those that are jumping a good few generations (as 1st generation core to 6th is probably a reasonable upgrade now).
I'm still trucking with a 2600k and no real incentive to move on so upgrade money has been better spent on a bigger graphics card, memory and SSDs :smiley:
mercutio98uk
1 Feb 16#108
Unless you're in need of the extra PCIe lanes for a tri-sli setup (or dual and a PCIe SSD), you'll get no better performance from an X99 platform.
The only real differences between X99+5820k and Z170+6700K are more PCIe lanes on the X99 board and more cores on the 5820k chip. The 5820k doesn't overclock nearly as well as skylake either so "per core" performance is often significantly worse. For gaming, faster cores is MUCH better than more cores. Unless you need the PCIe lanes or are doing "serious work" that will make good use of more cores you're better off with skylake.
I'm not after raining on anyones parade, we all buy shiny new toys with good reasons/intentions but perhaps something for those considering X99 to think about. It's a fair bit more expensive and for gaming... doesn't really seem worthwhile.
vmistery
1 Feb 16#109
It will be interesting to see what prices start at with Broadwell-E and the performance OF AMD zen when they are released late this year. Until then this is the king of Consumer CPUs and at not too bad a price (I suspect it won't go down much further than this till EOL).
RFC1795
1 Feb 16#111
Actually it does... I bought one around October time. £99+vat ... bet you think I'm telling porkies now. But I'm not. Novatech had an Intel gaming day, and it was on special at the time.
Edit: Sorry, not sure I read that right. I'm referring to the i7 6700 non-K version. It came with heatsink and fan.
xfaxfa
1 Feb 16#112
You picked up an i7-6700 for £99? And yes, you're not reading that comment right, we were talking specificially about the i7-6700K
RFC1795
1 Feb 16#113
Correct, and correct.. yes, £99+vat it cost me i7 6700 Skylake 1151 CPU, with heatsink and fan retail boxed, brand new and sealed, and yes, I didn't read it right as stated :sunglasses:
For what it's worth, the gain on the K version in the end didn't bother me too much,
marshalex
1 Feb 16#114
It's a good price in comparison to what it has been but in general the prices of Intel CPU's seems to increase significantly with each new generation due to the lack of competition. Hoping that AMD will drop something decent later this year (Zen) to force a bit of a price drop on these
xfaxfa to marshalex
1 Feb 16#115
So, like half price?
bountyhunter53
1 Feb 16#116
Which games? :man:
Not even BF4 uses all cores. It can see the cores but the foundations being Direct X 11, it is unable to utilise 2-3 cores efficiently and does not scale well, I remember there being a patch allowing you to use 8 cores but the game was lag land..
If a game was patched in a way to do this it will work all cores but the game will be laggy as hell, there's a reason why there is such a massive hubbub around DX12/Mantle as this technology allows us to do this on a fundamental level.
Right now having more cores will only assist you in two places, Video Transcoding, BOINC or in Windows itself.
More than anything right now is more important is per core oomph until DX12 comes and if it can utilise all these cores efficiently.
P.S This is why Mantle was introduced as AMD was getting mullered on the fact all its per core performance was utter balls.
P.S.S Your 5820k gets it's ass handed per core compared to a 6700k :smiley:
RFC1795
1 Feb 16#117
Yeah, pretty much. Actually had no idea what I was buying at the time. But sent details to mate after. Within an hour he was down there and bought 2 ... told me to get another. I should have listened!
vmistery
1 Feb 16#118
Exactly, the only game I can think of that might benefit from the 5820k at the moment would be something like Ashes of the Singularity in DX 12 mode.
kaisersolo
1 Feb 16#119
Note this has
- 1yr Warranty
as its OEM
xfaxfa to kaisersolo
1 Feb 16#120
You're a bit late on the ball. That was mentioned several times earlier on lol.
bountyhunter53
1 Feb 16#121
Don't use Prime95 with Skylake chips unless the BIOS of that board is uptodate after January time.
Prime95 sometimes gives a false report of instability by returning the wrong result.
Microcode update was pushed out after Jan and now-ish as well for some manufacturers.
bountyhunter53
1 Feb 16#122
Not tried that, looks good.
vmistery
1 Feb 16#123
If you like the old Command and Conquer games then you might like it. I enjoy a bit of a game on it but really even with the DX 12 boost my P is not really up to playing it.
bountyhunter53
1 Feb 16#124
What card do you have?
rev6
1 Feb 16#125
No command and conquer supports DX12.
vmistery
1 Feb 16#126
Nope but the game I was talking about Ashes of the singularity does.
vmistery
1 Feb 16#127
I have a Core2Quad q9550 backed by an AMD 7950 w 8 Feb ram. CPU is my limiting factor.
rev6
1 Feb 16#128
Sorry. I should have read the entire post :smiley:
vmistery
1 Feb 16#129
Lol no problem!
Nate1492
1 Feb 161#130
I did think you are telling porkies, but you sneakily said "+vat" which means you actually paid 119.99
But if I had to buy right now, the 6700 non k is around 250 on deal, and the 6700k is around 275 on deal. So I'm already in for the gander, I might as well get my goose too.
Nate1492
1 Feb 16#131
I'd actually be surprised if Ashes got any boost on the 5820k.
A quick check seems to confirm my suspicion. And that's comparing the 5960x, which is WAY stronger than the 5820k (and far more expensive).
xfaxfa
1 Feb 16#132
You should have listened to your friend! Good steal!
bountyhunter53
1 Feb 16#133
It's because per core the 6700k excels.
rev6
1 Feb 16#134
I agree with you both.
If we focus on the top 2 CPU's, look at the low settings, which puts more strain on the CPU (overhead), with DX11, the 6700K excels because of the increased core performance.
Now with DX12. The cores are being utilized, but the game is now GPU bound, so the scores are similar.
Using AMD as an example (poor DX11 MT), with DX12, up until a point, adding more cores helps. I doubt were going to need more than 20,000,000 drawcalls per second in games for a long time to come. We need more powerful GPU's.
And here's NVIDIA's API overhead test for reference.
If anyone reading this is interested in why we talk about CPU overhead a lot in CPU and GPU deals. Check out the DX11 drawcall performance, 290X vs 980 here. NVIDIA utiltizes multi-threaded, and even their single-thread performance is higher than both AMD's multi-threaded and single-threaded.
kaisersolo
2 Feb 16#135
its also been roughly this price for ages.
satty83
2 Feb 16#136
so will this speed up my loading times for Ms word, the current 4 sec I have to wait feel like an eternity :smile:
satty83
2 Feb 16#137
so will this speed up my loading times for Ms word, the current 4 sec I have to wait feel like an eternity :smile:
xfaxfa to satty83
2 Feb 16#139
No.
xfaxfa
2 Feb 16#138
Really? It was a one day deal, which has now expired.
tempt
2 Feb 16#140
Was it a one off deal or will it be back?
xfaxfa
2 Feb 16#141
I'm sure they'll offer it again soon on a deal. Few months ago these processors were incredibly hard to get a hold of, now not so much. If you're interested in one of these then I'd try looking out for a bundle deal, there was one online yesterday but when I checked the bundle offer was no more. Without checking around for individual prices, this looks ok... https://www.overclockers.co.uk/8pack-approved-elite-tier-skylake-atx-bundle-intel-i7-6700k-4.50ghz-z170-viii-hero-16gb-ddr4-bu-044-as.html (no doubt this will spark another debate if it gets seen by people! lol)
xfaxfa
2 Feb 16#142
This deal has now expired. Why is it still showing?
kaisersolo
2 Feb 16#143
its price is 289.99 now - sorry it was this price for ages until this flash sale
Opening post
This deal has now expired. I've clicked the button but nothing has changed.
Top comments
And Xfaxfa when you buy a item under the soga your contract is with the retailer and not the manufactuer but ocuk seem to think other
This is my opinion is very poor
All comments (145)
http://www.fudzilla.com/news/processors/39466-skylake-top-end-shortage-suggests-few-14nm-problems
Please try not to take things out of context. This deal is aimed towards builders and entusiasts and typically we only offer 12 months anyway
If you happen to be someone who uses software that makes use of hyperthreading this is a great deal. Everyone else should be looking at the i5.
Assume chips might be tested and best over clocking ones binned for a companies own over clocked builds.
And the staff Instore are terrible
This is my opinion is very poor
Was £255 once over
If you're happy gaming at 1080p around 60fps with high settings then chances are you're good with an i3, maybe even just a Pentium series. But for someone who games heavily and possibly does some CPU intensive productivity work it begins to make more sense going for one of these.
And then you have your hot rodders who just enjoy building top end systems, overclocking them and running benchmarks. An odd past time I know, but they enjoy it.
Did I join this forum 8 years ago and post 5000 comments just to appear legit when I finally chose my time to falsely besmirch the good name of your company on a mediocre deal for an i7 CPU that most people don't need?
I'd rather keep the box and a guaranteed 3 years warranty for £299 on amazon.
For this reason i vote cold.
If you did experience something wrong then you should have stood up for your rights. A shop is only obliged to replace an item under 28 days old, afgter 28 days it can send the item off and make you wait. If you settle for a bogus claim then fault can only be with the consumer for being so submissive.
What are you trying to achieve by making rediculous claims that I'm an employee of OcUK and do you really think they need to be plugged on HotUKDeals? :laughing: lol
Who said need? People want things like this!
And Xfaxfa when you buy a item under the soga your contract is with the retailer and not the manufactuer but ocuk seem to think other
Oh and I take it as long as you and wubb have had good service that ocuk are good ??
And what for the ones on trust pilot who have had bad experiences
I'm not interested in graphics as I'm an audio guy.
£600? £1000? More?
http://www.watercoolinguk.co.uk/p/Intel-Core-i7-6700K-40-GHz-Skylake-Socket-1151-boxed_54051.html
Unless clocking like crazy with really high voltages, a CPU should be fine for at least 10 years, that is long enough to actually become obsolete (although if the last five year are any indication, ten years may not bring much CPU performance boost any more).
IF something were to go wrong, it would most likely happen in the first few months (some defect in the manufacturing). Otherwise it should keep going. Plenty of Pentium 4s, 3s, 2s and even the original were only thrown out after they became too slow. Ditto for 486, 386 etc. CPUs generally do not die unless in overclocking 'suicide' runs.
Product is available here cheaper than it is from other providers. The value of the product versus alternative products is a subjective debate.
People accusing the guy of working for the seller is hilarious, he made one comment that people picked up on using the word 'we' and all of a sudden oh he's staff.
And negative feedback from the seller is good information to provide to people, but it's worth considering that when dealing with high volumes of customers, some are going to be left unhappy, and with vendors selling at cut throat prices, it's pretty typical that customer service can take a hit from it. I wouldn't for example order all components for a full computer build from ebuyer, but the odd bargain that crops up there I'd take a chance on.
All I'd say to the original poster is the deal still went hot, you saw a bunch of posts by people you can now stick on the ignore list, and with a lot of things on this site it brings the 'experts' out of the woodwork making sure everyone knows how much they know by hating on high end gear because OMG such and such a thing is way better who would buy this!
Intel Core i7-6700K 4.0 4.2 8MB 4/8 $316
Intel Core i5-6600K 3.0 3.9 6MB 4/4 $225
This is intel's current price list for these. Even with the devalued pound this is a tough conversion price wise. That being said it's hard to get the i5 6600k below £200.I can't see anyone on a i7 Haswell upgrading to this for 5% performance. On plus side £275 is much cheaper than £350. I don't see Kabylake offering more than 3-5% performance boost on this. I guess if you want this product £275.00 seems a good price compared to market prices. Guessing Intel is still struggling to make these.
I still happily game on my Phenom II X4 from 2009! The last high end PC I built was an i7 2600K in 2012 and this is only best case scenario 50% faster.
They've got no drive to chase performance or bring down pricing while AMD is still so far behind.
This chip is K'd for a reason, easy overclocking, gaming and getting more bang for your buck.
e.g
5820k doesn't overclock better, it just has more cores... No game utilises that. Per core 6700k is stronger.
Depends on the task. Shows a 57% quicker encoding process here (CPU). Less power consumption at the same time. This is compared to the 2600K.
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/core_i7_6700k_processor_review_desktop_skylake,11.html
Gaming is mostly limited by current API's, it should get better in the future. Faster cores should still prevail though.
The positive here is that we dont need a new CPU every few years.
CPUs are the most reliable part of a computer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq42waz0OpY
This shows otherwise but as you said, I guess it depends on the game as well.
Unless there's a specific chipset feature you need from a later generation, you might as well save some cash and buy an older generation. It may produce a few more sale prices for those that are jumping a good few generations (as 1st generation core to 6th is probably a reasonable upgrade now).
I'm still trucking with a 2600k and no real incentive to move on so upgrade money has been better spent on a bigger graphics card, memory and SSDs :smiley:
The only real differences between X99+5820k and Z170+6700K are more PCIe lanes on the X99 board and more cores on the 5820k chip. The 5820k doesn't overclock nearly as well as skylake either so "per core" performance is often significantly worse. For gaming, faster cores is MUCH better than more cores. Unless you need the PCIe lanes or are doing "serious work" that will make good use of more cores you're better off with skylake.
I'm not after raining on anyones parade, we all buy shiny new toys with good reasons/intentions but perhaps something for those considering X99 to think about. It's a fair bit more expensive and for gaming... doesn't really seem worthwhile.
Edit: Sorry, not sure I read that right. I'm referring to the i7 6700 non-K version. It came with heatsink and fan.
For what it's worth, the gain on the K version in the end didn't bother me too much,
Not even BF4 uses all cores. It can see the cores but the foundations being Direct X 11, it is unable to utilise 2-3 cores efficiently and does not scale well, I remember there being a patch allowing you to use 8 cores but the game was lag land..
If a game was patched in a way to do this it will work all cores but the game will be laggy as hell, there's a reason why there is such a massive hubbub around DX12/Mantle as this technology allows us to do this on a fundamental level.
Right now having more cores will only assist you in two places, Video Transcoding, BOINC or in Windows itself.
More than anything right now is more important is per core oomph until DX12 comes and if it can utilise all these cores efficiently.
P.S This is why Mantle was introduced as AMD was getting mullered on the fact all its per core performance was utter balls.
P.S.S Your 5820k gets it's ass handed per core compared to a 6700k :smiley:
- 1yr Warranty
as its OEM
Prime95 sometimes gives a false report of instability by returning the wrong result.
Microcode update was pushed out after Jan and now-ish as well for some manufacturers.
http://titan-power.eu/i7-6700-intel-119-99-novatech-instore-only/
So yeah, I believe you. Good take!
But if I had to buy right now, the 6700 non k is around 250 on deal, and the 6700k is around 275 on deal. So I'm already in for the gander, I might as well get my goose too.
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/DX12-GPU-and-CPU-Performance-Tested-Ashes-Singularity-Benchmark/Results-Avera?page=1
A quick check seems to confirm my suspicion. And that's comparing the 5960x, which is WAY stronger than the 5820k (and far more expensive).
I agree with you both.
If we focus on the top 2 CPU's, look at the low settings, which puts more strain on the CPU (overhead), with DX11, the 6700K excels because of the increased core performance.
Now with DX12. The cores are being utilized, but the game is now GPU bound, so the scores are similar.
Using AMD as an example (poor DX11 MT), with DX12, up until a point, adding more cores helps. I doubt were going to need more than 20,000,000 drawcalls per second in games for a long time to come. We need more powerful GPU's.
And here's NVIDIA's API overhead test for reference.
If anyone reading this is interested in why we talk about CPU overhead a lot in CPU and GPU deals. Check out the DX11 drawcall performance, 290X vs 980 here. NVIDIA utiltizes multi-threaded, and even their single-thread performance is higher than both AMD's multi-threaded and single-threaded.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/8pack-approved-elite-tier-skylake-atx-bundle-intel-i7-6700k-4.50ghz-z170-viii-hero-16gb-ddr4-bu-044-as.html (no doubt this will spark another debate if it gets seen by people! lol)