EVGA GeForce GTX 960 Superclocked 4GB GDDR5 Dual Link DVI HDMI DisplayPort Graphics card
The EVGA GeForce GTX 960 delivers incredible performance, power efficiency, and gaming technologies that only NVIDIA Maxwell technology can offer. This is the perfect upgrade, offering 60% faster performance and twice the power efficiency of previous-generation cards*. Plus, it features VXGI for realistic lighting, support for smooth, tear-free NVIDIA G-SYNC technology, and Dynamic Super Resolution for 4K-quality gaming on 1080P displays.The latest versions come outfitted with 4GB of high speed GDDR5 memory giving you higher texture qualities and better 4K performance!
SPECIFICATIONS
Base Clock: 1216 MHZ
Boost Clock: 1279 MHz
Memory Clock: 7010 MHz Effective
CUDA Cores: 1024
Bus Type: PCI-E 3.0
Memory Detail: 4096MB GDDR5
Memory Bit Width: 128 Bit
Memory Speed: 0.28ns
Memory Bandwidth: 112.16 GB/s
Top comments
llocou
25 Jan 164#6
I don't understand the 'deals' on these cards. The 960 and 380 were both often hovering at £139 a few months back. I know, I know, time machine comments etc. but GPUs tend to fall in price, these are going the wrong way. Market's pretty stale at the moment!
rev6
25 Jan 164#1
The R9 380 is also a good buy for around this price.
Latest comments (39)
capa
29 Jan 16#39
Would this bottleneck a 6600k?
Dacra
29 Jan 16#38
Tempted to buy one of these, really want a 970 but prices just wont drop. Graphics card only thing left I need for my new build..
Nate1492
28 Jan 16#37
Nice, so I infer there were problems with the Nano and you wanted to get rid of it.
Ferrari100
28 Jan 16#36
Yeah right.
I dont answer any question to anybody not deserving.
regards
Nate1492
27 Jan 16#35
Cry wolf? I did no such thing.
Why did you switch from Nano to Fury X? You are avoiding the question.
GTX 960 and R9 380 trade blows in most games, perhaps with the GTX 960 having a slight advantage.
rev6
27 Jan 16#33
That explains Async Compute, but it doesn't show how much impact it'll have on future DX12/Vulkan games. That's what's important here. AOST is not a good example.
Why did you buy a Nano in September when the Fury X was available, then switch to the Fury X?
Ferrari100
27 Jan 16#30
You could say I do the same for Intel then.
ValueForMoney
27 Jan 16#29
You've wasted at least 6 months of your life marketing for AMD, congratulations.
Ferrari100
27 Jan 16#28
lol.
I have never even visited reddit.
I am a fan of both Intel and AMD products. If you have to call me a fnboy so be it. But slating me for pointing to benchmarks that were only meant to help people out and were not cherry picked is just ridiculous.
Especially if as you say, you prefer AMD. Its not like I was lying about anything. I fail to understand what your drama is tbh.
PS I am also very much a huge fan of Intel products.
So that makes me an AMD and Intel fanboy.
ollie87
27 Jan 16#25
Being a fanboy of anything is completely irrational.
In my personal experience, for budget Intel CPU builds (dual core) pick a Nvidia GPU, for a budget quad core or higher CPU build pick an AMD card. AMDs driver overheads cause issues on a dual core rigs - GTA V etc was PAINFUL for me until I swapped my G3258 for an i5-4670k, even though my R9 280 is still a decent card.
Ferrari100
27 Jan 16#24
I have never said I was not. You are the one who accused me of cherry picking so I have a right to defend my actions. How is that a problem to you?
I never Cherry picked and if people wnat to check for themselves they are perfectly entitled to do so. You are being completely irrational.
ollie87
27 Jan 16#23
Please stop. I'm a big fan of AMD GPUs but you're not doing yourself or them any favours - people see you as a fanboy now so it's too late.
Ferrari100
27 Jan 16#22
This was not cherry picked at all.
For anybody wanting to find benchmarks themselves simply google
evga superclocked 960 AMD 380 benchmarks then click and see for yourself. You will see the images I posted here are near the top of the images shown as I cherry picked nothing.
God, I was not even trying to make a point before. But now I am.
The 380 is faster than this and there is plenty of evidence to prove it if you look yourself.
There are plenty of other articles on that site that point to Nvidia being a really bad company to buy your GPU from in 2016.
lostwebb
27 Jan 16#21
Here he comes.
ollie87
26 Jan 16#20
Exactly. I'm no fan of Nvidia but I can't be doing with people cherry picking figures to prove a point.
I'm an Information Analyst, that's my job! Clear off!
ollie87
26 Jan 161#19
You don't play Benchmark software.
You play games.
Nate1492
25 Jan 162#18
This is cherry picked SOOO hard.
Check this review out, it shows both the 380 and the 960 winning different games.
(Note this is a review of a 960, so the fact there is only one award given doesn't mean they believe the 380 is a bad card, they say they trade blows.)
Who would play GTA V with a 2k display using the R9 380 or the Nvidia 960? Who cares about synthetic benches that show about 6% difference?
stonebear
25 Jan 16#17
Yea, retailers need to be reducing these but if anything they are quite high most places right now.
However this is a decent deal and should have more heat than it has.
SpudUK
25 Jan 16#16
I might buy it just to spite Ferrari and his ridiculous bias (for an upgrade).
Ferrari100
25 Jan 16#15
llocou
25 Jan 164#6
I don't understand the 'deals' on these cards. The 960 and 380 were both often hovering at £139 a few months back. I know, I know, time machine comments etc. but GPUs tend to fall in price, these are going the wrong way. Market's pretty stale at the moment!
fishmaster to llocou
25 Jan 162#8
Was there a GTX 960 4GB for £139? Maybe it was 2GB version?
XP200 to llocou
25 Jan 16#14
Yeap, everybody is waiting for pascal to launch after summer, then we will see all these cards tumble in price, we just have to wait, and that's the hard bit, as i am in the market for a 970/980, but i know waiting until pascal launches will snag me a cracking 970/980 at a really good price.
capa
25 Jan 16#12
So this will play 4K movies to a 4K TV without issue?
rev6 to capa
25 Jan 161#13
Yeah. Supports native HDMI 2.0, hardware accelerated HEVC, 10bit too. Very good HTPC GPU.
ollie87
25 Jan 16#11
That's just one benchmark though. I'm not disagreeing that the R9 380 is a better card but not for everyone.
rev6
25 Jan 164#1
The R9 380 is also a good buy for around this price.
secretspartan1 to rev6
25 Jan 161#4
Yeah agreed at this price point it's really going to be preference between Nvidia & AMD as both these cards will comfortably do 1080p and can match and even surpass a GTX 970 when 2 are in sli moving towards 1440p if you can afford a high end monitor.
Little surprised this hasn't got hotter, oh well.
Daz555 to rev6
25 Jan 16#5
Indeed. The 380 drinks a lot more juice though at 190W v the 120W of the 960.
adderrson to rev6
25 Jan 16#10
Yup with the Saphire Nitro card (which has a tasty factory OC) is reguarly on offer for around £140-150, I honestly don't see why these 960's are gaining heat at this price.
Ferrari100
25 Jan 162#9
bluestreak56
25 Jan 16#7
Was looking at this the other day but decided to go for the MSI instead as I managed to get a barely used one on ebay for £135.
dannyjones106
25 Jan 16#3
Don't think I've seen this variant before. I've been watching the 4gb SSC version of this which is the one I'm after.
![Fresh Breakfast Meat Box (Using code) @ Campbells Meat [Haggis / Lorne Sausage / Bacon / Black Pudding & More]](/images/topics/208684_1.jpg)
![[Xbox One] Q. u. b. e: Director's Cut on Deals with Gold](/images/topics/208716_1.jpg)
Opening post
The EVGA GeForce GTX 960 delivers incredible performance, power efficiency, and gaming technologies that only NVIDIA Maxwell technology can offer. This is the perfect upgrade, offering 60% faster performance and twice the power efficiency of previous-generation cards*. Plus, it features VXGI for realistic lighting, support for smooth, tear-free NVIDIA G-SYNC technology, and Dynamic Super Resolution for 4K-quality gaming on 1080P displays.The latest versions come outfitted with 4GB of high speed GDDR5 memory giving you higher texture qualities and better 4K performance!
SPECIFICATIONS
Base Clock: 1216 MHZ
Boost Clock: 1279 MHz
Memory Clock: 7010 MHz Effective
CUDA Cores: 1024
Bus Type: PCI-E 3.0
Memory Detail: 4096MB GDDR5
Memory Bit Width: 128 Bit
Memory Speed: 0.28ns
Memory Bandwidth: 112.16 GB/s
Top comments
Latest comments (39)
I dont answer any question to anybody not deserving.
regards
Why did you switch from Nano to Fury X? You are avoiding the question.
GTX 960 and R9 380 trade blows in most games, perhaps with the GTX 960 having a slight advantage.
http://gpunit.com/2016/01/27/asynchronous-compute-engines-aces-in-a-nutshell/
I have never even visited reddit.
I am a fan of both Intel and AMD products. If you have to call me a fnboy so be it. But slating me for pointing to benchmarks that were only meant to help people out and were not cherry picked is just ridiculous.
Especially if as you say, you prefer AMD. Its not like I was lying about anything. I fail to understand what your drama is tbh.
PS I am also very much a huge fan of Intel products.
So that makes me an AMD and Intel fanboy.
In my personal experience, for budget Intel CPU builds (dual core) pick a Nvidia GPU, for a budget quad core or higher CPU build pick an AMD card. AMDs driver overheads cause issues on a dual core rigs - GTA V etc was PAINFUL for me until I swapped my G3258 for an i5-4670k, even though my R9 280 is still a decent card.
I never Cherry picked and if people wnat to check for themselves they are perfectly entitled to do so. You are being completely irrational.
For anybody wanting to find benchmarks themselves simply google
evga superclocked 960 AMD 380 benchmarks then click and see for yourself. You will see the images I posted here are near the top of the images shown as I cherry picked nothing.
God, I was not even trying to make a point before. But now I am.
The 380 is faster than this and there is plenty of evidence to prove it if you look yourself.
On top of that who would want to buy products from a company who consistently lie.
http://gpunit.com/2016/01/27/what-is-nvidia-lying-about-this-time/
There are plenty of other articles on that site that point to Nvidia being a really bad company to buy your GPU from in 2016.
I'm an Information Analyst, that's my job! Clear off!
You play games.
Check this review out, it shows both the 380 and the 960 winning different games.
(Note this is a review of a 960, so the fact there is only one award given doesn't mean they believe the 380 is a bad card, they say they trade blows.)
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2015/08/04/msi_geforce_gtx_960_gaming_4g_video_card_review/12
Who would play GTA V with a 2k display using the R9 380 or the Nvidia 960? Who cares about synthetic benches that show about 6% difference?
However this is a decent deal and should have more heat than it has.
Little surprised this hasn't got hotter, oh well.